https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3488539 ACM Digital Library home ACM home * Advanced Search * Browse * About * + Sign in + Register * * Advanced Search * Journals * Magazines * Proceedings * Books * SIGs * Conferences * People * * More * Search ACM Digital Library[ ] SearchSearch Advanced Search Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction * Journal Home * Just Accepted * Latest Issue * * Archive * About PACMHCI + About + Publication Schedule * Editorial Board * Tracks + CSCW + CHI PLAY + ISS + EICS * Authors + Submission Templates + PACMHCI & ACM Author Policies * Contact Us * More HomeACM JournalsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 5, No. ISSForming the Dog Internet: Prototyping a Dog-to-Human Video Call Device research-article Open Access Forming the Dog Internet: Prototyping a Dog-to-Human Video Call Device Share on * Authors: * #Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom View Profile , * #Roosa Piitulainen Aalto University, Espoo, Finland Aalto University, Espoo, Finland View Profile , * #Andres Lucero Aalto University, Espoo, Finland Aalto University, Espoo, Finland View Profile Authors Info & Claims Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVolume 5Issue ISS November 2021 Article No.: 494pp 1-20https://doi.org/10.1145/3488539 Online:05 November 2021Publication History * 0citation * 1,385Downloads Metrics Total Citations0 Total Downloads1,385 Last 12 Months1,385 Last 6 weeks64 * Get Citation Alerts New Citation Alert added! This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to: You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited. To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below. Manage my Alerts New Citation Alert! Please log in to your account * Save to Binder Save to Binder [loader] Create a New Binder Name [ ] + Cancel + Create * Export Citation * Publisher Site * eReader * PDF Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 5, Issue ISS PreviousArticleNextArticle ACM Digital Library Abstract [3488539] Over the past decade, many systems have been developed for humans to remotely connect to their pets at home. Yet little attention has been paid to how animals can control such systems and what the implications are of animals using internet systems. This paper explores the creation of a video call device to allow a dog to remotely call their human, giving the animal control and agency over technology in their home. After building and prototyping a novel interaction method over several weeks and iterations, we test our system with a dog and a human. Analysing our experience and data, we reflect on power relations, how to quantify an animal's user experience and what interactive internet systems look like with animal users. This paper builds upon Human-Computer Interaction methods for unconventional users, uncovering key questions that advance the creation of animal-to-human interfaces and animal internet devices. References 1. Joelle Alcaidinho, Giancarlo Valentin, Gregory D. Abowd, and Melody Jackson. 2016. Training Collar-Sensed Gestures for Canine Communication. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2995257.3012020 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 2. Mats Amundin. 2008. An echolocation visualization and interface system for dolphin research. In The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ASA, Article 123. https://doi.org/10.1121/ 1.2828213Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 3. Fredrik Aspling and Oskar Juhlin. 2017. Theorizing Animal-Computer Interaction as Machinations. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 98, C (Feb. 2017), 135--149. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhcs.2016.05.005 Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. ISS, Article 494. Publication date: November 2021. 494:18 Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas, Roosa Piitulainen, & Andres Lucero Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 4. Eric P.S. Baumer. 2015. Usees. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3295--3298. https://doi.org/10.1145 /2702123.2702147 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 5. BBC. [n.d.]. BBC Households 'buy 3.2 million pets in lockdown'. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-56362987. Accessed: 2020-06--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 6. BBC. [n.d.]. Guardian 'Concerns over pet welfare crisis due to high demand for "pandemic puppies". https://www.theguardian.com/ lifeandstyle/2021/aug/26/ concerns-over-pet-welfare-crisis-due-to-high-demandfor- pandemic-puppies. Accessed: 2020-09-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 7. Multispecies Salon: Becoming. [n.d.]. . Retrieved June 29, 2020 from http://www.multispecies-salon.org/becomings/Google Scholar Google Scholar 8. Ceara Byrne, Larry Freil, Thad Starner, and Melody Moore Jackson. 2017. A Method to Evaluate Haptic Interfaces for Working Dogs. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 98, C (Feb. 2017), 196--207. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.04.004 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Digital LibraryDigital Library 9. Yoram Chisik and Clara Mancini. 2019. P for Politics D for Dialogue: Reflections on Participatory Design with Children and Animals. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Haifa, Israel) (ACI'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 15, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3371049. 3371061 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 10. Elizabeth Cox, Clara Mancini, and Luisa Ruge. 2020. Understanding Dogs' Engagement with Interactive Games: Interaction Style, Behaviour and Personality. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI'2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 12 pages. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3446002.3446122 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Digital LibraryDigital Library 11. DogTV. [n.d.]