As regards trade in lace, America probably buys more from
Belgium than from France; France and England come next as
purchasers of nearly equal quantities, after which come Russia and
Italy.
The greatest amount of lace now made is that which issues from
machines in England, France and Germany. The total number of
persons employed in the lace industry in England in 1871 was 49,370,
and in 1901 about 34,929, of whom not more than 5000 made lace
by hand.
The early history7 of the lace-making machine coincides
with that of the stocking frame, that machine having been
adapted about the year 1768 for producing open-looped fabrics
which had a net-like appearance. About 1786 frames for making
point nets by machinery first appear at Mansfield and later at
Ashbourne and Nottingham and soon afterwards modifications
were introduced into such frames in order to make varieties of
meshes in the point nets which were classed as figured nets.
In 1808 and 1809 John Heathcoat of Nottingham obtained
patents for machines for making bobbin net with a simpler and
more readily produced mesh than that of the point net just
mentioned. For at least thirty years thousands of women
had been employed in and about Nottingham in the embroidery
of simple ornament on net. In 1813 John Leavers began to
improve the figured net weaving machines above mentioned,
and from these the lace-making machines in use at the present
time were developed. But it was the application of the celebrated
Jacquard apparatus to such machines that enabled
manufacturers to produce all sorts of patterns in thread-work
in imitation of the patterns for hand-made lace. A French
machine called the “dentellière” was devised (see La Nature
for the 3rd of March 1881), and the patterns produced by it
were of plaited threads. The expense, however, attending the
production of plaited lace by the “dentellière” is as great as
that of pillow lace made by the hand, and so the machine has
not succeeded for ordinary trade purposes. More successful
results have been secured by the new patent circular lace machine
of Messrs. Birkin & Co. of Nottingham, the productions of which,
all of simple design, cannot be distinguished from hand-made
pillow lace of the same style (see figs. 57, 58, 59).
Before dealing with technical details in processes of making
lace whether by hand or by the machine, the component parts of
different makes of lace may be considered. These are governed
by the ornaments or patterns, which may be so designed, as
they were in the earlier laces, that the different component parts
may touch one another without any intervening groundwork.
But as a wish arose to vary the effect of the details in a pattern
ground-works were gradually developed and at first consisted of
links or ties between the substantial parts of the pattern. The
bars or ties were succeeded by grounds of meshes, like nets.
Sometimes the substantial parts of a pattern were outlined with a
single thread or by a strongly marked raised edge of buttonhole-stitched
or of plaited work. Minute fanciful devices were then
introduced to enrich various portions of the pattern. Some
of the heavier needle-made laces resemble low relief carving in
ivory, and the edges of the relief portions are often decorated
with clusters of small loops. For the most part all this elaboration
was brought to a high pitch of variety and finish by French
designers and workers; and French terms are more usual in
speaking of details in laces. Thus the solid part of the pattern
is called the toilé or clothing, the links or ties are called brides,
the meshed grounds are called réseaux, the outline to the edges
of a pattern is called cordonnet or brodé, the insertions of
fanciful devices modes, the little loops picots. These terms are
applicable to the various portions of laces made with the needle,
on the pillow or by the machine.
The sequence of patterns in lace (which may be verified upon
referring to figs. 1 to 23) is roughly as follows. From about
1540 to 1590 they were composed of geometric forms set within
squares, or of crossed and radiating line devices, resulting in
a very open fabric, stiff and almost wiry in effect, without
brides or réseaux. From 1590 may be dated the introduction
into patterns of very conventional floral and even human
and animal forms and slender scrolls, rendered in a tape-like
texture, held together by brides. To the period from 1620 to
1670 belongs the development of long continuous scroll patterns
with réseaux and brides, accompanied in the case of needle-made
laces with an elaboration of details, e.g. cordonnet with
massings of picots. Much of these laces enriched with fillings
or modes was made at this time. From 1650 to 1700 the scroll
patterns gave way to arrangements of detached ornamental
details (as in Pl. VI. fig. 22): and about 1700 to 1760 more
important schemes or designs were made (as in Pl. fig. 19,
and in fig. 24 in text), into which were introduced naturalistic
renderings of garlands, flowers, birds, trophies, architectural
ornament and human figures. Grounds composed entirely
of varieties of modes as in the case of the réseau rosacé (Pl. V.
