[157] Griffin v. Kingston (1889), 17 Ont. Rep., 660; see Church v. Linton (1894), 25 Ont. Rep., 131, where some of the dicta in the above case were disapproved.
[158] [1900], 1 Ch., 122.
[159] Chilton v. Progress Printing and Publishing Co. [1895], 2 Ch., 29.
[160] Lindley, L. J. [1895], 2 Ch., at p. 34.
[161] (1852), 5 De Gex and Smale, 267; see Roworth v. Wilkes (1807), 1 Camp., 94; Newton v. Cowie (1827), 4 Bing., 234.
[162] See 21 Ch. D., 380.
[163] Parker, V. C., 5 De Gex and Smale, at p. 274.
[164] (1882), 21 Ch. D., 369; and see Cooper v. Stephens [1895], 1 Ch., 567; Marshall v. Petty (1900), 17 T. L. R., 501.
[165] At p. 377
[166] (1981), 64 L. T. (N. S.), 452.
[167] (1895), 43 W. R., 266; and see Guggenheim v. Leng (1896), 12 T. L. R., 491.
[168] Strong v. Worskett (1896), 12 T. L. R., 532; Fisher v. Folds (1834), 1 Jones, Ir. Ex., 12.
[169] (1896), 12 T. L. R., 532.
[170] Beckford v. Hood (1798), 7 T. R., 620.
[171] Hollinrake v. Truswell [1894], 3 Ch., at p. 427.
[172] Bach v. Longman (1777), 2 Camp., 623; Clementi v. Golding (1809), 2 Camp., 25; White v. Geroch (1819), 2 B. and Ald., 298; D'Almaine v. Boosey (1835), 1 Y. and C. Ex., 288; Jeffreys v. Boosey (1854). 4 H. L. C., 815.
[173] Coleman v. Wathen (1793), 5 T. R., 245; Macklin v. Richardson (1770), Amb., 694; D'Almaine v. Boosey (1835), 1 Y. and C. Ex., 288.
[174] Caird v. Sime (1887), 12 A. C., 326; Abernethy v. Hutchinson (1825), 3 L. J. (O. S.), Ch., 309. See p. 222, infra.
[175] Nicols v. Pitman (1884), 26 Ch. D., 374.
[176] See Walter v. Lane [1900], H. C., 539.
[177] Kenrick v. Danube Collieries (1891), 39 W. R., 473; Prince Albert v. Strange (1849), 2 De G. and Sm., 652; Jefferys v. Boosey (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815; Exchange Telegraph v. Gregory [1896], 1 Q. B., 147; Exchange Telegraph v. Central News [1897], 2 Ch., 48; Millar v. Taylor (1769), 4 Burr., at p. 2417; Turner v. Robinson (1860), 10 Ir. Ch. R., 121, 510.
[178] Blanchett v. Ingram (1887), 3 T. L. R., 687.
[179] (1819), 2 B. and Ald., 298.
[180] (1876), 5 Ch. D., 267.
[181] Turner v. Robinson (1860), 10 Ir. Ch. R., 121, 510.
[182] Clementi v. Walker (1824), 2 Bar and Cres., 861.
[183] Routledge v. Low (1868), L. R., 3 H. L., 100; Jeffreys v. Boosey (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815; Boosey v. Purday (1849), 4 Ex., 145; Chappell v. Purday (1845), 14 M. and W., 303; Cocks v. Purday (1848), 5 C. B., 860.
[184] 49 & 50 Vict. c. 33, sec. 8 (1).
[185] Cocks v. Purday (1848), 5 C. B., 860; Buxton v. James (1851), 5 De G. and S., 80.
[186] Reid v. Maxwell (1886), 2 T. L. R., 790.
[187] Lover v. Davidson (1856), 1 C. B. (N. S.), 182.
[188] Buxton v. James (1851), 5 De. G. and S., 80; as to author's nationality or residence, see p. 42.
[189] (1854), 4 H. L. C., at p. 983.
[190] (1824), 2 B. and C., 861, at p. 867.
[191] 7 & 8 Vict. c. 12, sec. 19.
[193] Boucicault v. Delafield (1863), 1 H. and M., 597; Boucicault v. Chatterton (1876), 5 Ch. D., 267.
[194] Boucicault v. Delafield (1863), 1 H. and M., 597; Boucicault v. Chatterton (1876), 5 Ch. D., 267; Ex p. Dobson (1892), 12 N. Z. L. R., 171.
[195] Boucicault v. Chatterton (1876), 5 Ch. D., 267.
[196] (1849), 13 Q. B., 257.
[197] D'Almaine v. Boosey (1835), 1 Y. and C. Ex., 288; see Willes, J., in Millar v. Taylor (1769), 4 Burr., at p. 2310; Delondre v. Shaw (1828), 2 Sim., 240.
[198] (1839), 10 Sim., 329.
