199. When the fraction a/b is not equal to c/d, but greater, a is said to have to b a greater ratio than c has to d; and when a/b is less than c/d, a is said to have to b a less ratio than c has to d. We propose the following questions as exercises, since they follow very simply from this definition.
I. If a be greater than b, and c less than or equal to d, a will have a greater ratio to b than c has to d.
II. If a be less than b, and c greater than or equal to d, a has a less ratio to b than c has to d.
III. If a be to b as c is to d, and if a have a greater ratio to b than c has to x, d is less than x; and if a have a less ratio to b than c to x, d is greater than x.
IV. a has to b a greater ratio than ax to bx + y, and a less ratio than ax to bx- y.
200. If a have to b a greater ratio than c has to d, a + c has to b + d a less ratio than a has to b, but a greater ratio than c has to d; or, in other words, if a/b be the greater of the two fractions a/b and c/d,
| a + c |
| b + d |
will be greater than c/d, but less than a/b. To shew this, observe that (mx + ny)/(m + n) must lie between x and y, if x and y be unequal: for if x be the less of the two, it is certainly greater than
| mx + nx |
| m + n |
or than x; and if y be the greater of the two, it is certainly less than
| my + ny |
| m + n |
or than y. It therefore lies between x and y. Now let a/b be x, and let c/d be y: then a = bx, c = dy. Now
| bx + dy |
| b + d |
is something between x and y, as was just proved; therefore
| a + c |
| b + d |
is something between a/b and c/d. Again, since a/b and c/d are respectively equal to ap/bp and cq/dq, and since, as has just been proved,
| ap + cq |
| bp + dq |
lies between the two last, it also lies between the two first; that is, if p and q be any numbers or fractions whatsoever,
| ap + cq |
| bp + dq |
lies between a/b and c/d.
201. By the last article we may often form some notion of the value of an expression too complicated to be easily calculated. Thus,
| 1 + x | lies between | 1 | and | x | , or 1 and | 1 | ; |
| 1 + xx | 1 | xx | x | ||||
| ax + by | lies between | ax | and | by | , | ||
| axx + bbyy | axx | bbyy | |||||
that is, between 1/x and 1/by. And it has been shewn that (a + b)/2 lies between a and b, the denominator being considered as 1 + 1.
202. It may also be proved that a fraction such as
| a + b + c + d |
| p + q + r + s |
always lies among
| a | , | b | , | c | , and | d | , |
| p | q | r | s |
that is, is less than the greatest of them, and greater than the least. Let these fractions be arranged in order of magnitude; that is, let a/p be greater than b/q, b/q be greater than c/r, and c/r greater than d/s. Then by (200)
| is less than |
and greater than |
|||||||
| a + b | a | b | and | c | ||||
| p + q | p | q | r | |||||
| a + b + c | a + b | and | a | c | and | d | ||
| p + q + r | p + q | p | r | s | ||||
| a + b + c + d | a + b + c | and | a | d | ||||
| p + q + r + s | p + q + r | p | s | |||||
whence the proposition is evident.
203. It is usual to signify “a is greater than b” by a > b and “a is less than b” by a < b; the opening of V being turned towards the greater quantity. The pupil is recommended to make himself familiar with these signs.