fig. 21) were sometimes made then. From 1760 to 1800 small
details consisting of bouquets, sprays of flowers, single flowers,
leaves, buds, spots and such like were adopted, and sprinkled
over meshed grounds, and the character of the texture was gauzy
and filmy (as in figs. 40 and 42). Since that time variants of
the foregoing styles of pattern and textures have been used
according to the bent of fashion in favour of simple or complex
ornamentation, or of stiff, compact or filmy textures.
Needlepoint Lace.—The way in which the early Venetian
“punto in aria” was made corresponds with that in which
needlepoint lace is now worked. The pattern is first drawn
upon a piece of parchment. The parchment is then stitched
to two pieces of linen. Upon the leading lines drawn on the
parchment a thread is laid, and fastened through to the parchment
and linen by means of stitches, thus constructing a skeleton
thread pattern (see left-hand
part of fig. 30).
Those portions which
are to be represented as
the “clothing” or toilé
are usually worked as
indicated in the enlarged
diagram (fig. 29),
and then edged as a rule with buttonhole stitching (fig. 28).
Between these toilé portions of the pattern are worked ties
(brides) or meshes (réseaux), and thus the various parts united into
one fabric are wrought on to the face of the parchment pattern
and reproducing it (see right-hand part of fig. 30). A knife is
passed between the two pieces of linen at the back of the parchment,
cutting the stitches which have passed through the parchment
and linen, and so releasing the lace itself from its pattern
parchment. In the earlier stages, the lace was made in lengths
to serve as insertions (passements) and also in vandykes (dentelles)
to serve as edgings. Later on insertions and vandykes were
made in one piece. All of such were at first of a geometric
style of pattern (Pl. figs. 3-5 and 6).
|
| Fig. 30.—Parchment Pattern showing work in progress: the
more complete lace is on the right half of the pattern. |
Following closely upon them came the freer style of design
already mentioned, without and then with links or ties—brides—interspersed
between the various details of the patterns (Pl. II.
fig. 7), which were of flat tape-like texture. In elaborate specimens
of this flat point lace some lace workers occasionally used
gold thread with the white thread. These flat laces (“Punto in
Aria”) are also called “flat Venetian point.” About 1640 “rose
(raised) point” laces began to be made (Pl. III. fig. 12). They
were done in relief and those of bold design with stronger reliefs
are called “gros point de Venise.” Lace of this latter class was
used for altar cloths, flounces, jabots or neckcloths which hung
beneath the chin over the breast (Pl. III. fig. 11), as well as for
trimming the turned-over tops of jack boots. Tabliers and
ladies’ aprons were also made of such lace. In these no regular
ground was introduced. All sorts of minute embellishments,
like little knots, stars and loops or picots, were worked on to the
irregularly arranged brides or ties holding the main patterns
together, and the more dainty of these raised laces (Pl. fig. 17)
exemplify the most subtle uses to which the buttonhole stitch
appears capable of being put in making ornaments. But about
1660 came laces with brides or ties arranged in a honeycomb
reticulation or regular ground. To them succeeded lace in
which the compact relief gave place to daintier and lighter
material combined with a ground of meshes or réseau. The
needle-made meshes were sometimes of single and sometimes of
double threads. A diagram is given of an ordinary method of
making such meshes (fig. 31). At the end of the 17th century
the lightest of the Venetian needlepoint
laces were made; and this class which
was of the filmiest texture is usually
known as “point de Venise à réseau”
(Pl. V. fig. 20a). It was contemporary
with the needle-made French laces of Alençon
and Argentan8 that became famous
towards the latter part of the 17th century
(Pl. V. fig. 20b). “Point d’Argentan” has been thought to
be especially distinguished on account of its delicate honeycomb
ground of hexagonally arranged brides (fig. 32), a peculiarity
already referred to in certain antecedent Venetian point laces.
