| | PAGE |
| BOOK VI. |
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF CHEMISTRY. |
| Chap. I. Attempts to conceive
Elementary Composition | 3 |
| Art. 1. | Fundamental Ideas of Chemistry. | |
| 2. |
Elements. | |
| 3. | Do
Compounds resemble their Elements? | |
| 4. | The
Three Principles. | |
| 5. | A
Modern Errour. | |
| 6. | Are
Compounds determined by the Figure of Elements? | |
| 7. |
Crystalline Form depends on Figure of Elements. | |
| 8. | Are
Compounds determined by Mechanical Attraction of
Elements? | |
| 9. |
Newton’s followers. | |
| 10. |
Imperfection of their Hypotheses. | |
| Chap. II. Establishment and
Development of the Idea of Chemical Affinity | 15 |
| Art. 1. | Early Chemists. | |
| 2. |
Chemical Affinity. | |
| 3. |
Affinity or Attraction? | |
| 4. |
Affinity preferable. | |
| 5. |
Analysis is possible. | |
| vi |
| 6. |
Affinity is Elective. | |
| 7. |
Controversy on this. | |
| 8. |
Affinity is Definite. | |
| 9. | Are
these Principles necessarily true? | |
| 10. |
Composition determines Properties. | |
| 11. |
Comparison on this subject. | |
| 12. |
Composition determines Crystalline Form. | |
| Chap. III. Of the Idea of
Substance | 29 |
| Art. 1. | Indestructibility of Substance. | |
| 2. | The
Idea of Substance. | |
| 3. |
Locke’s Denial of Substance. | |
| 4. | Is
all Substance heavy? | |
| Note on Sir W. Hamilton’s objections | 37 |
| Chap. IV. Application of the
Idea of Substance in Chemistry | 39 |
| Art. 1. | A Body is Equal to its Elements. | |
| 2. |
Lavoisier. | |
| 3. | Are
there Imponderable Elements? | |
| 4. |
Faraday’s views. | |
| 5. |
Composition of Water. | |
| 6. | Heat
in Chemistry. | |
| Chap. V. The Atomic Theory | 48 |
| Art. 1. | The Theory on Chemical Grounds. | |
| 2. |
Hypothesis of Atoms. | |
| 3. | Its
Chemical Difficulties. | |
| 4. |
Grounds of the Atomic Doctrine. | |
| 5. |
Ancient Atomists. | |
| 6. |
Francis Bacon. | |
| 7. |
Modern Atomists. | |
| 8. |
Arguments for and against. | |
| 9. |
Boscovich’s Theory. | |
| 10. |
Molecular Hypothesis. | |
| 11. |
Poisson’s Inference. | |
| 12. |
Wollaston’s Argument. | |
| 13. |
Properties are Permanent. | |
| vii |
| BOOK VII. |
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF MORPHOLOGY,
INCLUDING CRYSTALLOGRAPHY. |
| Chap. I. Explication of the Idea
of Symmetry | 67 |
| Art. 1. | Symmetry, what. | |
| 2. |
Kinds of Symmetry. | |
| 3. |
Examples in Nature. | |
| 4. |
Vegetables and Animals. | |
| 5. |
Symmetry a Fundamental Idea. | |
| 6. |
Result of Symmetry. | |
| Chap. II. Application of the
Idea of Symmetry to Crystals | 75 |
| Art. 1. | ‘Fundamental Forms.’ | |
| 2. |
Their use. | |
| 3. |
‘Systems of Crystallization.’ | |
| 4. |
Cleavage. | |
| 5. |
Other Properties. | |
| Chap. III. Speculations founded
upon the Symmetry of Crystals | 80 |
| Art. 1. | Integrant Molecules. | |
| 2. |
Difficulties of the Theory. | |
| 3. |
Merit of the Theory. | |
| 4. |
Wollaston’s Hypothesis. | |
| 5. |
Maxim for such Hypotheses. | |
| 6. |
Dalton’s Hypothesis. | |
| 7. |
Ampère’s Hypothesis. | |
| 8. |
Difficulty of such Hypotheses. | |
| 9. |
Isomorphism. | |
| viii |
| BOOK VIII. |
| PHILOSOPHY OF THE CLASSIFICATORY
SCIENCES. |
| Chap. I. The
Idea of Likeness as Governing the Use of Common Names | 95 |
| Art. 1. | Object of the Chapter. | |
| 2. |
Unity of the Individual. | |
| 3. |
Condition of Unity. | |
| 4. |
Kinds. | |
| 5. | Not made by
Definitions. | |
| 6. |
Condition of the Use of Terms. | |
| 7. |
Terms may have different Uses. | |
