https://blog.apnic.net/2022/04/20/rethinking-submarine-fibre-cable-projects-south-pacific/ Skip to content * Blog search [ ] Search Advanced Whois * Advanced Whois * Make a payment * Login * Select APNIC Direction + APNIC + Training + Academy + Blog + REx--The Resource Explorer + NetOX + DASH APNIC APNIC home * Get IP + Get IP Addresses / ASN + Make a payment + Membership + FAQs * Manage IP + MyAPNIC + Transfer IP and ASNs + Using Whois + Go IPv6 + Reverse DNS + Routing Registry + Make a payment + FAQs * Training + About + Events + Courses + Sponsor + Fees + Videos + Community Trainers + APNIC Academy * Events + Conferences + Calendar + Sponsorship + Code of Conduct * Research + Labs + REx--The Resource Explorer * Community + Policy Development + Addressing policies + Internet community + Code of Conduct + Technical Assistance + Root servers + Security at APNIC + ISIF Asia + APNIC Foundation + NRO NC + Mailing lists * Blog * Help Centre * About + APNIC Region + APNIC Membership + Executive Council + Service updates + Team + Annual Reports + Transparency + APNIC Survey + Corporate Documents + Publications Archive + Careers + Glossary * Contact * Select APNIC destination + APNIC + Training + Academy + Blog + REx--The Resource Explorer + NetOX + DASH * Login Skip to the article Rethinking submarine fibre cable projects in the South Pacific By Ulrich Speidel on 20 Apr 2022 Category: Tech matters Tags: Development, Guest Post, Pacific, capacity development, submarine cable Tweet Blog home [Pacific-Islands-FT-Marek-Okon-555x202] Pacific Islands by Marek Okon. (Unsplash) The recent catastrophic failures of Tonga's international and domestic submarine cable systems in the aftermath of the Hunga Tonga Hunga Ha'apai (HTHH) volcanic eruption have put the spotlight onto Pacific Island Internet connectivity, with the resulting lengthy communication outages and impairments causing significant impacts on the wellbeing of the people and their economies. Discussions with several parties around resilience in this area have led me to believe the approach to cable projects in the Pacific needs a fundamental rethink. This blog explains why, and what's needed. How cabling projects in the South Pacific typically happen This section will necessarily generalize and shouldn't detract from the wonderful pioneering work that has been done to date by so many determined individuals and organizations across the Pacific. A cable project in the South Pacific typically has its genesis when an island economy realizes that satellite Internet just isn't as powerful as a cable. The locals see what their family and friends in Australia, New Zealand (NZ), and Hawaii have at home or at their place of business and aspire to the same. But they're hundreds of kilometres away from the nearest place where they could tap into the international fibre networks, so connecting is an expensive proposition. In most cases, we're talking many millions of dollars. But, to their credit, they have high aspirations and are enterprising people, so they'll seek supporting partners to get an initiative off the ground such as Australia, NZ, US, Japan, EU, and agencies such as the ADB, IMF, World Bank, and so on. They'll cite poverty, low GDP, digital divide, and opportunities for development. Rightfully so. Eventually, they'll get a business case and the funding together, source a cable layer to assist them (perhaps with some old cable pulled up from elsewhere) and then, after a bit of economizing on repeater spacing, eventually the long-awaited cable arrives a few years down the track. And with it, Internet heaven. That heaven lasts until the cables break. For Tonga, that's