. . Retrieved June 29, 2020 from https:// www.dogtv.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 12. Larry Freil, Ceara Byrne, G. Valentin, Clint Zeagler, D. Roberts, Thad Starner, and Mellody Jackson. 2017. Canine- Centered Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 13. Fiona French, Clara Mancini, and Helen Sharp. 2015. Designing Interactive Toys for Elephants. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (London, United Kingdom) (CHI PLAY '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 523--528. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810327 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 14. Fiona French, Clara Mancini, and Helen Sharp. 2020. More Than Human Aesthetics: Interactive Enrichment for Elephants. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1661--1672. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395445 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Digital LibraryDigital Library 15. Annika Geurtsen and Schaaf Lamers, Marcel J.M. 2015. DInteractive Digital Gameplay Can Lower Stress Hormone Levels in Home Alone Dogs - A Case for Animal Welfare Informatics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Entertainment Computing. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--24589--8_18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 16. Stuart Gray, Fay Clark, Katy Burgess, Tom Metcalfe, Anja Kadijevic, Kirsten Cater, and Peter Bennett. 2018. Gorilla Game Lab: Exploring Modularity, Tangibility and Playful Engagement in Cognitive Enrichment Design. In Proceedingsof the Fifth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (ACI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3295598.3295604 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 17. Reinhard Gupfinger and Martin Kaltenbrunner. 2018. Animals Make Music: A Look at Non-Human Musical Expression. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2, 3 (Sep 2018), 51. https://doi.org /10.3390/mti2030051Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 18. Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas and Andres Lucero. 2019. On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog... Unless You're Another Dog. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300347 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Digital LibraryDigital Library 19. Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas, Patricia Pons, Janet Read, and Javier Jaen. 2018. Seven Years after the Manifesto: Literature Review and Research Directions for Technologies in Animal Computer Interaction. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2, 2 (Jun 2018), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2020030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 20. Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas and J.C. Read. 2015. Doggy Ladder of Participation.. In British Human Computer Interaction (BHCI). Workshop on Animal-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 21. Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas and Janet C. Read. 2014. Who Is Really In The Center Of Dog Computer Design?. In Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference (Funchal, Portugal) (ACE '14 Workshops). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2693787.2693793 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 22. Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas and Janet .C. Read. 2018. DoggyVision: Examining how Dogs (Canis familiaris) Interact with Media using a Dog-Driven Proximity Tracker Device. Animal Behaviour Cognition 5 (2018), 388--405. https: //doi.org/10.26451/abc.05.04.06.2018 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 23. Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas, Janet .C. Read, and Brendan Cassidy. 2017. A Dog Centred Approach to the Analysis of Dogs' Interactions with Media on TV Screens. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 98, C (Feb. 2017), 208--220. https: //doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhcs.2016.05.007 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 24. Katrina E Holland, Sara C Owczarczak-Garstecka, Katharine L Anderson, Rachel A Casey, Robert M Christley, Lauren Harris, Kirsten M McMillan, Rebecca Mead, Jane K Murray, Lauren Samet, et al. 2021. ?More attention than usual": A thematic analysis of dog ownership experiences in the UK during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Animals 11, 1 (2021), Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. ISS, Article 494. Publication date: November 2021. Forming the Dog Internet: Prototyping a Dog-to-Human Video Call Device 494:19 240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 25. Olivia Johnston-Wilder, Clara Mancini, Brendan Aengenheister, Joe Mills, Rob Harris, and Claire Guest. 2015. Sensing the Shape of Canine Responses to Cancer. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (Iskandar, Malaysia) (ACE '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 63, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2832932.2837017 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 26. Sabrina Karl, Ronald Sladky, Claus Lamm, and Ludwig Huber. 2021. Neural Responses of Pet Dogs Witnessing Their Caregiver's Positive Interactions with a Conspecific: An fMRI Study. Cerebral Cortex Communications 2, 3 (2021), tgab047.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 27. Hiroki Kobayashi, Kana Muramatsu, Junya Okuno, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Akio Fujiwara, and Kaoru Saito. 2015. Playful Rocksalt System: Animal-Computer Interaction Design in Wild Environments. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (Iskandar, Malaysia) (ACE '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 62, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2832932.2837012 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 28. Animal Rights Law. [n.d.]. . Retrieved June 29, 2020 from https:/ /definitions.uslegal.com/a/animal-rights/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 29. Shaun Lawson, Ben Kirman, and Conor Linehan. 