[199] Chappell v. Purday (1845), 14 M. and W., 303; Cocks v. Purday (1848), 5 C. B., 860; Boosey v. Davidson (1849), 13 Q. B., 257; Boosey v. Purday (1849), 4 Ex., 145; Ollendorff v. Black (1850), 20 L. T., 165; Boosey v. Jefferys (1851), 6 Ex., 580; Buxton v. James (1851), 5 De G. and Sm., 80.
[200] (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815.
[201] (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815.
[202] (1868), L. R., 3 H. L., 100.
[203] (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815.
[204] Ibid.
[205] The Fine Arts Act, 1862, is expressly confined to the works of authors who are British subjects or resident within the Dominions of the Crown; 25 & 26 Vict. c. 68.
[206] (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815.
[207] Ibid.
[208] (1868), L. R., 3 H. L., 100.
[209] (1868), L. R., 6 Eq., 415.
[210] (1868), L. R., 3 H. L., 100.
[211] (1854), 4 H. L. C., 815.
[212] Art. 6, "Report Copyright Commission," 1878, p. lxix.
[213] Scrutton on "Copyright," 3rd ed., p. 121.
[214] Chamier on "Literary Copyright," p. 13.
[215] Lawrence v. Smith (1822), Jac., 471; Murray v. Benbow (1822), Jac., 474 n.; Cowan v. Milbourn (1867), L. R., 2 Exch., 230; Burnett v. Chetwood (1720), 2 Mer., 441; see 9 Will. III. c. 35 (1698).
[216] Stockdale v. Onwhyn (1826), 5 B. and Cr., 173; Dodson v. Martin (1880), 24 Sol. J., 572.
[217] Hime v. Dale (1803), 2 Camp., 27 n.; Dr. Priestley's case, cited 2 Mer., 437.
[218] Hime v. Dale (1803), 2 Camp., 27 n.; Walcot v. Walker (1802), 7 Ves., 1.
[219] Wright v. Tallis (1845), 1 C. B., 893; Hogg v. Kirby (1803), 8 Ves., 215; MacFarlane v. Oak Foundry (1883), 10 R., 801; Hayward v. Lely (1887), 56 L. T. (N. S.), 418; Ward v. Beeton (1874), L. R., 19 Eq., 207; Metzler v. Wood (1878), 8 Ch. D., 606; Chappell v. Davidson (1856), 2 K. and J., 123.
[220] Wright v. Tallis (1845), 1 C. B., 893.
[221] Cary v. Faden (1799), 5 Ves., 24; Reade v. Conquest (1862), 11 C. B. (N. S.), at p. 492.
[222] Baschet v. London Illustrated [1900], 1 Ch., 73; Hayward v. Lely (1887), 56 L. T. (N. S.), 418.
[223] See point suggested, 1 C. B., 902.
[224] Baschet v. London Illustrated [1900], 1 Ch., 73; Newman v. Pinto (1887), L. T. (N. S.), 31.
[225] Dodson v. Martin (1880), 24 Sol. J., 572.
[226] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, secs. 11, 13, 24.
[227] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 24.
[228] Beckford v. Hood (1798), 7 T. R., 620; Roworth v. Wilkes (1807), 1 Camp., 94.
[229] Low v. Routledge (1864), L. R., 1 Ch., 42; Stannard v. Lee (1871), L. R., 6 Ch., 346; Hogg v. Scott (1874), L. R., 18 Eq., 444.
[230] Russell v. Smith (1848), 12 Q. B., 217; Lacy v. Rhys (1864), 4 B. and S., 873; Marsh v. Conquest (1864), 17 C. B. (N. S.), 418; Clark v. Bishop (1872), 25 L. T., 908.
[231] Goubaud v. Wallace (1877), 36 L. T. (N. S.), 704; Macmillan v. Suresh Chunder Deb (1890), Ind. L. R., 17 Calc., 951.
[232] Warne v. Lawrence (1886), 34 W. R., 452.
[233] (1879), 12 Ch. D., 886.
[234] (1880), 49 L. J. Ch., 412.
[235] Henderson v. Maxwell (1877). 5 Ch. D., 892; Dicks v. Yates (1881), 18 Ch. D., 76.
[236] Hogg v. Maxwell (1866), L. R., 2 Ch., 307; Correspondent v. Saunders (1865), 11 Jur. (N. S.), 540; Primrose Press v. Knowles (1886), 2 T. L. R., 404.
[237] Talbot v. Judges (1887), 3 T. L. R., 398; Schove v. Schmincké (1886), 33 Ch. D., 546.
[238] (1889), 40 Ch. D., 425.
[239] Walter v. Howe (1881), 18 Ch. D., 708; Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., 425; Cate v. Devon (1889), 40 Ch. D., 500.
[240] Cox v. Land and Water (1869), L. R., 9 Eq., 324.
[241] Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., 425.
[242] (1889), 40 Ch. D., 500; see also Prowett v. Mortimer (1856), 2 Jur. (N. S.), 414.
[243] Chappell v. Davidson (1856), 18 C. B., 194. See 32 & 33 Vict. c. 24.
[244] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 11.
[245] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 13.
[246] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 19.
[247] (1889), 5 T. L. R., 594.