already happened twice on each of their cable systems. And as we have just learned, when turbidity currents break a cable after a major volcanic eruption or submarine landslides, many dozens of kilometres of spare cable are needed to fix the problem. In the case of Tonga, that was a lot more than the cable ship could acquire when they raided their stores in Apia, Samoa, enroute to the Tongan cable grounds. Spares cost money, as does their storage, and many cable systems have operated for decades without significant failures. Read: When volcanoes go bang, submarine cables do ... what? Yet, when cables fail because of major events like the HTHH eruption, they fail at the very moment they are needed the most. With even the first connection being a financial exercise at the limits of the island economy's capability, getting a redundant cable in via a different route, away from potential natural hazards, is a project that many consider beyond reach (although Tonga is planning such a second cable). What's wrong with this picture? Now, who would begrudge an island their aspiration to become connected to the Internet? Nobody. And aren't there all those international funding agencies for whom these are great projects to support, and whose launch makes for great photo ops, and things to put into their annual reports? Sure. No complaints here. But let's examine a few repeat features of this approach and what it leads to: * Almost all such cable projects are driven exclusively by an island community that wants to get connected. They're almost never driven by larger economies wanting to help the islands get connected. Very few manage to exploit the synergies of connecting multiple economies and islands along the way. * In most cases, the cable is a dead end; it terminates in an endpoint from which there is only local connectivity. There is no transit traffic and no benefit from peering. One end of the cable supplies, the other consumes. * Few projects create resilient redundancy for other existing cables. * Practically all are one-off projects, requiring cable ship resources to be brought in from far away. For maintenance, this can mean a cable layer that is weeks away in case of a breakdown, or -- the expensive alternative -- paying a cable ship closer by to sit on idle standby for literally years on end. There is no significant amount of standardization in terms of cable technology across systems, and the warehousing of spares happens on a per-system basis. Diagram showing the South Pacific region cable network in 2022, dominated by large numbers of landing stations without path redundancy and more islands that simply don't have cable and literally, are not on the map. Figure 1 -- The South Pacific region cable network in 2022, dominated by large numbers of landing stations without path redundancy and even more islands that simply don't have cable and, literally, are not on the map. Source: Telegeography's Submarine Cable Map The big nation perspective Larger economies and organizations in the region only participate as donors but cannot leverage these cables as redundancy for their own cable systems because they literally lead nowhere from their perspective. At best, they're seeing island connectivity as extra load on their own international connectivity. In some cases, larger economies have significant populations from the island economies. For example, NZ is home to a large diaspora of Tongans, Samoans, Niueans, Tokelauans, Cook Islanders, and Fijians, to name a few, with the diaspora having a larger head count than the island population in some cases. However, the connectivity of these larger economies often rests on a