https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/csp2.366 * Skip to Article Content * Skip to Article Information Working off-campus? Learn about our remote access options Society for Conservation Biology Society for Conservation Biology [ ]Search within[This Journal] * Search term[ ] Advanced Search Citation Search * Search term[ ] Advanced Search Citation Search Login / Register * Journals + Conservation Biology + Conservation Letters + Conservation Science and Practice * Join SCB * conbio.org [ad] Conservation Science and Practice Volume 3, Issue 5 e366Conservation Science and Practice PERSPECTIVES AND NOTES Open Access Insect fatalities at wind turbines as biodiversity sinks Christian C. Voigt, Corresponding Author * voigt@izw-berlin.de * orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-3974 Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany Correspondence Christian C. Voigt, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Strasse 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany. Email: voigt@izw-berlin.de Search for more papers by this author Christian C. Voigt, Corresponding Author * voigt@izw-berlin.de * orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-3974 Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany Correspondence Christian C. Voigt, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Strasse 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany. Email: voigt@izw-berlin.de Search for more papers by this author First published: 26 January 2021 https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.366 Citations: 1 About Sections PDFPDF Tools * Request permission * Export citation * Add to favorites * Track citation ShareShare Give access Share full text access Share full-text access Please review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article. [ ]I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of Use --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shareable Link Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more. [ ] Copy URL Share a link Share on * Email * Facebook * Twitter * Linked In * Reddit * Wechat Abstract Evidence is accumulating that insects are frequently killed by operating wind turbines, yet it is poorly understood if these fatalities cause population declines and changes in assemblage structures on various spatial scales. Current observations suggest that mostly hill-topping, swarming, and migrating insects interact with wind turbines. Recently, the annual loss of insect biomass at wind turbines was estimated for Germany to amount 1,200 t for the plant growth period, which equates to about 1.2 trillion killed insects per year, assuming 1 mg insect body mass. Accordingly, a single turbine located in the temperate zone might kill about 40 million insects per year. Furthermore, Scheimpflug Lidar measurements at operating wind turbines confirm a high insect activity in the risk zone of turbines. These numbers and observations are alarming, yet they require further consolidation, particularly across all continents and climate zones where wind energy industry is expanding. We need to understand (a) how attraction of insects to wind turbines affect fatality rates and interactions of insect predators with wind turbines. (b) We have to connect insect fatalities at wind turbines with source populations and evaluate if these fatalities add to the decline of insect populations and potentially the extinction of species. (c) We need to assess how fatalities at wind turbines change insect-mediated ecosystem services. An ever-growing global wind energy industry with high densities of wind turbines may have long-lasting effects on insects and associated trophic links if negative impacts on insects are not considered during the erection and operation of wind turbines. 1 INTRODUCTION Energy production from renewable sources is increasing worldwide in an effort to reduce CO[2] emission and to avoid the risks associated with nuclear power production and waste management. Although labeled as environmentally friendly and thus as "green," some renewable energy sources are in conflict with biodiversity goals (Saidur, Rahim, Islam, & Solangi, 2011). For example, wind energy production has a record of generating high numbers of bird and bat fatalities (Grunkorn et al., 2017; Voigt, Lehnert, Petersons, Adorf, & Bach, 2015). Indeed, recent trend analyses suggest that populations of affected species may collapse if no appropriate avoidance and mitigation schemes are practiced, for example, avoiding wind turbines in sensitive habitats and preventing species from colliding with spinning rotor blades (Bellebaum, Korner-Nievergelt, Durr, & Mammen, 2013; Frick et al., 2017; Schaub, 2012). Efficient mitigation measures for airborne vertebrates involve