| 1. |
Historical development of the theory as to the localization of the germ-plasm in the nucleus |
174 |
| 2. |
Nägeli’s ‘idioplasm’ is not identical with Weismann’s ‘germ-plasm’ |
180 |
| 3. |
A retransformation of somatic idioplasm into germ-idioplasm does not take place |
183 |
| 4. |
Confirmation of the theory as to the significance of the nuclear substance afforded by Nussbaum’s and Gruber’s experiments on regeneration in Infusoria |
185 |
| 5. |
The nucleoplasm changes during ontogeny according to a certain law |
186 |
| 6. |
The identity of the daughter-nuclei produced by indirect nuclear division, as assumed by Strasburger, is not necessary for my theory |
187 |
| 7. |
The gradual decrease in complexity of the structure of the nucleus during ontogeny |
190 |
| 8. |
Nägeli’s view on the germs (‘Anlagen’) in the idioplasm |
192 |
| 9. |
The manner in which germ-cells arise from somatic cells |
194 |
| 10. |
’Embryonic’ cells in the mature organism |
196 |
| 11. |
The rule of probability is against a retransformation of somatic idioplasm into germ-plasm |
198 |
| 12. |
The regular cyclical development of the idioplasm founded upon phylogeny by Nägeli |
199 |
| 13. |
It follows from phyletic considerations that the germ-cells have not arisen at the end of ontogeny |
201 |
| 14. |
They originally arose at the beginning of ontogeny, but at a later period the time of their origin was displaced |
202 |
| 15. |
A continuity of the germ-cells does not now exist in most cases |
205 |
| 16. |
But there is a continuity of the germ-plasm |
205 |
| 17. |
Strasburger’s objection to my supposition that the germ-plasm passes along distinct routes |
209 |
| 18. |
The cell-body may remain unchanged when the nucleus is changed |
210 |
| 19. |
It is conceivable that all somatic nuclei may contain some germ-plasm |
211 |