relatively small number of fibres thinner than a human hair and often bundled in just a handful of cables. While there is some redundancy, it's still somewhat precarious, and not at the level economies with millions of people would ideally like to be connected at. But running a cable all the way across the Pacific is a project that even they cannot afford on an annual basis -- once a decade is more on the time scale of economies like NZ. Then there are large economies with interest in the South Pacific such as the US and its partners, China, France, Japan, and Taiwan. While they all share a seat on the Pacific Ring of Fire, they don't have the Pacific at the top of their agendas, in part because their economies are focused on other parts of the world, and in part, due to similar susceptibility to natural disasters -- volcanoes, earthquakes, tsunami, cyclones/typhoons, some with the potential of significant region-wide destruction. The big powers also witness the world's shifting attention to issues that put the Pacific at the centre like climate change, ocean pollution, fisheries, and the science that goes with it. In fact, there is an awful lot of science going on in the region, including very large and data-intensive projects such as the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) in Australia and the telescopes in Hawaii. However, there is a lot more science that could be done in the Pacific if there was appropriate connectivity. David Lassner, a well-known entity in networking circles in the Pacific and current President of the University of Hawaii System, gave an impassioned keynote at the 2019 IEEE GlobeCom conference in Hawaii, telling the world's top telecoms people why the Pacific was important for the global telecommunication community! So, in my opinion, it's time for the big powers in the region to stop merely asking what they can do for the islands in terms of cable projects. It's time to come together at a regional level to discuss mutual benefits for large and small economies, in the sphere of submarine fibre networks. Let's dream a bit. A Pacific mesh utopia Globally speaking, the South Pacific is a region with a few larger developed economies on the periphery and many smaller -- mostly developing -- island economies, dispersed between them. The former realize that their own connectivity needs to evolve over time and aspire to build with as much redundancy and geographical diversity as possible to minimize the risk of disruption due to natural disasters or deliberate interference. They understand that good connectivity on islands assists in growing business and social relationships and recognize that investing in island connectivity is to their advantage. The small island states are strategically positioned between the larger economies. In this 2030 utopia, most cable systems no longer run dead-end spurs to islands. Instead, islands serve as natural transit and peering venues. By then, this will have created a mesh with an abundance of redundant paths between all parties, greatly enhancing their resilience against cable outages. Adding fibre capacity to a large economy is now a matter of running a cable to the nearest island that is part of the mesh, or a matter of upgrading bottlenecks of a few hundred (or at most a few thousand) kilometres. Then, monolithic 12,000+ km transpacific cables would become less crucial. Island economies now have more access points to choose from in their neighbourhood. The access points are closer, and the cable routes of new cables become shorter. Shorter hops and advances in fibre technology have reduced the need for expensive submarine repeaters, bringing down