which induced Campbell to publish the poem. The two men, travelling in a stage-coach alone, beguiled the way by repeating poetry. At last Scott asked Campbell for something of his own. He replied that there was one thing he had never printed, full of "drums and trumpets and blunderbusses and thunder," and that he did not know if there was any good in it. He then repeated
Hohenlinden
. When he had finished, Scott broke out with,
"But, do you know, that's devilish fine! Why, it's the finest thing you ever wrote, and it must be printed!"
return



Footnote 6:
  See p. 31,
note 1.

return



Footnote 7:
  Douglas James William Kinnaird (1788-1830), fifth son of the seventh Baron Kinnaird, was educated at Eton, Göttingen, and Trinity College, Cambridge. He was an intimate friend of Hobhouse, with whom he travelled on the Continent (1813-14), and was in political sympathy. He represented Bishop's Castle from July, 1819, to March, 1820, but losing his seat at the general election, did not again attempt to enter Parliament. He was famous for his "mob dinners," to which Moore probably refers when he writes to Byron, in an undated letter, of the "Deipnosophist Kinnaird." He was a partner in the bank of Ransom and Morland, a member of the committee for managing Drury Lane Theatre, author of the acting version of
The Merchant of Bruges, or Beggar's Bush
(acted at Drury Lane, December 14, 1815), and a member of the Radical Rota Club.


Kinnaird was Byron's "trusty and trustworthy trustee and banker, and crown and sheet anchor." It was at his suggestion that Byron wrote the
Hebrew Melodies
and the
Monody on the Death of Sheridan
. Talking of Kinnaird to Lady Blessington (
Conversations
, p. 215), Byron said,
"My friend Dug is a proof that a good heart cannot compensate for an irritable temper; whenever he is named, people dwell on the last and pass over the first; and yet he really has an excellent heart, and a sound head, of which I, in common with many others of his friends, have had various proofs. He is clever, too, and well informed, and I do think would have made a figure in the world, were it not for his temper, which gives a dictatorial tone to his manner, that is offensive to the amour propre of those with whom he mixes."
return



Footnote 8:
 The Alfred Club (1808-55), established at 23, Albemarle Street, was the Savile of the day. Beloe, in his
Sexagenarian
(vol. ii. chaps, xx.-xxv.), describes among the members of the Symposium, as he calls it, Sir James Mackintosh, George Ellis, William Gifford, John Reeves, Sir W. Drummond, and himself. Byron, in his
Detached Thoughts
, says,
"I was a member of the Alfred. It was pleasant; a little too sober and literary, and bored with Sotheby and Sir Francis d'Ivernois; but one met Peel, and Ward, and Valentia, and many other pleasant or known people; and it was, upon the whole, a decent resource in a rainy day, in a dearth of parties, or parliament, or in an empty season."
It was, says Mr. Wheatley (
London Past and Present
), known as the
Half-read
.


In a manuscript note, now for the first time printed as written, on the above passage from Byron's
Detached Thoughts
, Sir Walter Scott writes,
"The Alfred, like all other clubs, was much haunted with boars, a tusky monster which delights to range where men most do congregate. A boar, or bore, is always remarkable for something respectable, such as wealth, character, high birth, acknowledged talent, or, in short, for something that forbids people to turn him out by the shoulders, or, in other words, to cut him dead. Much of this respectability is supplied by the mere circumstance of belonging to a certain society of clubists, within whose districts the bore obtains free-warren, and may wallow or grunt at pleasure. Old stagers in the club know and avoid the fated corner and arm-chair which he haunts; but he often rushes from his lair on the inexperienced."
return


List of Letters

Contents




214—to Thomas Moore


December 11, 1811.



My Dear Moore,—If you please, we will drop our former monosyllables, and adhere to the appellations sanctioned by our godfathers and godmothers. If you make it a point, I will withdraw your name; at the same time there is no occasion, as I have this day postponed your election
sine die
, till it shall suit your wishes to be amongst us. I do not say this from any awkwardness the erasure of your proposal would occasion to
me
, but simply such is the state of the case; and, indeed, the longer your name is up, the stronger will become your probability of success, and your voters more numerous. Of course you will decide—your wish shall be my law. If my zeal has already outrun discretion, pardon me, and attribute my officiousness to an excusable motive.


I wish you would go down with me to Newstead. Hodgson will be there, and a young friend, named Harness, the earliest and dearest I ever had from the third form at Harrow to this hour. I can promise you good wine, and, if you like shooting, a manor of 4000 acres, fires, books, your own free will, and my own very indifferent company.
Balnea, vina, Venus
1
.


Hodgson will plague you, I fear, with verse;—for
my
own part I will conclude, with Martial,
nil recitabo tibi
2
; and surely the last inducement, is not the least. Ponder on my proposition, and believe me, my dear Moore,

Yours ever,


Byron
.






Footnote 1:
 
"Balnea, vina, Venus corrumpunt corpora nostra."
The words are thus given in Grüter (
Corpus Inscriptionum
(1603), p. DCCCCXII. 10.

return to footnote mark



Footnote 2:
  Martial (xi. lii. 16),
Ad Julium Cerealem
:
"Plus ego polliceor: nil recitabo tibi."
return


List of Letters

Contents




215—to Francis Hodgson


8, St. James's Street, Dec. 12, 1811.



