https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/28/google_amp_core_web_vitals/ The Register(r) -- Biting the hand that feeds IT search [ ] # # Sign in Off-Prem All Off-PremEdge + IoTChannelPaaS + IaaSSaaS (X) On-Prem All On-PremServersStorageNetworksHPCPersonal Tech (X) Software All SoftwareAI + MLApplicationsDatabasesDevOpsOSesVirtualization (X) SecurityOffbeat All OffbeatDebatesColumnistsScienceGeek's GuideBOFHLegalBootnotesSite NewsAbout Us (X) Vendor Voice AdobeAmazon Web Services (AWS)Google CloudGoogle Cloud's Apigee NutanixRapid7Red hatSophosVeeamVirtru (X) # # # [front] Software Good news: Google no longer requires publishers to use the AMP format. Bad news: What replaces it might be worse Introducing 'Core Web Vitals' Scott Gilbertson Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 10:01 UTC Share reddit Twitter Facebook linkedin WhatsApp email [https://www.theregis] Copy 22 comment bubble on white --------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 comment bubble on white # reddit Twitter Facebook linkedin WhatsApp email [https://www.theregis] Copy Feature Google stopped prioritising Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) format in its Top News carousel last month. This means website owners no longer need to publish an extra set of pages written in the AMP format. Instead sites need to meet what Google calls "Core Web Vitals." This sounds like great news. As a long-time critic of Google AMP, I wish I could say that Google AMP is over and done with, but I'm not convinced. As I wrote years ago when it launched, Google's AMP is bad - bad in a potentially web-destroying way. It's bad for how the web is built, it's bad for publishers of credible online content, and it's bad for consumers of that content. Google AMP is only good for one party: Google. is Google or AMP "evil"? I don't know. It doesn't matter. The people behind AMP might have had good intentions, they might not have. Google does not have to be "evil" for it to do things that harm the open web... Unfortunately, the same can be said of Core Web Vitals. And make no mistake, AMP format pages did not just disappear from the web. It's great that AMP is no longer required to get in Google's coveted Top News carousel, but that doesn't mean AMP is gone. [front] Requiring publishers to use the AMP format for news is a moot point. All of the major purveyors of news already use AMP. Google doesn't need to require AMP because there's no one left to force into using it. Rolling back the AMP requirement isn't a sign of victory for the open web, it's a sign of defeat. [front] [front] The other problem is that if you were a publisher interested in dropping support for AMP, Google News isn't the only game to consider. AMP links are widely used throughout other Google services, including Gmail, Google Images, and Google Search. Even though it's no longer required for Google News, around a month after Google's ranking changes took effect, almost every story currently in the Google News carousel is still using AMP. [front] All of which is to say that Google AMP was forced on publishers and, given no choice, publishers embraced it - so don't expect it to go away now just because it's no longer required. Big media publishers are slow to adopt and even slower to abandon. Unfortunately, I don't expect AMP links to disappear any time soon. You can always do the web a favour by installing a browser plugin to toss out the AMP URL and give you the link to the actual URL (I like this one). It's a pain, but if we want to keep the web as AMP-free as possible, we're all going to have to do a little work. What's all the fuss? Before I get into why AMP's replacement might be worse, it would help to back up and define what AMP is, because things have changed since it launched. AMP is now an open-source web component framework developed by the AMP Open Source Project. See Google anywhere in that sentence? No, no you don't. Google has distanced itself from AMP considerably over the years, but it hasn't given up control. Google AMP began with the stated goal of speeding up the web. The logic behind AMP goes like this: web developers suck at making fast websites, let's strip out all the stuff people don't need and cache it on our super-fast servers. That sounds good. It's not hard to see how well-meaning people would get behind that idea. The problem is that being fast isn't what makes the web great. It's part of it, but it's not the most important part. Another common defence of AMP you'll hear is that it's open source. This is true, but also a non sequitur. There is nothing inherently good about something being open source. As web developer Ferdy Christant put it back in 2018, the open source defence "isn't just a weak defense, it's no defense at all. I can open-source a plan for genocide. The term 'open source' is meaningless if the thing that is open source is harmful." Quite. [front] Since we've now invoked something akin to Godwin's Law, let's pause for a moment to address the question, is Google or AMP "evil"? I don't know. It doesn't matter. The people behind AMP might have