2016. Power, Participation, and the Dog Internet. Interactions 23, 4 (June 2016), 37--41. https://doi.org/10.1145/2942442 Google Scholar Google ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 30. Ping Lee, David Cheok, Soon James, Lyn Debra,Wen Jie,Wang Chuang, and Farzam Farbiz. 2006. A Mobile PetWearable Computer and Mixed Reality System for Human--Poultry Interaction through the Internet. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 10, 5 (July 2006), 301--317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-005-0051--6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 31. Clara Mancini. 2013. Animal-Computer Interaction (ACI): Changing Perspective on HCI, Participation and Sustainability. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2227--2236. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2468356.2468744 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 32. Clara Mancini and Jussi Lehtonen. 2018. The Emerging Nature of Participation in Multispecies Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 907--918. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196785 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 33. Isabella Merola, Emanuela Prato-Previde, and Sarah Marshall-Pescini. 2012. Dogs' social referencing towards owners and strangers. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 34. Ann Morrison, Rune Heide Moller, Cristina Manresa-Yee, and Neda Eshraghi. 2016. The Impact of Training Approaches on Experimental Setup and Design ofWearable Vibrotactiles for Hunting Dogs. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2995257.2995391 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 35. Corsin A Muller, Kira Schmitt, Anjuli LA Barber, and Ludwig Huber. 2015. Dogs can discriminate emotional expressions of human faces. Current Biology 25, 5 (2015), 601--605.Google Scholar Google ScholarCross RefCross Ref 36. Carman Neustaedter and Jennifer Golbeck. 2013. Exploring Pet Video Chat: The Remote Awareness and Interaction Needs of Families with Dogs and Cats. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Antonio, Texas, USA) (CSCW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1549--1554. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2441776.2441953 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 37. Steve North. 2017. Hey, Where's My Hay? Design Fictions in Horse-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 17, 5 pages. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3152130.3152149 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Digital LibraryDigital Library 38. Susanna Paasovaara, Mikko Paldanius, Petri Saarinen, Jonna Hakkila, and Kaisa Vaananen-Vainio-Mattila. 2011. The Secret Life of My Dog: Design and Evaluation of Paw Tracker Concept. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Stockholm, Sweden) (MobileHCI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 231--240. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037373.2037409 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 39. Patrizia Paci, Clara Mancini, and Blaine A. Price. 2020. Understanding the Interaction Between Animals andWearables: The Wearer Experience of Cats. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1701--1712. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3357236.3395546 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 40. Roosa Piitulainen and Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas. 2020. Music for Monkeys: Building Methods to Design with White-Faced Sakis for Animal-Driven Audio Enrichment Devices. Animals 10, 10 (2020), 1768.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 41. PRNewsWire. [n.d.]. . Retrieved June 29, 2020 from https:// www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pet-tech-market-tosurpass- usd-20-billion-by-2025-global-market-insights-inc-300892272.html Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 42. Friederike Range and Zsofia Viranyi. 2013. Social learning from humans or conspecifics: differences and similarities between wolves and dogs. Frontiers in Psychology 4 (2013), 868. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00868Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref 43. Janet C. Read, Daniel Fitton, and Matthew Horton. 2014. Giving Ideas an Equal Chance: Inclusion and Representation in Participatory Design with Children. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Aarhus, Denmark) (IDC '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 105--114. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2593968.2593986 Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 5, No. ISS, Article 494. Publication date: November 2021. 494:20 Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas, Roosa Piitulainen, & Andres Lucero Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 44. Charlotte Robinson and Alice Torjussen. 2020. Canine Co-Design: Investigating Buttons as an Input Modality for Dogs. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1673--1685. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395462 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Digital LibraryDigital Library 45. Charlotte L. Robinson, Clara Mancini, Janet van der Linden, Claire Guest, and Robert Harris. 2014. Canine-Centered Interface Design: Supporting the Work of Diabetes Alert Dogs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3757--3766. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557396 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 46. Alexandre Pongracz Rossi, Sarah Rodriguez, and Cassia Rabelo Cardoso dos Santos. 2016. A dog using skype. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction. 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 47. Alexandre Pongracz Rossi, Sarah Rodriguez, and Cassia Rabelo Cardoso dos Santos. 2016. A Dog Using Skype. