Footnote 7:
  Napoleon fought the battle of Nangis against Blucher on the 17th of February, 1814, and that of Montereau against Prince Schwartzenberg on the following day.

return


List of Journal Entries
Contents




Sunday, March 6th [1814]


On
Tuesday last dined with Rogers,—Madame de Staël, Mackintosh, Sheridan, Erskine
1
, and Payne Knight, Lady Donegal, and Miss R. there. Sheridan told a very good story of himself and Madame de Recamier's handkerchief; Erskine a few stories of himself only.
She
is going to write a big book about England, she says;—I believe her.
Asked
by her how I liked Miss Edgeworth's thing, called
Patronage
2
, and answered (very sincerely) that I thought it very bad for
her
, and worse than any of the others.
Afterwards
thought it possible Lady Donegal
3
, being Irish, might be a patroness of Miss Edgeworth, and was rather sorry for my opinion, as I hate putting people into fusses, either with themselves or their favourites; it looks as if one did it on purpose. The party went off very well, and the fish was very much to my gusto. But we got up too soon after the women; and Mrs. Corinne always lingers so long after dinner that we wish her in—the drawing-room.


To-day
Campbell called, and while sitting here in came Merivale
4
. During our colloquy, C. (ignorant that Merivale was the writer) abused the "mawkishness of the
Quarterly Review
of Grimm's
Correspondence
." I (knowing the secret) changed the conversation as soon as I could; and C. went away, quite convinced of having made the most favourable impression on his new acquaintance. Merivale is luckily a very good-natured fellow, or God he knows what might have been engendered from such a malaprop. I did not look at him while this was going on, but I felt like a coal—for I like Merivale, as well as the article in question.


Asked
to Lady Keith's
5
to-morrow evening—I think I will go; but it is the first party invitation I have accepted this "season," as the learned Fletcher called it, when that youngest brat of Lady ——'s cut my eye and cheek open with a misdirected pebble—"Never mind, my Lord, the scar will be gone before the
season
;" as if one's eye was of no importance in the mean time.


Lord Erskine called, and gave me his famous pamphlet, with a marginal note and corrections in his handwriting. Sent it to be bound superbly, and shall treasure it.


Sent
my fine print of Napoleon
6
to be framed. It
is
framed; and the Emperor becomes his robes as if he had been hatched in them.






Footnote 1:
  Thomas, Lord Erskine (1750-1823), youngest son of the tenth Earl of Buchan, a midshipman in the Royal Navy (1764-67), an ensign, and subsequently a lieutenant in the First Foot (1767-75), was called to the Bar in 1778, and became Lord Chancellor in 1806. As an advocate he was unrivalled.
"Even the great luminaries of the law," says Wraxall (Posthumous Memoirs, vol. i. p. 86), "when arrayed in their ermine, bent under his ascendancy, and seemed to be half subdued by his intelligence, or awed by his vehemence, pertinacity, and undaunted character."
With a jury he was particularly successful, though he lived to write the lines quoted by Lord Campbell (
Lives of the Chancellors
, ed. 1868, vol. viii. p. 233):
"The monarch's pale face was with blushes suffused,
To observe right and wrong by twelve villains confused,
And, kicking their ——s all round in a fury,
Cried, 'Curs'd be the day I invented a jury!'"
A Whig in politics, and in sympathy with the doctrines of the French Revolution, he defended Paine, Frost, Hardy, and other political offenders, and did memorable service to the cause of constitutional liberty. In the House of Commons, which he entered as M. P. for Portsmouth in 1783, he was a failure; his maiden speech on Fox's India Bill fell flat, and he was crushed by Pitt's contempt. As Lord Chancellor (1806-7) he proved a better judge than was expected. At the time when Byron made his acquaintance, he had practically retired from public life, and devoted himself to literature, society, and farming, writing on the services of rooks, and attending the Holkham sheep-shearings. Lord Campbell has collected many of his verses and jokes in vol. ix. chap. cxc. of his
Lives of the Chancellors
. His famous pamphlet,
On the Causes and Consequences of the War with France
(1797), was written, as he told Miss Berry (
Journal of Miss Berry
, vol. ii. p. 340),
"on slips of paper in the midst of all the business which I was engaged in at the time—not at home, but in open court, whilst the causes were trying. When it was not my turn to examine a witness, or to speak to the Jury, I wrote a little bit; and so on by snatches."
His
Armata
was published by Murray in 1817. In society Erskine was widely known for his brilliancy, his puns, and his extraordinary vanity. His egotism gained him such titles as Counsellor Ego, Baron Ego of Eye, and supplied Mathias (
Pursuits of Literature
) with an illustration:
"A vain, pert prater, bred in Erskine's school."
return to footnote mark



