https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2021/05/14/anal-oxygen-administration-may-save-lives Skip to content * Menu * Weekly edition * Search Subscribe Sign in * Featured + Coronavirus + The Biden presidency + Climate change + Brexit + Daily briefing + The World in 2021 + 1843 magazine * Sections + The world this week + Leaders + Letters + Briefing + United States + The Americas + Asia + China + Middle East & Africa + Europe + Britain + International + Business + Finance & economics + Science & technology + Books & arts + Graphic detail + Obituary + Special reports + Technology Quarterly + Essay + By Invitation + Schools brief + The World If + Open Future + Prospero + The Economist Explains * More + Newsletters + Podcasts + Video + Subscriber events + iOS app + Android app + Executive courses * Manage my account * Sign out Search [ ] [20210515_stp506] Medical ventilation Anal oxygen administration may save lives Inspired by fish, researchers are planning oxygen enemas Science & technology --------------------------------------------------------------------- May 14th 2021 * * * * FISH BREATHE through their gills. That much is well-known. But some fish are also able to breathe through their bottoms. The guts of vertebrates are well supplied with blood vessels, to enable them to absorb digested food. But this means they can also, in principle, absorb oxygen. And that is precisely what happens in species such as the weather loach (pictured). As far as is known, no land vertebrate can perform this trick. But, in a paper just published in Cell, Takebe Takanori of the Cincinnati Children's Hospital, in Ohio, describes how terrestrial animals might, with a bit of assistance, be enabled to so. So far, Dr Takabe and his colleagues have turned mice, rats and pigs into bottom breathers. If they can extend the trick to people, it could offer an alternative to tracheal intubation as a means of keeping those with breathing difficulties alive. The notion that intestinal oxygen might be medically beneficial surfaced briefly in the mid-20th century, though experimental evidence swiftly crushed it. But Dr Takebe observed that the experiments in question had failed to consider a crucial fact. Mammalian rectums are lined with layers of mucous which could limit the exchange of gases. To test the intestinal breathing hypothesis properly, this mucous would need to be removed, to grant oxygen direct access to the intestinal wall. To begin with, Dr Takebe and his colleagues tried this with mice. After anaesthetising their subjects, they scraped away the mucous linings using toothpicks. They then fitted the animals with masks, to restrict their air supply, and pumped oxygen into their intestines. Control mice, masked but not so perfused, survived for less than a quarter of an hour. Those receiving rectal oxygen lasted 50 minutes. Buoyed by these results, the team sought a less traumatic means of delivering the gas. They settled on liquid perfluorocarbons, which can absorb large amounts of oxygen and are often used as a blood substitute or to assist the ventilation of premature babies. The quantity of oxygen carried by such liquids, combined with the extra pressure they applied to the intestinal lining, meant scraping away the mucous was no longer necessary. After administering oxygenated perfluorocarbon enemas to anaesthetised mice with intact rectal linings, the researchers put them in chambers with a restricted oxygen supply, to see what would happen. They found that mice dosed with perfluorocarbons retained high levels of oxygen in their blood for over an hour--more than four times longer than control animals not so treated. What is more, says Dr Takebe, the rodents' subsequent behaviour did not seem to be affected by the time they had spent in low-oxygen conditions. Following the success of these experiments, the researchers moved on to rats and pigs, and found that the technique worked with them, too. In light of this Dr Takebe hopes to start trials on healthy human volunteers next year. Though Dr Takebe began working on this project before the appearance of covid-19, the pandemic has thrown into sharp relief the need for better means of medical ventilation. And, while rectal ventilation sounds uncomfortable, it might actually be easier on the body than the traumatic process of tracheal intubation. Whether perfluorocarbon enemas would deliver enough oxygen to be useful, and whether the weakened bodies of patients with respiratory failure could absorb it, remains to be seen. But in the face of a ventilation crisis, as John Hurst, a respiratory specialist at University College, London, puts it, "anything that is innovative is immediately attractive as a solution." Reuse this contentThe Trust Project The Economist Today Hand-picked stories, in your inbox A daily email with the best of our journalism [ ]Sign up More from Science & technology Gender medicine Doubts are growing about therapy for gender-dysphoric children [20210515_stp502] Hypersonic flight A new fuel for jets and missiles is on the cards [20210515_stp505] Red planet China lands a rover on Mars [20210515_stp507] * Subscribe * Group subscriptions * Reuse our content * Help and contact us Keep updated * * * * * * Published since September 1843 to take part in "a severe contest between intelligence, which presses forward, and an unworthy, timid ignorance obstructing our progress." The Economist * About * Advertise * Press centre The Economist Group * The Economist Group * The Economist Intelligence Unit * The Economist Events * The Economist Store * Careers * Which MBA? * GMAT Tutor * GRE Tutor * Executive Jobs * Executive Education Navigator * Executive Education * Terms of Use * Privacy * Cookie Policy * Manage Cookies * Accessibility * Modern Slavery Statement * Do Not Sell My Personal Information Copyright (c) The Economist Newspaper Limited 2021. All rights reserved.