camera or radar informed and context dependent operation schemes, which stop wind turbine operation when bird or bat activity is high (Arnett et al., 2016; Tome, Canario, Leitao, Pires, & Repas, 2017). Despite our advanced understanding of how to avoid or mitigate the negative effects of wind energy production on airborne vertebrates, few scientific studies have ever addressed in a systematic manner if aerial invertebrates get also killed by wind turbines, and if these fatalities constitute a significant anthropogenic biodiversity sink. This is surprising because observations of arthropods being active at turbines and getting killed by rotating blades have been reported since the early days of wind energy production. 2 FATAL COLLISIONS OF INSECTS WITH WIND TURBINES After collision, most insects leave a layer of organic detritus on the leading edge of blades. This layer disrupts the laminar airflow, causing a significant drop in power production (Han, Kim, & Kim, 2018 ; Soltani, Birjandi, & Seddighi Moorani, 2011). Indeed, insect remains that stick to the leading edges of blades during low-wind periods can halve power generation during high-wind periods (Corten & Veldkamp, 2001). Consequently, insect contamination of blades constitutes a significant problem for wind energy companies (Wilcox & White, 2016), which led to the invention of cleaning techniques and the emergence of a service industry that removes insect and other detritus from blades (Deb, Patel, & Singh, 2017; Jeon, Kim, Park, & Hong, 2013; Figure 1). The contaminant layer of insect detritus on blades is an undisputable record of insect fatalities, yet the true number of insects killed at wind turbines may be even higher, because insects may be propelled away after impingement without leaving organic matter on blades. Among these, large-bodied insects are more likely to be found below wind turbines than small insects (Figure 2). Even if small insects fall to the ground next to turbines, they may be difficult to detect by searchers or they may be quickly removed by scavengers such as ants. Wind drift may push away carcasses of light insects, which complicates estimating how many insects and which species collide with wind turbines. image FIGURE 1 Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Wind turbine with a blade-cleaning maintenance worker (a). Insect detritus at the leading edge of blades (b) (Jose Luis Ruiz, Bladecleaning S.A.) image FIGURE 2 Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Wind park on a mountain top in Japan (a). Dead insects (b) collected during a 15-min search under a single turbine at site (a) included two butterflies (Lepidoptera) and dragonflies (Odonata) (note that insects were piled up for the picture and that some insects show physical injuries) 3 HOW MANY INSECTS ARE KILLED BY WIND TURBINES? Studies dealing with the question of how many insects are killed by wind turbines are difficult based on the reasons mentioned in the previous section. In a first pilot study conducted by the German Aerospace Center, Trieb and colleagues estimated for Germany's 30,000 onshore wind turbines that about 1,200 t of insect biomass is lost due to collisions with wind turbines during the plant growth period (April-October) (Trieb, 2018; Trieb, Gerz, & Geiger, 2018). Assuming an average wet mass of 1 mg for an insect (Hu et al., 2016), this equates to about 1.2 trillion insects killed per year for all onshore wind turbines in Germany, or 40 million insects killed annually by a single wind turbine in Germany. It is important to note here that these estimates are sensitive to deviations from model assumptions, and thus they certainly require further confirmation based on robust empirical data. For example, these estimates may vary largely across regions, depend on the composition of local insect assemblages and on the relevance of insect migration in a specific region. Nonetheless, the postulated numbers hint at the magnitude at which insect fatalities might occur at wind turbines in the temperate zone. It is likely that this situation is aggravated in regions with a higher abundance of aerial invertebrates compared with Germany. 