https://3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2021/09/the-grandfather-of-modern-self-help.html Skip to content Sign up for a small monthly payment and enjoy ads-free browsing at 3QD 3 Quarks Daily Make a one-time donation and enjoy ads-free browsing at 3QD Menu * Home * About Us * Monday Magazine * Archives * Support 3QD * Log In * Search for: [ ] The grandfather of modern self-help Posted on Monday, Sep 20, 2021 1:35AMMonday, September 20, 2021 by Emrys Westacott by Emrys Westacott [Unknown-1]1859 was not a bad year for publishing in Britain. Books that came out that year included Darwin's On the Origin of Species, John Stuart Mill's On Liberty, and George Eliot's Adam Bede. The first installments of Dickens' A Tale of Two Cities and Wilkie Collins' The Woman in White also made their appearance. And Samuel Smiles published Self-Help. The fiction in this list remains fairly popular. Mill's essay is generally considered a foundational text of modern liberalism and is widely used in political science undergraduate courses. Few people other than serious historians of science read On the Origin of Species in its entirety, but its standing as one of the most important and influential works ever penned is unassailable. Self-Help, by contrast, is rarely read or referred to these day except by literary and cultural historians of the Victorian era. Yet in its day it was an immediate bestseller, was quickly translated into several languages, and established Smiles' reputation, thereby enabling him to settle into the ranks of those who, by dint of their own efforts, had achieved success and security. Self-help books have been around for a long time, of course. One of the purposes of Plato's dialogues was to direct people towards living the good life for a human being. Epictetus' Handbook offered the same promise from a Stoic perspective. Plutarch's Lives, at least some of them, have long been taken to provide inspirational models. But in the modern era, few texts in this category have been as influential, at least in their day, as Self-Help. Perhaps its most important precursor was Ben Franklin's Autobiography, which tells how its author rose from an impoverished nobody to a highly respected somebody, and was explicitly written to illustrate the process. Self-Help: With Illustrations of Character, Conduct, and Perseverance , is an easy book to criticize. It consists mainly of innumerable potted biographies and anecdotes, all designed to illustrate a few recurring themes. The characters described are overwhelming white, male, and European, with a few Americans thrown in. A smug nationalism sometimes surfaces, the imperial prosperity and power of Britain being traced to certain individual virtues of the native population. No-one would describe Smiles as a great writer. He can be eloquent enough when urging his claims, but only in a fairly pedestrian way. Here is a typical sample:[Unknown] Character is human nature in its best form. It is moral order embodied in the individual. Men of character are not only the conscience of society, but in every well-governed State they are its best motive power, for it is moral qualities in the main which rule the world. The book is chock full of such edifying moral aphorisms, but like this one they are utterly conventional. Most of all, though, the book is fantastically repetitious. Hundreds of lives are summarized and incidents are recounted, all to illustrate the same few general ideas. And even then, the same people are regularly referenced (e.g. Isaac Newton, Joshua Reynolds, Robert Peel, Richard Arkwright, Robert Burns, George Stephenson) and occasionally the very same words are quoted in different chapters. A carefully wrought artistic whole it is not. On top of all that, Self-Help has often had a press from progressives. In Robert Tressell's The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists, for instance, it is dismissed as a work that teaches "ignorant, shallow-pated dolts...on their duty to their betters."[1] And E.J. Hobsbawn describes Smiles as a "self-made journalist-publisher who hymned the virtues of capitalism."[2] People who haven't read it may mistakenly believe it mainly offers advice about how to "get on" in a dog-eat-dog world. Others who were sympathetic to socialism did not share this view, however. There were reasons for this. In his essay, "Samuel Smiles and the Gospel of Work," Asa Briggs cites a lecture by Smiles (a lecture that became the germ for Self-Help) in which he says: [T]he education of the working classes is to be regarded, in its highest aspect, not as a means of raising up a few clever and talented men into a higher rank of life, but of elevating and improving the whole class-of raising the entire condition of the working man. Briggs also cites the socialist Robert Blatchford (1851-1943: author of Merrie England) as saying that Self-Help was "one of the most delightful and charming books it has been my happy fortune to meet with,[3] finding it genuinely inspirational. The fact is, to represent Self-Help as a paean to material or social success, the acquisition of wealth, or to individualism, is to misrepresent it. The main lessons it peddles on the basis of all the examples offered-and there can"t be much doubt about these since they are repeated ad nauseum-are the following: * All work of any kind should be honoured since it all contributes to a society's prosperity. * Practical, hands-on experience is very often more valuable than theory or book learning. * There