[248] Per Coleridge, L. C. J., in Harris v. Smart (1889), 5 T. L. R., 594.
[249] (1887), 57 L. T. (N. S.), 864.
[250] Lover v. Davidson (1856), 1 C. B., (N. S.), 182; Leader v. Purday (1848), 7 C. B., 4; Chappell v. Sheard (1855), 2 K. and J., 117.
[251] (1889), 40 Ch. D., 500
[252] 40 Ch. D., at p. 506.
[253] (1864), 10 L. T. (N. S.), 838.
[254] As to what is publication, see p. 38.
[255] Wood v. Boosey (1867), L. R., 3 Q. B., 223.
[256] Mathieson v. Harrod (1868), L. R., 7 Eq., 270; Collingridge v. Emmott (1887), 57 L. T. (N. S.), 864; and see Page v. Wisden (1869), 20 L. T. (N. S.), 435; Maxwell v. Hogg (1867), L. R., 2 Ch., 307.
[257] Thomas v. Turner (1886), 33 Ch. D., 292.
[258] Murray v. Bogue (1852), 1 Drew, 353; Hayward v. Lely (1887), 56 L. T. (N. S.), 418.
[259] Maple v. Junior Army and Navy Stores (1882), 21 Ch. D., 369.
[260] Macmillan v. Suresh Chunder Deb (1890), Ind. L. R., 17 Calc., 951.
[261] Henderson v. Maxwell (1876), 4 Ch. D., 163.
[262] Johnson v. Newnes [1894], 3 Ch., 663.
[263] Mayhew v. Maxwell (1860), 1 J. and H., 312.
[264] Dicks v. Yates (1881), 18 Ch. D., 76; Trade Auxiliary v. Middlesborough (1889), 40 Ch. D., at p. 434.
[265] Bacon, V. C., in Coote v. Judd (1883), 23 Ch. D., 727.
[266] Weldon v. Dicks (1878), 10 Ch. D., 247.
[267] Weldon v. Dicks (1878), 10 Ch. D., 247; Rock v. Lazarus (1872), L. R., 15 Eq. 104; Macmillan v. Suresh Chunder Deb (1890), Ind. L. R., 17 Calc., 951.
[268] Nottage v. Jackson (1883), 11 Q. B. D., 627; 49 L. T. (N. S.), 339.
[269] Weldon v. Dicks (1878), 10 Ch. D., 247.
[270] London Printing v. Cox [1891], 3 Ch., 291.
[271] Petty v. Taylor [1897], 1 Ch., 465.
[272] London Printing v. Cox [1891], 3 Ch., per Lindley, L. J., at pp. 301 and 302.
[273] Liverpool General Brokers v. Commercial Press [1897], 2 Q. B., 1; Morang v. Publishers (1900), 32 Ont. Rep., 393.
[274] Weldon v. Dicks (1878), 10 Ch. D., 247.
[275] Low v. Routledge (1864), 33 L. J. Ch., 717; 10 L. T. (N. S.), 838.
[276] Lover v. Davidson (1856), 1 C. B. (N. S.), 182.
[277] Cassell v. Stiff (1856), 2 K. and J., 279.
[278] Fairlie v. Boosey (1879), 4 A. C., 711.
[279] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 11; Hildesheimer & Faulkner v. Dunn (1891), 64 L. T. (N. S.), 452.
[280] Lucas v. Cooke (1880), 13 Ch. D., 872.
[281] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 12.
[282] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 14.
[283] Hole v. Bradbury (1879), 12 Ch. D., 886; 48 L. J. Ch., 673.
[284] In re The Young Duchess (1891), 8 T. L. R., 41.
[285] Ex parte Poulton (1884), 53 L. J., Q. B., 320; in re Hall (1899), 24 Vict. L. R., 702.
[286] Ex parte Davidson (1856), 18 C. B., 296; see in re Martin (1884), 10 Vict. L. R., Law., 196.
[287] Blackburn, J., Graves' case, 10 B. and S., at p. 688.
[288] Ex parte Bastow (1854), 14 C. B., 631.
[289] Ex parte Davidson (1856), 18 C. B., 296; Chappell v. Purday (1843), 12 M. and W., 303.
[290] Graves' case (1869), 4 Q. B., 715.
[291] Graves' case (1869), 4 Q. B., 715.
[292] Chappell v. Purday (1843), 12 M. and W., 303; ex parte Davidson (1856), 18 C. B., at p. 309.
[293] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 10.
[294] Ibid.
[295] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 6.
[296] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 7.
[297] Ibid.
[298] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 8.
[299] (1828), 4 Bing.. 540.
[300] Cf. Cambridge University v. Bryce (1812), 16 East., 317; Routledge v. Low (1868), L. R., 3 H. L., 100.
[301] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, sec. 3.
[302] Ibid.
[303] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, secs. 3, 18.
[304] 5 & 6 Vict. c. 45, secs. 3, 18.
[305] See supra, p. 26.
[306] See Nottage v. Jackson (1883), 11 Q. B. D., 627.