4 WHICH INSECT SPECIES INTERACT WITH WIND TURBINES, AND WHY? Besides looking at the aspect of insect numbers and biomass lost by wind turbine operation, it is equally important to understand which species or higher taxonomic groups may get killed by wind turbines. Currently, we do not know if certain insect taxa are more vulnerable at wind turbines than others, and if certain insect taxa are attracted to wind turbines. Attraction to wind turbines might happen particularly in swarming and hill-topping species. These may fly vertically along the turbine structure to higher altitudes, where they may collide with the spinning blades. Recently, Scheimpflug Lidar technique was used to document insect swarms in the operation range of blades (Jansson, Malmqvist, Brydegaard, Akesson, & Rydell, 2020). Such data of high spatial and temporal resolution support earlier observations that insects get attracted to wind turbines (Long, Flint, & Lepper, 2011). In addition, insect aggregations at wind turbines have been observed specifically in summer and autumn, when insects migrate or when insects may rest at dusk on turbine structures that were heated up by sunshine. Some invasive insects also use wind turbine structures for overwintering, potentially helping these opportunistic species to expand their range by facilitating winter survival (Dudek, Dudek, & Tryjanowski, 2015). 5 ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCE OF INSECT INTERACTIONS WITH WIND TURBINES As swarming and migration are linked to mating and dispersal, respectively, fatalities at wind turbines may have profound effects on insect populations at various spatial scales. Some insects, such as hill-topping butterflies, may occur only in small populations at a local scale. Placing wind turbines close to these populations or to the corresponding mating areas of these insects, for example on a mountain ridge or hilltop (Figure 2), may largely affect local populations. In addition, decline of insect populations may also diminish their ecosystem function, including services like pollination. Currently, we lack data on how siting of wind turbines affect insect fatalities at turbines and thus, how turbine siting may impact local insect diversity and associated ecosystem functions. Migrating insects may get in contact with wind turbines when moving at aerial layers that are also suitable for wind energy production. A high fatality rate of migratory insects at wind turbines may have negative consequences for distant insect populations. However, it seems challenging to quantify the effect of turbine-related fatalities on populations of migratory insects because of the intrinsic difficulty in establishing connectivity between the site where insects are killed and the corresponding source populations. It is noteworthy that insect-wind turbine interactions may also affect predators hunting for insects at turbines. Aerial insectivores such as bats are well known for searching and hunting insects in proximity to wind turbines (Foo et al., 2017; Horn, Arnett, & Kunz, 2008; Johnson, 1957; Roeleke, Blohm, Kramer-Schadt, Yovel, & Voigt, 2016; Valdez & Cryan, 2013). Rydell and colleagues argued that the findings of diurnal flies in the stomachs of bat carcasses collected below wind turbines is indicative of bats hunting for flies resting on turbine structures (Rydell et al., 2016). Furthermore, it was argued that bat mortality at wind turbines is linked to insect migration in northern Europe (Rydell et al., 2010). Thus, insect attraction to wind turbines may impact trophic links associated with these insects, such as insect-mediated ecosystem functions and aerial predation of these insects at wind turbines. Concluding, interactions of insects with wind turbines have multifaceted consequences that reach across trophic levels and over larger spatial scales. 6 FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS More research is needed to better understand how insects interact with wind turbines. Using remote sensing devices such as Scheimpflug Lidar instruments seems to be a promising avenue. In addition, we need to improve our understanding of which species are affected by wind energy production, that is, which species are at high risk of colliding with wind turbines. Meta-barcoding of the contaminant layer on blades may reveal insect DNA, which would allow the identification of affected species and possibly also establishing connectivity between wind turbine sites and source populations. Identifying populations and species of concern will inform conservation managers about necessary measures for avoidance and mitigation, for example when choosing sites for wind turbines at critical distances to populations of threatened insect species of high collision risk. Identifying population level effects may be challenging for local populations, since the presence of wind turbines may impact local habitats as well. For example, building and maintaining wind turbines require large platforms and roads. On the one hand, platforms and roads may increase local habitat diversity with positive effects on some insect species. Yet, they may as well have negative effects on sensitive habitats and associated insect species because of disturbance and fragmentation. Overall, the direction of likely effects of infrastructure verges on insect diversity is controversially discussed in the literature (Villemey et al., 2018). It will become particularly important in future studies to disentangle these habitat-driven effects from fatality-driven effects on local insect populations. We also need to improve our knowledge about how insect fatalities at wind turbines vary between regions. This might help us identifying areas where wind turbines could operate without causing large numbers of insect fatalities and without affecting potentially insect diversity and their ecosystem functions. Overall, research in the outlined directions would allow us to better evaluate if we need to consider measures to protect insect diversity in our efforts to fight global climate change by promoting wind energy production. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The author declares no conflicts of interest. ETHICS STATEMENT Research for this paper did not involve any animal experiments. Open Research DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT This policy paper is presented without any original data. REFERENCES * Arnett, E. B., Baerwald, E. F., Mathews, F., Rodrigues, L., Rodriguez-Duran, A., Rydell, J., ... Voigt, C. C. (2016). Impacts of wind energy development on bats: A global perspective. In Bats in the Anthropocene: Conservation of bats in a changing world (pp. 295- 323). Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar * Bellebaum, J., Korner-Nievergelt, F., Durr, T., & Mammen, U. ( 2013). Wind turbine fatalities approach a level of concern in a raptor population. Journal for Nature Conservation, 21, 394- 400. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Corten, G. P., & Veldkamp, H. F. (2001). Insects can halve wind-turbine power. Nature, 412, 41- 42. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Deb, D., Patel, M., & Singh, H. (2017). Automated cleaning of wind turbine blades with no downtime. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) (pp. 394-399). IEEE. Google Scholar * Dudek, K., Dudek, M., & Tryjanowski, P. (2015). Wind turbines as overwintering sites attractive to an invasive lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis Pallas (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 69, 665- 669. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Foo, C. F., Bennett, V. J., Hale, A. M., Korstian, J. M., Schildt, A. J., & Williams, D. A. (2017). Increasing evidence that bats actively forage at wind turbines. PeerJ, 5, e3985. CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Frick, W. F., Baerwald, E. F., Pollock, J. F., Barclay, R. M. R., Szymanski, J. A., Weller, T. J., ... McGuire, L. P. (2017). Fatalities at wind turbines may threaten population viability of a migratory bat. Biological Conservation, 209, 172- 177. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Grunkorn, T., Blew, J., Kruger, O., Potiek, A., Reichenbach, M., von Ronn, J., ... Nehls, G. (2017). A large-scale, multispecies assessment of avian mortality rates at land-based wind turbines in Northern Germany. In Wind energy and wildlife interactions (pp. 43- 64). Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar * Han, W., Kim, J., & Kim, B. (2018). Effects of contamination and erosion at the leading edge of blade tip airfoils on the annual energy production of wind turbines. Renewable Energy, 115, 817- 823. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Horn, J. W., Arnett, E. B., & Kunz, T. H. (2008). Behavioral responses of bats to operating wind turbines. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 72, 123- 132. Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Hu, G., Lim, K. S., Horvitz, N., Clark, S. J., Reynolds, D. R., Sapir, N., & Chapman, J. W. (2016). Mass seasonal bioflows of high-flying insect migrants. Science, 354(6319), 1584- 1587. CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Jansson, S., Malmqvist, E., Brydegaard, M., Akesson, S., & Rydell, J. (2020). A Scheimpflug Lidar used to observe insect swarming at a wind turbine. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106578. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Jeon, M., Kim, B., Park, S., & Hong, D. (2013). Efficiency evaluation of wind power blade surface cleaning using brush and water jet. Journal of the Korean Society for Precision Engineering, 30, 977- 982. CrossrefGoogle Scholar * Johnson, C. G. (1957). The distribution of insects in the air and the empirical relation of density to height. Journal of Animal Ecology, 26, 479- 494. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Long, C. V., Flint, J. A., & Lepper, P. A. (2011). Insect attraction to wind turbines: Does colour play a role? European Journal of Wildlife Research, 57, 323- 331. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Roeleke, M., Blohm, T., Kramer-Schadt, S., Yovel, Y., & Voigt, C. C. (2016). Habitat use of bats in relation to wind turbines revealed by GPS tracking. Scientific Reports, 6, 1- 9. CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Rydell, J., Bach, L., Dubourg-Savage, M. J., Green, M., Rodrigues, L., & Hedenstrom, A. (2010). Mortality of bats at wind turbines links to nocturnal insect migration? European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56, 23- 827. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Rydell, J., Bogdanowicz, W., Boonman, A., Pettersson, S., Suchecka, E., & Pomorski, J. J. (2016). Bats may eat diurnal flies that rest on wind turbines. Mammalian Biology, 81, 331- 339 . CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Saidur, R., Rahim, N. A., Islam, M. R., & Solangi, K. H. (2011). Environmental impact of wind energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 2423- 2430. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Schaub, M. (2012). Spatial distribution of wind turbines is crucial for the survival of red kite populations. Biological Conservation, 155, 111- 118. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Soltani, M., Birjandi, A., & Seddighi Moorani, M. (2011). Effect of surface contamination on the performance of a section of a wind turbine blade. Scientia Iranica, 18, 349- 357. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Tome, R., Canario, F., Leitao, A. H., Pires, N., & Repas, M. ( 2017). Radar assisted shutdown on demand ensures zero soaring bird mortality at a wind farm located in a migratory flyway. In Wind energy and wildlife interactions (pp. 119- 133). Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar * Trieb, F. (2018). Interference of flying insects and wind parks (FliWip) - Study report. Available from https://www.dlr.de/tt/ Portaldata/41/Resources/dokumente/st/FliWip-Final-Report.pdf Google Scholar * Trieb, F., Gerz, T., & Geiger, M. (2018). Modellanalyse liefert Hinweise auf Verluste von Fluginsekten in Windparks. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 68, 11. Google Scholar * Valdez, E. W., & Cryan, P. M. (2013). Insect prey eaten by hoary bats (Lasiurus cinereus) prior to fatal collisions with wind turbines. Western North American Naturalist, 73, 516- 524. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Villemey, A., Jeusset, A., Vargac, M., Bertheau, Y., Coulon, A., Touroult, J., ... Deniaud, N. (2018). Can linear transportation infrastructure verges constitute a habitat and/or a corridor for insects in temperate landscapes? A systematic review. Environmental Evidence, 7(1), 5. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Voigt, C. C., Lehnert, L. S., Petersons, G., Adorf, F., & Bach, L. (2015). Wildlife and renewable energy: German politics cross migratory bats. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 61, 213- 219. CrossrefWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar * Wilcox, B., & White, E. (2016). Computational analysis of insect impingement patterns on wind turbine blades. Wind Energy, 19, 483 - 495. Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science(r)Google Scholar Citing Literature [csp2] Volume3, Issue5 May 2021 e366 [ad] * Figures * References * Related * Information [spinner] [ad] Close Figure Viewer Return to Figure[ ] Previous FigureNext Figure Caption Download PDF Society for Conservation Biology Logo (c) 2021 The Society for Conservation Biology * About SCB * Membership * Contact Us (c) 2021 The Society for Conservation Biology Additional links About Wiley Online Library * Privacy Policy * Terms of Use * Cookies * Accessibility * Publishing Policies Help & Support * Contact Us * Training and Support * DMCA & Reporting Piracy Opportunities * Subscription Agents * Advertisers & Corporate Partners Connect with Wiley * The Wiley Network * Wiley Press Room Copyright (c) 1999-2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved Wiley Home Page [logo-heade] Log in to Wiley Online Library Email or Customer ID [ ] Password [ ] Forgot password? [Log In] NEW USER > INSTITUTIONAL LOGIN > [logo-heade] Change Password Old Password [ ] New Password [ ] Too Short Weak Medium Strong Very Strong Too Long [Submit] Password Changed Successfully Your password has been changed Create a new account Email or Customer ID [ ] [Register] Returning user [logo-heade] Forgot your password? Enter your email address below. Email or Customer ID [ ] [RESET PASSWORD] Please check your email for instructions on resetting your password. If you do not receive an email within 10 minutes, your email address may not be registered, and you may need to create a new Wiley Online Library account. Request Username Can't sign in? Forgot your username? Enter your email address below and we will send you your username Email or Customer ID [ ] [Submit] Close If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username