https://seeingbothsides.com/2021/05/02/venture-capital-and-velocity-11/ SEEING BOTH SIDES VC Perspectives from a Former Entrepreneur - Jeff Bussgang Navigation Skip to content * Home * About Me * Archives [cropped-riviecc80re_saint-charles_vue_du_pont_drouin] Venture Capital and Velocity: 11 Posted on May 2, 2021 by Jeff Bussgang [s-l1600] "How's work going?" As we emerge from the pandemic, it's the common casual question that many of us receive when we reconnect with our friends. I find I am struggling to answer it concisely. In my over twenty-five years in the startup and venture capital (VC) industry, I have never seen anything like this moment that we are in. To answer this friendly inquiry in as clear and open a manner as possible, the only word that comes to mind is velocity. As everyone who took high school physics knows, velocity is the rate of change of an object's position over a period of time as compared to a frame of reference. Entrepreneurs and VCs have a common historical frame of reference: we are all accustomed to moving quickly and dynamically in our collective journey to fund and build innovative, ground-breaking companies. That collective journey has created a series of routines and common practices over the many decades since the first venture capital firm, ARD, invested in Digital Equipment Corporation in 1957. What's changed in this pandemic is that the velocity of our activity has dramatically increased due to the systemic removal of any modicum of friction that might have existed in "the old days" up until March of 2020. Startup Fundraising Process: 1957-2020 To get a sense of how this increased velocity is happening in practice, let me deconstruct the typical fundraising process for the last 60 years of venture capital and startups: * Entrepreneurs set up meetings with VCs and travel to their offices in SF, NYC, and/or Boston (this business is profoundly concentrated, with 85% of total assets under management in the US concentrated in just three states: California, New York, and Massachusettes). * A week or two later, follow-up meetings take place at the VC offices for broader exposure amongst the partnership and management teams. * Then, entrepreneurs host investors in their offices to provide the opportunity for a deeper dive into the business and a tangible sense of the culture as well as an opportunity to meet key executives. * Upon passing further due diligence to everyone's satisfaction, the management team presents to the entire VC firm on Monday during the weekly partners meeting (which always, always happens on Mondays). * If the investment decision is made, negotiations on deal terms commence, and after some back and forth over a number of days and additional face-to-face meetings, term sheets are issued and signed. * Lawyers from both sides are retained to negotiate the definitive investment agreements. * Definitive agreements are signed, the investment is closed and money is wired. Entrepreneurs would typically meet with 20-30 firms in order to secure 2-3 term sheets and select their chosen partner. This process typically would take 3-6 months end-to-end simply due to the logistics of multiple rounds of meetings, travel, scheduling, and negotiations. Hence, when we are coaching our entrepreneurs regarding "how long should I plan to be fundraising?", 3-6 months is prudent having 6-9 months of cash cushion gives you a little wiggle room. Startup Fundraising Process: 2020-2021 When covid hit, everyone's world turned upside down and remote. VCs and entrepreneurs have adapted particularly quickly. As a result, the fundraising process for today's entrepreneurs goes as follows: * Hold twenty to thirty Zoom meetings, each in 30-minute increments, over the course of a handful of days to meet prospective investors. * For deeper dives, 60 or 90-minute follow-up meetings are scheduled with a broader set of VC partners at the prospective firm along with various members of the management team -- each of whom seamlessly Zooms in for their relevant portion of the meeting. * Like Flybridge, many VC firms have shifted their model from weekly Monday morning meetings to multiple meetings per week -- after all, with zero travel and infinitely flexible schedules, it's easy to coordinate the entire investment team's calendars and hold more frequent, smaller time slots to meet teams and discuss investment opportunities. * Deal documents are now completely standardized and simple. For those of us who invest in the early stages, SAFE notes are the "currency of the realm," which means there is very little to negotiate once an investment decision is made except for price and amount. * Any possible points of friction -- meeting the entire partnership, meeting other members of the management team, negotiating deal elements, forming a full investment syndicate -- have been eliminated or sharply reduced, easily squeezed in during the course of a day full of remote meetings over Zoom. As a result of this reduced friction, fundraising -- even for large later-stage companies -- takes only a few weeks. Thus, velocity has dramatically -- in many cases, breathtakingly -- increased. Some Data Pitchbook recently released their Q1 2021 report, demonstrating the frenetic pace that everyone in the technology and innovation world is experiencing. Investors deployed $69 billion into nearly 4,000 VC-backed companies in Q1, an increase of 93% in capital deployed in just one year. The amount of capital being deployed, never mind the surge of IPOs and SPACs, is simply dizzying. If you take the estimated early-stage deal count in Q1 2021 1,170 and annualize it to 4,680, it represents a 50% increase from 5 years ago. To see this graphically, look at the chart below (again, using Pitchbook data). I took the annual overall deal value in Q1 and simply annualized it and chart it in comparison to the last 15 years. At a more granular level, the quarterly data shows that