Often intermixed with this hexagonal brides ground is the fine-meshed
ground or réseau (fig. 20b), which has been held to be
distinctive of “point d’Alençon.” But the styles of patterns
and the methods of working them, with rich variety of insertions
or modes, with the brodé or cordonnet of raised buttonhole stitched
edging, are alike in Argentan and Alençon needle-made laces
(Pl. V. fig. 20b and fig. 32). Besides the hexagonal brides
ground and the ground of meshes another variety of grounding
(réseau rosacé) was used in certain Alençon designs. This ground
consisted of buttonhole-stitched skeleton hexagons within each
of which was worked a small hexagon of toilé connected with the
outer surrounding hexagon by means of six little ties or brides
(Pl. V. fig. 21). Lace with this particular ground has been
called “Argentella,” and some writers have thought that it was
a specialty of Genoese or Venetian work. But the character
of the work and the style of the floral patterns are those of
Alençon laces. The industry at Argentan was virtually an offshoot
of that nurtured at Alençon, where “lacis,” “cut work”
and “vélin” (work on parchment) had been made for years
before the well-developed needle-made “point d’Alençon”
came into vogue under the favouring patronage of the state-aided
lace company mentioned as having been formed in 1665.
Madame Despierre in her Histoire du point d’Alençon gives an
interesting and trustworthy account of the industry.
|
| Fig. 32.—Border of Needlepoint Lace made in France about
1740-1750, the clear hexagonal mesh ground, which is compactly
stitched, being usually regarded as characteristic of the point de
France made at Argentan. |
In Belgium, Brussels has acquired some celebrity for needle-made
laces. These, however, are chiefly in imitation of those
made at Alençon, but the toilé is of less compact texture and
sharpness in definition of pattern. Brussels needlepoint lace is
often worked with meshed grounds made on a pillow, and a plain
thread is used as a cordonnet for their patterns instead of a thread
overcast with buttonhole stitches as in the French needlepoint
laces. Note the bright sharp outline to the various ornamental
details in Pl. V. fig. 20b.
|
| Fig. 33.—Shirt decorated with Insertions of Flat Needlepoint Lace.
(English, 17th century. Victoria and Albert Museum.) |
Plate IV.
|
| Fig. 18.—CHARLES GASPARD GUILLAUME DE VINTI-MILLE,
WEARING LACE SIMILAR IN STYLE OF
DESIGN SHOWN IN FIG. 19. About 1730. |
|
| Fig. 19.—PORTION OF FLOUNCE, NEEDLEPOINT LACE
COPIED AT THE BURANO LACE SCHOOL FROM THE
ORIGINAL OF THE SO-CALLED “POINT DE VENISE
À BRIDES PICOTÉES.” |
| 17th century. Formerly belonging to Pope Clement XIII., but
now the property of the queen of Italy. The design and work,
however, are indistinguishable from those of important flounces of
“Point de France.” The pattern consists of repetitions of two
vertically-arranged groups of fantastic pine-apples and vases with
flowers, intermixed with bold rococo bands and large leaf devices.
The hexagonal meshes of the ground, although similar to the
Venetian “brides picotées,” are much akin to the buttonhole
stitched ground of “Point d’Argentan.” (Victoria and Albert
Museum.) |
|
|
| A Fig. 20. B |
| A.—A LAPPET OF “POINT DE VENISE À RÉSEAU.” |
| The conventional character of the pseudo-leaf and floral forms
contrasts with that of the realistic designs of contemporary French
laces. Italian. Early 18th century. |
| B.—A LAPPET OF FINE “POINT D’ALENÇON.” |
| Louis XV. period. The variety of the fillings of geometric design
is particularly remarkable in this specimen, as is the buttonhole
stitched cordonnat or outline to the various ornamental forms. |
|
| Fig. 21.—BORDER OF FRENCH NEEDLEPOINT LACE,
WITH GROUND OF “RÉSEAU ROSACÉ.” 18th century. |
|
Plate VI.
