filial affection
and
modesty
dwell."
Verax
.
Detailed Contents of Appendices
Contents
(10) Lord Byron (Morning Post, February 18, 1814).
If it was the object of Lord
Byron
to stamp his character, and to bring
his name forward by a single act of his life into general notoriety, it
must be confessed that he has completely succeeded. We do not recollect
any former instance in which a Peer has stood forth as the libeller of
his Sovereign. If he disapproves the measures of his Ministers, the
House of Parliament, in which he has an hereditary right to sit, is the
place where his opinions may with propriety be uttered. If he thinks he
can avert any danger to his country by a personal conference with his
Sovereign, he has a right to demand it. The Peers are the natural
advisers of the Crown, but the Constitution which has granted them such
extraordinary privileges, makes it doubly criminal in them to attack the
authority from which it is derived, and to insult the power which it is
their peculiar province to uphold and protect. What then must we think
of the foolish vanity, or the bad taste of a titled Poet, who is the
first to proclaim himself the Author of a Libel, because he is fearful
it will not be sufficiently read without his avowal. We perfectly
remember having read the verses in question a year ago; but we could not
then suppose them the offspring of patrician bile, nor should we now
believe it without the Author's special authority. It seems by some late
quotations from his Lordship's works, which have been rescued from that
oblivion to which they were hastening with a rapid step, by one of our
co-equals, that this peerless Peer has already gone through a complete
course of private ingratitude. The inimitable Hogarth has traced the
gradual workings of an unfeeling heart in his progress of cruelty. He
has shewn, that malevolence is progressive in its operation, and that a
man who begins life by impaling flies, will find a delight in torturing
his fellow creatures before he closes it. We have heard that even at
school these poetical propensities were strongly manifested in Lord
Byron
, and that he began his satirical career against those persons to
whom the formation of his mind was entrusted. From his schoolmaster he
turned the œstrum of his opening genius to his guardian and uncle, the
Earl of
Carlisle
. We cannot believe that the Noble Person's conduct has
in this instance been a perfect contrast to the general tenor of his
life. We have heard, that during his guardianship he tripled the amount
of his nephew's fortune. If the Earl of
Carlisle
was satisfied with his
own
conscia mens recti
, if he wanted no thanks, he must at least
have been much surprised to find such attentions and services rewarded
with a libel, in which not only his literary accomplishments, but his
bodily infirmities, were made the subject of public ridicule. The Noble
Earl was certainly at liberty to treat such personal attacks with the
contempt which they deserve, but since his Sovereign is become the
object of a vile and unprovoked libel, he will no doubt draw the
attention of his Peers to a new case of outrage to good order and
government, which has been unfortunately furnished by his own nephew.
Detailed Contents of Appendices
Contents
III: The Sun
(1) The Sun, February 4, 1814.
That poetical Peer, Lord
Byron
, knowing full well that anything
insulting to his Prince or injurious to his country would be most
thankfully received and published by the
Morning Chronicle
, did
in March, 1812, send the following loyal and patriotic lines to that
loyal and patriotic Paper, in which of course they appeared:
"To
a Lady Weeping.
"Weep, daughter of a Royal line,
A Sire's disgrace, a realm's decay:
Ah! happy! if each tear of thine
Could wash a father's fault away!
"Weep—for thy tears are Virtue's tears—
Auspicious to these suffering isles:
And be each drop, in future years,
Repaid thee by thy people's smiles!"
These lines the
Morning Chronicle
, in the following paragraph of
yesterday, informs us were aimed at the
Prince Regent
, and addressed to
the Princess
Charlotte
:
"The Courier is indignant at the discovery now made by Lord
Byron, that he was the author of 'the Verses to a Young Lady weeping,'
which were inserted about a twelvemonth ago in the Morning
Chronicle. The Editor thinks it audacious in a hereditary
Counsellor of the King to admonish the Heir Apparent. It may
not be courtly, but it is certainly British, and we wish
the kingdom had more such honest advisers."