the cost of the physical cables. Because of the number of cable systems involved, the Pacific can now sustain a small fleet of cable ships engaged in laying and maintenance. These cable ships are permanently based in the region as there is significant ongoing work. Projects are no longer lumbered with huge overheads for lengthy cable ship commutes from faraway seas. Maintenance contracts no longer build in charges for long periods of ship idle time as the ships are no longer so idle. Cable damage that once took several weeks to repair can now be fixed in a few days. Continuous demand for cable simplifies spares warehousing and has even led to the establishment of a cable manufacturing plant in the region. More and more islands have achieved sustainable connectivity with redundant and cheaper connections. Satellite capacity has been redeployed to the smallest islands. The mesh operates on a stakeholder basis, overseen by an international not-for-profit organization that manages the fundraising process and commissions and operates most of the cables. It prioritizes the cable projects and liaises directly with the region's governments and regulators, as well as with major service providers, for example, in the content delivery network space. Donors that would have once contributed to one-off cable projects now provide ongoing large strategic investment to the organization, but this is dwarfed by contributions from the larger economies, with significant sums being provided by private investors. Island economies still contribute to the cable projects that connect them, but no longer bear the heavy financial burden they once did. Image showing the possibility of a Pacific cable world in 2030. Many previous dead-end cables have been extended into cross-connects to other cable systems, providing new quality connectivity to previously unconnected island states such as Kiribati, Tuvalu, and Nauru while adding redundancy to others.Figure 2 -- The Pacific cable world in 2030? Many previous dead-end cables have been extended into cross-connects to other cable systems, providing new quality connectivity to previously unconnected island states such as Kiribati, Tuvalu, and Nauru while adding redundancy to others. Could it actually be done? Yes, but two things need to happen. Firstly, small island economies will need to realize that they can be so much more than just aid recipients at the end of a long road. Likewise, larger economies in the region will need to recognize the benefits of a mesh architecture for resilience, and the advantage that small islands offer as nodes in such a highly resilient mesh. Secondly, there needs to be a multilateral initiative to kickstart the organization that will make it all happen. This requires strong leadership from and collaboration among the established economies. The cables shown in Figure 2 as thick red lines could probably be constructed for around USD 1B as a rough ballpark figure. This might sound like a lot of money to a small island economy, and it is, but the US government alone spent USD 6.8T in 2021. To put it another way, if a foreign government sends a frigate to the South Pacific to show its presence there, as governments from the region and beyond do on a regular basis, USD 1B per frigate is roughly the amount of capital they commit in doing so. Yet, arguably, a mesh of the kind proposed would bring significantly more stability, prosperity, and resilience to the region than a frigate. Most cables serve for decades, so that initial cost would be amortized over time. Dr Ulrich Speidel is a senior lecturer in Computer Science at the University of Auckland with research interests in fundamental and applied problems in data communications, information theory, signal processing and information measurement. The APNIC Foundation supported his research through its ISIF Asia grants. Rate this article --------------------------------------------------------------------- The views expressed by the authors of this blog are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of APNIC. Please note a Code of Conduct applies to this blog. