http://m.nautil.us/blog/a-breakthrough-in-measuring-the-building-blocks-of-nature * * [p] Nautilus [nautilus-l] * Issues * Topics * Coronavirus * Blog * Thanks for Joining the Newsletter * * * Login * Subscribe SELECT NEWSLETTERS AND SUBMIT CONTACT DETAILS... * [*]New chapters Thursdays Nautilus publishes a new chapter of feature stories on its monthly theme, every Thursday. Sign up to this list to stay up to date on [ ] the latest and greatest. [ ] [Submit] * [*]Editor's picks Sundays Read about the Nautilus stories and blogs we've been thinking about over the past week. [ ] * * * Evolving_THUMB Issue 094 Evolving Forerunners_THUMB Issue 093 Forerunners Frontiers_THUMB Issue 092 Frontiers AmazeBrain_THUMB Issue 091 The Amazing Brain SomethingGreen_THUMB Issue 090 Something Green DarkSide_THUMB Issue 089 The Dark Side Love-Sex_THUMB Issue 088 Love & Sex Risk_THUMB Issue 087 Risk Energy_THUMB Issue 086 Energy Reopen_THUMB Issue 085 Reopening Outbreak_THUMB Issue 084 Outbreak Intelligence_THUMB Issue 083 Intelligence * Panpyschism_THUMB Issue 082 Panpsychism Maps_THUMB Issue 081 Maps Scharf_TH Issue 080 Aliens Catalysts_THUMB Issue 079 Catalysts Atmospheres_THUMB Issue 078 Atmospheres Underworlds_THUMB Issue 077 Underworlds Language_THUMB Issue 076 Language Story_THUMB Issue 075 Story Networks_THUMB Issue 074 Networks Play_THUMB Issue 073 Play Quandary_THUMB Issue 072 Quandary Flow_Curtain-THUMB Issue 071 Flow * Variables_THUMB Issue 070 Variables Patterns_THUMB Issue 069 Patterns Context_THUMB Issue 068 Context Reboot_THUMB Issue 067 Reboot Clockwork_THUMB Issue 066 Clockwork Curtain_THUMB Issue 065 In Plain Sight Unseen_THUMB-F Issue 064 The Unseen Horizons_THUMB Issue 063 Horizons Systems_THUMB Issue 062 Systems Coordinates_THUMB-2 Issue 061 Coordinates Searches_CURTAIN_THUMB Issue 060 Searches Connections_THUMB Issue 059 Connections * Self_Curtain_HERO Issue 058 Self Community-THUMB Issue 057 Communities Curtain_THUMB Issue 056 Perspective Trust_HERO Issue 055 Trust Unspoken_CURTAIN_THUMB Issue 054 The Unspoken Monsters_Curtain_THUMB Issue 053 Monsters Hive_Curtain_THUMB Issue 052 The Hive Limits_Curtain_THUMB-2 Issue 051 Limits Emergence_THUMB Issue 050 Emergence Absurd_THUMB-F Issue 049 The Absurd Chaos_THUMB Issue 048 Chaos 047_TH-2 Issue 047 Consciousness * Balance_CURTAIN-THUMB Issue 046 Balance Power_TH_2 Issue 045 Power Luck_TH-2 Issue 044 Luck Heroes_TH-1 Issue 043 Heroes Fakes_TH Issue 042 Fakes Selection-TH-1 Issue 041 Selection LEARNING_TH-2 Issue 040 Learning Sport_THUMB-2 Issue 039 Sport Noise_THUMB Issue 038 Noise Currents_TH-3 Issue 037 Currents Aging_THUMB Issue 036 Aging Boundaries_THUMB-preview Issue 035 Boundaries * Adaptation_CURTAIN_THUMB Issue 034 Adaptation Attraction_THUMB-F. Issue 033 Attraction Space_TH. Issue 032 Space Stress_THUMB Issue 031 Stress Identity_TH-1 Issue 030 Identity 029_Scaling_TH-2 Issue 029 Scaling 028_THUMB Issue 028 2050 027_THUMB_F1 Issue 027 Dark Matter 026_CURTAIN_THUMB Issue 026 Color 025-Water_THUMB Issue 025 Water 024_THUMB-F. Issue 024 Error 023-THUMB-1 Issue 023 Dominoes * 022_THUMB-2 Issue 022 Slow Information_THUMB-1 Issue 021 Information 020_Creativity_THUMB-v2 Issue 020 Creativity SP_Nature_THUMB Special Issue In Our Nature 019_THUMB Issue 019 Illusions 018_THUMB_1 Issue 018 Genius Cover_THUMB Issue 017 Big Bangs 16_THUMB. Issue 016 Nothingness 015_THUMB Issue 015 Turbulence 14_THUMB Issue 014 Mutation Issue13_THUMB Issue 013 Symmetry 012_THUMB Issue 012 Feedback * 011_THUMB Issue 011 Light Issue-010_COVER-THUMB Issue 010 Mergers & Acquisitions Time_COVER_THUMB Issue 009 Time SpaceNest_THUMB Issue 008 Home 007_THUMB Issue 007 Waste Issue6_THUMB Issue 006 Secret Codes See Issue Library Enter Search Below... [ ] Search TRENDING TOPIC Science Practice [14783_7a60] Does Theranos Mark the Peak of the Silicon Valley Bubble? Aerodynamics Aliens Animals Anthropology Archaeology Architecture Art Artificial Intelligence Astronomy Chemistry Climate Cognitive Science Computer Science Cryptography Earth Science Economics Education Environment Evolution Fiction Fine Art Food Genetics Health History Information Theory Insects Linguistics Literature Math Memoir Microbiology Mortality Music