is no shame in manual work. * Many great men have raised themselves from extremely humble beginnings. * Genius and natural talent are overrated. Even when it is necessary (e.g. Shakespeare) it is useless without great industry. * Accidental circumstances contribute very little to the production of any great result. (Newton's mind had to be prepared to reflect on the falling apple.) * Good resources aren't necessary for success. Many have succeeded with poor tools. * The only way to achieve excellence in any field is through diligent application and perseverance. * Mastery in any field can only be achieved slowly. This requires patience. * In most cases, perseverance will be rewarded. * Those who succeed are rarely motivated by money or fame but by the enjoyment they take in the process. * Being active and working hard produces happiness; idleness leads to dissolution and despair. * The ultimate goal of self-help should be moral character. This is far more important than anything else. * Moral character has nothing to do with wealth, rank, or education. In this sense, anyone can be a true "gentleman." It's easy to look down condescendingly on Victorian moralizing. But a few observations are worth making about this list of precepts. First, it is undoubtedly intended to be egalitarian. Every kind of work is held to deserve respect; and blood, titles, origins, property, education, even inborn ability, are considered insignificant compared to the capacity for hard work, which everyone is assumed to have in equal measure. Second, most of the above claims still command general assent. There may be quibbles over a few of them. Some parents who live and work in the upper social echelons might not be happy if their offspring choose careers that don't require at least a college education. Many would argue that the motivating power of money is greater than Smiles allows. For all that, you could easily insert any of these propositions into a boilerplate high school or college graduation speech today and no-one would notice since they are not especially controversial. Nevertheless, there are potentially pernicious aspects to the self-help gospel. As Blatchford observed, when one applies it to oneself it can encourage just the sort of virtues it is meant to arouse: industriousness; diligence; perseverance; patience; etc. And these are indeed presumably qood qualities to cultivate. But they also, of course, just happen to be qualities that employers like to see in their employees. And all over the world many people work in dire conditions from which there is very little hope of escape. So while Smiles pays tribute to working people, his ethic may also contribute to their oppression. The moral code of Self-Help can also lead us to be harsh in our judgements about people, including ourselves. Self-Help was written for a society in which social mobility had greatly increased during the preceding century. A subtextual implication of its teaching is that since self-improvement is always possible, those who fail to improve themselves have only themselves to blame. Without doubt, this became one of the pillars on which the current, widely-held belief that we live in some sort of meritocracy rests. There may often be a case for taking the "No excuses!" stance towards oneself as a way of avoiding what Jean-Paul Sartre calls "bad faith." But applied too readily to others, it becomes a justification for withholding sympathy-and, for that matter, government assistance. Finally, Self-Help, glorifies work for its own sake to an absurd degree. Here, Smiles was taking his lead from Thomas Carlyle whom he admired, and who preached the "gospel of work," with no holds barred. Here is a typical-perhaps even slightly restrained!- passage from Carlyle's Past and Present: Blessed is he who has found his work; let him ask no other blessedness. He has a work, a life-purpose; he has found it, and will follow it! ..... Labour is Life: from the inmost heart of the Worker rises his god-given Force, the sacred celestial Life-essence breathed into him by Almighty God; from his inmost heart awakens him to all nobleness,--to all knowledge, 'self-knowledge' and much else......".etc. etc.[4] Even back then, this view of work seemed absurd to some. John Stuart Mill, for instance, rejected the idea that work had intrinsic value. Today, when thanks to ongoing technological revolutions, the prospect of most people living comfortably without having to work too hard should be easier to reach than ever, a more balanced view seems called for. Pure idleness may not be a recipe for happiness. But neither is an obsessive compulsion to put every moment to good use. As the Greeks said, "nothing to excess." [1] Robert Tressell, The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists (London: Grafton, 1987), p. 453. [Cited by Peter Sinnema in Self-Help, (Oxford), p. viii.] [2] E. J. Hobsbawn, The Age of Revolution, 1789-1848 (London: Cardinal, 1989), p. 228. . [Cited by Peter Sinnema in Self-Help, (Oxford), p. viii.] [3] Asa Briggs, Victorian People, (London: Penguin, 1954)p. 145. [4] Thomas Carlyle, Past and Present, New York: Cornell, 1896), p. 246. Tagged Samuel Smiles, Self-Help, Victorian era, work ethic Post navigation The Right to Remember Catspeak Receive 3QD Posts by Email Please fill out the form below to get our email with all the posts from the previous 24 hours, which is sent out a bit after midnight (NY City time) each day. This is completely free of charge for everyone. [ ][ ][ ] Name: [ ] Your email address:* [ ] [click to join]Please wait... Please enter all required fields Click to hide Correct invalid entries Click to hide Coronavirus COVID-19 Info PLEASE CLICK HERE. Search 3QD Search for: [ ] Follow 3QD on Social Media * * * * * What People Say About 3QD [annie-dillard-15] "3 Quarks Daily is a warm and often amusing home for intellectuals and other wags." --Annie Dillard, Pulitzer Prize-winning American writer. [Sean] "3 Quarks Daily is one of the most interesting and thoughtful websites out there." --Sean Carroll, physicist at Caltech, author. [mohsin-hamid] "3 Quarks Daily is one of the most interesting aggregator blogs out there. It puts together stuff from art, science, philosophy, politics, literature. It's a completely international, cosmopolitan place to get information. It's become my entry point to reading on the Web." --Mohsin Hamid, author of Moth Smoke, The Reluctant Fundamentalist, and How to Get Filthy Rich in Rising Asia, in the New York Times. [william-dalrympl] "I'm a big admirer of 3 Quarks Daily!" --William Dalrymple, award winning historian and travel writer, as well as distinguished broadcaster, critic, art historian, foreign correspondent and founder and co-director of Asia's largest literary festival. [smith_360x450_0] "The algorithms that curate your social-media timeline do so with indifference and programmed greed. The humans who curate 3QD do so with love and well-aged wisdom. Read 3QD instead! It's so much better!" --Justin E. H. Smith, Professor of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Paris. [stormer-2] "I really appreciate your selection of generally sane and mostly stimulating articles. 3 Quarks Daily has been my goto website at the end of the day, and now also during the day!" --Horst Ludwig Stormer, Nobel laureate in physics and emeritus professor at Columbia University. [imageedit_2_4672667615] "Thanks for 3 Quarks Daily which has been very high on my reading list for several years now!" --Huw Price, Bertrand Russell Professor of Philosophy and Fellow of Trinity College at the University of Cambridge. He is also co-founder, with Martin Rees and Jaan Tallinn, of a project to establish a Centre for the Study of Existential Risk. [clay-shirky] "I look for relevant research, interesting themes and funny stories on sites like 3 Quarks Daily, Crooked Timber, Boing Boing and Slashdot." --Clay Shirky, prominent thinker on the Internet and its social and economic consequences, and author of Here Comes Everybody, in The Atlantic. [nn-taleb] "It is a great honor to be mentioned in one of my two ONLY portals to the internet--and the world, since I do not read newspapers. My discipline, to avoid drowning in information, is not to cruise the web outside of these two points. I tried many sites; yours has CHARM." --Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of Fooled by Randomness and The Black Swan. [The other site NNT is referring to is the excellent Arts & Letters Daily.] [john-allen-paulo] "I've recommended your site to a number of friends and colleagues who've bemoaned the dearth of sites with any literary/scientific muscularity. Keep up the wonderful work." --John Allen Paulos, Professor of Mathematics at Temple University, and bestselling author of Innumeracy [CookbookAd] [MorganSile] [TFC_AZRA_R] [TimeIsScar] Recent Comments on 3QD * Gabriel Martin Up to a point, I can see where you're coming from. I try to be considerate by making sure to sit on the side of the aircraft I know isn't going to get... What we lose when airlines won't let us look out the windows * Thursday, September 23, 2021 * Emrys Charlie, you're certainly right that books like Self-Help contains and fuels a lot of mythologies, particularly, perhaps, the mythology of... The grandfather of modern self-help * Wednesday, September 22, 2021 * Derek Neal Thanks for the recommendation, Larry. That's quite an interesting split (44/100)! The Rotten Tomatoes Equation * Wednesday, September 22, 2021 * Jochen Szangolies Thanks for commenting, Jeff! Yes, I'm not quite sure I managed to make everything fully coherent, either; but in a way, the lack of coherence---the... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * Jochen Szangolies Thanks, Cristi! Glad you found your way here. I have to admit, I'm not familiar with your take on free will---although I'm sure I at least read your... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * vbscript2 I love looking out the window at landscapes. But, on long-haul flights, I can definitely understand why they'd dim the windows. Maybe you're not... What we lose when airlines won't let us look out the windows * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * Jeff Fox I could not yet find the coherence in the article, I must dig deeper, yet found it very useful. The comments seem to express the many threads of the... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * Charles Frauman I appreciate that you touch on collective action and cooperation. In my home country, where concepts such as these and other concepts like... If we could all be good for just one day....it wouldn't make much difference * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * davod A problem I had with the subtitles is that they were not on the screen long enough. I was always playing catch up. The Intoxicating Radiance of Mr. Sunshine: What Hollywood could learn from a South Korean TV series * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * davod Wasn't that the film that was set in Australia? The Intoxicating Radiance of Mr. Sunshine: What Hollywood could learn from a South Korean TV series * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * davod Maybe, it's a simple as looking down on what they consider to be a lower form of humanity. The Intoxicating Radiance of Mr. Sunshine: What Hollywood could learn from a South Korean TV series * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * Cristi Stoica Nice essay, Jochen! I don't know if you know, but I explored the consistency of libertarian free-will with determinism by "delaying" the initial... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * Larry Franz Last night I watched an historical drama that Rotten Tomatoes indicated was Bad Good (44% from 16 critics, 100% from fewer than 50 members of the... The Rotten Tomatoes Equation * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * Mary Slowik Siciliano Thank you, David, for helping me face the almost unfaceable in this essay with your characteristic tenacity and grace. As much as Robinson, you are... Kim Stanley Robinson's Global Catastrophe Epic: We Will Keep Going * Tuesday, September 21, 2021 * Jochen Szangolies Ah, apologies for overexplaining myself! I wrote the essay in a bit if a hurry, due to spending a fair portion of the past couple of weeks in a tent... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * S Herb As a physics person I agree that physics has little to say about free will, but I am not sure that anything else does either, except as a historical... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * D. L. Pughe This offers a dissenting view from a translator /poet whom I respect, Michael Hofmann.... How Colm Toibin Burrowed Inside Thomas Mann's Head * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Brooks Riley I did realize the aim of your essay, which I tried to articulate in the second sentence of my comment. I really do like that you contested the... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Jochen Szangolies Ultimately, I have to say I agree---the appeal to physics is, really, a kind of conceptual confusion (see my reply to Brooks above). But in a way,... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Jochen Szangolies Thanks for sharing that wonderful quote! Freedom can, indeed, not be conceived simply: any model, any single story we tell about it, is bound to fall... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Jochen Szangolies Thanks for commenting, Brooks, happy you enjoyed my musings! You (and Charlie) are perfectly right that free will is a multifaceted phenomenon where... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * D. L. Pughe I like Toibin and he sounds fascinating in himself which most of this article highlights. I haven't read his book on Mann which Michael Hofmann... How Colm Toibin Burrowed Inside Thomas Mann's Head * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Gabe Eisenstein I've opposed the "nonrevisionary" interpretation of Wittgenstein's writings for several decades. What I find is rather that the... The Roots of Wittgenstein's "Anthropological" Philosophical Perspective * Monday, September 20, 2021 * D. L. Pughe Hurray, I have finally passed the identify the traffic lights correctly and have made it to the comments section. So many of the issues discussed in... The Perpetual Hygiene Regime and the STEMification of the Intellectuals * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Brooks Riley It is indeed a delight, and always pushes the envelope of one's routine thought processes. And thanks for the supportive comment. Coming from a... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Charlie Huenemann I agree with you, Brooks. I am a physics nerd, but I think physics really has nothing helpful to say about free will (or consciousness). The phenomena... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Charlie Huenemann It always gladdens me when someone takes the time to read and remind others of a book that was once a hit but is now forgotten (and for the most part... The grandfather of modern self-help * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Brooks Riley A wonderful quote from a marvelous writer! Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Sally Benzon Even though I skimmed through the essay (and will read it properly later), I'll let Flannery O'Connor speak to this right from the get-go; her voice... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 * Brooks Riley I really enjoyed this essay, Jochen, but I find myself increasingly unhappy that physics and physicists have coopted the notion of free will as... Incoherent Incoherence: Freedom In A Physical World II * Monday, September 20, 2021 3QD Design History and Credits The original site was designed by S. Abbas Raza in 2004 but soon completely redesigned by Mikko Hypponen and deployed by Henrik Rydberg. It was later upgraded extensively by Dan Balis in 2006. The next major revision was designed by S. Abbas Raza, building upon the earlier look, and coded by Dumky de Wilde in 2013. And this current version 5.0 has been designed and deployed by Dumky de Wilde in collaboration with S. Abbas Raza. 3 Quarks Daily 3 Quarks Daily started in 2004 with the idea of creating a curated retreat for everything intellectual on the web. No clickbait, no fake news, not just entertainment, but depth and breadth --something increasingly hard to find on the internet today. If you like what we do, please consider making a donation. * * *