| 8. |
Gradation of Kinds. | |
| 9. |
Characters of Kinds. | |
| 10. |
Difficulty of Definitions. | |
| 11. |
‘The Five Words.’ | |
| Chap. II. The Methods of Natural
History, as regulated by the Idea of Likeness | 108 |
| Sect. I. | Natural History in
General. | |
| Art. 1. | Idea of Likeness in Natural History. | |
| 2. | Condition of its Use. | |
| Sect. II. |
Terminology. | |
| Art. 3. | Meaning of the word. | |
| Sect. III. | The Plan
of the System. | |
| Art. 4. | Its Meaning. | |
| 5. |
Latent Reference to Natural Affinity. | |
| 6. |
Natural Classes. | |
| 7. |
Artificial Classes. | |
| 8. | Are
Genera Natural? | |
| 9. |
Natural History and Mathematics. | |
| 10. |
Natural Groups given by Type, not by Definition. | |
| 11. |
Physiography. | |
| 12. |
Artificial and Natural Systems. | |
| ix |
| Sect. IV. | Methods
of framing Natural Systems. | |
| Art. 13. | Method of Blind Trial. | |
| 14. |
Method of General Comparison. | |
| Sect. V. | Gradation
of Groups. | |
| Art. 15. | Series of Subdivisions. | |
| 16. |
What is a Species? | |
| 17. |
The words ‘Species’ and ‘Genus.’ | |
| 18. |
Varieties. Races. | |
| Sect. VI. |
Nomenclature. | |
| Art. 19. | Binary Nomenclature. | |
| Sect. VII. |
Diagnosis. | |
| Art. 20. | Characteristick and Systematick. | |
| Chap. III. Application of the
Natural History Method to Mineralogy | 138 |
| Art. 1. | Mohs’s System. | |
| 2. | His
‘Characteristick.’ | |
| 3. |
Mineral Species not yet well fixed. | |
| 4. |
Orders of Minerals. | |
| 5. |
Nomenclature of Minerals. | |
| 6. | M.
Necker’s ‘Règne Mineral.’ | |
| 7. |
Inconvenience of taking a Chemical Basis of Mineral
Systems. | |
| 8. |
Relation of Natural History and Chemistry. | |
| 9. | What
is a Mineralogical Individual? | |
| 10. | A
well-formed Crystal is an Individual. | |
| 11. |
Not the Integrant Molecules, | |
| 12. |
Nor the Cleavage Forms. | |
| 13. |
Compound Crystals are not Individuals. | |
| 14. |
Crystalline Forms are sufficiently complete for
this. | |
| 15. |
Including aggregate Masses. | |
| 16. | Do
Artificial Crystals belong to Mineralogy? | |
| 17. |
The Mineralogical Individual extends as far as the same Crystalline
Axes extend. | |
| 18. |
Artificial Crystals do belong to Mineralogy: | |
| x |
| 19. |
Cannot be excluded. | |
| 20. |
Species to be determined by the Crystalline Power. | |
| 21. |
Secondary Derivative Forms are Varieties: | |
| 22. |
Are not Species, as M. Necker holds. | |
| Chap. IV. Of the Idea of Natural
Affinity | 159 |
| Art. 1. | The Idea of Affinity | |
| 2. | Is
not to be made out by Arbitrary Rules. | |
| 3. |
Functions of Living things are many, | |
| 4. | But
all lead to the same arrangement. | |
| 5. | This
is Cuvier’s principle: | |
| 6. | And
Decandolle’s. | |
| 7. | Is
this applicable to Inorganic Bodies? | |
| 8. | Yes;
by the agreement of Physical and Chemical
Arrangement. | |
| BOOK IX. |
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY. |
| Chap. 1. Analogy of Biology with
other Sciences | 169 |
| Art. 1. | Biology involves the Idea of Life. | |
| 2. | This
Idea to be historically traced. | |
| 3. | The
Idea at first expressed by means of other Ideas. | |
| 4. |
Mystical, Mechanical, Chemical, and Vital Fluid
Hypotheses. | |
| Chap. II. Successive Biological
Hypotheses | 174 |
| Sect. I. | The Mystical School. | |
| Sect. II. | The Iatrochemical School. | |
| Sect. III. | The Iatromathematical School. | |
| Sect. IV. | The Vital Fluid School. | |
| Sect. V. | The Psychical School. | |
