https://meshedinsights.com/2021/02/04/citizen-stakeholders/ Site Index * About Us + Bitcoin Donations + Business Information + Meshed Logo Store + Rented Accommodation + Thank You! * Services We support entrepreneurs in emerging economies through the Kiva micro-finance initiative, and we encourage you to do so too. Meta * Register * Log in * Entries feed * Comments feed * WordPress.com (c) 2013-21, Meshed Insights Ltd. All rights reserved, all wrongs righted. Unless otherwise credited all photographs, videos and other media are included in this statement. Some photographs are available for licensing via iStockPhoto. + Meshed Insights Ltd Navigating Rights and Responsibilities in the Meshed Society * Facebook * Twitter Menu Skip to content * About Meshed Insights * Blogs + Wild Webmink o Essays + InfoWorld + Facebook [cropped-shadeas-of-grey] Posted on February 4, 2021 by Simon Phipps Tagged CopyrightDemocracy European DirectivesRepresentation CommentsNo Comments on The Missing Stakeholders The Missing Stakeholders The coming wave of digital regulation may claim to target "Big Tech" but will inevitably end up harming citizen-innovators most because regulators have forgotten to include them in their process. Tracks in the snow suggest a bird being captured by a cat.^ Stakeholder-Citizen Interaction Here come the regulators. "Big Tech" companies like Facebook and Google definitely deserve some guide-rails, as well as some consequences for the unwanted impacts they have foisted on society along with the desirable ones. Facebook in particular has some deep, serious consequences of its amorality due soon. But so far, pretty much every regulation relating to the digital realm is defective. For example the GDPR takes the best of intentions around citizen privacy and ends up causing unintended harm by layering ambiguous and extensive responsibilities and liabilities on small businesses and individuals with web presence. They either comply at great cost (relative to their turnover) or ignore it all, intentionally or out of bewilderment. Meanwhile, well-resourced transnational corporations use their existing staffs to comply at a cost that's effectively small change to them. The result is the local companies suffer higher costs and risk while the behemoths treat it as just another minor global cost. This "friendly fire effect" is evident throughout the regulatory landscape - see the EU Terrorism Regulation for example, or the accidental hit on non-content industries like software when the European Copyright Directive draft was released (fortunately patched up in the final text). While the targets of much of this bad legislation are indeed those US new-wave corporations, the actual victims are repeatedly the Europeans who are our best hope of countering this US corporate power; citizen-innovators. Far from gutting Google's guns and foiling Facebook's finagling, the new rules give them and their peers unintended power over European innovators. Hammers To Crack Nuts A root cause of many of the problems with British and European legislation regarding the Internet is a failure to recognise that, in the meshed society it creates, the citizen can play roles previously reserved for the corporation. I can create published works, I can directly fund new ventures, I can build global-scale applications (or at least be a critical link in their supply chain) and so on. But current political thinking only understands me as either a spending unit or a labour unit. Believing these and other capabilities to only be within the scope of corporations, legislation frequently fails to observe the impact of regulations on individuals and small businesses. Penalties are disproportionate because they assume corporate resources; recourse is onerous or absent because they assume a legal department is involved; restrictions are asymmetric because they assume targets are a fraction of a giant operation not the entirety of a small one. Consequently, only well-resourced corporations can hope to fully comply -- an exclusionary gift to the large and established players and a further smack in the face of small European innovators. Worse, the Byzantine complexity and special vocabulary of the regulations mean that legal hyenas running trolling operations like they did around copyright regulations are bound to be along Real Soon. One final wrinkle is the system is well populated with representatives of rights-holder organisations and patent-dependent corporations, who use the opportunity of a policy vacuum to inject restrictions on the pesky "pirates" they blame for their own slow transition to the meshed economy. Consequently what regulations do appear with digital elements are weighed down with "checks and balances" to make sure legacy rights holders can still collect their rents. Missing So Unrepresented How did this happen? It's in no small part because the anachronistic absence of citizen-scale thinking from the legislative process means it consequently has no representation for citizen-innovators. Only organisational "stakeholders" -- corporations, trade associations and special-interest groups -- are included in the cycle of research, consultation and review through which every new instrument proceeds. Worse, the European native corporate voices who are consulted make things worse by advocating for IPR extremism to prop up their own flagging fortunes. Our current legislative worldview treats citizens only as consumers or workforce, never as stakeholders, so rarely even meaningfully alerts us to proposals let alone considers or consults us. To make significant progress with any "Digital Charter" of the kind the UK government purports to love or with the expansive digital agenda the European Commission is rushing, we first need to recognise that the Internet has created a meshed society of opportunity for all and not just a new market for the winners of the previous age to re-sell/rent their old goods and methods. Digital sovereignty is an excellent concept and goal, but shouldn't citizen-innovators also be allowed to aspire? Until the legislators consult open source developers, self-published writers and musicians and other small-but-scaleable innovators, new rules targeting the Internet will only result in reinforced oligarchies. Share this: * LinkedIn * Twitter * Facebook * More * * Email * Pinterest * * Tumblr * Reddit * * Pocket * Like this: Like Loading... Related This entry was posted in Articles, Public Policy and tagged Copyright , Democracy, European Directives, Representation. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here... [ ] Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: * * * * Gravatar Email (required) (Address never made public) [ ] Name (required) [ ] Website [ ] WordPress.com Logo You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change ) Google photo You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change ) Twitter picture You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change ) Facebook photo You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change ) Cancel Connecting to %s [ ] Notify me of new comments via email. [ ] Notify me of new posts via email. [Post Comment] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Post navigation - The Rights-Ratchet Model Thank you for supporting Meshed! - Tip Jars! We're an independent team & rely on your support & donations for our community interventions - thanks! [patreon-bu] Sponsor at GitHub PayPal - The safer, easier way to pay online. [bitcoin-donation] Can We Help? Meshed Insights can help you with your open source strategy. Contact us for support with community, governance, licensing, branding or any other aspect of your open source strategy. We can also support you on digital rights issues. We offer research reports and white papers for your management and Board from experienced advisors, as well as on-site consulting and longer term engagements such as non-executive directorships. Contact us now, or read more about our services. Search [ ] [Search] February 2021 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 << Jan Apache Bitcoin blockchain Blocking Bolzano business model Canonical Censorship CERN Chromebook Cloud Community Compliance Contributor Agreements Copyleft Copyright crowdfunding Culture downloader EFF European Directives Facebook FAQ FLOSS Weekly FOSDEM Foundations FRAND Free Software Google Governance Government GPL InfoWorld Intellectual property Internet Java Legislation LibreOffice License licenses Licensing Linux Desktop Linux Voice MariaDB Meshed Society Microsoft NSA ODF OIN Open data Open Innovation OpenJDK Open Rights Group open source OpenSource open source community Open Source Initiative Open source license Oracle Oracle v Google OSCON OSI Patent Patents Patent Trolls Policy Privacy SCOTUS Security software freedom Software Patents SourceForge Standards The Linux Foundation VP8 Enter your email address to receive new posts via email. Email Address: [ ] Join Mailing List Website Powered by WordPress.com. Add your thoughts here... (optional) [ ] Post to [] Cancel [Reblog Post] Send to Email Address [ ] Your Name [ ] Your Email Address [ ] [ ] loading [Send Email] Cancel Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Email check failed, please try again Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. %d bloggers like this: [b]