https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2020/10/cost-new-way-message-instagram Skip to main content * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities + EFF 30th Anniversary * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate [summer-sit]Greetings from the Internet [summer-sit] Electronic Frontier Foundation * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities + EFF 30th Anniversary * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] The Cost of the "New Way to Message on Instagram" DEEPLINKS BLOG By Andres Arrieta November 2, 2020 [facebook-r] The Cost of the "New Way to Message on Instagram" Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link [facebook-realnames] * Espanol If you are on Instagram, you have been probably bombarded by Instagram Stories and notifications about new features like emojis, chat themes, selfie stickers, and "cross-platform messaging" that will allow you to exchange direct messages with, and search for, friends who are on Facebook. But the insistent messages to "Update Messaging" minimize the extent of this change, which will blur the lines between the two apps in ways that might unpleasantly surprise users. 1_instagram_fb_changecolor.png Image of Instagram Notification of "Change Color" funcition in new messenger 1_instagram_fb_express.png Image of Instagram Notification of "Express with Stickers" funcition in new messenger 1_instagram_fB_react.png Image of Instagram Notification of "React with emojis" funcition in new messenger Images of notification promoting new features when updating the Messaging in Instagram Even worse, if you choose to accept the update, you won't be able to go back. Reading the fine print at the bottom raises questions about whether this is a mere update or an entirely new messaging system. "When you update, the old version won't be available." 2_instagram_fb_new_way.jpg Image of Instagram Notification to update messenger Images of notification promoting new features with fine print at the bottom "When you update, the old version won't be available." The "old version" Facebook refers to is simply the Instagram Direct messaging app. And the "new version" is a new messaging system that links Instagram and Facebook. To put it simply, you now have " Instagram Messenger." After the "update," you have in essence Facebook Messenger inside of Instagram. Competition Facebook announced their intention to merge Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct, and WhatsApp in March 2019. The announcement promised new privacy and security features across the board, including end-to-end encryption, ephemeral messages, and reduced data retention. End-to-end encryption beyond WhatsApp hasn't arrived yet, but cross-platform messaging between Messenger and Instagram is clearly one step in this grand plan. And its execution seems to be in step with Facebook's custom of minimizing the extent--and invasiveness--of a business move in order to get users to click "ok." When Facebook acquired WhatsApp in 2014, antitrust enforcers already had concerns about what this meant for consumers. WhatsApp users had made the choice to use a service outside of Facebook, and many were concerned that this was not only an attempt to acquire the users' data and crush competitors, but also to eventually merge WhatsApp into Facebook's ecosystem. Facebook made promises to keep the two services operating separately, and Facebook broke those promises just two years later, with similarly unclear notice to users. Facebook's acquisition of Instagram in 2012 came the same story, concerns, and failure from enforcers to properly evaluate the acquisition. Now, this latest update represents another step towards merging Instagram into Facebook, and making it harder to distinguish one from the other. It's not a coincidence that the "updated" version of the Instagram messaging app does not use the Instagram logo or a new one, but the Facebook Messenger logo. In the initial 2019 announcement on merging the three messaging apps, Facebook called it a step toward "interoperability, saying, "We want to give people a choice so they can reach their friends across these networks from whichever app they prefer." But communicating across services owned and operated by a single company isn't interoperability. If anything, Facebook isn't trying to make its messengers interoperable; it's trying to make them indistinguishable to regulators with competition and data-sharing concerns and to users. And, if this Instagram update is any indication, users are not getting the opportunity to make a clear, informed choice. Choice Tech companies like Facebook have mastered the art of distorting choice and consent. Here, you have the choice to change to the new messaging system-- but you don't have the choice to go back to the previous Instagram non-linked version. More importantly, hiding this detail in the fine print makes it an unclear choice to users who are surrounded by notifications, pings, and banners pressuring them into the change. Not forgetting that Facebook's policy means that this change will eventually link to your real name. This is not an update, but a new messaging system from which you can't switch back. There is nothing especially innovative about having colors in chats, or new emojis. Facebook could have added these to the Instagram Direct messaging app without bringing Facebook Messenger cross-platform functionality along with it. These are simply features presented to artificially devalue one of the systems, distract from the real changes, and manipulate users into changing to a different system. This is not an "update," but a forced change to blur the lines between Facebook-owned apps. Related Issues Competition Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Join EFF Lists Join Our Newsletter! Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Related Updates [big-tech-lines-1] Deeplinks Blog by Mitch Stoltz | June 29, 2021 Setbacks in the FTC's Antitrust Suit Against Facebook Show Why We Need the ACCESS Act After a marathon markup last week, a number of bills targeting Big Tech's size and power, including the critical ACCESS Act, were passed out of committee and now await a vote by the entire House of Representatives. This week, decisions by a federal court tossing out both the Federal... An image of a house receiving fast, reliable internet from underground fiber cables. Deeplinks Blog by Ernesto Falcon | June 29, 2021 A Wide, Diverse Coalition Agrees on What Congress Needs to Do About Our Broadband A massive number of groups representing interests as diverse as education, agriculture, tech sector, public and private broadband providers, low-income advocacy, workers, and urban and rural community economic development entities came together to ask Congress to be bold in its infrastructure plan. They are asking Congress to tackle the digital... Competition Deeplinks Blog by Katharine Trendacosta | June 22, 2021 Congress Wants to Put the Brakes on Runaway Acquisitions by Big Tech The Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives recently released a comprehensive series of bills designed to curb the excesses of Big Tech. One of them, the Platform Competition and Opportunity Act, addresses one of the biggest, most obvious problems among the largest tech companies: that they use... An image symbolizing the principle of interoperability. Deeplinks Blog by Bennett Cyphers, Cory Doctorow | June 21, 2021 The New ACCESS Act Is a Good Start. Here's How to Make Sure It Delivers. We've praised the ACCESS Act as "a step towards a more interoperable future." However, the bill currently before Congress is just a first step, and it's far from perfect. While we strongly agree with the authors' intent, some important changes would make sure that the ACCESS Act delivers on its... purple background with diagram of technologies working together Deeplinks Blog by Katharine Trendacosta, Bennett Cyphers, Cory Doctorow, Cindy Cohn | June 11, 2021 The ACCESS ACT Takes a Step Towards a More Interoperable Future When it comes to online services, there are a few very large companies whose gravitational effects can alter the entire tech universe. Their size, power, and diverse levers of control mean that there is no single solution that will put right that which they've thrown out of balance. One thing... An image of a house receiving fast, reliable internet from underground fiber cables. Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley | June 11, 2021 1000 Californians Have Asked Their Representatives To Fix Our Broken Broadband System. Have You? The California legislature has been handed what might be their easiest job this year, and they are refusing to do it. Californians far and wide have spent the pandemic either tethered to their high-speed broadband connections (if they're lucky), or desperately trying to find ways to make their internet... [california-state] Deeplinks Blog by Ernesto Falcon | June 3, 2021 California Has $7 Billion for Broadband. Sacramento May Just Sit On It It's hard to believe that when Governor Newsom identifies a total of $7 billion for California's legislature to spend on broadband access--coming from a mix of state surplus dollars and federal rescue money to invest in broadband infrastructure-- that the legislature would do nothing. An image of a house receiving fast, reliable internet from underground fiber cables. Deeplinks Blog by Ernesto Falcon | May 14, 2021 Governor Newsom's Budget Proposes Historic Investment in Public Fiber Broadband This morning, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced his plans for the state's multi-billion dollar surplus and federal recovery dollars, including a massive, welcome $7 billion investment in public broadband infrastructure. It's a plan that would give California one of the largest public broadband fiber networks in the country. The... Spying eye with Chrome logo, blinking Deeplinks Blog by Cory Doctorow | April 21, 2021 Fighting FLoC and Fighting Monopoly Are Fully Compatible Are tech giants really damned if they do and damned if they don't (protect our privacy)?That's a damned good question that's been occasioned by Google's announcement that they're killing the invasive, tracking third-party cookie (yay!) and replacing it with FLoC, an alternative tracking scheme that will... An image of a house receiving fast, reliable internet from underground fiber cables. Deeplinks Blog by Ernesto Falcon | April 14, 2021 Congress, Don't Let ISP Lobbyists Sabotage Fiber for All For the first time an American president has proposed a plan that wouldn't just make a dent in the digital divide, it will end it. By deploying federal resources at the level and scale this country has not seen since electrification nearly 100 years ago, the U.S. will again connect... Join Our Newsletter! Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Related Issues Competition Back to top EFF Home Follow EFF: * twitter * facebook * instagram * youtube * flicker * rss Contact * General * Legal * Security * Membership * Press About * Calendar * Volunteer * Victories * History * Internships * Jobs * Staff * Diversity & Inclusion Issues * Free Speech * Privacy * Creativity & Innovation * Transparency * International * Security Updates * Blog * Press Releases * Events * Legal Cases * Whitepapers * EFFector Newsletter Press * Press Contact Donate * Join or Renew Membership Online * One-Time Donation Online * Shop * Other Ways to Give * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks JavaScript license information *