Footnote 2:
  Miss Edgeworth's
Patronage
was published in 1813-4. In 1813 she had been in London with her father and stepmother. The following entries respecting the family are taken from Byron's
Detached Thoughts
:
"Old Edgeworth, the fourth or fifth Mrs. Edgeworth, and the Miss Edgeworth were in London, 1813. Miss Edgeworth liked, Mrs. Edgeworth not disliked, old Edgeworth a bore, the worst of bores—a boisterous Bore. I met them in Society—once at a breakfast of Sir H. D.'s. Old Edgeworth came in late, boasting that he had given 'Dr. Parr a dressing the night before' (no such easy matter by the way). I thought her pleasant. They all abused Anna Seward's memory. When on the road they heard of her brother's—and his son's—death. What was to be done? Their London apparel was all ordered and made! so they sunk his death for the six weeks of their sojourn, and went into mourning on their way back to Ireland. Fact!

"While the Colony were in London, there was a book with a subscription for the 'recall of Mrs. Siddons to the Stage' going about for signatures. Moore moved for a similar subscription for the 'recall of Mr. Edgeworth to Ireland!' "Sir Humphry Davy told me that the scene of the French Valet and Irish postboy in Ennui was taken from his verbal description to the Edgeworths in Edgeworthtown of a similar fact on the road occurring to himself. So much the better—being life."
return



Footnote 3:
 The Marquis of Donegal married, in 1795, Anna, daughter of Sir Edward May, Bart.

return



Footnote 4:
  For J. H. Merivale, see
Letters
, vol. iii. (January, 1814.
note
1).

return



Footnote 5:
  Hester Maria, eldest daughter and co-heir of Henry Thrale, of Streatham, the friend of Dr. Johnson, married, in 1808, Viscount Keith.

return



Footnote 6:
  Byron's "Portrait of Bonaparte, engraved by Morghen,
very fine impression, in a gilt frame
," was sold at his sale, April 5, 1816.

return


List of Journal Entries
Contents




March 7th [1814]


Rose
at seven—ready by half-past eight—went to Mr. Hanson's, Bloomsbury Square—went to church with his eldest daughter, Mary Anne (a good girl), and gave her away to the Earl of Portsmouth
1
. Saw her fairly a countess—congratulated the family and groom (bride)—drank a bumper of wine (wholesome sherris) to their felicity, and all that—and came home. Asked to stay to dinner, but could not. At three sat to Phillips for faces. Called on Lady M. [Melbourne]—I like her so well, that I always stay too long. (Mem. to mend of that.)


Passed the evening with Hobhouse, who has begun a poem, which promises highly;—wish he would go on with it.
Heard
some curious extracts from a life of Morosini
2
, the blundering Venetian, who blew up the Acropolis at Athens with a bomb, and be damned to him! Waxed sleepy—just come home—must go to bed, and am engaged to meet Sheridan to-morrow at Rogers's.


Queer ceremony that same of marriage—saw many abroad, Greek and Catholic—one, at
home
, many years ago. There be some strange phrases in the prologue (the exhortation), which made me turn away, not to laugh in the face of the surpliceman. Made one blunder, when I joined the hands of the happy—rammed their left hands, by mistake, into one another. Corrected it—bustled back to the altar-rail, and said "Amen." Portsmouth responded as if he had got the whole by heart; and, if any thing, was rather before the priest. It is now midnight and ——.






Footnote 1:
  Lord Portsmouth (see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 9,
note
2 [Footnote 3 of Letter 3]), who had long known the Hansons, from whose house he married his first wife, married, March 7, 1814, Mary Anne, eldest daughter of John Hanson. A commission of lunacy was taken out by the brother and next heir, the Hon. Newton Fellowes; but Lord Chancellor Eldon decided that Lord Portsmouth was capable of entering into the marriage contract and managing his own affairs. The commission was, however, ultimately granted. Byron swore an affidavit on the first occasion.
"Denman mentioned Lord Byron's affidavit about Lord Portsmouth as a proof of the influence of Hanson over him; Lord B. swearing that Lord P. had 'rather a superior mind than otherwise'"
(
Memoirs, etc., of Thomas Moore
, vol. vi. p. 47).


The following is the note which Byron sent Hanson to embody in his affidavit:
"I have been acquainted with Mr. Hanson and his family for many years. He is my solicitor. About the beginning of March last he sent to me to ask my opinion on the subject of Lord Portsmouth, who, as I understood from Mr. H., was paying great attention to his eldest daughter. He stated to me that Mr. Newton Fellowes (with whom I have no personal acquaintance) was particularly desirous that Lord Portsmouth should marry some 'elderly woman' of his (Mr. Fellowes's) selection—that the title and family estates might thereby devolve on Mr. F. or his children; but that Lord P. had expressed a dislike to old women, and a desire to choose for himself. I told Mr. Hanson that, if Miss Hanson's affections were not pre-engaged, and Lord Portsmouth appeared attached to her, there could be, in my opinion, no objection to the match. I think, but cannot be positive, that I saw Lord Portsmouth at Mr. Hanson's two or three times previous to the marriage; but I had no conversation with him upon it.