had good intentions, they might not have. Google does not have to be "evil" for it to do things that harm the open web. * Google to revive RSS support in Chrome for Android * Google AMP gets a shock to its system as advisor quits, lawsuit claims foul play * Brave takes brave stand against Google's plan to turn websites into ad-blocker-thwarting Web Bundles * Google isn't even trying to not be creepy: 'Continuous Match Mode' in Assistant will listen to everything until it's disabled Regardless of motivation, the fact remains that the AMP developers produced something that is bad for the open web ecosystem because it destroys three sacrosanct elements of the web: the URL, the open web standard of HTML, and the decentralisation of the web. The URL is destroyed because when you visit an AMP page you visit a cached URL. Share that URL and the people who visit it will also visit the Google cache, not the publisher's URL. There is no web when that happens. There is just traffic coming to Google, which is good for... Google. To my mind this the biggest problem with AMP. The URL is the web. Literally. Without the URL you have nothing. AMP doesn't stop there; it also strips out all kinds of perfect valid, approved-by-standards-bodies HTML. Programmers hate HTML. It's messy, vague, imprecise, and user agents must deal with that, which is a huge pain for programmers. It's a valid criticism in many ways, but it also misses the fact that these are exactly the qualities that have enabled millions of people to use HTML. It's messy, vague, imprecise, and perfect for creating the web. What's more, it is developed very slowly, by many people, representing many points of view, many needs. AMP is a set of programming guidelines shoved down your throat by Google. The third problem with AMP is that it disrupts the web's decentralised design. This is really an outgrowth of the two things, but important in its own right when we start considering Google AMP's ostensible replacement, "Core Web Vitals." Decentralisation means that no one entity controls web content. With AMP, Google gets total control of the content. Google hosts it, and Google alone knows who visits it. The final point is either ironic or, if you lean towards conspiracy, proof that Google knows exactly what it's doing here - namely, locking up content where Google can control it and mine users for data. Are you ready for it? Google AMP pages aren't any faster than regular HTML pages. Worse, they're often slower. Nope, not kidding. When AMP pages are faster, it's because Google is pre-loading them, which Google could do for any page on the web. Still, getting a spot in the Top News carousel of Google News is a powerful carrot, and it worked. Nearly every major publisher on the web (including this one) publishes AMP versions of their pages. Now AMP is no longer required of publishers, those of us shouting about how this is bad can just shut up now, right? Unfortunately, there are problems with AMP's replacement as well. And those problems go right back to what was wrong with AMP in the first place: Google is in charge of it. As web developer Ethan Marcotte points out: "While the shift to Core Web Vitals is a step in the right direction, it also means that Google alone determines what a 'great page experience' means." Currently it means your page should mostly load in 2.5 seconds. That's not a very high bar to be honest, but it is still a bar and the web does not do bars. Worse, that requirement might change tomorrow. Marcotte makes it clear that he thinks deprioritising AMP in favour of Core Web Vitals is a very good thing, but I'm not so sure that's true. Neither, it seems, is Marcotte, who goes on to note that Google has "taken its proprietary document format, and swapped it out for a proprietary set of performance statistics that has even less external oversight." It's all about control In the end AMP and Core Web Vitals boil down to a very simple reality: Google is again using its dominance in the search business to force everyone to play on its terms. Whether that's a proprietary markup language or some arbitrary set of performance standards, the end result is the same. Google is a monopoly and it is using its monopoly position to force the rest of the web into doing what it wants. Google AMP and its successor are classic examples that could have been pulled from another monopoly's playbook: embrace, extend, and extinguish. The difference is that Google is being much more clever about how it extinguishes things than Microsoft ever was. Google embraced HTML, then extended it with AMP and now, in claiming to have extinguished AMP, it gets the control it wants without the bad press. The slight twist in the extinguish move is a nice touch, Google. Well played. I've said it before, I'll say it again. The power of the web lies in its decentralisation, it lies with its messiness, it lies with its edge nodes - that is, with you and me. We rejected AMP, it may be fading, but we need to keep rejecting. If we reject Core Web Vitals, it too will die. (r) Get our Tech Resources #Share reddit Twitter Facebook linkedin WhatsApp email [https://www.theregis] Copy 22 Comments Similar topics * MORE * Google Corrections Send us news --------------------------------------------------------------------- [front] Other stories you might like * Yes, 5G means faster downloads to your phone - but that's just the beginning Find out what 5G really means for your business with this video Q &A between ZTE's Zhang Jianpeng and El Reg's Simon Sharwood David Gordon Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 22:30 UTC Sponsored For the past 18 months of lockdown, 5G may well have made your life a little easier, allowing you to stream games and movies using its generous bandwidth. However, this is just scratching the surface of what 5G technology means for our work and private lives. 