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Comment [ ] Name * [ ] Email * [ ] Website [ ] [ ] Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. [ ] Yes, add me to your mailing list [ ] [Post Comment] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] D[ ] Top Get Updates Please leave this field empty[ ] Email *[ ] Show options [Subscribe!] Select list(s):[ ] Daily[*] Weekly Thanks for subscribing! Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription. Authors * Geoff Huston * Paul Wilson * A Khalil Azizi * AbdelRahman Abdou * Abhishek Jain * Achie Atienza * Adam Gosling * Adam McFillin * Adam Oest * Adeel Sadiq * Adiel Akplogan * Adisorn Lertsinsrubtavee * Adli Wahid * Adrian Wan * Afifa Abbas * Afsheen Saadat * Aftab Siddiqui * Agustin Formoso * Ahmad Darki * Ajay Kumar * Akimichi Ogawa * Alan Mauldin * Alden Hilton * Alec Muffett * Alex Band * Alex Boten * Alex Turing * Alex Yen * Alexander Azimov * Alfred Arouna * Ali Abedi * Ali Norouzi * Amaury Van Bemten * Amrita Choudhury * Anand Buddhdev * Anant Shah * Andra Lutu * Andre Gelderblom * Andreas Dewes * Andreas Reuter * Andree Toonk * Andrei Robachevsky * Andrew Campling * Andrew Cushen * Andrew Gray * Andrew Sullivan * Andrew Toimoana * Andy Mindnich * Andy Newton * Anju Mangal * Anna Maria Mandalari * Annaliza Mulingbayan * Anosh Khan * Anriette Esterhuysen * Anthony Lee * Anton Strydom * Anup Changaroth * Anurag Bhatia * APNIC * Apoorv Shukla * Arash Molavi Kakhki * Arian Niaki * Aris Tzermias * Arjuna Sathiaseelan * Arth Paulite * Artyom Gavrichenkov * Asad Ali * Asanka Sayakkara * Ashil Oogarah * Ashwin Kumar * Ashwin Rangan * Audrey Randall * Aurelien Aptel * Austin Hounsel * Austin Ruckstuhl * Avery Pennarun * Ayesha Iftikhar * Ayush Mishra * Azfar Adib * Azhar Khuwaja * Azura Mat Salim * Baojun Liu * Baptiste Jonglez * Barry Greene * Bart Hogeveen * Basileal Imana * Ben Cox * Ben Du * Benjz Gerard Sevilla * Benno Overeinder * Bert Hubert * Bhadrika Magan * Bhumika Sapkota * Bikram Shrestha * Bill Hess * Bill Stearns * Bill Woodcock * Bjorn Teigen * Blake Anderson * Blas Trigueros * Brenda Buwu * Brenden Kuerbis * Brent Carey * Brian Carpenter * Brian Nisbet * Brian Trammell * Byron Ellacott * Byungjin Jun * Cameron Steel * Carsten Strotmann * Caspar Schutijser * Cecilia Testart * Cengiz Alaettinoglu * CF Chui * Champika Wijayatunga * Che-Hoo Cheng * Cheeyong Tay * Cherie Lagakali * Chia Ling (Jolin) Chan * Chika Yoshimura * Ching-Heng Ku * Chris Amin * Chris Ritzo * Christoph Dietzel * Chuan Jiang * Ciprian Popoviciu * Clarence Filsfils * Claudio Jeker * Clemens Mosig * Colin Perkins * Constance Bommelaer * Constanze Dietrich * Craig Miller * Craig Ng * Craig Rowland * Dale Roberts * Dan Fidler * Dan Li * Daniel Kopp * Danilo Giordano * Danny Alex Lachos Perez * Danny Pinto * Daryll Swer * Dave Mill * Dave Phelan * David Anderson * David Dawson * David Holder * David Holsgrove * David Huberman * Dean Pemberton * Debashis Pal * Debopam Bhattacherjee * Deepak Vasisht * Denesh Bhabuta * Dennis Baaten * Desiree Miloshevic * Dewangga Alam * Dewole Ajao * Dhruv Dhody * Di Ma * Diego Pino Garcia * Dmytro Shypovalov * Donatas Abraitis * Doug Madory * Doug Montgomery * Dr Bahaa Al-Musawi * Dr