| xi |
| Chap. III. Attempts to Analyse
the Idea of Life | 195 |
| Art. 1. | Definitions of Life, | |
| 2. | By
Stahl, Humboldt, Kant. | |
| 3. |
Definition of Organization by Kant. | |
| 4. | Life
is a System of Functions. | |
| 5. |
Bichat. Sum of Functions. | |
| 6. | Use
of Definition. | |
| 7. |
Cuvier’s view. | |
| 8. |
Classifications of Functions. | |
| 9. |
Vital, Natural, and Animal Functions. | |
| 10. |
Bichat. Organic and Animal Life. | |
| 11. |
Use of this Classification. | |
| Chap. IV. Attempts to form Ideas
of separate Vital Forces, and first, of Assimilation and
Secretion | 203 |
| Sect. I. | Course of
Biological Research. | |
| Art. 1. | Observation and New Conceptions. | |
| Sect. II. | Attempts
to form a distinct Conception of Assimilation and
Secretion. | |
| Art. 2. | The Ancients. | |
| 3. |
Buffon. Interior Mould. | |
| 4. |
Defect of this view. | |
| 5. |
Cuvier. Life a Vortex. | |
| 6. |
Defect of this view. | |
| 7. |
Schelling. Matter and Form. | |
| 8. | Life
a constant Form of circulating Matter, &c. | |
| Sect. III. | Attempts
to conceive the Forces of Assimilation and
Secretion. | |
| Art. 9. | Assimilation is a Vital Force. | |
| 10. |
The name ‘Assimilation.’ | |
| 11. |
Several processes involved in Assimilation. | |
| 12. |
Absorption. Endosmose. | |
| 13. |
Absorption involves a Vital Force. | |
| 14. |
Secretion. Glands. | |
| 15. |
Motions of Vital Fluids. | |
| xii |
| Sect. IV. | Attempts
to conceive the Process of Generation. | |
| Art. 16. | ‘Reproduction’ figuratively used for
Generation. | |
| 17. |
Nutrition different from | |
| 18. |
Generation. | |
| 19. |
Generations successively included. | |
| 20. |
Pre-existence of Germs. | |
| 21. |
Difficulty of this view. | |
| 22. |
Communication of Vital Forces. | |
| 23. |
Close similarity of Nutrition and Generation. | |
| 24. |
The Identity of the two Processes exemplified. | |
| Chap. V. Attempts to form Ideas
of separate Vital Forces, continued.—Voluntary Motion. | 222 |
| Art. 1. | Voluntary Motion one of the animal
Functions. | |
| 2. | Progressive knowledge of
it. | |
| 3. |
Nervous Fluid not electric. | |
| 4. |
Irritability. Glisson. | |
| 5. |
Haller. | |
| 6. |
Contractility. | |
| 7. |
Organic Sensibility and Contractility not
separable. | |
| 8. |
Improperly described by Bichat. | |
| 9. |
Brown. | |
| 10. | Contractility a peculiar
Power. | |
| 11. |
Cuvier’s view. | |
| 12. |
Elementary contractile Action. | |
| 13. |
Strength of Muscular Fibre. | |
| 14. |
Sensations become Perceptions | |
| 15. | By
means of Ideas; | |
| 16. |
And lead to Muscular Actions. | |
| 17. |
Volition comes between Perception and Action. | |
| 18. |
Transition to Psychology, | |
| 19. | A
center is introduced. | |
| 20. |
The central consciousness may be obscure. | |
| 21. |
Reflex Muscular Action. | |
| 22. |
Instinct. | |
| 23. |
Difficulty of conceiving Instinct. | |
| 24. |
Instinct opposed to Insight. | |
| xiii |
| Chap. VI. Of the Idea of Final
Causes | 239 |
| Art. 1. | Organization. Parts are Ends and
Means. | |
| 2. | Not
merely mutually dependent. | |
| 3. | Not
merely mutually Cause and Effect. | |
| 4. |
Notion of End not derived from Facts. | |
| 5. | This
notion has regulated Physiology. | |
| 6. |
Notion of Design comes from within. | |
| 7. |
Design not understood by Savages. | |
| 8. |
Design opposed to Morphology. | |
| 9. |
Impression of Design when fresh. | |
| 10. |
Acknowledgement of an End by adverse Physiologists. | |
| 11. |