Why, Hodgson! I fear you have left off wine and me at the same time,—I have written and written and written, and no answer!
My
dear Sir Edgar
1
, water disagrees with you—drink sack and write. Bland did not come to his appointment, being unwell, but Moore supplied all other vacancies most delectably. I have hopes of his joining us at Newstead. I am sure you would like him more and more as he developes,—at least I do.


How Miller and Bland go on, I don't know. Cawthorne talks of being in treaty for a novel of Madame D'Arblay's, and if he obtains it (at 1500 guineas!!) wishes me to see the MS. This I should read with pleasure,— not that I should ever dare to venture a criticism on her whose writings Dr. Johnson once revised, but for the pleasure of the thing. If my worthy publisher wanted a sound opinion, I should send the MS. to Rogers and Moore, as men most alive to true taste. I have had frequent letters from Wm. Harness, and
you
are silent; certes, you are not a schoolboy. However, I have the consolation of knowing that you are better employed, viz. reviewing. You don't deserve that I should add another syllable, and I won't.


Yours, etc.


P.S.—I only wait for your answer to fix our meeting.






Footnote 1:
  Hodgson published, in 1810,
Sir Edgar, a Tale
.

return to footnote mark


List of Letters

Contents




216—to R. C. Dallas


[
Undated
, Dec.? 1811]
1



Dear Sir
,—I have only this scrubby paper to write on—excuse it. I am certain that I sent some more notes on Spain and Portugal, particularly one on the latter. Pray rummage, and don't mind my
politics
. I believe I leave town next week. Are you better? I hope so.


Yours ever,

B.






Footnote 1:
  Dallas's answer is dated December 14, 1811

return to footnote mark


List of Letters

Contents




217—to William Harness


8, St. James's Street, Dec. 15, 1811.



I wrote you an answer to your last, which, on reflection, pleases me as little as it probably has pleased yourself. I will not wait for your rejoinder; but proceed to tell you, that I had just then been greeted with an epistle of ——'s, full of his petty grievances, and this at the moment when (from circumstances it is not necessary to enter upon) I was bearing up against recollections to which
his
imaginary sufferings are as a scratch to a cancer. These things combined, put me out of humour with him and all mankind. The latter part of my life has been a perpetual struggle against affections which embittered the earliest portion; and though I flatter myself I have in a great measure conquered them, yet there are moments (and this was one) when I am as foolish as formerly. I never said so much before, nor had I said this now, if I did not suspect myself of having been rather savage in my letter, and wish to inform you this much of the cause. You know I am not one of your dolorous gentlemen: so now let us laugh again.


Yesterday
I went with Moore to Sydenham to visit Campbell
1
. He was not visible, so we jogged homeward merrily enough. To-morrow I dine with Rogers, and am to hear Coleridge, who is a kind of rage at present.
Last
night I saw Kemble in
Coriolanus
2
; —he
was glorious
, and exerted himself wonderfully. By good luck I got an excellent place in the best part of the house, which was more than overflowing. Clare
3
and
Delawarr
4
, who were there on the same speculation, were less fortunate. I saw them by accident,—we were not together. I wished for you, to gratify your love of Shakspeare and of fine acting to its fullest extent. Last week I saw an exhibition of a different kind in a
Mr
. Coates
5
, at the Haymarket, who performed Lothario in a
damned
and damnable manner.


I told you the fate of B[land] and H[odgson] in my last. So much for these sentimentalists, who console themselves in their stews for the loss—the never to be recovered loss—the despair of the refined attachment of a couple of drabs! You censure
my
life, Harness,—when I compare myself with these men, my elders and my betters, I really begin to conceive myself a monument of prudence —a walking statue—without feeling or failing; and yet the world in general hath given me a proud pre-eminence over them in profligacy. Yet I like the men, and, God knows, ought not to condemn their aberrations. But I own I feel provoked when they dignify all this by the name of
love
—romantic attachments for things marketable for a dollar!


Dec. 16th.—I have just received your letter;—I feel your kindness very deeply. The foregoing part of my letter, written yesterday, will, I hope, account for the tone of the former, though it cannot excuse it. I do
like
to hear from you—more than
like
. Next to seeing you, I have no greater satisfaction. But you have other duties, and greater pleasures, and I should regret to take a moment from either. H——was to call to-day, but I have not seen him. The circumstances you mention at the close of your letter is another proof in favour of my opinion of mankind. Such you will always find them— selfish and distrustful. I except none. The cause of this is the state of society. In the world, every one is to stir for himself—it is useless, perhaps selfish, to expect any thing from his neighbour. But I do not think we are born of this disposition; for you find
friendship
as a schoolboy, and
love
enough before twenty.


I went to see ——; he keeps me in town, where I don't wish to be at present. He is a good man, but totally without conduct. And now, my dearest William, I must wish you good morrow, and remain ever,

Most sincerely and affectionately yours, etc.






