https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-58668534 BBC Homepage * Skip to content * Accessibility Help * Your account * Home * News * Sport * Reel * Worklife * Travel * Future * Culture * MenuMore Search * Home * News * Sport * Reel * Worklife * Travel * Future * Culture * Music * TV * Weather * Sounds Close menu BBC News Menu * Home * Coronavirus * Climate * Video * World * US & Canada * UK * Business * Tech * Science * Stories More * Entertainment & Arts * Health * In Pictures * Reality Check * World News TV * Newsbeat * Long Reads * Tech AI cannot be the inventor of a patent, appeals court rules Published 2 days ago Share close Share page Copy link About sharing Two robot hands gently manipulate an origami paper craneimage source, Getty Images Artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be the inventor of new patents, the UK Court of Appeal has ruled. Patents assign the ownership of a new invention to its creator. At its core, the argument is about whether a law written for human inventors can be applied to machines. The appeal court ruled against Stephen Thaler, creator of a system called Dabus, who took a case against the UK's Intellectual Property Office (IPO) which refused patents to his AI. It is the latest such judgement in a long-running battle to grant machines the status of inventor. Earlier this month, Mr Thaler lost a similar case in the United States - although he has won elsewhere. Mr Thaler filed two patent applications in 2018, one for a type of food container and one for a flashing light. But he did not list himself as the inventor. Instead, he chose to list Dabus, arguing that he should be granted the patent, "by ownership of the creativity machine" - while making clear that Dabus, not he, was the inventor. The IPO told Mr Thaler he needed to list a real person as the inventor - something he did not do, and the IPO decided that the application had been withdrawn. Mr Thaler took the case to the High Court - where he lost - and onward to the Court of Appeal. Machine rights The UK panel decided, by a two-to-one majority, that an inventor must be a real human person under UK law. "Only a person can have rights. A machine cannot," wrote Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing in her judgement. "A patent is a statutory right and it can only be granted to a person." Lord Justice Arnold, agreeing, wrote: "In my judgement it is clear that, upon a systematic interpretation of the 1977 Act, only a person can be an 'inventor'." The third judge, Lord Justice Birss, took a different view. While he agreed that "machines are not persons", he concluded that the law did not demand a person be named as the inventor at all. "The fact that no inventor, properly so-called, can be identified simply means that there is no name which the [IPO] has to mention on the patent as the inventor," he wrote. Instead, the IPO "is is not obliged to name anyone (or anything)." He also signalled that the patent case could have been made simpler if only Mr Thaler "was not such an obsessive". If "instead of calling Dabus the inventor, he named himself... then none of these problems would arise," he wrote. But since Lord Justice Arnold and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing had the majority, the appeal was dismissed. Diego Black from intellectual property law firm, Withers & Rogers, said the decision "is as expected". "The rights to a patent normally belong to the inventor, or their successor in title. However, if a decision were made to allow a machine to be named as inventor, ownership of these rights would be thrown into question," he explained. "It seems inevitable that the current criteria for assessing inventorship will need to be reassessed to take into account the greater role the machine plays in the invention process," he said. But such a change would need careful consideration, he said. Global battle Mr Thaler filed similar applications - and has followed up with legal challenges - in several countries, as part of a bid to gain patent rights for AI. Some academics believe that the law around invention is outdated, and should be changed. The movement has seen mixed success. In July, an Australian court decided that AI systems can be recognised as the inventor for patent purposes - an outcome of one of Mr Thaler's Dabus-related claims. Days earlier, South Africa had issued a similar ruling. But the United States, arguably one of the most significant markets to secure patents in, agrees with the UK judges that only "natural persons" can be inventors. Earlier this month, US District Judge Leonie M Brinkema upheld that ruling, writing: "As technology evolves, there may come a time when artificial intelligence reaches a level of sophistication such that it might satisfy accepted meanings of inventorship. "But that time has not yet arrived, and, if it does, it will be up to Congress to decide how, if at all, it wants to expand the scope of patent law". Related Topics * Artificial intelligence * Inventions More on this story * Calls for an AI to be credited as an inventor Published 1 August 2019 * AI cannot be recognised as an inventor, US rules Published 29 April 2020 Top Stories * Merkel backs 'bridge-builder' for German elections The outgoing leader strongly endorses her party's candidate Armin Laschet in an unusually tight race. Published 5 hours ago * 'EU and UK will have to work together as friends' Video'EU and UK will have to work together as friends' Published 6 hours ago * Chinese tech executive freed by Canada comes home Published 1 hour ago Features * Is another storm brewing in Silicon Valley? Elizabeth Holmes * Whisper it cautiously... progress this week on climate Steam chimneys from a coal-fired power station at Boxberg * The prison staffed by inmates released by the Taliban. VideoThe prison staffed by inmates released by the Taliban inmate * * Attacked by a hyena: My advice for a fellow victim. VideoAttacked by a hyena: My advice for a fellow victim Hyena victim * Ros Atkins On... Germany's election explained. VideoRos Atkins On... Germany's election explained Ros Atkins Clean Graphic * La Palma volcano: Visual guide to what happened Home spared from the lava flow after a volcanic eruption on the Canary Island of La Palma, Spain * Can sustainable fashion turn the red carpet green? Hannah Peel wearing the sustainable Kitty Joseph * Freezing to death on the edge of the EU. VideoFreezing to death on the edge of the EU Migrant * The cupboard-sized flats of Tokyo Woman sitting in tiny Tokyo flat Elsewhere on the BBC * Football phrases 15 sayings from around the world football being kicked on a field - Vauxhall image blurred in the background. Most Read * Chinese tech executive freed by Canada comes home1 * Taliban hang bodies as warning in Afghan city2 * Billie Eilish and Ed Sheeran join 24-hour concert3 * Merkel backs 'bridge-builder' for German elections4 * Music company buys NFT of 'Side-eyeing Chloe' meme5 * Prince accepts being served with US lawsuit papers6 * Airport closed as La Palma volcano intensifies7 * Nike and Costco warn of product shortages and delays8 * La Palma volcano: Visual guide to what happened9 * China frees Canadians after Huawei boss released10 BBC News Services * On your mobile * On smart speakers * Get news alerts * Contact BBC News * Home * News * Sport * Reel * Worklife * Travel * Future * Culture * Music * TV * Weather * Sounds * Terms of Use * About the BBC * Privacy Policy * Cookies * Accessibility Help * Parental Guidance * Contact the BBC * Get Personalised Newsletters * Why you can trust the BBC * Advertise with us * AdChoices / Do Not Sell My Info (c) 2021 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.