|
| Fig. 22.—JABOT OR CRAVAT OF PILLOW-MADE LACE. Brussels. Late 17th century. (Victoria and Albert Museum.) |
|
| Fig. 23.—JABOT OR CRAVAT OF PILLOW-MADE LACE OF FANTASTIC FLORAL DESIGN, THE GROUND OF WHICH IS
COMPOSED OF LITTLE FLOWERS AND LEAVES ARRANGED WITHIN SMALL OPENWORK VERTICAL STRIPS. |
| Brussels. 18th century. (Victoria and Albert Museum.) |
Needlepoint lace has also been occasionally produced in
England. Whilst the character of its design in the early 17th
century was rather more primitive, as a rule, than that of the
contemporary Italian, the method of its workmanship is virtually
the same and an interesting specimen of English needle-made
lace inset into an early 17th-century shirt is illustrated in fig. 33.
Specimens of needle-made work done by English school children
may be met with in samplers of the 17th and 18th centuries.
Needlepoint lace is successfully made at Youghal, Kenmare and
New Ross in Ireland, where of late years attention has been given
to the study of designs for it. The lace-making school at Burano
near Venice produces hand-made laces which are, to a great extent,
careful reproductions of the more celebrated classes of point laces,
such as “punto in aria,” “rose point de Venise,” “point de
Venise à réseau,” “point d’Alençon,” “point d’Argentan”
and others. Some good needlepoint lace is made in Bohemia
and elsewhere in the Austrian empire.
Pillow-made Lace.—Pillow-made lace is built upon no substructure
corresponding with a skeleton thread pattern such as
is used for needlepoint lace, but is the representation of a pattern
obtained by twisting and plaiting threads.
These patterns were never so strictly geometric in style as
those adopted for the earliest point lace making from the antecedent
cut linen and drawn thread embroideries. Curved forms,
almost at the outset of pillow lace, seem to have been found easy
of execution (see lower border, Pl. II. fig. 3); its texture was
more lissom and less crisp and wiry in appearance than that of
contemporary needle-made lace. The early twisted and plaited
thread laces, which had the appearance of small cords merging
into one another, were soon succeeded by laces of similar make but
with flattened and broader lines more like fine braids or tapes
(Pl. I. fig. 2, and Pl. fig. 10). But pillow laces of this tapey
character must not be confused with laces in which actual tape
or braid is used. That peculiar class of lace-work does not arise
until after the beginning of the 17th century when the weaving
of tape is said to have commenced in Flanders. In England
this sort of tape-lace dates no farther back than 1747, when two
Dutchmen named Lanfort were invited by an English firm to
set up tape looms in Manchester.
|
| Fig. 34.—Diagram showing six Bobbins in use. |
|
| Fig. 35. |
The process by which lace is made on the pillow is roughly
and briefly as follows. A pattern is first drawn upon a piece
of paper or parchment. It is then
pricked with holes by a skilled “pattern
pricker,” who determines where the
principal pins shall be stuck for guiding
the threads. This pricked pattern
is then fastened to the pillow. The
pillow or cushion varies in shape in
different countries. Some lace-makers
use a circular pad, backed with a flat
board, in order that it may be placed
upon a table and easily moved. Other
lace-workers use a well-stuffed round
pillow or short bolster, flattened at
the two ends, so that they may hold it conveniently on their
laps. From the upper part of pillow with the pattern fastened
on it hang the threads from the bobbins. The bobbin threads
thus hang across the pattern. Fig. 34 shows the commencement,
for instance, of a double set of three-thread
plaitings. The compact portion in a pillow lace
has a woven appearance (fig. 35).
About the middle of the 17th century pillow
lace of formal scroll patterns somewhat in imitation
of those for point lace was made, chiefly
in Flanders. The earlier of these had grounds of
ties or brides and was often called “point de Flandres” (Pl.
fig. 14) in contradistinction to scroll patterns with a mesh
ground, which were called “point d’Angleterre” (Pl. fig. 16).
Into Spain and France much lace from Venice and Flanders was
imported as well as into England, where from the 16th century
the manufacture of the simple pattern “bone lace” by peasants
in the midland and southern counties was still being carried on.