Neuroscience Oceanography Paleontology Philosophy Physics Physiology Psychology Reproduction Science Practice Sociology Technology The Web Facts So Romantic On Matter A Breakthrough in Measuring the Building Blocks of Nature Posted By Subodh Patil on Jan 08, 2021 * Add a comment * Facebook * Twitter * Email * Sharing * Reddit * Stumbleupon * Tumblr * Pocket [18082_ad5db5924e3e97ed8a387a499efa9fa0]An artistic rendering of the quarks and gluons that make up a proton.Illustration by D. Dominguez / CERN In a recent experiment done at the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics, in Germany, physicist Alexey Grinin and his colleagues came a step closer to resolving one of the more significant puzzles to have arisen in particle physics over the past decade. The puzzle is this: Ordinarily, when you set about measuring the size of something, you'd expect to get the same answer no matter what you use to measure it--a soda can has the diameter it does whether you measure it with a tape measure or callipers (provided these are properly calibrated, of course). Something must be amiss if your attempts to measure the can return different answers depending on the equipment, yet this is precisely what's happened over multiple attempts to measure the spatial extent of a proton. What's potentially at stake is our understanding of the building blocks of reality: the differing measurements could be heralding the existence of new forces or particles. What does it mean for a subatomic particle to have a measurable "size"? Mathematically, fundamental particles are idealized as point particles, which is to say that, as far as we can tell, they have no meaningfully discernible spatial extent, or substructure, at all. True, all fundamental particles are associated with a quantum mechanical wave packet, which does have a spatial extent that depends on the energy of the particle. Yet these basic bits of Lego are entities whose wave packets you can, in principle, pack into as small a region as you'd like before the very notion of continuum geometry starts, at the Planck scale, to lose meaning. Fundamental particles organize into something analogous to a mini periodic table--consisting of the various force carrying particles, such as photons and gluons (the carrier particles of the strong nuclear force), along with three generations of quarks and leptons and the mass-generating Higgs boson--and can stack together in different combinations to form a zoo of so-called composite particles. There is less than one in about a trillion chance that the discrepancy could be a statistical fluke. Perhaps the most familiar and ubiquitous of these is the proton. With at least one in every kind of element, it's made up of two up quarks and a down quark that dance around each other in a tightly bound orbit maintained by exchanging gluons. This exchange process is so energetic that most of the mass of the proton (or for that matter, most of the material that makes us up) derives from the energy contained in these gluons--a consequence, as Einstein informed us, of E being equal to mc^2. [18083_78b8d6620afcd434a4b7fb41b22e595b]Fundamental particles organize into something analogous to a mini periodic table (above). CERN So it's not meaningless to ask what the "size" of the proton is. The study by Grinin's team highlights the fact that defining this notion remains a rather tricky affair. And, as we'll see, their results serve to sharpen the mystery as to why other measurement methods researchers have used previously disagree. A physicist can reasonably infer a proton's size from the "charge radius"--roughly the averaged spatial extent of quark orbits inside. This quantity is probed in slightly different ways by electrons and muons (another sort of fundamental particle), when you probe their orbital configurations as they form "bound states" with the proton--atomic hydrogen in the case of electrons, muonic hydrogen in the case of muons. Because muons are about 200 times heavier than electrons, their lowest energy orbital configurations are much more tightly bound around the proton than are electrons in atomic hydrogen. Consequently, the differences in the energies of various