https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-passes-historic-anti-corruption-legislation-that-effectively-bans-anonymous-shell-companies-b1781380.html Support us Contribute Subscribe Login Support us Contribute Subscribe Login * News + UK + World + Europe * Politics + 2020 Election * Voices + Robert Fisk + Mary Dejevsky * Sport + US sports + Soccer + Tennis + Boxing + Formula 1 + WWE * Culture + Film + TV + Music + Books + Crosswords & Puzzles + Ed Cumming * indy/life + Fashion & Beauty + Tech + Food & Drink + Travel + Health & Fitness + Love & relationships * IndyBest * Video * Daily Edition + Subscribe for a free trial + Read Now * Conversations * UK Edition * US Edition * Edicion en Espanol * News + UK + World + Europe * UK Politics + Brexit + Conservatives + Labour + Lib Dems + SNP + Green Party + DUP * US politics * Voices + Help the Hungry + Editorials * Sport + Football + Boxing + Rugby Union + Cricket + F 1 + Tennis + Cycling + Golf + Podcast + US Sport + Miguel Delaney * Culture + Film + Music + TV & Radio + Photography + Theatre & Dance * Lifestyle + Travel + Women + Fashion & beauty + Food & drink + Health & fitness + Dating & relationships + Royal Family + Tech + Motoring + The Competition * IndyBest + Sports & Fitness + Home & Garden + Kids + Books + Fashion & Beauty + Food & Drink + Travel & outdoors + Tech + Deals * Money + Mortgages + Loans + Savings + Pensions + Money transfers + Health insurance + Money Deals * indy100 * Voucher codes + TUI + Groupon + Argos + Hyperoptic + John Lewis + Currys + Nike + ASOS + JD Sports + boohoo + AO.com + Gousto + Vodafone * Premium + Subscription offers + Independent Premium app + Daily Edition app + Chris Blackhurst + Hamish McRae + Janet Street-Porter + Mary Dejevsky + Matthew Norman + Jenny Eclair * Climate blogs NewsWorldAmericas US passes 'historic' anti-corruption law that effectively bans anonymous shell companies The new law prevents criminals from hiding money in US banks Richard Hall@_richardhall Friday 01 January 2021 22:15 0 comments Article bookmarked Find your bookmarks in your Independent Premium section, under my profile [ ]Don't show me this message again Contested Election Wall Street Contested Election Wall Street (Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved) The United States has effectively banned anonymous shell companies from operating in the country with the passing of a new anti- corruption law described by campaigners as "historic". The new legislation was included in the annual National Defense Authorization Act, which allocates funds to the US military, and was passed by veto-proof majority in Congress on Friday. Under the new rules, companies will be required to provide "beneficial ownership" information to the treasury department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Unit. Anonymous companies, which can be used to hide funds illicitly obtained by criminals and corrupt foreign officials, would be effectively banned. Transparency International, an advocacy group that worked with lawmakers to craft the bill, called the new law "historic" and "one of the most important anti-corruption measures ever passed by the US Congress." Read more * This latest banking scandal shows it's still too easy to launder money "It's a huge step forward in fighting illicit finance at home and around the globe," said Gary Kalman, the group's US director. "Simply put, corporate transparency means it will be harder for corrupt leaders and other criminals to hide and move stolen money through secretly-owned corporations." Anti-corruption campaigners have lobbied for years to close loopholes that allow criminals to hide money in the US. Last year, the US overtook Switzerland in a global ranking of financial secrecy hotspots. It currently ranks second in the world in the Tax Justice Network's Financial Secrecy Index 2020, behind only the Cayman Islands. Corporate secrecy rules have previously made it possible for anyone to create an anonymous shell company, in which they could hide enormous sums of money without being identifiable. Corrupt foreign leaders, cartel bosses, and criminals have all made use of lax US laws to hide their ill-gotten gains. [ ]Please enter your email addressPlease enter a valid email addressPlease enter a valid email address SIGN UP Thanks for signing up to the News newsletter {{#verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}} {{^verifyErrors}} {{message}} {{/verifyErrors}} [ ]The Independent would like to keep you informed about offers, events and updates by email, please tick the box if you would like to be contacted Read our full mailing list consent terms here SIGN UP [ ]The Independent would like to keep you informed about offers, events and updates by email, please tick the box if you would like to be contacted Read our full mailing list consent terms here That will now change. The new Corporate Transparency Act, passed with bipartisan support, requires anyone forming a company in the US to provide their name, date of birth, unique identification number and other information. That information can be shared with law enforcement --including those acting on behalf of a foreign law enforcement agency -- as well as for national security and intelligence purposes. The act also makes "deliberate false statements or willful evasion of its requirements" a federal crime, punishable by up to three years in jail. Larger companies that employ more than 20 people, have revenues above $5 million and a physical presence in the US, are exempt from the act. Churches, charities and other non-profits are also exempt. Casey Michel, author of the forthcoming book about money