No wonder the
Courier
, and every loyal man, should be indignant
at the discovery (made by the republication of these worthless lines, in
the Noble Lord's new Volume) that this gross insult came from the pen of
"a hereditary Counsellor of the
King
! "No wonder every good subject
should execrate this novel and disagreeable mode of "
admonishing
the Heir Apparent," which is further from being British than it is from
being Courtly; for, from Courtier baseness may be expected, but from a
Briton no such infamous dereliction of his duty as is involved in a
malignant,
anonymous
attack by a Peer of the Realm upon the
person exercising the Sovereign Authority of his Country. But the
assertions of Lord
Byron
are as false as they are audacious. What was
the "Sire's Disgrace" to be thus bewept? He preferred the independence
of the Crown to the arrogant dictation of a haughty Aristocracy, who
desired to hold him in Leading-strings. It was then, amid a "Realm's
(fancied) decay," because this Faction were not admitted to supreme
power, that his Royal Highness's early friends drunk his health in
contemptuous silence, while their more vulgar partizans "at the lower
end of the Hall" hissed and hooted the royal name. But mark the reverse
since March, 1812, a reverse which it might have been thought would have
induced the Noble Lord, from prudent motives, to have withheld this
ill-timed publication! How is his Royal Highness's health toasted
now
? With universal shouts and acclamations. Treason itself dare
not interpose a single discordant sound save in its own private orgies!
Where is
now
the realm's decay? oh short-sighted prognosticators
of the prophecies! look around, and dread the fate of the speakers of
falsehood among the Jews of old, who were stoned to death by the people!
The wide world furnishes the answer to your selfish croakings, and tells
Lord
Byron
that he is destitute of at least one of the qualities of an
inspired Bard.
Perhaps we might add another, viz. honesty in acknowledging his
plagiarisms, one of which (as we have already said more than his silly
verse above quoted deserves, except from the rank of its author) we
shall take the liberty of stating to the Public.
The
Bride of Abydos
begins, something in the stile of an old
ballad, thus:
"Know ye the land where the cypress and myrtle
Are emblems of deeds that are done in their clime,
Where the rage of the vulture—the love of the turtle—
Now melt into sorrow—now madden to crime?—
Know ye the land of the cedar and vine?
Where the flowers ever blossom, the beams ever shine,
Where the light wings of Zephyr, oppress'd with perfume,
Wax faint o'er the gardens of Gúl in her bloom;
Where the citron and olive are fairest of fruit,
And the voice of the nightingale never is mute;
Where the tints of the earth, and the hues of the sky,
In colour though varied, in beauty may vie,
And the purple of Ocean is deepest in dye."
The whole of which passage we take to be a paraphrase, and a bad
paraphrase too, of a song of the German of Göthe, of which the following
translation was published at Berlin in 1798:
"Know'st thou the land, where citrons scent the gale,
Where glows the orange in the golden vale,
Where softer breezes fan the azure skies,
Where myrtles spring and prouder laurels rise?
"Know'st them the pile, the colonnade sustains,
Its splendid chambers and its rich domains,
Where breathing statues stand in bright array,
And seem, 'What ails thee, hapless maid?' to say?
"Know'st thou the mount, where clouds obscure the day;
Where scarce the mule can trace his misty way;
Where lurks the dragon and her scaly brood;
And broken rocks oppose the headlong flood?"
Detailed Contents of Appendices
Contents
(2) Epigram (The Sun, February 8, 1814)
.
On the Detection of Lord
Byron's
Plagiarism, in
The Sun
of Friday
last.
"That Byron borrows verses is well known,
But his misanthropy is all his own."
Detailed Contents of Appendices
Contents
(3) Lord Byron (The Sun, February 11, 1814).
We are informed from very good authority, that as soon as the House of
Lords meets again, a Peer of very independent principles and character
intends to give notice of a motion, occasioned by the late spontaneous
avowal of a copy of verses by Lord Byron, addressed to the Princess
Charlotte of Wales, in which he has taken the most unwarrantable
liberties with her august Father's character and conduct; this motion
being of a personal nature, it will be necessary to give the Noble
Satirist some days notice, that he may prepare himself for his defence
against a charge of so aggravated a nature, which may perhaps not be a
fit subject for a criminal prosecution, as the laws of the country, not
forseeing the probability of such a case ever occurring, under all the
present circumstances, have not made a provision against it; but we know
that each House of Parliament has a controul over its own members, and
that there are instances on the Journals of Parliament, where an
individual Peer has been suspended from all the privileges of the high
situation to which his birth entitled him, when by any flagrant offence
against good order and government, he has rendered himself unworthy of
exercising so important a trust.
Morning Post.
Detailed Contents of Appendices
Contents
(4) Parody (The Sun, February 16, 1814)
.
"'Weep, Daughter of a Royal Line!'
"Mourn, dabbler in dull party rhyme,
Thy mind's disease, thy name's disgrace.
Ah, lucky! if the hand of Time
Should all thy Muse's crimes efface!
"Mourn—for thy lays are Rancour's lays—
Disgraceful to a Briton born;
And hence each theme of factious praise
Consigns thee to thy Country's scorn."
Detailed Contents of Appendices
Contents
end of text