orbitals in muonic hydrogen are much more sensitive to the proton's size as well as being more "high pitched" than that of regular atomic hydrogen. In other words, similar to how plucking a guitar string at a given tension produces a much higher note were we to fret it open, or at 1/ 200th its open length, the typical frequencies of the radiation emitted by transitions in muonic hydrogen are about 200 times higher than that in atomic hydrogen. These frequencies relate to something called the Rydberg constant--the tension of the guitar string in the analogy--which appears to be one of the potentially more significant sources of uncertainty proton size-wise. Orbital energy levels depend on both this constant and the charge radius of the proton. Proton-size measurements didn't conflict for decades. Different methods--like measuring the radius by observing electrons orbit within hydrogen atoms, or by scattering energetic electrons off of unbound protons--had converged on a value of 0.875 (give or take 0.006) femtometers. That's a little less than a trillionth of a millimeter. That convergence was disrupted in 2010, when a paper came out titled, "The size of the proton." As the researchers reported, measurements involving orbital configurations in muonic hydrogen returned a value of 0.842, give or take 0.001 femtometers. This may not seem like much of a difference, but it's the accompanying error bars that matter. The measurements are, individually, so precise that their disagreement is over seven standard deviations--there is less than one in about a trillion chance that the discrepancy could be a statistical fluke. There are only two possibilities for the anomalous result if the equipment used in the experiments and their calibrations all check out after careful scrutiny. Either some combination of physical constants, which researchers assume in order to experimentally infer the proton charge radius, isn't known as accurately as we thought, or there is something different about the way muons interact with protons, compared to electrons, that renders particle physics incomplete. The latter possibility, if substantiated, would, of course, cause a flurry of excitement among theoretical physicists to say the least, as it could imply the existence of new forces and particles. Not only would it reshape our understanding of the universe, it would represent a throwback to the days when physicists discovered particles (such as the muon itself) using equipment that could fit on a proverbial tabletop. Get the Nautilus newsletter The newest and most popular articles delivered right to your inbox! [ ] [ ] [Subscribe] * [*]New Chapters Thursdays * [*]Editor's Picks Sundays [ ] Over the past few years, various teams have been attempting to get to the bottom of the matter by looking at different orbital transitions in atomic hydrogen that are sensitive to different combinations of the Rydberg constant and the charge radius. A 2019 measurement by a group of researchers at York University in Canada looked at a particular orbital transition that was independent of the value of this constant, finding a value of 0.833 +- 0.010 femtometers, consistent with the smaller value obtained in muonic hydrogen. Grinin's team went a step further. They used a technique known as frequency comb spectroscopy. It involves pulses of laser light that are a superposition of equally spaced frequencies--a ruler in frequency space if you will--that allowed them to look at two different orbital transitions in atomic hydrogen sensitive to two different combinations of the proton size and the Rydberg constant. This permitted them to determine both with unprecedented accuracy. The technique reduced, to only about one part in ten trillion, the observational uncertainties in the frequency of light these transitions emitted--a staggering degree of accuracy by any standard. Not only did Grinin's team find a value for the charge radius of the proton consistent with the value obtained in muonic hydrogen, they inferred a much more precise value for the Rydberg constant. This accounted for some part of the discrepancy seen in other measurements in atomic hydrogen (which presumed a less