In Charles II.’s time its manufacture was threatened with
extinction by the preference given to the more artistic and
finer Flemish laces. The importation of the latter was accordingly
prohibited. Dealers in Flemish lace sought to evade the
prohibitions by calling certain of their laces “point d’Angleterre,”
and smuggling them into England. But smuggling was made
so difficult that English dealers were glad to obtain the services
of Flemish lace-makers and to induce them to settle in England.
It is from some such cause that the better 17th- and 18th-century
English pillow laces bear resemblance to pillow laces of Brussels,
of Mechlin and of Valenciennes.
|
| Fig. 36.—Border of English Pillow-made (Devonshire) Lace in
the style of a Brussels design of the middle of the 18th century. |
|
| Fig. 37—Border of English (Bucks. or Beds.) Pillow-made Lace
in the Style of a Mechlin design of the latter part of the 18th century. |
|
| Fig. 38—Border of Pillow-made Lace, Mechlin, from a design
similar to such as was used for point d’Alençon of the Louis XV.
period. |
As skill in the European lace-making developed soon after the
middle of the 17th century, patterns and particular plaitings
came to be identified with certain localities. Mechlin, for
instance, enjoyed a high reputation for her productions. The
chief technical features of this pillow lace lie in the plaiting of
the meshes, and the outlining of the clothing or toilé with a
thread cordonnet. The ordinary Mechlin
mesh is hexagonal in shape. Four of the
sides are of double twisted threads, two
are of four threads plaited three times
(fig. 39).
In Brussels pillow lace, which has
greater variety of design, the mesh is
also hexagonal; but in contrast with the
Mechlin mesh whilst four of its sides are
of double-twisted threads the other two
are of four threads plaited four times
(fig. 41). The finer specimens of Brussels
lace are remarkable for the fidelity and
grace with which the botanical forms in many of its patterns
are rendered (Pl. VI. fig. 23). These are mainly reproductions or
adaptations of designs for point d’Alençon, and the soft quality
imparted to them in the texture of pillow-made lace contrasts
with the harder and more crisp appearance in needlepoint
lace. An example of dainty Brussels pillow lace is given in
fig. 42. In the Brussels pillow lace a delicate modelling effect
is often imparted to the close textures of the flowers by means
of pressing them with a bone instrument which gives concave
shapes to petals and leaves, the edges
of which consist in part of slightly raised
cordonnet of compact plaited work.
|
| Fig. 40.—Border of Pillow-made Lace, Mechlin, end of the
18th century. |
|
| Fig. 41.—Enlargement of Brussels Mesh. |
|
| Fig. 42.—Portion of a Wedding Veil, 7 ft. 6 in. × 6 ft. 6 in., of
Pillow-made Lace, Brussels, late 18th century. The design consists
of light leafy garlands of orange blossoms and other flowers daintily
festooned. Little feathery spirals and stars are powdered over the
ground, which is of Brussels vrai réseau. In the centre upon a more
open ground of pillow-made hexagonal brides is a group of two birds,
one flying towards the other which appears ready to take wing from
its nest; an oval frame containing two hearts pierced by an arrow,
and a hymeneal torch. Throughout this veil is a profusion of pillow
renderings of various modes, the réseau rosacé, star devices, &c. The
ornamental devices are partly applied and partly worked into the
ground (Victoria and Albert Museum). |
Honiton pillow lace resembles Brussels
lace, but in most of the English pillow
laces (Devonshire, Buckinghamshire,
Bedfordshire) the réseau is of a simple
character (fig. 43). As a rule, English
lace is made with a rather coarser thread
than that used in the older Flemish
laces. In real Flemish Valenciennes
lace there are no twisted sides to the
mesh; all are closely plaited (fig. 44)
and as a rule the shape of the mesh is
diamond but without the openings as
shown in fig. 44. No outline or cordonnet
to define the pattern is used in Valenciennes
lace (see fig. 45). Much lace of the Valenciennes type
(fig. 54) is made at Ypres. Besides these distinctive classes of
pillow-like laces, there are others in which equal care in plaiting
and twisting threads is displayed, though the character of
the design is comparatively simple, as for instance in ordinary
pillow laces from Italy, from the Auvergne, from Buckinghamshire,
or rude and primitive as in laces from Crete,
southern Spain and Russia. Pillow lace-making in Crete is
now said to be extinct. The laces were made chiefly of silk. The
patterns in many specimens are outlined with one, two or
three bright-coloured silken threads. Uniformity in simple
character of design may also be observed in many Italian,
Spanish, Bohemian, Swedish and Russian pillow laces (see the
lower edge of fig. 46).