"The night before the ceremony, I received an invitation from Mr. Hanson, requesting me, as a friend of the family, to be present at the marriage, which was to take place next morning. I went next morning to Bloomsbury Square, where I found the parties. Lady Portsmouth, with her brother and sister and another gentleman, went in the carriage to St. George's Church; Lord Portsmouth and myself walked, as the carriage was full, and the distance short. On my way Lord Portsmouth told me that he had been partial to Miss Hanson from her childhood, and that, since she grew up, and more particularly subsequent to the decease of the late Lady P., this partiality had become attachment, and that he thought her calculated to make him an excellent wife. I was present at the ceremony and gave away the bride. Lord Portsmouth's behaviour seemed to me perfectly calm and rational on the occasion. He seemed particularly attentive to the priest, and gave the responses audibly and very distinctly. I remarked this because, in ordinary conversation, his Lordship has a hesitation in his speech. After the ceremony, we returned to Mr. Hanson's, whence, I believe, they went into the country—where I did not accompany them. Since their return I have occasionally seen Lord and Lady Portsmouth in Bloomsbury Square. They appeared very happy. I have never been very intimate with his Lordship, and am therefore unqualified to give a decided opinion of his general conduct. But had I considered him insane, I should have advised Mr. Hanson, when he consulted me on the subject, not to permit the marriage. His preference of a young woman to an old one, and of his own wishes to those of a younger brother, seemed to me neither irrational nor extraordinary."
There is nothing in the note itself, or in the draft affidavit, to bear out Moore's report of Denman's statement.


Byron, according to the account given by Newton Hanson, is wrong in saying that Mrs. Hanson approved of the marriage. On the contrary, it was the cause of her death, a fortnight later. In 1828 the marriage was annulled, a jury having decided that Lord Portsmouth was
non compos mentis
when he contracted it.

return to footnote mark



Footnote 2:
  Francesco Morosini (1618-1694) occupied the Morea for Venice (1687), besieged Athens, and bombarded the Parthenon, which had been made a powder-magazine. He became Doge of Venice in 1688.

return


List of Journal Entries
Contents




March 10th [1814]


Thor's Day


On Tuesday dined with Rogers,—Mackintosh, Sheridan, Sharpe,—much talk, and good,—all, except my own little prattlement. Much of old times—Horne Tooke—the Trials—evidence of Sheridan, and anecdotes of those times, when
I
, alas! was an infant. If I had been a man, I would have made an English Lord Edward Fitzgerald.


Set down Sheridan at Brookes's,—where, by the by, he could not have well set down himself, as he and I were the only drinkers.
Sherry
means to stand for Westminster, as Cochrane
1
(the stock-jobbing hoaxer) must vacate. Brougham
2
is a
candidate
. I fear for poor dear Sherry. Both have talents of the highest order, but the youngster has
yet
a character. We shall see, if he lives to Sherry's age, how he will pass over the redhot plough-shares of public life. I don't know why, but I hate to see the
old
ones lose; particularly Sheridan, notwithstanding all his
méchanceté
.


Received many, and the kindest, thanks from Lady Portsmouth,
père
and
mère
, for my match-making. I don't regret it, as she looks the countess well, and is a very good girl. It is odd how well she carries her new honours. She looks a different woman, and high-bred, too. I had no idea that I could make so good a peeress.


Went to the play with Hobhouse.
Mrs
. Jordan superlative in Hoyden
3
, and Jones well enough in Foppington.
What plays
! what wit!—
hélas
! Congreve and Vanbrugh are your only comedy. Our society is too insipid now for the like copy. Would
not
go to Lady Keith's. Hobhouse thought it odd. I wonder
he
should like parties. If one is in love, and wants to break a commandment and covet any thing that is there, they do very well. But to go out amongst the mere herd, without a motive, pleasure, or pursuit—'sdeath! "I'll none of it." He told me an odd report,—that
I
am the actual Conrad, the veritable Corsair, and that part of my travels are supposed to have passed in privacy. Um!—people sometimes hit near the truth; but never the whole truth. H.
don't
know what I was about the year after he left the Levant; nor does any one—nor —— nor—nor—however, it is a lie—but, "I doubt the equivocation of the fiend that lies like truth!"
4


I shall have letters of importance to-morrow. Which, ——, ——, or ——? heigho!— —— is in my heart, —— in my head, —— in my eye, and the
single
one, Heaven knows where. All write, and will be answered. "
Since
I have crept in favour with myself, I must maintain it;"
5
but I never "mistook my person,"
6
though I think others have.


