https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/02/student-surveillance-vendor-proctorio-files-slapp-lawsuit-silence-critic Skip to main content * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities + EFF 30th Anniversary * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Email updates on news, actions, and events in your area. Join EFF Lists * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks Electronic Frontier Foundation Donate EFF TURNS 30! LEARN MORE ABOUT US, AND HOW YOU CAN HELP. EFF TURNS 30! LEARN MORE. Electronic Frontier Foundation * About + Contact + Press + People + Opportunities + EFF 30th Anniversary * Issues + Free Speech + Privacy + Creativity and Innovation + Transparency + International + Security * Our Work + Deeplinks Blog + Press Releases + Events + Legal Cases + Whitepapers * Take Action + Action Center + Electronic Frontier Alliance + Volunteer * Tools + Privacy Badger + HTTPS Everywhere + Surveillance Self-Defense + Certbot + Atlas of Surveillance + Cover Your Tracks + Crocodile Hunter * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give + Membership FAQ * Donate + Donate to EFF + Shop + Other Ways to Give * Search form Search [ ] Student Surveillance Vendor Proctorio Files SLAPP Lawsuit to Silence A Critic DEEPLINKS BLOG By Joe Mullin February 23, 2021 [anti-slapp] Student Surveillance Vendor Proctorio Files SLAPP Lawsuit to Silence A Critic Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link [anti-slapp-banner-2] During the pandemic, a dangerous business has prospered: invading students' privacy with proctoring software and apps. In the last year, we've seen universities compel students to download apps that collect their face images, driver's license data, and network information. Students who want to move forward with their education are sometimes forced to accept being recorded in their own homes and having the footage reviewed for "suspicious" behavior. Given these invasions, it's no surprise that students and educators are fighting back against these apps. Last fall, Ian Linkletter, a remote learning specialist at the University of British Columbia, became part of a chorus of critics concerned with this industry. Now, he's been sued for speaking out. The outrageous lawsuit--which relies on a bizarre legal theory that linking to publicly viewable videos is copyright infringement--will become an important test of a 2019 British Columbia law passed to defend free speech, the Protection of Public Participation Act, or PPPA. Sued for Linking This isn't the first time U.S.-based Proctorio has taken a particularly aggressive tack in responding to public criticism. In July, Proctorio CEO Mike Olsen even publicly posted the chat logs of a student who complained about the software's support, posting the conversation on Reddit, a move he later apologized for. Shortly after that, Linkletter dove in deep to analyze the software that many students at his university were being forced to adopt, an app called Proctorio. He became concerned about what Proctorio was--and wasn't--telling students and faculty about how its software works. In Linkletter's view, customers and users were not getting the whole story. The software performed all kinds of invasive tracking, like watching for "abnormal" eye movements, head movements, and other behaviors branded suspicious by the company. The invasive tracking and filming were of great concern to Linkletter, who was worried about students being penalized academically on the basis of Proctorio's analysis. "I can list a half dozen conditions that would cause your eyes to move differently than other people," Linkletter said in an interview with EFF. "It's a really toxic technology if you don't know how it works." In order to make his point clear, Linkletter published some of his criticism on Twitter, where he linked to Proctorio's own published YouTube videos describing how their software works. In those videos, Proctorio describes its own tracking functions. The videos described functions with titles like "Behaviour Flags," "Abnormal Head Movement," and "Record Room." Instead of replying to Linkletter's critique, Proctorio sued him. Even though Linkletter didn't copy any Proctorio materials, the company says Linkletter violated Canada's Copyright Act just by linking to its videos. The company also said those materials were confidential, and alleged that Linkletter's tweets violated the confidentiality agreement between UBC and Proctorio, since Linkletter is a university employee. Test of New Law Proctorio's legal attack on Ian Linkletter is meritless. It's a classic SLAPP, an acronym that stands for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. Fortunately, British Columbia's PPPA is a type of "anti-SLAPP" law. This is a type of law that's being widely adopted throughout U.S. states and also exists in two Canadian provinces. In Canada, anti-SLAPP laws typically allow a defendant to bring an early challenge to the lawsuit against them on the basis that their speech is on a topic of "public interest." If the court accepts that characterization, the court shall dismiss the action--unless the plaintiff can prove that their case has substantial merit, the defendant has no valid defense, and that the public interest in allowing the suit to continue outweighs the public's interest in protecting the expression. That's a very high bar for plaintiffs and changes the dynamics of a typical lawsuit dramatically. Without anti-SLAPP laws, well-funded companies like Proctorio are often able to litigate their critics into silence--even in situations where the critics would have prevailed on the legal merits. "Cases like this are exactly why anti-SLAPP laws were invented," said Ren Bucholz, a litigator in Toronto. Linkletter should prevail here. It isn't copyright infringement to link to a published video on the open web, and the fact that Proctorio made the video "unlisted" doesn't change that. Even if Linkletter had copied parts or all of the videos--which he did not--he would have broad fair dealing rights (similar to U.S. "fair use" rights) to criticize the software that has put many UBC students under surveillance in their own homes. Linkletter had to create a GoFundMe page to pay for much of his legal defense. But Proctorio's bad behavior has inspired a broad community of people to fight for better student privacy rights, and hundreds of people donated to Linkletter's defense fund, which raised more than $50,000. And the PPPA gives him a greater chance of getting his fees back. We hope the PPPA is proven effective in this, one of its first serious tests, and that lawmakers in both the U.S. and Canada adopt laws that prevent such abuses of the litigation system. Meanwhile, Proctorio should cease its efforts to muzzle critics from Vancouver to Ohio. Legal documents * Proctorio notice of claim * Proctorio notice of application * Linkletter notice of application * Linkletter affidavit (500+ pages) Related Issues Student Privacy CyberSLAPP Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Join EFF Lists Join Our Newsletter! Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Related Updates students in caps & gowns using phone tracking apps Deeplinks Blog by Rory Mir | February 1, 2021 Keeping Up With "At Home with EFF": From Student Privacy to Online Censorship We're excited to have yet another "At Home with the EFF" event coming up this Wednesday, February 3rd, with panels making sense of all the online censorship issues emerging this year. From the takedown of Parler to Trump getting banned, we'll offer an insider look on how censorship decisions... The number 2020 in a glitchy screen Deeplinks Blog by Lindsay Oliver, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews | December 29, 2020 Student Privacy and the Fight to Keep Spying Out of Schools: Year in Review 2020 As students were sent home from school in the spring due to the coronavirus pandemic, schools followed them home with invasive surveillance technology. This trend, spurred by the surge in remote learning, was an opportunistic move by tech companies and schools already in a race to control students through... [og-studentprivacygoogle_0] Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley | December 22, 2020 ExamSoft Flags One-Third of California Bar Exam Test Takers for Cheating One of EFF's chief concerns about exam proctoring software--in addition to the fact that it subjects students to excessive surveillance--is the risk that it will incorrectly flag students for cheating, called "false positives." This can be due either to the software's technical failures or to its requirements that students... student on laptop under dark cloud with sinister hands Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley, Lindsay Oliver | December 9, 2020 Senators Express Privacy Concerns Over Proctoring Apps Last week, five Senators joined the chorus of privacy advocates, students, and teachers expressing concern over surveillance proctoring apps being used to watch students remotely during exams. "You must be able to demonstrate that you are respecting students' privacy," the Senators write-and so far, that... [icon-2019-privacy] Deeplinks Blog by Hayley Tsukayama, Lindsay Oliver | December 7, 2020 Missed the RJI-EFF Event on Deciphering Data Privacy? We've Got You Covered EFF recently partnered with the University of Missouri's Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute on a virtual event, "Deciphering Data Privacy." This event aimed to foster a conversation with journalists, technologists, and privacy experts on the ways that we can make the conversation about privacy--how companies view it, how it affects... [eff-pr-og] Press Release | November 16, 2020 EFF Urges Universities to Commit to Transparency and Privacy Protections For COVID-19 Tracing Apps San Francisco--The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) called on universities that have launched or plan to launch COVID-19 tracking technologies--which sometimes collect sensitive data from users' devices and lack adequate transparency or privacy protections--to make them entirely voluntary for students and disclose details about data collection practices.Monitoring public... students in caps & gowns using phone tracking apps Deeplinks Blog by Rory Mir | November 16, 2020 End University Mandates for COVID Tech Since the COVID-19 crisis began, many universities have looked to novel technologies to assist their efforts to retain in-person operations. Most prominent are untested contact tracing and notification applications or devices. While universities must commit to public health, too often these programs invade privacy and lack transparency.... [student-privacy-2-og] Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley | October 9, 2020 Bar Applicants Deserve Better than a Remotely Proctored "Barpocalypse" This week was the California Bar Exam, a grueling two-day test that determines whether or not a person can practice law in California. Despite the privacy and security risks remote proctoring apps present to users, the California Bar, as well as several other state bars throughout the country, are requiring... [student-privacy-og] Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley | September 25, 2020 Students Are Pushing Back Against Proctoring Surveillance Apps Special thanks to legal intern Tracy Zhang, who was lead author of this post.Privacy groups aren't the only ones raising the alarm about the dangers of invasive proctoring apps. Through dozens of petitions across the country, and the globe, students too are pushing school administrators and teachers to consider... [og-studentprivacygoogle_0] Deeplinks Blog by Jason Kelley, Sophia Cope, Lindsay Oliver | September 10, 2020 EFF Tells California Supreme Court Not to Require ExamSoft for Bar Exam This week, EFF sent a letter (pdf link) to the Supreme Court of California objecting to the required use of the proctoring tool ExamSoft for the October 2020 California Bar Exam. Test takers should not be forced to give their biometric data to ExamSoft, the letter says, which... Join Our Newsletter! Email updates on news, actions, events in your area, and more. Email Address [ ] Postal Code (optional) [ ] Anti-spam question: Enter the three-letter abbreviation for Electronic Frontier Foundation: [ ] Don't fill out this field (required) [ ] [Submit] Thanks, you're awesome! Please check your email for a confirmation link. Oops something is broken right now, please try again later. Share It Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Copy link Related Issues Student Privacy CyberSLAPP Back to top EFF Home Follow EFF: * twitter * facebook * instagram * youtube * flicker * rss Contact * General * Legal * Security * Membership * Press About * Calendar * Volunteer * Victories * History * Internships * Jobs * Staff * Diversity & Inclusion Issues * Free Speech * Privacy * Creativity & Innovation * Transparency * International * Security Updates * Blog * Press Releases * Events * Legal Cases * Whitepapers * EFFector Newsletter Press * Press Contact Donate * Join or Renew Membership Online * One-Time Donation Online * Shop * Other Ways to Give * Copyright (CC BY) * Trademark * Privacy Policy * Thanks JavaScript license information *