Govind * Drikus Brits * Duane Wessels * Duncan Macintosh * E. Marie Brierley * Edward Lewis * Edwin Sandys * Eliot Lear * Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph * Elly Tawhai * Elvin Prasad * Emile Aben * Emily Stark * Emir Beganovic * Eneken Tikk * Enno Rey * Enric Pujol * Eric Lawrence * Eric Loos * Eric Vyncke * Erik Hjelmvik * Erik Rye * Erin Scherer * Eshaan Bansal * Esteban Carisimo * Eunju Pak * Fabian Bustamante * Fakrul Alam * Farha Diba * Ferenc Fejes * Fernando Gont * Flavia Salutari * Flavio Luciani * Florentin Rochet * Florian Streibelt * Foy Shiver * Francesco Sassi * Franck Martin * Frane Maroevic * Frank Denis * Frank Herberg * Franziska Lichtblau * Fred Christopher * Fred Templin * Ganga R Dhungyel * Gaurab Raj Upadhaya * Gautam Akiwate * Gavin Reid * Geoff Huston * George Kuo * George Michaelson * George Odagi * George Sadowsky * Giacomo Giuliari * Gianmarco Pagani * Giovane Moura * Gonchig Altansukh * Gordon King * Greg Ferro * Gregory Mounier * Guangliang Pan * Guillermo Baltra * GZ Kabir * Ha Dao * Han Zhang * Hannah Durack * Hanno Bock * Harish Chowdhary * Helen Hollins * Hideyuki Sasaki * Hinne Hettema * Hiroki Kawabata * Hiroko Kamata * Hiromu Shiozawa * Hisham Ibrahim * Hoang Nguyen Phong * Houlin Zhao * Hyojoon Kim * Ignacio Castro * Ihita Gangavarpu * Ike Kunze * Ilker Nadi Bozkurt * Imtiaz Rahman * Ioana Livadariu * Italo Cunha * Ivan Ristic * Ivana Tomic * Ivo A. Ivanov * Ivy Yip * Izumi Okutani * Jaclyn Knight * Jacob Davis * Jahangir Hossain * Jake Bauer * Jake Flint * Jake Holland * James Ah Wai * James Pavur * James Richards * James Shank * Jamie Gillespie * Jan Harm Kuipers * Jan Ruth * Jan Zorz * Jan-Piet Mens * Jari Arkko * Jason Livingood * Jason Smith * Jasper den Hertog * Jawad Ahmed * Jay Daley * Jay Ford * Jeff Fry * Jeff Man * Jen Linkova * Jenine Beekhuyzen * Jerry Lundstrom * Jessica Shen * Jessica Wei * Jethro Webston * Jia-Rong Low * Jim Forster * Jim Vella * Jimmy Lim * Jing Qiao * Joanna Kulesza * Joao L. Sobrinho * Joao Luis Silva Damas * Joao M. Ceron * Job Snijders * Joel Jaeggli * Johanna Amann * Johannes Krupp * Johannes Weber * Johannes Zirngibl * John Bambenek * John Garrity * John Jack * John Kristoff * John Scudder * John Welborn * Jonathan Brewer * Jordan Carter * Jordan Jueckstock * Jordi Palet Martinez * Josef Gustafsson * Joseph Salowey * Joy Chan * Joyce Chen * Juan Ramon Santana * Juha Saarinen * Julia Evans * Julian Martin Del Fiore * Julien Gamba * Jun Murai * Kaajal Kumar * Kaan Onarlioglu * Kanagaraj Krishna * Karel Hynek * Karl Lovink * Karla Skarda * Kasek Galgal * Kashyap Thimmaraju * Kathleen Moriarty * Katsuyasu Toyama * Kazunori Fujiwara * Ke Ma * Keisuke Kamata * Kemal Sanjta * Kenjiro Cho * Kenny Huang * Kensuke Fukuda * Kevin Bock * Kevin Ku * Kevin Meynell * Kevin Vermeulen * Kevon Swift * Keyu Man * Khee Hong Loke * Klee Aiken * Kobayashi Masayuki * Koen van Hove * Koichi Kunitake * Koki Nakagawa * Konrad Wolsing * Korian Edeline * Kostas Zorbadelos * Kris Shrishak * Kurt Lindqvist * Kyle Drake * Kyle Schomp * Lan Wei * Lars Prehn * Lars-Johan Liman * Leandro Bertholdo * Leandro Navarro * Lee Howard * Leo Vegoda * Leonid Todorov * Leslie Daigle * Lia Hestina * Liang Wang * Liangcheng Yu * Linjian Song * Lisa Corness * Lisandro Ubiedo * Liz Izhikevich * Loba Olopade * Lorenzo Cogotti * Louise Tromp * Luca Sani * Luuk Hendriks * Maarten Botterman * Maciej Korczynski * Madeline Carr * Maemura Akinori * Mai Thu Thuy * Major Hayden * Manaf Gharaibeh * Mansour Ganji * Marc Bruyere * Marcin Nawrocki * Marco Chiesa * Marco Cilloni * Marco Hogewoning * Marcus Brinkmann * Marcus Keane * Maria Theresa Perez * Mariko Kobayashi * Marilyn