https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-do-we-assume-extraterrestrials-might-want-to-visit-us/ Skip to main content SubscribeLatest IssuesMenu Scientific American * Cart 0 * Sign In Email *:[ ]Password *:[ ] Forgot password?LoginLoading Not yet registered? * |Stay Informed SearchSubscribe Close [ ]SearchClose Search Advanced Search * Coronavirus * The Sciences * Mind * Health * Tech * Sustainability * Video * Podcasts * Opinion * Publications * Subscribe * Current Issue * Cart0 * Sign In * Stay Informed * Share * Latest * * * * Advocate for Science Subscribe Space | Opinion Why Do We Assume Extraterrestrials Might Want to Visit Us? It presumes we're inherently fascinating, but that's not necessarily the case * By Avi Loeb on January 21, 2021 * Share on Facebook * Share on Twitter * Share on Reddit * Share on LinkedIn * Share via * Print Why Do We Assume Extraterrestrials Might Want to Visit Us? Credit: David Wall Getty Images Advertisement It is presumptuous to assume that we are worthy of special attention from advanced species in the Milky Way. We may be a phenomenon as uninteresting to them as ants are to us; after all, when we're walking down the sidewalk we rarely if ever examine every ant along our path. Our sun formed at the tail end of the star formation history of the universe. Most stars are billions of years older than ours. So much older, in fact that many sunlike stars have already consumed their nuclear fuel and cooled off to a compact Earth-size remnant known as a white dwarf. We also learned recently that of order half of all sunlike stars host an Earth-size planet in their habitable zone, allowing for liquid water and for the chemistry of life. Since the dice of life were rolled in billions of other locations within the Milky Way under similar conditions to those on Earth, life as we know it is likely common. If that is indeed the case, some intelligent species may well be billions of years ahead of us in their technological development. When weighing the risks involved in interactions with less-developed cultures such as ours, these advanced civilizations may choose to refrain from contact. The silence implied by Fermi's paradox ("Where is everybody?") may mean that we are not the most attention-worthy cookies in the jar. As a first approximation to what humans look like, it is reasonable to glance at the mirror. This approach relies on the unremarkable assumption that each of us shares a common genetic ancestry with all people. But this might not be the case for life that developed independently on other planets. For example, animals and vegetation on the nearest habitable exoplanet, Proxima Centauri b, could be shockingly different from those on Earth. In particular, the animals might possess strange-looking eyes, optimized to detect the infrared radiation emitted by Proxima Centauri, a dwarf star with half the surface temperature of the sun. Since Proxima b is 20 times closer to its star than the Earth is to the sun, we expect it to be tidally locked, showing the same face to its star at all times, as the moon always shows the same face to us. The species residing on its permanent dayside may be completely different from those on its colder nightside, exhibiting distinct patterns of enforced sleep. Any vegetation on the planet's surface would adapt to harvesting infrared light, showing a "red edge" at a longer wavelength than plants on Earth. As a result, the grass in our neighbor's yard may be dark red and not green like ours. It is even more difficult to forecast what technologies that are billions of years old would look like. In searching for them, we must flag anomalies seen through our telescopes and not sweep unexpected signals under the rug of conservatism. If our instruments are not sensitive enough or our search techniques are inadequate, we will not discover technosignatures. Processing data without suitable machine-learning algorithms may resemble casting an ineffective fishing net that never catches fish because its holes are too big. We design our searches based on what we see in the mirror. After radio communication and lasers were invented, we started searching for radio and laser signals from outer space; search considerations progressed similarly with the technology of light sails. As we imagine new technologies, we may ultimately find the one that would allow us to detect many other species who use it. However, we should take caution with anecdotal observations that are not up to the standards of quantitative scientific evidence. This includes conspiracy theories without supporting evidence, which appear with some regularity, or reports about unidentified flying objects (UFOs), which do not stand up to the scrutiny of reproducibility--the prerequisite for being counted as credible scientific data. UFO reports provide clues that are always on the borderline of detectability. Since our recording devices have improved considerably over time, one would expect that a fuzzy photo taken by an old camera from 50 years ago would turn into a crisp image in today's advanced cameras, thus providing conclusive evidence beyond any reasonable doubt. But the clues are always marginal, implying that UFOs are most likely artifacts in our instruments or natural phenomena. To achieve scientific credibility, any finding of an unusual object must be followed by studying it or other objects of its type quantitatively through well-documented scientific procedures. Scientific evidence restricts our imagination and brings salvation from far-fetched ideas. Fermi's paradox is pretentious in that it assumes we humans have some sort of cosmic significance. The reality may be that we are ordinary and doomed to perish, just like the dinosaurs, consequent to some catastrophe. Why would our galactic neighbors care about how green our grass is? Given that dwarf stars like Proxima Centauri are much more abundant than the sun, most habitable planets might be covered with dark red grass, which would be as soothing to the infrared eyes of most exo-vacationers as green grass is to us. As a result, interstellar tourist agencies may find Proxima b to be a more attractive destination than Earth. We could wonder, as Enrico Fermi did, why no exo-tourists have shown up to admire us. But better yet, we could get in touch with Proxima b and entice the locals to visit and share a water-based drink with us. [rightsPerm] Rights & Permissions ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S) Avi Loeb Avi Loeb is former chair (2011-2020) of the astronomy department at Harvard University, founding director of Harvard's Black Hole Initiative and director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. He also chairs the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies and the advisory board for the Breakthrough Starshot project, and is a member of President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Loeb is the author of Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth forthcoming from Houghton Mifflin Harcourt in January 2021. Recent Articles * Did We Receive a Message from a Planet Orbiting the Nearest Star? * The Cosmic Dawn of Technology * Let's Search for Alien Probes, Not Just Alien Signals Read This Next Public Health Biden Aims for 100 Million COVID Vaccinations in First 100 Days 1 hour ago -- Victoria Knight and Kaiser Health News Space Biden Administration Appoints Acting NASA Chief 3 hours ago -- Meghan Bartels and SPACE.com Climate Here Are All the Climate Actions Biden Took on Day One 5 hours ago -- Jean Chemnick and E&E News Policy & Ethics Meet Biden's Science Team 5 hours ago -- Nidhi Subbaraman, Jeff Tollefson, Giuliana Viglione and Nature magazine Policy & Ethics Eric Lander Is Not the Ideal Choice for Presidential Science Advisor 5 hours ago -- 500 Women Scientists | Opinion Engineering Alexander Graham Bell Goes and Flies a Kite--For Science 7 hours ago -- Leslie Nemo Advertisement Newsletter Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter. Sign Up Support Science Journalism Scientific American Space & Physics is a roundup of the most important stories about the universe and beyond Subscribe Now!Support Science Journalism Follow us * instagram * soundcloud * youtube * twitter * facebook * rss Scientific american arabic l`rby@ * Return & Refund Policy * About * Press Room * FAQs * Contact Us * Site Map * Advertise * SA Custom Media * Terms of Use * Privacy Policy * California Consumer Privacy Statement * Use of cookies/Do not sell my data * International Editions Scientific American is part of Springer Nature, which owns or has commercial relations with thousands of scientific publications (many of them can be found at www.springernature.com/us). Scientific American maintains a strict policy of editorial independence in reporting developments in science to our readers. (c) 2021 Scientific American, a Division of Springer Nature America, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Scroll To Top * You have free articles left. Temp Paywall Img Support our award-winning coverage of advances in science & technology. See Subscription Options Already a subscriber? Sign in. Subscribers get more award-winning coverage of advances in science & technology. Sign In See Subscription Options