https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/24798/should-proofs-include-a-third-context-column Stack Exchange Network Stack Exchange network consists of 178 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. Visit Stack Exchange [ ] Loading... 1. 2. 0 3. +0 4. + Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site + Help Center Detailed answers to any questions you might have + Meta Discuss the workings and policies of this site + About Us Learn more about Stack Overflow the company + Business Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us 5. 6. Log in Sign up 7. current community + Mathematics Educators help chat + Mathematics Educators Meta your communities Sign up or log in to customize your list. more stack exchange communities company blog Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those involved in the field of teaching mathematics. It only takes a minute to sign up. Sign up to join this community [ano] Anybody can ask a question [ano] Anybody can answer [an] The best answers are voted up and rise to the top Mathematics Educators 1. Home 2. 1. Public 2. Questions 3. Tags 4. Users 5. Unanswered 3. Teams Stack Overflow for Teams - Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. [teams-illo-free-si] Create a free Team What is Teams? 1. Teams 2. Create free Team Teams Q&A for work Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. Learn more Should proofs include a third "context" column? Ask Question Asked today Active today Viewed 2k times 1 $\begingroup$ Proofs, or any mathematical derivation, appearing in any real setting, such as a book or textbook or talk, or even when we're teaching it in class, includes a great deal of surrounding explanation. But when we ask students to regurgitate proofs, we ask for what is merely the skeletal core of the proof in this rib-like two column format. At the very least, it seems to me, proofs ought to have three columns, including a new multi-row lefthand column that describes (at least) the approach being taken in that section of the proof. By "multi-row" I mean that the proposed new lefthand "row" can encompass multiple rows of the basic two-column proof. The resulting format would look like this: =================|===============|============== What we're |