laundering called 'American Kleptocracy', said the bill was a victory for anti-corruption efforts not just in the US, but around the world. "It's difficult to overstate the importance of today's legislation," he told The Independent, describing it as "the most significant anti-money laundering move the US has taken in decades, and potentially ever." "Oligarchs and kleptocrats, gun-runners and cartel heads, wildlife poachers and human traffickers -- anyone with a bit of dirty money burning holes in their pocket, really -- can no longer turn to American shell companies for their money laundering needs," he added. Mr Michel, whose book is due to be published later this year, said that the use of anonymous shell companies in the US had acted as the "building blocks" for corrupt networks around the world, which were able to hide dirty money from investigators and journalists. "For years, the US -- thanks especially to states like Delaware, Nevada, and Wyoming -- has acted as the world's biggest provider of anonymous shell companies. Now, thanks to the NDAA's passage, that reality is a thing of the past," he said. Donald Trump had originally vetoed the $740bn defence bill containing the anti-corruption measures. He listed among his objections a requirement for the US military to rename bases named after Confederate leaders and the refusal of lawmakers to include a repeal of a law that provides immunity to social media platforms for content posted on their sites. He was opposed by his own party colleagues as Republicans joined Democrats to pass the bill by the two-thirds majority required to override the president's veto. More about * Congress * United States * corruption * Donald Trump Show 0 comments 1/1US passes 'historic' anti-corruption law banning shell companies US passes 'historic' anti-corruption law banning shell companies Contested Election Wall Street Copyright 2020 The Associated Press. All rights reserved Comments Share your thoughts and debate the big issues Learn more About The Independent commenting Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss real-world solutions, and more. Our journalists will try to respond by joining the threads when they can to create a true meeting of independent Premium. The most insightful comments on all subjects will be published daily in dedicated articles. You can also choose to be emailed when someone replies to your comment. The existing Open Comments threads will continue to exist for those who do not subscribe to Independent Premium. Due to the sheer scale of this comment community, we are not able to give each post the same level of attention, but we have preserved this area in the interests of open debate. Please continue to respect all commenters and create constructive debates. Subscribe Already registered? Log in Delete Comment Are you sure you want to delete this comment? Cancel Delete comment Report Comment Are you sure you want to mark this comment as inappropriate? Cancel Flag comment Independent Premium comments0 Independent Premium commentsOpen comments0 open comments Join the discussion Join the discussion... Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines. * You may not agree with our views, or other users', but please respond to them respectfully * Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable * Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties * We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification You can find our Community Guidelines in full here. Create a commenting name to join the debate [ ] Submit [ ] [ ] Post ReplyDelete 0 0 Create a commenting name to join the debate [ ] Submit [ ] [ ] Cancel Post * Newest first * Oldest first * Most liked There are no Independent Premium comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts Show all commentsRead more Join the discussion Join the discussion... Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines. * You may not agree with our views, or other users', but please respond to them respectfully * Swearing, personal abuse, racism, sexism, homophobia and other discriminatory or inciteful language is not acceptable * Do not impersonate other users or reveal private information about third parties * We reserve the right to delete inappropriate posts and ban offending users without notification You can find our Community Guidelines in full here. Create a commenting name to join the debate [ ] Submit [ ] [ ] Post ReplyDelete 0 0 Create a commenting name to join the debate [ ] Submit [ ] [ ] Cancel Post * Newest first * Oldest first * Most liked There are no comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts Show all commentsRead more Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today. Subscribe Already subscribed? Log in Most popular {{title}} Popular videos {{title}} Featured {{shortHeadline}} Sponsored Features {{title}} * Get in touch + Contact us + Jobs + * Our Products + Subscriptions + Donations + Install our apps + Archive * Other publications + International editions + Independent en Espanol + Independent Arabia + Independent Turkish + Independent Persian + Independent Urdu + Evening Standard + Novaya Gazeta * Extras + All topics + Voucher codes + Advertising guide + Syndication * Legal + Code of conduct and complaints + Contributors + Cookie policy + Donations Terms & Conditions + Privacy notice + User policies Log in [ ]Email address [ ]Password Email and password don't match [ ]Keep me logged in Submit Forgotten your password? New to The Independent? Register Want an ad-free experience? Subscribe to Independent Premium. View offers Hi {{fullName}} * My Independent Premium * Account details * Help centre * Logout