https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02585-6 Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. Advertisement Advertisement Nature * View all Nature Research journals * Search * My Account Login * Explore content * Journal information * Publish with us Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed 1. nature 2. news 3. article NEWS 29 August 2019 No 'gay gene': Massive study homes in on genetic basis of human sexuality Nearly half a million genomes reveal five DNA markers associated with sexual behaviour -- but none with the power to predict the sexuality of an individual. Jonathan Lambert Search for this author in: * Pub Med * Nature.com * Google Scholar * Share on Twitter * Share on Facebook * Share via E-Mail PDF version Brighton Pride parade on the 3rd August 2019 in Brighton in the United Kingdom. The 2019 Pride parade in Brighton, UK. Genetic variants associated with same-sex sexual behaviour can't be used to predict someone's sexual orientation.Credit: Sam Mellish/In Pictures/Getty The largest study^1 to date on the genetic basis of sexuality has revealed five spots on the human genome that are linked to same-sex sexual behaviour -- but none of the markers are reliable enough to predict someone's sexuality. The findings, which are published on 29 August in Science and based on the genomes of nearly 500,000 people, shore up the results of earlier, smaller studies and confirm the suspicions of many scientists: while sexual preferences have a genetic component, no single gene has a large effect on sexual behaviours. "There is no 'gay gene'," says lead study author Andrea Ganna, a geneticist at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Ganna and his colleagues also used the analysis to estimate that up to 25% of sexual behaviour can be explained by genetics, with the rest influenced by environmental and cultural factors -- a figure similar to the findings of smaller studies. "This is a solid study," says Melinda Mills, a sociologist at the University of Oxford, UK, who studies the genetic basis of reproductive behaviours. But she cautions that the results may not be representative of the overall population -- a limitation that the study authors acknowledge. The lion's share of the genomes comes from the UK Biobank research programme and the consumer-genetics company 23andMe, based in Mountain View, California. The people who contribute their genetic and health information to those databases are predominantly of European ancestry and are on the older side. UK Biobank participants were between 40 and 70 years old when their data were collected, and the median age for people in 23andMe's database is 51. The study authors also point out that they followed convention for genetic analyses by dropping from their study people whose biological sex and self-identified gender did not match. As a result, the work doesn't include sexual and gender minorities (the LGBTQ community) such as transgender people and intersex people. A need for more data Scientists have long thought that someone's genes partly influenced their sexual orientation. Research from the 1990s^2 showed that identical twins are more likely to share a sexual orientation than are fraternal twins or adopted siblings. Some studies suggested that a specific part of the X chromosome called the Xq28 region was associated with the sexual orientation of people who were biologically male -- although subsequent research cast doubt on those results. But these studies all had very small sample sizes and most focused on men, says Mills. This hampered scientists' ability to detect many variants associated with sexual orientation. In the recent study, Ganna and his colleagues used a method known as a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to look at the genomes of hundreds of thousands of people for single-letter DNA changes called SNPs. If lots of people with a trait in common also share certain SNPs, chances are that the SNPs are related in some way to that characteristic. The researchers split their study participants into two groups -- those who reported having had sex with someone of the same sex, and those who didn't. Then the researchers performed two separate analyses. In one, they evaluated more than one million SNPs and looked at whether people who had more SNPs in common with each other also reported similar sexual behaviours. The scientists found that genetics could explain 8-25% of the variation in sexual behaviour. For their second analysis, Ganna and his colleagues wanted to see which particular SNPs were associated with same-sex sexual behaviours, and found five that were more common among those individuals. However, those five SNPs collectively explained less than 1% of the variation in sexual behaviour. This suggests that there are a lot of genes that influence sexual behaviour, many of which researchers haven't found yet, says Ganna. An even larger sample size could help to identify those missing variants, he says. But Ganna cautions that these SNPs can't be used to reliably predict sexual preferences in any individual, because no single gene has a large effect on sexual behaviours. It's complicated Although the researchers have identified some of the SNPs involved in same-sex sexual behaviour, they aren't sure what the genetic variants do. One is near a gene related to smell, which Ganna says has a role in sexual attraction. Another SNP is associated with male-pattern baldness -- a trait influenced by levels of sex hormones, which suggests that these