5G is much more than just another cellular network technology. It offers more bandwidth than previous wireless technologies plus it has lower latency and is ideal for massive Machine Type Communications. Combine all this with other world-changing technologies, from AI and autonomous vehicles to high-resolution imaging and, inevitably, the cloud, and you open up some amazing possibilities. How amazing? To get a deep insight into how 5G is fundamentally changing business and industry, and society at large, you should check out the video Q&A, embedded below, between ZTE Corporation senior vice president Zhang Jianpeng and The Register's Asia-Pacific editor Simon Sharwood. Continue reading * Watch the moment China's Zhurong rover landed on Mars, hear it truckin' for the first time Chinese space agency emits footage of Red Planet rover Katyanna Quach Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 21:49 UTC comment bubble on black Videos The China National Space Administration has released videos and pictures of its first Mars rover scooting around on the surface of the Red Planet. Plonking a robot in one piece on Mars is no easy feat. China is only the second Earth nation to successfully pull it off after the United States. The Middle Kingdom's Zhurong rover separated from its mothership Tianwen-1 and landed last month. Continue reading * Microsoft approved a Windows driver booby-trapped with rootkit malware Redmond's legendary QA strikes again Thomas Claburn in San Francisco Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 20:10 UTC 4 comment bubble on white Microsoft on Friday admitted it had signed malicious third-party driver code submitted for certification through its Windows Hardware Compatibility Program. According to Microsoft, the miscreant behind the subverted driver was focused on computer game players in China, and is not the sort of nation-state-backed group that has been giving Microsoft and its enterprise customers headaches over the past few months. The rootkit-grade software, once installed on a Windows PC, could be used to circumvent region-based restrictions in games and/or snoop on players to steal their account login credentials as they typed them in. It might be that the person behind the booby-trapped driver intended to distribute the software as a tool for bypassing location checks that also secretly spied on gamers. Continue reading * See what's on the slab: Apple reportedly mulls stretching the iPad Pro to 14 and 16 inches Possible west coast/east coast beef brewing over deliberate misinterpretation of 'Big Apple' Matthew Hughes Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 19:15 UTC 7 comment bubble on white Apple may be considering increasing the size of the iPad Pro's display, with potential stretches including 14-inch and 16-inch versions, according to reports. The rumblings have come from Bloomberg sources claiming to be privy to Apple's engineering plans. If Apple opts to bring the device beyond the proof-of-concept phase, the chatty people noted it would be several years before it hits shelves. Continue reading * Forget about Venus - Jupiter's clouds are much more friendly to alien life, say astroboffins Gas giant's atmosphere has the right concentration of water and temperature Tim Richardson Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 18:31 UTC 1 comment bubble on white Astroboffins from Queen's University Belfast reckon the clouds that swirl around Jupiter might contain enough water to support life. That's just one of the conclusions of a study published in Nature Astronomy which looked at the concentrations of water in planetary clouds. They found that it isn't the quantity of water that matters for making life viable, but the effective concentration of water molecules - known as "water activity". Continue reading * NASA's InSight lander expected to survive most of summer before choking to death on Martian dust Why can't Ingenuity use its blades to clear panels? It's 2,145 miles away Richard Speed Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 16:55 UTC 11 comment bubble on white Amid reports of declining power levels, NASA's InSight lander looks set to keep its science instruments running for most of summer. InSight has been on Mars since 2018 and far surpassed its original mission duration. However, despite the probe's longevity, its