|
| Fig. 45.—Lappet of delicate Pillow-made Lace,
Valenciennes, about 1750. The peculiarity of Valenciennes
lace is the filmy cambric-like texture and
the absence of any cordonnet to define the separate
parts of the ornament such as is used in needlepoint lace
of Alençon, and in pillow Mechlin and Brussels lace. |
Guipure.—This name is often applied to needlepoint and
pillow laces in which the ground consists of ties or brides, but
it more properly designates a kind of lace or “passementerie,”
made with gimp of fine wires whipped
round with silk, and with cotton
thread. An earlier kind of gimp was
formed with “Cartisane,” a little strip
of thin parchment or vellum covered
with silk, gold or silver thread. These
stiff gimp threads, formed into a
pattern, were held together by
stitches worked with the needle. Gold
and silver thread laces have been
usually made on the pillow, though
gold thread has been used with fine
effect in 17th-century Italian needlepoint
laces.
|
| Fig. 46.—Border to a Cloth. The wide part bearing the double-headed
eagle of Russia is of drawn thread embroidery: the scalloped
edging is of Russian pillow-made lace, though the style of its pattern
is often seen in pillow laces made by peasants in Danubian provinces
as well as in the south of Spain. |
|
| Fig. 49.—Section of Lace Machine. |
|
|
| Fig. 50.—Machine-made Lace in
imitation of 16th-century Needlepoint
“Reticella” Lace. |
Fig. 51.—Border of Machine-made
Lace in the style of 17th-century
Pillow Guipure Lace. |
|
|
| Fig. 52.—Border of Machine-made Lace in imitation of 17th-century
Pillow Lace. |
Fig. 53.—Machine-made Trimming
Border in imitation of Irish
Crochet Lace. |
|
| Fig. 54.—A Piece of Hand-made Pillow Lace, Belgian (Ypres),
20th century. (The machine imitation is given in fig. 55.) |
|
|
| Fig. 55.—Machine-made Lace in
imitation of the Hand-made Specimen of fig. 54. (Nottingham, 20th
century.) |
Fig. 56.—Small Borders (a) Hand-made and (b)
Machine-made Lace Valenciennes. (Nottingham, 20th century.) |
|
|
| Fig. 57.—Specimen of Hand-made Pillow Lace. |
Fig. 58.—Specimen of Machine-made Lace in
which the twisting and plaiting of the threads
are identical with those of the hand-made specimen
of fig. 57. (Nottingham, 20th century.) |
Machine-made Lace.—We have
already seen that a technical peculiarity
in making needlepoint lace is
that a single thread and needle are
alone used to form the pattern, and
that the buttonhole stitch and other
loopings which can be worked by
means of a needle and thread mark
a distinction between lace made in
this manner and lace made on the
pillow. For the process of pillow lace
making a series of threads are in
constant employment, plaited and
twisted the one with another. A
buttonhole stitch is not producible
by it. The Leavers lace machine
does not make either a buttonhole
stitch or a plait. An essential principle
of this machine-made work is
that the threads are twisted together
as in stocking net. The Leavers lace
machine is that generally in use at
Nottingham and Calais. French ingenuity
has developed improvements
in this machine whereby laces of delicate
thread are made; but as fast
as France makes an improvement
England follows with another, and
both countries virtually maintain an equal position in this
branch of industry. The number of threads brought into operation
in a Leavers machine is regulated by the pattern to be
produced, the threads being of two sorts, beam or warp threads
and bobbin or weft threads. Upwards of 8880 are sometimes
used, sixty pieces of lace being made simultaneously, each piece
requiring 148 threads—100 beam threads and 48 bobbin threads.
