https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/commentary-and-opinion/julian-assange-peering-through-the-murk/5109400.article Our Privacy Policy has changed. Please click here to read about how we process your data in compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). OK * Skip to main content * Skip to navigation * The Law Society * Find a Solicitor * Gazette Jobs * The Gazette * Law Society Learning * Bookshop * Events * Library search * Insights LSG logo [print_logo] LSG logo LSG logo Mast navigation * Contact us * Advertise with us * Register now * Sign in Search our site Search our site [ ] Search Menu Close menu * Home * News + Back to parent navigation item + News + Recent headlines + Obiter + Brexit + Coronavirus * Analysis + Back to parent navigation item + Analysis + Features + Commentary and opinion + Wellbeing + Feedback + Reviews + Insights * Law + Back to parent navigation item + Law + Personal injury + Private client + Property + Risk and compliance + Law reports + Legal updates + Litigation funding + Practice points * Practice + Back to parent navigation item + Practice + SDT and SRA interventions + Practice management * In-house * People + Back to parent navigation item + People + Profiles + Roundtables + Women in the Law + Lawyer in the news + My legal life + Movers + Deceased * Directories + Back to parent navigation item + Directories + Legal Services Directory + Charity Explorer o Back to parent navigation item o Charity Explorer o Animals and Birds o Arts, culture & sport o Children and youth o Disability support o Education o Environment and heritage o Hospitals and hospices o Medical relief and research o Older people o Overseas aid and development o Social welfare o Trades and professions * Careers counsellor * Jobs * Home * News + o Recent headlines o Obiter o Brexit o Coronavirus + Blurred passers-by walk in front of the London City skyline Top-50 financial results table: updated live + I. Stephanie Boyce Setting the standards for lawtech + Robert Buckland News focus: Judicial Review and Courts Bill - bigger reforms on the horizon? * Analysis + o Features o Commentary and opinion o Wellbeing o Feedback o Reviews o Insights + HM Revenue & Customs Taxing partners + Multiple-choice-exam Testing times + Tired doctor Battle fatigue * Law + o Personal injury o Private client o Property o Risk and compliance o Law reports o Legal updates o Litigation funding o Practice points + Home Office Right-to-work regime + Covid contracts 'Breathing space' on contractual disputes + Police station Police station advice: on a slippery slope * Practice + o SDT and SRA interventions o Practice management + HM Revenue & Customs Data page - July 2021 + Rishi Sunak A shared lexicon to promote progress + Ian Madej Maturity and mergers * In-house + EY GCs fear workload crisis, global survey finds + A business woman laughs with colleagues in a meeting Getting your secondment right first time + Anonymous business woman looks out on the City Wooing GCs in a shrinking market + Handshakenew Slashed budgets put junior lawyers in frame for GC posts * People + o Profiles o Roundtables o Women in the Law o Lawyer in the news o My legal life o Movers o Deceased + Michael-Burke Lawyer in the news: Michael Burke, PGMBM + Rachel-O'Connor My legal life: Rachel O'Connor, Michelmores + TONY_STOCKDALE_metamorph Strength in numbers * Directories + o Legal Services Directory + o Charity Explorer # Animals and Birds # Arts, culture & sport # Children and youth # Disability support # Education # Environment and heritage # Hospitals and hospices # Medical relief and research + o # Older people # Overseas aid and development # Social welfare # Trades and professions * Careers counsellor * Jobs * More navigation items Commentary and opinion Julian Assange: peering through the murk By Joshua Rozenberg2 August 2021 * * * * * * 2 Comments * If Julian Assange is extradited to the United States and convicted of any of the charges he faces there - such as unauthorised obtaining of national defence information - the US government will let him serve his sentence in an Australian prison. Julian-Assange-May-2019 Julian Assange The US has also agreed that, as things stand, the Wikileaks founder will not be held at the administrative maximum security prison near Florence, Colorado, known as ADX. Nor will he be subject to special administrative measures designed to prevent the disclosure of classified information - such as limits on correspondence, visits and telephone calls. But if, as Swift has held, the US has raised 'arguable issues that should be considered at a final hearing', lawyers with clients currently facing extradition to the US need to know - now - precisely what these are This could be a game-changer. An application by the US government for Assange's extradition was dismissed in January because a court in London had found it would be oppressive to extradite him to a country where he might face these restrictions. District Judge Baraitser was persuaded that if he was subjected to the 'extreme conditions' of special administrative measures, 'Assange's mental health will deteriorate to the point where he will commit suicide'. But Assange remains in prison. The district judge refused him bail after the US government said it would seek to appeal to the High Court against her decision. And on 5 July Mr Justice Swift granted the US permission on three of the five grounds set out in its application for permission to appeal. What were those? This is where the story becomes murky. The judge's two-page order, which has not been published but is readily available from the court, explains briefly why he refused the US permission to appeal