Zhang * Mario Loffredo * Mark Andrews * Mark Karpilovskij * Mark Nottingham * Mark Prior * Mark Smith * Markus Dahlmanns * Markus Legner * Marten Porte * Martin Hannigan * Martin Hoffmann * Martin Langer * Martin Thomson * Martin Winter * Mary Rose Ofianga-Rontal * Masanori Yajima * Masataka Mawatari * Massimo Candela * Mat Ford * Matt Larson * Matt Oh * Matt Palmer * Matt Ringel * Matt Stith * Matthew Thomas * Matthias Wichtlhuber * Mattijs Jonker * Maxime Mouchet * Md Abdul Awal * Megan Baker * Melchior Aelmans * Merike Kaeo * Metin Acikalin * Michael Kende * Michael Patterson * Michael Rabinovich * Michael Schapira * Mika Kerttunen * Mike Kosek * Min Sung Jung * Minzhao Lyu * Miwa Fujii * Mohamad Dikshie Fauzie * Mohamed Boucadair * Mohammad Larosh Khan * Molay Ghosh * Moritz Muller * Mubashir Sargana * Muhammad Moinur Rahman * Muhammad Yasir Shamim * Muzamer Mohd Azalan * Nadir Hassan * Nafeez Islam * Nalini Elkins * Narayan G * Narelle Clark * Natale Bianchi * Nate Sales * Nathalie Romo Moreno * Nathalie Trenaman * Neta Rozen Schiff * Nick Buraglio * Nick Hilliard * Nick Janetakis * Nico Schottelius * Nicola Rustignoli * Nicole Wajer * Nihit Tandon * Nikolai Hampton * Nikos Kostopoulos * Nils Wisiol * Nirav Atre * Nurul Islam Roman * Nusenu * Nyamkhand Buluukhuu * Oky Tria Saputra * Olafur Gudmundsson * Olamide Omolola * Oliver Gasser * Oliver Michel * Olivier Tilmans * Omar Alrawi * Ondrej Caletka * Ondrej Sury * Otto Moerbeek * Pablo Hinojosa * Paolo Lucente * Paresh Khatri * Parkpoom Tripatana * Pasan Lamahewa * Patrick McManus * Patrik Faltstrom * Paul Dale * Paul Wilson * Pawel Foremski * Pawel Urbanek * Pedro Marcos * Pengxiong Zhu * Pete Sclafani * Pete Stevens * Peter Blee * Peter Hansteen * Peter Maynard * Peter Peele * Petr Spacek * Petros Gigis * Phil Lavin * Phil Mawson * Philip Homburg * Philip Paeps * Philip Smith * Philipp Jeitner * Philipp Richter * Pier Carlo Chiodi * Piotr Kijewski * Platon Kotzias * Pranav Kondala * Praneet Kaur * Pubudu Jayasinghe * Quincy Liao * Rachee Singh * Rafael Cintra * Raffaele Sommese * Raffaele Zullo * Rajnesh Singh * Ralph Dolmans * Ram Sundara Raman * Ramakrishna Padmanabhan * Rami Al-Dalky * Ran Ben Basat * Ranysha Ware * Raquel Rugani Lage * Raskia Nayanajith * Ray Bellis * Rebekah Houser * Remi Gacogne * Rene Bakker * Rene Wilhelm * Renee Burton * Richard Cziva * Richard Jimmerson * Richard Nelson * Richard Patterson * Richard Read * Rick McElroy * Rishabh Chhabra * Robbie Mitchell * Robert Kisteleki * Roderick Fanou * Rohana Palliyaguru * Roland van Rijswijk-Deij * Romain Fontugne * Ron Bonica * Ron Winward * Ronald van Kleunen * Roy Arends * Rudiger Birkner * Russ White * Ryan Beckett * Ryo Nakamura * Sachin Ashok * Said Jawad Saidi * Said Zazai * Salvatore Cuzzilla * Samantha Douglas * Samit Jana * Samuel Steffen * Sandra Davey * Sandra Siby * Sangeetha Abdu Jyothi * Sanjaya * Sara Dickinson * Sarah Escandor-Tomas * Sarmad Hussain * Sarvesh Mathi * Sasha Romijn * Satoru Matsushima * Satoru Tsurumaki * Scott Hollenbeck * Scott Shenker * Sebastian Castro * Sebastian Zander * Seiichi Kawamura * Seluvaia Kauvaka * Shah Sahari * Shahee Mirza * Shahzeb Mustafa * Shamim Reza * Shamsullah Shams * Shane Alcock * Shane Kerr * Sheetal Kumar * Sheikh Md Seum * Shermaine Yung * Sherry Shek * Sheryl Hermoso * Shian-Shyong Tseng * Shinoj Pittandavida * Shuai Hao * Shucheng Liu * Shumon Huque * Shusei Tomonaga * Siena Perry * Simon Baroi * Simon Bauer * Simran Patil * Siva Kesava * Sivaram Ramanathan * Sofia Silva Berenguer * Sonam Keba * Song Bing * Spiros Thanasoulas * Srikanth Sundaresan * Srimal Andrahennadi * Stanley Osao * Stefan Ubbink * Steinthor Bjarnason * Stephan Marwedel * Stephane Bortzmeyer * Stephen McQuistin * Stephen Ryan * Stephen Strowes * Steve Crocker * Steve Santorelli * Sue Graves * Suetena Faatuuala Loia * Suksit Sripitchayaphan * Sunny Chendi * Susan Forney * Svaradiva Devi * Swapneel Patnekar * Sylvain Cortes * Sylvia Cadena * Szymon Trocha * Taejoong Chung * Taiji Kimura * Talha Paracha * Tan Kean Siong * Tashi Phuntsho * Teav Sovandara * Theo Jepsen * Theophilus A. Benson * Thomas Holterbach * Thomas Koch * Thomas Krenc * Thomas Millar * Thomas Patzke * Thomas Scheffler * Thomas Wirtgen * Thymen Wabeke * Tianxiang Dai * Tim Bruijnzeels * Tim Fiola * Tim Raphael * Timm Bottger * Timothy Winters * Tobias Fiebig * Todd Arnold * Tom Barbette * Tom Carpay * Tom Do * Tom Harrison * Tom Hollingsworth * Tom Krizek * Tom Perrine * Tomek Mrugalski * Tomoaki Tani * Tony Finch * Tony Li * Tony Scheid * Tony Smith * Tony Tauber * Torsten Zimmermann * Trinh Viet Doan * Truong Khanh Huyen * Tuan Nguyen * Tugsorshikh Badarch * Ulrich Hauser * Ulrich Speidel * Usama Naseer * Uta Meier-Hahn * Vashkar Bhattacharjee * Vasileios Giotsas * Vasileios Kotronis * Vasilis Chryssos * Veronika McKillop * Vesna Manojlovic * Vicky Risk * Vijay Sivaraman * Vijay Varadharajan * Viktor Dukhovni * Vincent Bernat * Vitaly Kamluk * Vittorio Bertola * Vivek Nigam * W K Shiu * Wanqing Tu * Warren Finch * Warren Kumari * Wassie Goushe * Wayne Thayer * Werachart Muttitanon * Wes Hardaker * Wilaiwan Phanarin * Wilhelm Boeddinghaus * Willem Toorop * William Lu * Willy Sutrisno * Winfried Tilanus * Wita Laksono * Wout de Natris * Wouter de Vries * Xiao Zhang * Xiaohong Deng * Xiaoqi Chen * Xing Li * Yali Liu * Yeo Lee Chin * Yi Cao * Yiming Zhang * Ying Tian * Ying-Chu Chen * Yoshibumi Suematsu * Yoshitaka Aharen * Younghwan Choi * Yuedong Zhang * Yunfei Ma * Yurie Ito * Yuta Takata * Zachary Bischof * Zaid Ali Kahn * Zaifeng Zhang * Zen Ng * Zhenyu Li * Zinan Lin * Zolzaya Shagdar * More Tags * APNIC Foundation * APNIC Training * ASNs * Australia * BGP * capacity development * CERTs * China * DNS * DNSSEC * Event Wrap * Guest Post * How to * IANA * ICANN * IETF * IGF * India * Indonesia * Internet Governance * Internet of Things * IPv4 * IPv6 * ISIF Asia * ITU * IXPs * Japan * measurement * networking * NOGs * NRO * Pacific * peering * Policy * RIPE NCC * RIRs * ROAs * routing * RPKI * security * Taiwan * TCP * Thailand * Three of the best * Whois Related Articles * At the bottom of the sea: a short history of submarine cablesAt the bottom of the sea: a short history of... by Geoff Huston February 12, 2020 Submarine cable development brings together advanced physics, marine technology and engineering to create truly amazing pieces of networking infrastructure. * When volcanoes go bang, submarine cables do ... what?When volcanoes go bang, submarine cables do ... what? by Ulrich Speidel March 1, 2022 Guest Post: Insights and lessons from Tonga in the last five weeks. * Unintended consequences of submarine cable deployment on Internet routingUnintended consequences of submarine cable... by Roderick Fanou February 22, 2021 Guest Post: How do you quantify the end-to-end performance changes brought about by a new submarine cable? * How critical are submarine cables to end-users?How critical are submarine cables to end-users? by Shucheng Liu January 13, 2021 Guest Post: A common assumption is that popular resources tend to be hosted locally, and submarine cables are for backend traffic. Is this accurate? Connect with us * Facebook * Twitter * YouTube * Flickr * Weibo * Slideshare * LinkedIn * RSS (c) 2022 APNIC ABN 42 081 528 010 * Privacy * Contact * Help Centre * NRO News * Service Status * Careers