Footnote 1:
  For Byron's Rochdale property, which was supposed to contain a quantity of coal, see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 78,
note
2. [Footnote 2 of Letter 34]

return to footnote mark



Footnote 2:
  Gifford.

return



Footnote 3:
  For John Cam Hobhouse, see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 163,
note
1. [Footnote 1 of Letter 86]

return



Footnote 4:
  The poem remained unpublished till after Byron's death. (See
note
, p. 23, and
Poems
, ed. 1898, vol. i. pp. 385-450.)

return



Footnote 5:
 
"In Seaham churchyard, without any memorial," says Mr. Surtees, "rest the remains of Joseph Blacket, an unfortunate child of genius, whose last days were soothed by the generous attention of the family of Milbanke."
Hist. of Durham
, vol. i. p. 272. (See also
Letters
, vol. i. p. 314,
note
2 [Footnote 2 of Letter 154]. For Miss Milbanke, afterwards Lady Byron, see p. 118,
note
4.) [Footnote 1 of Letter 7]

return

cross-reference: return to Footnote 1 of Letter 235



Footnote 6:
  On July 28, 1811, Lord Grenville wrote to Lord Auckland,
"It is, I believe, certainly true that the King has taken for the last three days scarcely any food at all, and that, unless a change takes place very shortly in that respect, he cannot survive many days"
(A
uckland Correspondence
, vol. iv. p. 366).

It was, however, the mind, and not the physical strength that failed.
"The King, I should suppose," wrote Lord Buckinghamshire, on August 13, "is not likely to die soon, but I fear his mental recovery is hardly to be expected "
(
ibid
., vol. iv. p. 367).

George III. never, except for brief intervals, recovered his reason.

return



Footnote 7:
  For C. S. Matthews, see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 150,
note
3.[Footnote 2 of Letter 84]

return


List of Letters

Contents




172—to R. C. Dallas1


Newstead Abbey, Aug. 27, 1811.



I was so sincere in my note on the late Charles Matthews, and do feel myself so totally unable to do justice to his talents, that the passage must stand for the very reason you bring against it. To him all the men I ever knew were pigmies. He was an intellectual giant.
It
is true I loved Wingfield
2
better; he was the earliest and the dearest, and one of the few one could never repent of having loved: but in ability—ah! you did not know Matthews!


Childe Harold
may wait and welcome—books are never the worse for delay in the publication.
So
you have got our heir, George Anson Byron
3
, and his sister, with you.


You
may say what you please, but you are one of the
murderers
of Blackett, and yet you won't allow Harry White's genius
4
.


Setting aside his bigotry, he surely ranks next Chatterton. It is astonishing how little he was known; and at Cambridge no one thought or heard of such a man till his death rendered all notice useless. For my own part, I should have been most proud of such an acquaintance: his very prejudices were respectable.
There
is a sucking epic poet at Granta, a Mr. Townsend
5
,
protégé
of the late Cumberland. Did you ever hear of him and his
Armageddon
? I think his plan (the man I don't know) borders on the sublime: though, perhaps, the anticipation of the "Last Day" (according to you Nazarenes) is a little too daring: at least, it looks like telling the Lord what he is to do, and might remind an ill-natured person of the line,
"And fools rush in where angels fear to tread."
But I don't mean to cavil, only other folks will, and he may bring all the lambs of Jacob Behmen about his ears. However, I hope he will bring it to a conclusion, though Milton is in his way.


Write to me—I dote on gossip—and make a bow to Ju—, and shake George by the hand for me; but, take care, for he has a sad sea paw.


P.S.—I would ask George here, but I don't know how to amuse him—all my horses were sold when I left England, and I have not had time to replace them. Nevertheless, if he will come down and shoot in September, he will be very welcome: but he must bring a gun, for I gave away all mine to Ali Pacha, and other Turks. Dogs, a keeper, and plenty of game, with a very large manor, I have—a lake, a boat, houseroom, and
neat wines
.






Footnote 1:
  Dallas, writing to Byron, August 18, 1811, had said,
"I have been reading the Remains of Kirke White, and find that you have to answer for misleading me. He does not, in my opinion, merit the high praise you have bestowed upon him."
Writing again, August 26, he objected to the
note
on Matthews in
Childe Harold
:
"In your note, as it stands, it strikes me that the eulogy on Matthews is a little at the expense of Wingfield and others whom you have commemorated. I should think it quite enough to say that his Powers and Attainments were above all praise, without expressly admitting them to be above that of a Muse who soars high in the praise of others."
return to footnote mark