hormones are also linked to same-sex sexual behaviour. The results demonstrate the complexity of human sexuality, says Ganna. They also presented a challenge to the study researchers, who knew that explaining nuanced findings on such a sensitive topic to the general public would be tricky. To ensure that their results are not misinterpreted, the study researchers worked with LGBTQ advocacy groups and science-communication specialists on the best way to convey their findings in the research paper and to the public. Their efforts included the design of a website that lays out the results -- and their limitations -- to the public, using sensitive, jargon-free language. Ewan Birney, a geneticist and director of EMBL European Bioinformatics Institute near Cambridge, UK, applauds that effort. "It's a communications minefield," he says. Although some researchers and LGBTQ advocates might question the wisdom of conducting this kind of research, Birney says that it's important. There has been a lot of sociological research on same-sex sexual behaviours, he says, but this is an incredibly complicated topic. It's time to bring a strong, biologically based perspective to the discussion, Birney says. Nature 573, 14-15 (2019) doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02585-6 References 1. 1. Ganna, A. et al. Science 365, eaat7693 (2019). + o Article o Google Scholar 2. 2. Pillard, R. C. & Bailey, J. M. Hum. Biol. 70, 347-365 (1998). + o PubMed o Google Scholar Download references Latest on: Human behaviour Tracking QAnon: how Trump turned conspiracy-theory research upside down Tracking QAnon: how Trump turned conspiracy-theory research upside down News 04 FEB 21 Hands speak: how casual gestures shape what we hear Hands speak: how casual gestures shape what we hear Research Highlight 27 JAN 21 Brain rhythms that help us to detect borders Brain rhythms that help us to detect borders News & Views 23 DEC 20 Genomics Scientists call for fully open sharing of coronavirus genome data Scientists call for fully open sharing of coronavirus genome data News 03 FEB 21 Regulatory genomic circuitry of human disease loci by integrative epigenomics Regulatory genomic circuitry of human disease loci by integrative epigenomics Article 03 FEB 21 Multiple genomes give switchgrass an advantage Multiple genomes give switchgrass an advantage News & Views 01 FEB 21 Jobs from Nature Careers * + o All jobs + o Director National Primate Research Center University of Washington (UW) Seattle, WA, United States JOB POST o Research Faculty University of Maryland, Baltimore (UMB) Baltimore, MD, United States JOB POST o Neurology- Neuro-Oncology Division Chief Stanford Medicine Stanford, CA, United States JOB POST o Neurology- Headache Medicine Division Chief Stanford University Stanford, CA, United States JOB POST Nature Briefing An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday. Email address [ ] [ ] Yes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Sign up Related Articles * The approach to predictive medicine that is taking genomics research by storm The approach to predictive medicine that is taking genomics research by storm * Genetic study homes in on height's heritability mystery Genetic study homes in on height's heritability mystery * Ethics: Taboo genetics Ethics: Taboo genetics * Discrimination drives LGBT+ scientists to think about quitting Discrimination drives LGBT+ scientists to think about quitting Subjects * Human behaviour * Genomics Advertisement Sign up to Nature Briefing An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday. Email address [ ] [ ] Yes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Sign up * Close Nature Briefing Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter -- what matters in science, free to your inbox daily. Email address [ ] Sign up [ ] I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy. Close Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing * Explore content * Research articles * News * Opinion * Research Analysis * Careers * Books & Culture * Podcasts * Videos * Current Issue * Browse Issues * Collections * Subjects * Follow us on Facebook * Follow us on Twitter * Subscribe * Sign up for alerts * RSS feed Journal information * About the Journal * Awards Publish with us * For Authors * For Referees * Submit manuscript Search Search articles by keyword or author [ ] Search Advanced search Quick links * Explore articles by subject * Find a job * Guide to authors * Editorial policies Nature ISSN 1476-4687 (online) nature.com sitemap Nature portfolio * About us * Press releases * Press office * Contact us * * * Discover content * Journals A-Z * Articles by subject * Nano * Protocol Exchange * Nature Index Publishing policies * Nature portfolio policies * Open access Author & Researcher services * Reprints & permissions * Research data * Language editing * Scientific editing * Nature Masterclasses * Nature Research Academies Libraries & institutions * Librarian service & tools * Librarian portal * Open research * Recommend to library Advertising & partnerships * Advertising * Partnerships & Services * Media kits * Branded content Career development * Nature Careers * Nature Conferences * Nature events Regional websites * Nature China * Nature India * Nature Japan * Nature Korea * Nature Middle East Legal & Privacy * Privacy Policy * Use of cookies * Manage cookies/Do not sell my data * Legal notice * Accessibility statement * Terms & Conditions * California Privacy Statement Springer Nature (c) 2021 Springer Nature Limited