This included in the Notion of Disease. | |
| 12. | It
belongs to organized Creatures only. | |
| 13. |
The term Final Cause. | |
| 14. |
Law and Design. | |
| 15. |
Final Causes and Morphology. | |
| 16. |
Expressions of physiological Ends. | |
| 17. |
The Conditions of Existence. | |
| 18. |
The asserted presumption of Teleology. | |
| 19. |
Final Causes in other subjects. | |
| 20. |
Transition to Palætiology. | |
| BOOK X. |
| THE PHILOSOPHY OF
PALÆTIOLOGY. |
| Chap. I. Of Palætiological
Sciences in General | 257 |
| Art. 1. | Description of Palætiology. | |
| 2. | Its
Members. | |
| 3. |
Other Members. | |
| 4. |
Connexion of the whole subject. | |
| 5. | We
shall take Material Sciences only; | |
| 6. | But
these are connected with others. | |
| Chap. II. Of the Three Members
of a Palætiological Science | 263 |
| Art. 1. | Divisions of such Sciences. | |
| 2. | The
Study of Causes. | |
| 3. |
Ætiology. | |
| xiv |
| 4. |
Phenomenology requires Classification. Phenomenal
Geology. | |
| 5. |
Phenomenal Uranology. | |
| 6. |
Phenomenal Geography of Plants and Animals. | |
| 7. |
Phenomenal Glossology. | |
| 8. | The
Study of Phenomena leads to Theory. | |
| 9. | No
sound Theory without Ætiology. | |
| 10. |
Causes in Palætiology. | |
| 11. |
Various kinds of Cause. | |
| 12. |
Hypothetical Order of Palætiological Causes. | |
| 13. |
Mode of Cultivating Ætiology:—In Geology: | |
| 14. |
In the Geography of Plants and Animals: | |
| 15. |
In Languages. | |
| 16. |
Construction of Theories. | |
| 17. |
No sound Palætiological Theory yet extant. | |
| Chap. III. Of the Doctrine of
Catastrophes and the Doctrine of Uniformity | 284 |
| Art. 1. | Doctrine of Catastrophes. | |
| 2. |
Doctrine of Uniformity. | |
| 3. | Is
Uniformity probable a priori? | |
| 4. |
Cycle of Uniformity indefinite. | |
| 5. |
Uniformitarian Arguments are Negative only. | |
| 6. |
Uniformity in the Organic World. | |
| 7. |
Origin of the present Organic World. | |
| 8. |
Nebular Origin of the Solar System. | |
| 9. |
Origin of Languages. | |
| 10. |
No Natural Origin discoverable. | |
| Chap. IV. Of the Relation of
Tradition to Palætiology | 297 |
| Art. 1. | Importance of Tradition. | |
| 2. |
Connexion of Tradition and Science. | |
| 3. |
Natural and Providential History of the World. | |
| 4. | The
Sacred Narrative. | |
| 5. |
Difficulties in interpreting the Sacred Narrative. | |
| 6. |
Such Difficulties inevitable. | |
| 7. |
Science tells us nothing concerning Creation. | |
| xv |
| 8. |
Scientific views, when familiar, do not disturb the authority of
Scripture. | |
| 9. |
When should Old Interpretations be given up? | |
| 10. |
In what Spirit should the Change be accepted? | |
| 11. |
In what Spirit should the Change be urged? | |
| 12. |
Duty of Mutual forbearance. | |
| 13. |
Case of Galileo. | |
| Chap. V. Of the Conception of a
First Cause | 316 |
| Art. 1. | The Origin of things is not naturally
discoverable; | |
| 2. | Yet
has always been sought after. | |
| 3. |
There must be a First Cause. | |
| 4. |
This is an Axiom. | |
| 5. |
Involved in the proof of a Deity. | |
| 6. | The
mind is not satisfied without it. | |
| 7. | The
Whole Course of Nature must have a Cause. | |
| 8. |
Necessary Existence of God. | |
| 9. |
Forms of the Proof. | |
| 10. |
Idea of a First Cause is Necessary. | |
| 11. |
Conception of a First Cause. | |
| 12. |
The First Cause in all Sciences is the same. | |
| 13. |
We are thus led to Moral Subjects. | |
| Conclusion of this
History. |