the climb in deal value has been dramatic since the pandemic. [deal-volum] A lot has been written about the rise of SPACs, another financial instrument that makes more capital available to entrepreneurs. The chart below shows that the SPAC market raised record capital in just one quarter as compared to previous years. Again, this surge would only be possible with a surge in velocity and the dramatic reduction of deal friction. [spac-growt] As venture capitalist, Everett Randle put it in an insightful blog post about Tiger Global's strategy of high-velocity capital deployment (which is being replicated by many aggressive growth stage investors), "[Tiger and other fast-moving VC firms] have turned the velocity dial to 11." Implications There are many obvious upsides to this increase in velocity, but there are many downsides. Forget that VCs and entrepreneurs are working harder than ever (whine away, my friends -- I hear the violin music now). What really concerns me is the sloppiness that results in increased velocity. Faster due diligence, faster decisions, and fewer opportunities to slow down and build authentic, trust-based relationships can be dangerous when there are bumps in the road. The faster your velocity, the bigger an impact those speed bumps make on you and the organization. Further, the famous "fraud triangle" of opportunity, incentive, and rationalization suggests this surge in velocity could yield both a surge in underlying incentive and opportunity. Fraud in entrepreneurial settings can range from the obviously illegal (see: Theranos and uBiome) to the slightly exaggerated. When we are all vaccinated and back to meeting face-to-face, this unsustainable velocity will surely slow down. Right? Until then, everyone is operating at "11". Spinal Tap: Taking it to 11 Share this: * Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window) * Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) * Like this: Like Loading... Related This entry was posted in flybridge. Bookmark the permalink. Post navigation - Rocket Ship List: 2021 Edition Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here... [ ] Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: * * * * Gravatar Email (required) (Address never made public) [ ] Name (required) [ ] Website [ ] WordPress.com Logo You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change ) Google photo You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change ) Twitter picture You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change ) Facebook photo You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change ) Cancel Connecting to %s [ ] Notify me of new comments via email. [ ] Notify me of new posts via email. [Post Comment] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Search [ ] [Search] Jeff Bussgang Jeff Bussgang I am a 2x entrepreneur, Harvard Business School Lecturer, and general partner at Flybridge Capital Partners, an early-stage investment firm focused on technology companies. Personal Links * Flybridge Capital Partners View Full Profile - Follow Blog via Email Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Email Address: [ ] Follow My Book My Book My Tweets Recent Posts * Venture Capital and Velocity: 11 * Rocket Ship List: 2021 Edition * What Everyone Is Missing About 2020: Wealth Creation * Startup Lessons From Zen and The Art of Motorcycle Maintenance * HBS Class - Launching Tech Ventures (LTV) Archives * May 2021 * March 2021 * January 2021 * October 2020 * August 2020 * March 2020 * September 2019 * June 2019 * May 2019 * March 2019 * February 2019 * November 2018 * August 2018 * June 2018 * May 2018 * April 2018 * February 2018 * January 2018 * October 2017 * August 2017 * July 2017 * June 2017 * May 2017 * April 2017 * February 2017 * January 2017 * December 2016 * November 2016 * October 2016 * September 2016 * August 2016 * July 2016 * June 2016 * May 2016 * April 2016 * March 2016 * February 2016 * January 2016 * December 2015 * November 2015 * October 2015 * September 2015 * August 2015 * June 2015 * April 2015 * March 2015 * February 2015 * January 2015 * December 2014 * November 2014 * October 2014 * September 2014 * July 2014 * June 2014 * May 2014 * April 2014 * March 2014 * February 2014 * January 2014 * December 2013 * November 2013 * October 2013 * September 2013 * August 2013 * July 2013 * June 2013 * May 2013 * April 2013 * March 2013 * February 2013 * January 2013 * December 2012 * November 2012 * October 2012 * September 2012 * August 2012 * July 2012 * June 2012 * May 2012 * April 2012 * March 2012 * February 2012 * January 2012 * December 2011 * November 2011 * October 2011 * September 2011 * August 2011 * July 2011 * June 2011 * May 2011 * April 2011 * March 2011 * February 2011 * January 2011 * December 2010 * November 2010 * October 2010 * September 2010 * August 2010 * July 2010 * June 2010 * May 2010 * April 2010 * March 2010 * February 2010 * January 2010 * December 2009 * November 2009 * October 2009 * September 2009 * August 2009 * July 2009 * June 2009 * May 2009 * April 2009 * March 2009 * February 2009 * January 2009 * December 2008 * November 2008 * October 2008 * September 2008 * August 2008 * July 2008 * June 2008 * May 2008 * April 2008 * March 2008 * February 2008 * January 2008 * December 2007 * November 2007 * October 2007 * September 2007 * August 2007 * July 2007 * June 2007 * May 2007 * April 2007 * March 2007 * February 2007 * January 2007 * December 2006 * November 2006 * October 2006 * September 2006 * August 2006 * July 2006 * June 2006 * May 2006 * April 2006 * March 2006 * February 2006 * January 2006 * December 2005 * November 2005 * October 2005 * September 2005 * August 2005 * July 2005 * June 2005 * May 2005 * April 2005 * March 2005 * February 2005 SEEING BOTH SIDES Blog at WordPress.com. [ ] Email (Required) [ ] Name (Required) [ ] Website [ ] [Post Comment] Loading Comments... Comment x %d bloggers like this: [b]