CONTENTS.

REVIEW OF HON. E. B. WASHBURNE’S PAPER ON THE UNION OF THE TELEGRAPH AND POSTAL SYSTEMS.
 
Page
A merited Compliment to Professor Morse 1
Congressional Aid 2
Erroneous Charges against the American Telegraph System 3
Brief Statement of Facts 4
Statistics of the Telegraph in Europe and America for the year 1866, from Official Reports 5
The Complaint of Indifference to Public Convenience without Foundation 5
Official Statistics of the Telegraphs in Europe for the year 1866 7
Statistics of the Western Union Telegraph Company, of the United States, and of the Montreal Telegraph Company, Dominion of Canada, for the year ending June 30, 1867 7
The asserted Union of the Postal and Telegraph Systems in Europe an Error 8
The Shortcomings of British Telegraphs 9
The Telegraph System of the United States Unparalleled for its Extent and Efficiency 10
Asserted Effect of Governmental Control on Belgian Telegraphs 11
Early Belgian Rates contrasted with American 12
Natural Increase in Telegraphy 13
Unfortunate Effects of Low Rates and Competition 15
American and European Rates compared 15
The Peculiarities of the Belgian Telegraph Service 17
Belgian Officials acknowledge the Imperfections of their System 18
Instructive History of Belgian Telegraphs 19
Singular Idea that a Small Telegraph System is more Difficult to Manage than a Large One 20
Necessity for the Unification of the Telegraph System 22
Estimate of the Cost of Building Telegraph Lines 24
Doubts regarding the Estimates of Telegraph Experts as to Cost of Constructing Lines 27
Incorrect Assertion that American Telegraphs are not constructed according to Specifications 29
Cost of American Telegraphs estimated by European Data 30
Value of Western Union Telegraph Property, based on European data 32
Erroneous Estimate of the Value of the Western Union Telegraph Company’s Property 33
The Organization of the Western Union Telegraph Company 35
Financial Statistics of the Western Union Telegraph Company 36
Stations, Lines, and Employees of the Western Union Telegraph Company 39
English and American Telegraphs compared 40
Acknowledged Superiority of the early American Service 41
Remarkably Low Tariffs of the early American Telegraphs 42
No Similarity between the Telegraph and Postal Systems 43
Collection and Delivery of Telegrams by Letter-Carriers Impracticable 45
Mr. Washburne’s proposed Experimental Line 47
London District Telegraph Company 50
Telegraphs under Government and Private Control compared 51
The Telegraph and the Press 52
 
 
REVIEW OF MR. GARDINER G. HUBBARD’S LETTER TO THE POSTMASTER-GENERAL ON THE EUROPEAN AND AMERICAN SYSTEMS OF TELEGRAPH.
 
Erroneous Statements relative to Belgian Telegraphs 56
Belgian Telegrams delivered by Post 58
Want of Uniformity in Rates 58
Assertion that Commercial Messages are transmitted at a Loss 61
Correction of Erroneous Statements 62
Tariffs not Increased by Consolidation of the Lines 63
Erroneous Assertion that a Large Proportion of the Offices are at Railroad Stations 64
American and European Telegraph Tariffs compared 65
Rules of the European Telegraphs 66
Rules of the Western Union Telegraph Company 66
Statement showing the Minimum Rate for Telegrams from London to Principal Cities in Europe, and from New York to Principal Cities in America 67
Singular Notions of Practical Telegraphy 68
Absurd Theories regarding the Working Capacity of Telegraph Lines 69
Impossibility of Utilizing the Telegraph Lines by Night as well as Day 70
Proposed Incorporation of the United States Postal Telegraph Company 72
Messages delivered within a Mile of the Office free 73
European Charges for delivering Telegrams 74
Telegrams to be placed in the Street Boxes 75
Privileged Persons to have Priority in the Use of the Wires 75
Proposition to operate Telegraphs at a Loss, and Make Money by it 76
Speculative Telegraph Schemes 77
More Startling Inventions for Rapid Telegraphing 78
Erroneous Table of European Statistics 79
European Telegrams counted Several Times 82
Labor the Principal Element of Expense in operating Telegraphs 82
Prevailing Error of all Theorizers on the Business of Telegraphing 83
Statistics of Traffic through the Atlantic Cables from July 28, 1866, to November 1, 1868 86
 
 
PROGRESS OF THE ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH IN AMERICA AND EUROPE.
 
The United States 87
Proportion of Telegrams to Letters 87
Early History of the Telegraph in America 88
Evils arising from Separate Organizations 89
The Unification of the Telegraph accomplished 90
Telegraph Companies in the United States 91
Statistics of the Telegraph in the Dominion of Canada 92
Statement showing the Progress of Telegraphy in Austria 93
Statement showing the Progress of Telegraphy in Belgium 94
Bavaria 98
Denmark 98
Statement showing the Progress of Telegraphy in Great Britain and Ireland 100
Decrees regulating the Use of the Telegraph in France 102
Peculiar Character of the French Telegraph 103
Statement showing the Progress of Telegraphy in France 104
Increase in Telegrams not due to Low Rates 104
Greece 105
Prussia 105
Statement showing the Progress of Telegraphy in Prussia 106
Russia 106
Switzerland 107
Statement showing the Progress of Telegraphy in Switzerland 109
Royal Decree relating to Telegraphs in Spain 110
Turkey 111
 
 
REASONS WHY GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT ENTER INTO COMPETITION WITH THE PEOPLE IN THE OPERATION OF THE TELEGRAPH.
 
Political Reasons why Government should not Control the Telegraph 113
The Post-Office Department not Competent to manage the Telegraphs 114
Government assumes no Responsibility 116
The Proposition to Erect Competitive Governmental Telegraphs Unfounded in Public Necessity 117
The Telegraph Bill proposed to be enacted by Congress without National Example 118