Footnote 1:
  Campbell lived at Sydenham from 1804 to 1820. Moore (
Life
, p. 148) adds the following note:
"On this occasion, another of the noble poet's peculiarities was, somewhat startlingly, introduced to my notice. When we were on the point of setting out from his lodgings in St. James's Street, it being then about midday, he said to the servant, who was shutting the door of the vis-a-vis, 'Have you put in the pistols?' and was answered in the affirmative. It was difficult,—more especially taking into account the circumstances under which we had just become acquainted,— to keep from smiling at this singular noonday precaution."
return to footnote mark



Footnote 2:
  On December 14, 1811, at Covent Garden, Kemble acted "Coriolanus" with Mrs. Siddons as "Volumnia." It was Kemble's great part, and in it he made his last appearance on the stage (June 23, 1817).

return



Footnote 3:
  For Lord Clare, see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 116,
note
1. [Footnote 1 of Letter 65]

return



Footnote 4:
 For Lord Delawarr, see
Letters
, vol. i. p. 41, note 1 [Footnote 5 of Letter 13].

return



Footnote 5:
  Robert Coates, "the Amateur of Fashion," known as "Romeo" Coates, sometimes as "Diamond" Coates, sometimes as "Cock-a-doodle-doo" Coates (1772-1848), was the only surviving son of a wealthy West Indian planter. He made his first appearance on the stage at Bath (February 9, 1810), as "Romeo." In the play-bill he was announced as "a Gentleman, 1st Appearance on any stage." Genest (
English Stage
, vol. viii. p. 207) says,
"Many gentlemen have been weak enough to fancy themselves actors, but no one ever persevered in obtruding himself for so long a time on the notice of the public in spite of laughter, hissing, etc."
On December 9, 1811, he appeared at the Haymarket as "Lothario" in Rowe's
Fair Penitent
. Mathews, at Covent Garden, imitated his performance, in Bate Dudley's
At Home
, as "Mr. Romeo Rantall," appearing in the
"pink silk vest and cloak, white satin breeches and stockings, Spanish hat, with a rich high plume of ostrich feathers,"
in which Coates had played "Lothario".


Memoirs of Charles Mathews
, vol. ii. pp. 238, 239).

return


List of Letters

Contents




218—to Robert Rushton1


8, St. James's Street, Jan. 21, 1812.



Though I have no objection to your refusal to carry
letters
to Mealey's, you will take care that the letters are taken by
Spero
at the proper time. I have also to observe, that Susan is to be treated with civility, and not
insulted
by any person over whom I have the smallest controul, or, indeed, by any one whatever, while I have the power to protect her. I am truly sorry to have any subject of complaint against
you
; I have too good an opinion of you to think I shall have occasion to repeat it, after the care I have taken of you, and my favourable intentions in your behalf. I see no occasion for any communication whatever between
you
and the
women
, and wish you to occupy yourself in preparing for the situation in which you will be placed. If a common sense of decency cannot prevent you from conducting yourself towards them with rudeness, I should at least hope that your
own interest
, and regard for a master who has
never
treated you with unkindness, will have some weight.


Yours, etc.,
Byron
.


P.S.—I wish you to attend to your arithmetic, to occupy yourself in surveying, measuring, and making yourself acquainted with every particular relative to the
land
of Newstead, and you will
write
to me
one letter every week
, that I may know how you go on.






Footnote 1:
  The two following letters, and a suppressed passage in the letter to Moore of January 29, 1812, refer to a quarrel among his dependents, in which Rushton, the "little page" of Childe Harold (see
Letters
, vol. i. pp. 224, 242), played a part. The story is told at considerable length in a letter to Hodgson, dated January 28, 1812. To the same affair probably belong the following scrap and Byron's note:
"Pray don't forget me, as I shall never cease thinking of you, my Dearest and only Friend, (signed) S. H. V."
To this Byron has added this note:
"This was written on the 11th of January, 1812; on the 28th I received ample proof that the Girl had forgotten me and herself too. Heigho! B."
The letters show, writes Moore (
Life
, p. 152),
"how gravely and coolly the young lord could arbitrate on such an occasion, and with what considerate leaning towards the servant whose fidelity he had proved, in preference to any new liking or fancy by which it might be suspected he was actuated toward the other."
In a MS. book written by Mrs. Heath of Newstead (
née
Rebekah Beardall), it is stated that the elder Rushton had as his farm-servant Fletcher, afterwards Byron's valet. Byron watched Fletcher and young Robert Rushton ploughing, took a fancy to both, and engaged them as his servants. Rushton accompanied Byron to Geneva, but afterwards entered the service of James Wedderburn Webster (see p. 2,
note
1). In 1827 he married a woman of the name of Bagnall, and with her help kept a school at Arnold, near Nottingham. Subsequently he took a farm on the Newstead estate, named Hazelford, and shortly afterwards died, leaving a widow and three children.

return


List of Letters

Contents




219—to Robert Rushton


8, St. James's Street, January 25, 1812.



Your refusal to carry the letter was not a subject of remonstrance: it was not a part of your business; but the language you used to the girl was (as