Footnote 2:
  For Wingfield, see
Letters
, vol. i, p. 180,
note
1. [Footnote 2 of Letter 92]

return



Footnote 3:
 For George Anson Byron, afterwards Lord Byron, and his sister Julia, see
Letters
, vol. i, p. 188,
note
1. [Footnote 1 of Letter 96]

return



Footnote 4:
  For H. K. White, see
Letters
, vol. i, p. 336,
note
2. [Footnote 3 of Letter 167]

return



Footnote 5:
  The Rev. George Townsend (1788-1857) of Trinity College, Cambridge, published
Poems
in 1810, and eight books of his
Armageddon
in 1815. The remaining four books were never published. Townsend became a Canon of Durham in 1825, and held the stall till his death in 1857. Richard Cumberland, dramatist, novelist, and essayist (1732-1811), the "Sir Fretful Plagiary" of
The Critic
, announced the forthcoming poem in the
London Review
; but, as Townsend says, in the Preface to
Armageddon
, praised him "too abundantly and prematurely." "My talents," he adds, "were neither equal to my own ambition, nor his zeal to serve me." (See
Hints from Horace
, lines 191-212, and Byron's
note
to line 191,
Poems
, ed. 1898, vol. i. p. 403.)

return


List of Letters

Contents




173—To the Hon. Augusta Leigh1


Newstead Abbey, August 30th, 1811.



My Dear Augusta,—The embarrassments you mention in your last letter I never heard of before, but that disease is epidemic in our family. Neither have I been apprised of any of the changes at which you hint, indeed how should I? On the borders of the Black Sea, we heard only of the Russians. So you have much to tell, and all will be novelty.


I
don't know what Scrope Davies
2
meant by telling you I liked Children, I abominate the sight of them so much that I have always had the greatest respect for the character of Herod. But, as my house here is large enough for us all, we should go on very well, and I need not tell you that I long to see
you
. I really do not perceive any thing so formidable in a Journey hither of two days, but all this comes of Matrimony, you have a Nurse and all the etceteras of a family. Well, I must marry to repair the ravages of myself and prodigal ancestry, but if I am ever so unfortunate as to be presented with an Heir, instead of a
Rattle
he shall be provided with a
Gag
.


I shall perhaps be able to accept D's invitation to Cambridge, but I fear my stay in Lancashire will be prolonged, I proceed there in the 2d week in Septr to arrange my coal concerns, & then if I can't persuade some wealthy dowdy to ennoble the dirty puddle of her mercantile Blood,—why—I shall leave England and all it's clouds for the East again; I am very sick of it already. Joe
3
has
been
getting well of a disease that would have killed a troop of horse; he promises to bear away the palm of longevity from old Parr. As you won't come, you will write; I
long
to hear all those unutterable things, being utterly unable to guess at any of them, unless they concern
your
relative the Thane of Carlisle
4
, though I had great hopes we had done with him.


I have little to add that you do not already know, and being quite alone, have no great variety of incident to gossip with; I am but rarely pestered with visiters, and the few I have I get rid of as soon as possible. I will now take leave of you in the Jargon of 1794. "Health &
Fraternity!"


Yours alway, B.






Footnote 1:
 For the Hon. Augusta Leigh, see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 18,
note
1. [Footnote 1 of Letter 7] Byron's letter is in answer to the following from his half-sister:
"6 Mile Bottom, Aug. 27th.

"My Dearest Brother,—Your letter was stupidly sent to Town to me on Sunday, from whence I arrived at home yesterday; consequently I have not received it so soon as I ought to have done. I feel so very happy to have the pleasure of hearing from you that I will not delay a moment answering it, altho' I am in all the delights of unpacking, and afraid of being too late for the Post.

"I have been a fortnight in Town, and went up on my eldest little girl's account. She had been very unwell for some time, and I could not feel happy till I had better advice than this neighbourhood affords. She is, thank Heaven! much better, and I hope in a fair way to be quite herself again. Mr. Davies flattered me by saying she was exactly the sort of child you would delight in. I am determined not to say another word in her praise for fear you should accuse me of partiality and expect too much. The youngest (little Augusta) is just 6 months old, and has no particular merit at present but a very sweet placid temper.

"Oh! that I could immediately set out to Newstead and shew them to you. I can't tell you half the happiness it would give me to see it and you; but, my dearest B., it is a long journey and serious undertaking all things considered. Mr. Davies writes me word you promise to make him a visit bye and bye; pray do, you can then so easily come here. I have set my heart upon it. Consider how very long it is since I've seen you.

"I have indeed much to tell you; but it is more easily said than written. Probably you have heard of many changes in our situation since you left England; in a pecuniary point of view it is materially altered for the worse; perhaps in other respects better. Col. Leigh has been in Dorsetshire and Sussex during my stay in Town. I expect him at home towards the end of this week, and hope to make him acquainted with you ere long.

"I have not time to write half I have to say, for my letter must go; but I prefer writing in a hurry to not writing at all. You can't think how much I feel for your griefs and losses, or how much and constantly I have thought of you lately. I began a letter to you in Town, but destroyed it, from the fear of appearing troublesome. There are times, I know, when one cannot write with any degree of comfort or satisfaction. I intend to do so again shortly, so I hope yon won't think me a bore.

Remember me most kindly to Old Joe. I rejoice to hear of his health and prosperity. Your letter (some parts of it at least) made me laugh. I am so very glad to hear you have sufficiently overcome your prejudices against the fair sex to have determined upon marrying; but I shall be most anxious that my future Belle Soeur should have more attractions than merely money, though to be sure that is somewhat necessary. I have not another moment, dearest B., so forgive me if I write again very soon, and believe me,

Your most affec'tn Sister, A. L.