—— called to-day in great despair about his mistress, who has taken a freak of ——. He began a letter to her, but was obliged to stop short—I finished it for him, and he copied and sent it. If
he
holds out, and keeps to my instructions of affected indifference, she will lower her colours. If she don't, he will, at least, get rid of her, and she don't seem much worth keeping. But the poor lad is in love—if that is the case, she will win. When they once discover their power,
finita è la musica
.


Sleepy, and must go to bed.






Footnote 1:
 Thomas, Lord Cochrane (1775-1860), eldest son of the ninth Earl of Dundonald, a captain in the Royal Navy, and M. P. for Westminster, had done brilliant service in his successive commands—the
Speedy, Pallas, Impérieuse
, and the flotilla of fire-ships at Basque Roads in 1809. In the House of Commons he had been a strong opponent of the Government, an advocate of Parliamentary Reform, and a vigorous critic of naval administration. In February, 1814, he had been appointed to the
Tonnant
for the American Station, and it was while he was on a week's leave of absence in London, before sailing, that the stock-jobbing hoax occurred.


During the days February 8-26, 1814, it seemed possible that Napoleon might defeat the Allied Armies, and the Funds were sensitive to every rumour. At midnight on Sunday, February 20, a man calling himself Du Bourg brought news to Admiral Foley, at Dover, that Napoleon had been killed by a party of Cossacks. Hurrying towards London, Du Bourg, whose real name was Berenger, spread the news as he went. Arrived in London soon after daybreak, he went to Cochrane's house, and there changed his uniform. When the Stock Exchange opened at ten on February 21, 1814, the Funds rose rapidly, and among those who sold on the rise was Cochrane. The next day, when the swindle had been discovered, the Stocks fell.


A Stock Exchange Committee sat to investigate the case, and their report (March 7) threw grave suspicion on Cochrane. He, his uncle, Cochrane Johnstone, a Mr. Butt, and Berenger, were indicted for a conspiracy, tried before Lord Ellenborough, June 8-9, and convicted. Cochrane was sentenced to a year's imprisonment and a fine of £1000. On the back of the note for £1000 (still kept in the Bank of England) with which he paid his fine on July 3, 1815, he wrote:
"My health having suffered by long and close confinement, and my oppressors being resolved to deprive me of property or life, I submit to robbery to protect myself from murder, in the hope that I shall live to bring the delinquents to justice."
Cochrane was also expelled from the House of Commons and from the Order of the Bath. There is little doubt that the circumstances were extremely suspicious. Those who wish to form an opinion as to Cochrane's guilt or innocence will find the subject of the trial exhaustively treated in Mr. J.B. Atlay's
Lord Cochrane's Trial before Lord Ellenborough
(1897).

return to footnote mark



Footnote 2:
  Henry, Lord Brougham (1778-1868) acknowledged that he wrote the famous article on Byron's
Hours of Idleness
in the
Edinburgh Review
(Sir M.E. Grant-Duff's
Notes from a Diary
, vol. ii. p. 189). He lost his seat for Camelford in September, 1812, and did not re-enter the House till July, 1815, when he sat for Winchelsea. In the postscript of a letter written by him to Douglas Kinnaird, December 9, 1814, he speaks of Byron thus:
"Your friend, Lord B., is, in my opinion, a singularly agreeable person, which is very rarely the case with eminent men. His independent principles give him a great additional charm."
But the part which Brougham played in the separation, both as counsel and in society, infuriated Byron, who wrote of him in his letters with the utmost bitterness. (See also the passage, now for the first time published, from Byron's
Detached Thoughts
, on his Parliamentary experiences, p. 198,
first paragraph
of
note
.)

return



Footnote 3:
  Dorothy Jordan (1762-1816) first appeared as "Phoebe" in
As You Like It
at the Crow Street Theatre, Dublin, in 1777. After acting in provincial theatres, she made her
début
on the London stage at Drury Lane (October 18, 1785) as "Peggy" in Garrick's
Country Girl
, an expurgated version of Wycherley's
Country Wife
. During the season she appeared also in six of her best parts: "Miss Hoyden" in
The Trip to Scarborough
, "Priscilla Tomboy" in
The Romp
, "Hypolita" in
She would and she would not
, "Mrs. Brady" in
The Irish Widow
, "Viola" in
Twelfth Night
, and "Rosalind" in
As You Like It
. Her last appearance on the London stage was as "Lady Teazle" in
The School for Scandal
, at Covent Garden, June 1, 1814. A list of her principal characters is given by Genest (
English Stage
, vol. viii. pp. 432-434). As a comic actress, Mrs. Jordan was unrivalled; her voice was perfect; and her natural gaiety irresistible. Sir Joshua Reynolds preferred her to all other actresses as a being "who ran upon the stage as a playground, and laughed from sincere wildness of delight." In genteel comedy, critics like Genest (
English Stage