The ends of both sets of threads are fixed to a cylinder upon
which as the manufacture proceeds the lace becomes wound.
The supply of the beam or warp threads is held upon reels, and
that of the bobbins or weft threads is held in bobbins. The
beam or warp thread reels are arranged in frames or trays
beneath the stage, above which and between it and the cylinder
the twisting of the bobbin or weft with beam or warp threads
takes place. The bobbins
containing the bobbin or
weft threads are flattened
in shape so as
to pass conveniently between
the stretched beam
or warp threads. Each
bobbin can contain about
120 yds. of thread. By
most ingenious mechanism
varying degrees of
tension can be imparted
to warp and weft threads
as required. As the bobbins
or weft threads pass
like pendulums between
the warp threads the
latter are made to oscillate,
thus causing them
to become twisted with
the bobbin threads. As
the twistings take place,
combs passing through
both warp and weft
threads compress the
twistings. Thus the texture
of the clothing or
toilé in machine-made lace may generally be detected by
its ribbed appearance, due to the compressed twisted threads.
Figs. 47 and 48 are intended to show effects obtained by
varying the tensions of weft and warp threads. For instance,
if the weft, as threads b, b, b, b in fig. 47, be tight
and the warp thread slack, the warp thread a will be twisted
upon the weft threads. But if the warp thread a be tight and
the weft threads b, b, b, b, be slack, as in fig. 48, then the weft
threads will be twisted on the warp thread. At the same time
the twisting in both these cases arises from the conjunction of
movements given to the two sets of threads, namely, an oscillation
or movement from side to side of the beam or warp threads,
and the swinging or pendulum-like movement of the bobbin
or weft threads between the
warp threads. Fig. 49 is a
diagram of a sectional elevation
of a lace machine representing
its more essential parts.
E is the cylinder or beam upon
which the lace is rolled as made,
and upon which the ends of
both warp and weft threads are
fastened at starting. Beneath
are w, w, w, a series of trays
or beams, one above the other,
containing the reels of the
supplies of warp threads; c, c
represent the slide bars for the
passage of the bobbin b with
its thread from k to k, the
landing bars, one on each side
of the rank of warp threads; s, t are the combs which take it
in turns to press together the twistings as they are made.
The combs come away clear from the threads as soon as
they have pressed them together and fall into positions ready
to perform their pressing operations again. The contrivances
for giving each thread a particular tension and movement at
a certain time are connected with an adaptation of the Jacquard
system of pierced cards. The machine lace pattern drafter has
to calculate how many holes shall be punched in a card, and to
determine the position of
such holes. Each hole
regulates the mechanism
for giving movement to a
thread. Fig. 54 displays a
piece of hand-made Valenciennes
(Ypres) lace and
fig. 55 a corresponding piece
woven by the machine. The
latter shows the advantage
that can be gained by using
very fine gauge machines,
thus enabling a very close
imitation of the real lace to
be made by securing a very
open and clear réseau or net,
such as would be made on a
coarse machine, and at the same time to keep the pattern fine and
solid and standing out well from the net, as is the case with the
real lace, which cannot be done by using a coarse gauge machine.
In this example the machine used is a 16 point (that is 32 carriages
to the inch), and the ground is made half gauge, that is 8 point,
and the weaving is made the full gauge of the machine, that is
16 point. Fig. 56 gives other examples of hand- and machine-made
Valenciennes lace. The machine-made lace (b) imitating
the real (a) is made on a 14-point machine (that is 28 carriages
to the inch), the ground being 7 point and the pattern being full
gauge or 14 point. Although
the principle in these examples
of machine work is exactly
the same, in so far that they
use half gauge net and full
gauge clothing to produce the
contrast as mentioned above,
the fabrication of these two
examples is quite different,
that in fig. 55 being an example
of tight bobbins or weft, and
slack warp threads as shown
in fig. 47. Whereas the example
in fig. 56 is made with
slack bobbins or weft threads
and tight warp threads as in
fig. 48. In fig. 57 is a piece of
hand-made lace of stout thread,
very similar to much Cluny
lace made in the Auvergne and to the Buckinghamshire “Maltese”
lace. Close to it are specimens of lace (figs. 58 and 59) made by
the new patent circular lace machine of Messrs Birkin of Nottingham.