Do write if you can."
return to footnote mark



Footnote 2:
  For Scrope Berdmore Davies, see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 165,
note
2. [Footnote 2 of Letter 86] The following story is told of him by Byron, in a passage of his
Detached Thoughts
(Ravenna, 1821):
"One night Scrope Davies at a Gaming house (before I was of age), being tipsy as he usually was at the Midnight hour, and having lost monies, was in vain intreated by his friends, one degree less intoxicated than himself, to come or go home. In despair, he was left to himself and to the demons of the dice-box.

Next day, being visited about two of the Clock, by some friends just risen with a severe headache and empty pockets (who had left him losing at four or five in the morning), he was found in a sound sleep, without a night-cap, and not particularly encumbered with bed-cloathes: a Chamber-pot stood by his bed-side, brim-full of—-Bank Notes!, all won, God knows how, and crammed, Scrope knew not where; but There they were, all good legitimate notes, and to the amount of some thousand pounds."
return



Footnote 3:
 For Joe Murray, see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 21,
note
3. [Footnote 4 of Letter 7]

return



Footnote 4:
  For the Earl of Carlisle, see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 36,
note
2. [Footnote 3 of Letter 13]

return



List of Letters

Contents




174—To the Hon. Augusta Leigh


Newstead Abbey, Aug'st 30th, 1811.



My Dear Augusta
,—I wrote to you yesterday, and as you will not be very sorry to hear from me again, considering our long separation, I shall fill up this sheet before I go to bed. I have heard something of a quarrel between your spouse and the Prince, I don't wish to pry into family secrets or to hear anything more of the matter, but I can't help regretting on your account that so long an intimacy should be dissolved at the very moment when your husband might have derived some advantage from his R. H.'s friendship. However, at all events, and in all Situations, you have a brother in me, and a home here.


I am led into this train of thinking by a part of your letter which hints at pecuniary losses. I know how delicate one ought to be on such subjects, but you are probably the only being on Earth
now
interested in my welfare, certainly the only relative, and I should be very ungrateful if I did not feel the obligation. You must excuse my being a little cynical, knowing how my
temper
was tried in my Non-age; the manner in which I was brought up must necessarily have broken a meek Spirit, or rendered a fiery one ungovernable; the effect it has had on mine I need not state.


However, buffeting with the World has brought me a little to reason, and two years travel in distant and barbarous countries has accustomed me to bear privations, and consequently to laugh at many things which would have made me angry before. But I am wandering —in short I only want to assure you that I love you, and that you must not think I am indifferent, because I don't shew my affection in the usual way.


Pray can't you contrive to pay me a visit between this and Xmas? or shall I carry you down with me from Cambridge, supposing it practicable for me to come? You will do what you please, without our interfering with each other; the premises are so delightfully extensive, that two people might live together without ever seeing, hearing or meeting,—but I can't feel the comfort of this till I marry. In short it would be the most amiable matrimonial mansion, and that is another great inducement to my plan,—my wife and I shall be so happy,—one in each Wing. If this description won't make you come, I can't tell what will, you must please yourself. Good night, I have to walk half a mile to my Bed chamber.

Yours ever,
Byron
.


List of Letters<

Contents/p>




175—To James Wedderburn Webster


Newstead Abbey, Notts., Aug'st 31st, 1811.



My Dear W.
,—I send you back your friend's letter, and, though I don't agree with his Canons of Criticism, they are not the worse for that.
My
friend Hodgson
1
is not much honoured by the comparison to the
Pursuits of L.
, which is notoriously, as far as the
poetry
goes, the worst written of its kind; the World has been long but of one opinion, viz. that it's sole merit lies in the Notes, which are indisputably excellent.


Had Hodgson's "Alterative" been placed with the
Baviad
the compliment had been higher to both; for, surely, the
Baviad
is as much superior to H.'s poem, as I do firmly believe H.'s poem to be to the
Pursuits of Literature
.


Your correspondent talks for talking's sake when he says "Lady J. Grey" is neither "Epic, dramatic, or legendary." Who ever said it was "epic" or "dramatic"? he might as well say his letter was neither "epic or dramatic;" the poem makes no pretensions to either character. "Legendary" it certainly is, but what has that to do with its merits? All stories of that kind founded on facts are in a certain degree legendary, but they may be well or ill written without the smallest alteration in that respect. When Mr. Hare prattles about the "Economy," etc., he sinks sadly;—all such expressions are the mere cant of a schoolboy hovering round the Skirts of Criticism.


Hodgson's tale is one of the best efforts of his Muse, and Mr. H.'s approbation must be of more consequence, before any body will reduce it to a "Scale," or be much affected by "the place" he "assigns" to the productions of a man like Hodgson.


But I have said more than I intended and only beg you never to allow yourself to be imposed upon by such "common place" as the 6th form letter you sent me. Judge for yourself.


I
know
the Mr. Bankes