on grounds 3 and 4. It says nothing about Swift's reasons for granting permission on grounds 1, 2 and 5. That's not a problem as far as the parties are concerned: they know what the grounds of appeal were. And when the appeal is heard - this autumn or next year - we shall find out too. But if, as Swift has held, the US has raised 'arguable issues that should be considered at a final hearing', lawyers with clients currently facing extradition to the US need to know - now - precisely what these are. Foreign governments seeking extradition are represented by the Crown Prosecution Service. I asked the CPS for a copy of the application they had filed for permission to appeal. They refused to let me see it. Instead, they suggested I asked the High Court. The court told me I needed to make a written application to the judge and pay a fee of PS255. I was not willing to do so - it raises concerns about access to justice data that were the subject of an important report by the Legal Education Foundation last month - and I have not been able to get hold of a copy in any other way. After further requests, the CPS agreed to send me an informal briefing note that had been supplied to other journalists shortly after Swift's ruling. This note, which includes a minor inaccuracy, is the source of all media reports and legal commentaries on the judge's ruling. The first arguable ground, according to this note, was that Baraitser had made errors of law in applying the test under section 91 of the Extradition Act 2003. This says that if the physical or mental condition of a suspect 'is such that it would be unjust or oppressive to extradite him', the judge must either order his or her discharge or adjourn the hearing until he or she is better. We don't know what Baraitser's alleged errors were. The second arguable ground is that, having decided that the threshold for discharge was met, Baraitser should have notified the requesting state of her provisional view and given the US a chance to offer assurances. The third arguable ground - ground 5 - was that the US has now provided the UK with the assurances I summarised earlier. The two grounds on which permission was refused related to the evidence of a defence psychiatrist and the risk of suicide. Swift said that Baraitser's findings were reasonably open to her and her conclusions on the disputed evidence were also reasonable. The matters referred to in the application for permission to appeal - we have no idea what these were - 'are no more than an attempt to re-run determination of the evidential disputes reached by the district judge'. Nick Vamos, an extradition partner at Peters & Peters, said the apparent willingness of the US authorities to provide specific assurances - which they have resisted in the past - may signify the importance they place on this case. Alternatively, it may 'simply be the US bowing pragmatically to the inevitability that bespoke assurances are now an indispensable part of many extradition proceedings'. But it's the details that matter: would Assange have to remain in the US pending any appeal, for example? It may be some months before we find out. joshua@rozenberg.net Topics * Columnist * Comment * * * * * * 2 Comments * Related articles * stock id 170155602 Opinion No room on the press bench 2021-08-04T10:35:00Z Open justice is suffering from some Covid side-effects. * David-Greene-2020 Opinion Guideline hourly rates: an assessment 2021-08-03T09:17:00Z A member of the last costs committee to propose new guideline hourly rates, which were rejected, assesses the Civil Justice Council's final report. * Tim-Kiely Opinion Welcome to the punishment show 2021-07-28T09:10:00Z Government talk of 'chain gangs' is a new low in criminal justice. Load more articles Premier job [IOPCpremjo] Search jobs by keyword [ ] Find jobs Browse over 3,200 law jobs. Get jobs by email. 2 Readers' comments You're not signed in. Only registered users can comment on this article. Sign in Register More Commentary and opinion * Paul rogerson Opinion The future's orange 2 August 2021 'Cutbacks are being made across the criminal justice system, with a massive shortfall in the court service budget and prison reform groups saying efficiency savings are crippling attempts at rehabilitation.' * Kings College students sitting exam Opinion Best of the blogs - 31 July 2021 2021-07-31T05:20:00Z Missed our blogs this week? Here's our top five... * Eduardo Reyes Opinion A levels and training contracts - don't ask, don't tell 2021-07-30T07:52:00Z I'm waiting for A level results. 10 August. Not mine, of course, but my eldest daughter's - but as well as wanting the best for her, it's brought back that clear sense I had of everything in my future riding on results day. Load more articles Partnership The Law Society is the independent professional body for solicitors. We represent and support our members, promoting the highest professional standards and the rule of law. Find out more about the benefits of membershipFind out more about the Law Society Recommended services Law Society Learning Designed to give members efficient, easy access to high quality courses. Bookshop Law Society Publishing titles, e-books and selected key works from other legal publishers. Events We organise a wide range of webinars, seminars, conferences and networking event for our members. Online library It brings you quick, access to the library catalogue and value added legal information sources. * Recent issues * A-Z contributors * Submit a move * Write for us * Permission enquiries * Privacy and Cookies * Site terms * Contact us * Advertise with us * Print subscription Copyright (c) 2021 The Law Society Site powered by Webvision Cloud