lifespan is dictated by the twin masters of funding and power. The former is set to run until the end of 2022 as part of a two-year mission extension. The latter, however, is proving a challenge as dust accumulates on the lander's solar panels. Continue reading * UK's competition watchdog preps to shoulder post-Brexit workload from European Commission Apparently Eastenders' Phil Mitchell is in charge these days - it sounds fighty Tim Richardson Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 16:19 UTC 14 comment bubble on white The head of the UK's competition regulator said the body planned to "come down like a ton of bricks" on anyone attempting to stifle the country's economic recovery. Jonathan Scott, chair of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), said the nation was now ready to "step up and fulfil the regulatory role previously held by the European Commission." Addressing the Law Society last week, Scott said: "Now we are out of the Transition Period, we are carrying responsibility for the biggest and most complex competition and merger investigations which previously would have been the exclusive preserve of the European Commission. Continue reading * Apple warns kit may interfere with implanted medical devices at close proximity It just works, until it unexpectedly and disastrously doesn't Matthew Hughes Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 15:53 UTC 23 comment bubble on white If you have a pacemaker, it's probably not a good idea to hug your Apple kit. The company has warned about potential interference with implanted medical devices from virtually every product it sells. Over the weekend, Apple published an updated list of devices that may interfere with potentially life-saving healthcare equipment, including implanted pacemakers and defibrillators. The list includes virtually every product containing a magnet or radio, ranging from the AirPods and the HomePod smart speaker, to the MacBook Pro and Mac Mini. Continue reading * Developing for Windows 11: Like developing for Windows 10, but with rounded corners? Windows App SDK, Android, Arm64, micro-interactions, and two new fonts Tim Anderson Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 15:17 UTC 17 comment bubble on white Microsoft has been hyping the versatility of Windows 11 for developers, from Android to Linux to Progressive Web Applications and the new Win UI 3, though much of what it showed last week also applies to Windows 10. Kevin Gallo, Developer Platform Corporate VP, said last week that "Windows 11 is for all developers." That is a pitch not for Windows 11 as a platform for deploying applications, but rather as a platform for building applications that are deployed elsewhere, such as web applications running on Linux, and mobile apps for Android and iOS. Continue reading * No BS*: BT is hooking up with OneWeb to tackle UK notspots It's like an animal farm / That's the rural charm in the country Tim Richardson Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 14:31 UTC 12 comment bubble on white BT is looking to the heavens to help connect homes and businesses in the UK's rural areas to the internet - inking a deal with none other than partly state-owned OneWeb, the telco has confirmed. It has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the UK satellite outfit to explore ways that hard-to-reach premises in the UK - still in the digital slow lane - might be able to get a decent service. The tie-up is very much in the early stages, although something could be ready for scrutiny by the end of the year. Continue reading * Serco bags PS322m contract extension for Test and Trace, is still struggling to share data with local authorities Look who's having a good pandemic Lindsay Clark Mon 28 Jun 2021 // 13:47 UTC 7 comment bubble on white Serco has been awarded a PS322m contract to continue its work on the COVID-19 Test and Trace system in England and Northern Ireland. In an announcement to the markets today, the outsourcing giant said the new contract had been awarded after a competitive process run by the Department for Health and Social Care and the Crown Commercial Service. It runs for 12 months, with an option to extend for a further six months. The actual contract value could differ from the stated PS322m, as it would be "matching services to the demand for testing over the coming months." Serco was part of a gang of consultants and outsourcers who helped build the test and trace system for the government's COVID-19 response. Continue reading ABOUT US* * Who we are * Under the hood * Contact us * Advertise with us MORE CONTENT* * Latest News * Popular Stories * Forums * Whitepapers * Webinars SITUATION PUBLISHING* * The Next Platform * DevClass * Blocks and Files * Continuous Lifecycle London * M-cubed Situation Publishing The Register - Independent news and views for the tech community. Part of Situation Publishing SIGN UP TO OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER Subscribe Twitter Facebook LinkedIn feeds no-js Biting the hand that feeds IT (c) 1998-2021 Do not sell my personal information Cookies Privacy Ts&Cs