https://airbus-seclab.github.io/c-compiler-security/ View on GitHub Getting the maximum of your C compiler, for security Security-related flags and options for C compilers Getting the maximum of your C compiler, for security * GCC TL;DR * Clang TL;DR * Microsoft Visual Studio 2019 TL;DR * References Introduction This guide is intended to help you determine which flags you should use to compile your C Code using GCC, Clang or MSVC, in order to: * detect the maximum number of bugs or potential security problems. * enable security mitigations in the produced binaries. * enable runtime sanitizers to detect errors (overflows, race conditions, etc.) and make fuzzing more efficient. Disclaimer: The flags selected and recommended here were chosen to maximize the number of classes of detected errors which could have a security benefit when enabled. Code generation options (such as -fstack-protector-strong) can also have performance impacts. It is up to you to assess the impact on your code base and choose the right set of command line options. Comments are of course welcome. GCC TL;DR Detailed page Always use the following warnings and flags on the command line: -O2 -Werror -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic -Wformat=2 -Wformat-overflow=2 -Wformat-truncation=2 -Wformat-security -Wnull-dereference -Wstack-protector -Wtrampolines -Walloca -Wvla -Warray-bounds=2 -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 -Wtraditional-conversion -Wshift-overflow=2 -Wcast-qual -Wstringop-overflow=4 -Wconversion -Warith-conversion -Wlogical-op -Wduplicated-cond -Wduplicated-branches -Wformat-signedness -Wshadow -Wstrict-overflow=4 -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wstack-usage=1000000 -Wcast-align=strict -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -fPIE -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,noexecstack -Wl,-z,separate-code On legacy code bases, some of the warnings may produce some false positives. On code where the behavior is intended, pragmas can be used to disable the specific warning locally. Run debug/test builds with sanitizers (in addition to the flags above): AddressSanitizer + UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=pointer-compare -fsanitize=pointer-subtract -fsanitize=leak -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize=bounds-strict -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow export ASAN_OPTIONS=strict_string_checks=1:detect_stack_use_after_return=1:check_initialization_order=1:strict_init_order=1:detect_invalid_pointer_pairs=2 If your program is multi-threaded, run with -fsanitize=thread (incompatible with ASan). Finally, use -fanalyzer to spot potential issues. Clang TL;DR Detailed page First compile with: -O2 -Werror -Walloca -Wcast-qual -Wconversion -Wformat=2 -Wformat-security -Wnull-dereference -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-overflow=3 -Wvla -Warray-bounds -Warray-bounds-pointer-arithmetic -Wassign-enum -Wbad-function-cast -Wconditional-uninitialized -Wconversion -Wfloat-equal -Wformat-type-confusion -Widiomatic-parentheses -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wloop-analysis -Wpointer-arith -Wshift-sign-overflow -Wshorten-64-to-32 -Wswitch-enum -Wtautological-constant-in-range-compare -Wunreachable-code-aggressive -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -fsanitize=safe-stack -fPIE -fstack-clash-protection -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-z,noexecstack -Wl,-z,separate-code On legacy code bases, some of the warnings may produce some false positives. On code where the behavior is intended, pragmas can be used to disable the specific warning locally. Run debug/test builds with sanitizers (in addition to the flags above): AddressSanitizer + UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: -fsanitize=address -fsanitize=leak -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize=bounds-strict -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow -fsanitize=integer -fsanitize-no-recover export ASAN_OPTIONS=strict_string_checks=1:detect_stack_use_after_return=1:check_initialization_order=1:strict_init_order=1:detect_invalid_pointer_pairs=2 If your program is multi-threaded, run with -fsanitize=thread (incompatible with ASan). Finally, use scan-build to spot potential issues. In addition, you can build production code with -fsanitize=integer -fsanitize-minimal-runtime -fsanitize-no-recover to catch integer overflows. Microsoft Visual Studio 2019 TL;DR Detailed page * Compile with /Wall /sdl /guard:cf /guard:ehcont /CETCOMPAT * Use ASan with /fsanitize=address * Analyze your code with /fanalyze Tips * Check https://github.com/pkolbus/compiler-warnings to see which compiler version supports a given flag * Use the Compiler explorer to experiment and check the impact on machine code produced * If you have a doubt about the actual semantics of a flag, check the tests (for Clang, GCC) * Use checksec.py to verify your binaries have mitigations References * For GCC * For Clang * For MSVC * https://github.com/pkolbus/compiler-warnings: GCC/Clang/XCode parsers for warnings definitions. * https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerFlags: ASan runtime options Written by Raphael Rigo and reviewed by Sarah Zennou @ Airbus Security lab, 2021. Contributing Please open an issue if you notice any error, imprecision or have comments or improvements ideas. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Getting the maximum of your C compiler, for security maintained by airbus-seclab Published with GitHub Pages