accurate value). It thus appears that the experimental value of the proton charge radius Grinin's team obtained in atomic hydrogen is converging on the smaller values for the proton charge radius other researchers initially obtained in muonic hydrogen. The smaller value has by now even been adopted as the official value on the National Institute of Standards and Technology CODATA list of recommended physical constants--the official almanac for nuclear and atomic chemists and physicists. Although this convergence, based on the continued refinement of experimental techniques, did not deliver the new physics some may have been hoping for, even the most despondent theoretical physicist can acknowledge the experimental artistry that seems to be bringing the matter closer to conclusion. What remains unresolved is the reason why measurements, relying on different spectroscopic methods in atomic hydrogen, return different values for the charge radius of the proton. The mystery, and along with it, the diminishing hope of particle physicists, endures for the time being. This was enough motivation for a team of theoretical physicists, led by Cliff Burgess at the Perimeter Institute, in Canada, to systematically catalogue all possible sources of theoretical uncertainty in atomic spectroscopy over a series of papers. By isolating the ways in which new forces and particles might leave a tell-tale signature, they've thrown the gauntlet firmly back to the experimentalists. Future experiments, as always, will be the ultimate arbiter in this matter. Subodh Patil is an assistant professor at the Lorentz Institute for Theoretical Physics at Leiden University. He tweets on occasion at @_subodhpatil. Most Recent Entries See All * [18059_b9b4228fec4cd35410468b0f5] Matter We're the Cosmic 1 Percent But Our Solar System Isn't a Complete Weirdo Posted on Jan 04, 2021 * [18056_7aaba5f3511f56128e7130c29] Matter How to Talk Like a Physicist Posted on Jan 01, 2021 * [18053_367df17877b8e778ae3fdc032] Biology Vaccines Are the Safest Medical Procedure We Have. Make Your Wager Wisely Posted on Dec 29, 2020 * [18045_8b3bff7384cfaa945eaf210e4] Matter The Sight of Jupiter and Saturn Together Is a Beautiful Thing Posted on Dec 20, 2020 * [18024_44cfe8d9745f15f8c1534bf55] Ideas Larry David and the Game Theory of Anonymous Donations Posted on Dec 16, 2020 Current Issue See Full Issue Evolving_THUMB Join the Discussion [blog_wait] Related Issue 094: Evolving A change is gonna come See Full Issue Related Facts So Romantic * Matter We're the Cosmic 1 Percent But Our Solar System Isn't a Complete Weirdo [18059_b9b4228fec4cd35410468b0f5] About half of all stars seem to have "super-Earth" planets on orbits closer to their stars than Mercury is to the Sun, but we don't.Illustration... Read More * Matter How to Talk Like a Physicist [18056_7aaba5f3511f56128e7130c29] Theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder, who probably is the smartest person on her block, has fun in her latest video skewering the scientific braggart.Photograph... Read More * Matter The Sight of Jupiter and Saturn Together Is a Beautiful Thing [18045_8b3bff7384cfaa945eaf210e4] A conjunction is a good time to reflect on our cosmic heritage, and on the long shadows cast by the gas giants.Illustration by SN VFX / ShutterstockToday,... Read More * Matter Physicists Nail Down the "Magic Number" That Shapes the Universe [17991_7ce5417e80aef872ba2091701] Reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine's Abstractions blog.A team in Paris has made the most precise measurement yet of the fine-structure constant,... Read More * About * Awards and Press * Contact / Work with Us * Donate * FAQ * Media Kit * Prime * Privacy Policy * RSS * Subscribe * Terms of Services NAUTILUS: SCIENCE CONNECTED Nautilus is a different kind of science magazine. We deliver big-picture science by reporting on a single monthly topic from multiple perspectives. Read a new chapter in the story every Thursday. Get Nautilus Editor's Picks and new articles right to your inbox! [ ] [Subscribe] x (c) 2021 NautilusThink Inc, All rights reserved. Matter, Biology, Numbers, Ideas, Culture, Connected Site by Code and Theory * Quantcast