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 10, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2995257.3012019 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 48. Luisa Ruge, Elizabeth Cox, Clara Mancini, and Rachael Luck. 2018. User Centered Design Approaches to Measuring Canine Behavior: Tail Wagging as a Measure of User Experience. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (ACI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 12 pages. https:// doi.org/10.1145/3295598.3295599 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar Digital LibraryDigital Library 49. Michael Smyth, Ingi Helgason, Frank Kresin, Mara Balestrini, Andreas B. Unteidig, Shaun Lawson, Mark Gaved, Nick Taylor, James Auger, Lone Koefoed Hansen, Douglas C. Schuler, Mel Woods, and Paul Dourish. 2018. Maker Movements, Do-It-Yourself Cultures and Participatory Design: Implications for HCI Research. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--7. https://doi.org /10.1145/3170427.3170604 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 50. Alice Torjussen and Holly Root-Gutteridge. 2020. Is Nothing Better Than Something? A Preliminary Investigation into Disembodied Stimuli for Home Alone Dogs. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI'2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446002.3446127 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 51. Heli Vaataja, Paivi Majaranta, Poika Isokoski, Yulia Gizatdinova, Miiamaaria V. Kujala, Sanni Somppi, Antti Vehkaoja, Outi Vainio, Oskar Juhlin, Mikko Ruohonen, and Veikko Surakka. 2018. Happy Dogs and Happy Owners: Using Dog Activity Monitoring Technology in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Animal- Computer Interaction (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (ACI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3295598.3295607 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 52. Sarah Webber, Marcus Carter, Wally Smith, and Frank Vetere. 2020. Co-Designing with Orangutans: Enhancing the Design of Enrichment for Animals. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1713--1725. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395559 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 53. Michelle Westerlaken and Stefano Gualeni. 2016. Becoming with: Towards the Inclusion of Animals as Participants in Design Processes. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2995257.2995392 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library 54. Hanna Wirman. 2014. Games for/with strangers - captive orangutan (Pongo Pygmaeus) touch screen play. Antennae, New York, NY, USA. http://hdl.handle.net/10397/7611Google ScholarGoogle Scholar 55. Hanna E Wirman and Ida KH Jorgensen. 2015. Designing for intuitive use for non-human users. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library 56. Clint Zeagler, Jay Zuerndorfer, Andrea Lau, Larry Freil, Scott Gilliland, Thad Starner, and Melody Moore Jackson. 2016. Canine Computer Interaction: Towards Designing a Touchscreen Interface for Working Dogs. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Animal-Computer Interaction (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) (ACI '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2995257.2995384 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital Library Digital Library Index Terms 1. Forming the Dog Internet: Prototyping a Dog-to-Human Video Call Device 1. Human-centered computing 1. Human computer interaction (HCI) 2. Interaction design Comments Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus. Login options Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article. Sign in Full Access Get this Article * Information * Contributors * Published in Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 5, Issue ISS ISS November 2021 481 pages EISSN:2573-0142 DOI:10.1145/3498314 + Editor: + #Jeff Nichols Google Issue's Table of Contents Copyright (c) 2021 Owner/Author Sponsors In-Cooperation Publisher Association for Computing Machinery New York, NY, United States Publication History + Online: 5 November 2021 + Published: 5 November 2021 Permissions Request permissions about this article. Request Permissions Author Tags + participatory design + animal-computer interaction + remote human-animal systems Qualifiers + research-article Conference Funding Sources * [loader] Other Metrics View Article Metrics * Bibliometrics * Citations0 * Article Metrics + 0 Total Citations View Citations + 1,385 Total Downloads + Downloads (Last 12 months)1,385 + Downloads (Last 6 weeks)64 Other Metrics View Author Metrics * Cited By This publication has not been cited yet PDF Format View or Download as a PDF file. PDF eReader View online with eReader. eReader Digital Edition View this article in digital edition. View Digital Edition * Figures * Other * * Share this Publication link https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3488539 Copy Link Share on Social Media Share on * * * * 0References * * * Close Figure Viewer Browse AllReturnChange zoom level[ ] Caption View Issue's Table of Contents Export Citations Select Citation format[BibTeX ] + Download citation + Copy citation * Preview is not available. By clicking download,a new tab will open to start the export process. The process may takea few minutes but once it finishes a file will be downloaded on your browser soplease do not close the new tab. Download Categories * Journals * Magazines * Books * Proceedings * SIGs * Conferences * Collections * People About * About ACM Digital Library * Subscription Information * Author Guidelines * Using ACM Digital Library * All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library * ACM Computing Classification System Join * Join ACM * Join SIGs * Subscribe to Publications * Institutions and Libraries Connect * Contact * Facebook * Twitter * Linkedin The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. Copyright (c) 2022 ACM, Inc. * Terms of Usage * Privacy Policy * Code of Ethics ACM Digital Library home ACM home About Cookies On This Site We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Learn more Got it!