This machine although very slow in production actually
reproduces the real lace, at a cost slightly below that of the hand-made
lace. In another branch of lace-making by machinery,
mechanical ingenuity, combined with chemical treatment, has
led to surprising results (figs. 53 and 50). Swiss, German and
other manufacturers use machines in which a principle of the
sewing-machine is involved. A fine silken tissue is thereby
enriched with an elaborately raised cotton or thread embroidery.
The whole fabric is then treated with chemical mordants which,
whilst dissolving the silky web, do not attack the cotton or
thread embroidery. A relief embroidery possessing the appearance
of hand-made raised needlepoint lace is thus produced.
Figs. 60 and 61 give some idea of the high quality to which this
admirable counterfeit has been brought.
|
| Fig. 59.—Specimens of Machine-made Torchon Lace, in the same manner as such lace is made on the pillow by hand. (Nottingham,
20th century.) |
|
| Fig. 60.—Machine-made Lace of Modern Design. |
|
| Fig. 61.—Machine-made Lace in imitation of 17th-century
Needlepoint Lace, “Gros point de Venise.” |
Collections of hand-made lace chiefly exist in museums and
technical institutions, as for instance the Victoria and Albert
Museum in London, the Musée des Arts Décoratifs in Paris, and
museums at Lyons, Nuremberg, Berlin, Turin and elsewhere.
In such places the opportunity is presented of tracing in chronological
sequence the stages of pattern and texture development.
Literature.—The literature of the art of lace-making is considerable.
The series of 16th- and 17th-century lace pattern-books, of which the
more important are perhaps those by F. Vinciolo (Paris, 1587),
Cesare Vecellio (Venice, 1592), and Isabetta Catanea Parasole
(Venice, 1600), not to mention several kindred works of earlier and
later date published in Germany and the Netherlands, supplies a
large field for exploration. Signor Ongania of Venice published a
limited number of facsimiles of the majority of such works. M. Alvin
of Brussels issued a brochure in 1863 upon these patterns, and in the
same year the marquis Girolamo d’Adda contributed two bibliographical
essays upon the same subject to the Gazette des Beaux-Arts
(vol. xv. p. 342 seq., and vol. xvii. p. 421 seq.). In 1864 Cavaliere
A. Merli wrote a pamphlet (with illustrations) entitled Origine ed
uso delle trine a filo di rete; Mons F. de Fertiault compiled a brief and
rather fanciful Histoire de la dentelle in 1843, in which he reproduced
statements to be found in Diderot’s Encyclopédie, subsequently
quoted by Roland de la Platière. The first Report of the Department
of Practical Art (1853) contains a “Report on Cotton Print Works
and Lace-Making” by Octavius Hudson, and in the first Report of
the Department of Science and Art are some “Observations on Lace.”
Reports upon the International Exhibitions of 1851 (London) and
1867 (Paris), by M. Aubry, Mrs Palliser and others contain information
concerning lace-making. The most important work first issued
upon the history of lace-making is that by Mrs Bury Palliser (History
of Lace, 1869). In this work the history is treated rather from an
antiquarian than a technical point of view; and wardrobe accounts,
inventories, state papers, fashionable journals, diaries, plays, poems,
have been laid under contribution with surprising diligence. A new
edition published in 1902 presents the work as entirely revised, rewritten
and enlarged under the editorship of M. Jourdain and Alice
Dryden. In 1875 the Arundel Society brought out Ancient Needlepoint
and Pillow Lace, a folio volume of permanently printed photographs
taken from some of the finest specimens of ancient lace
collected for the International Exhibition of 1874. These were
accompanied by a brief history of lace, written from the technical
aspect of the art, by Alan S. Cole. At the same time appeared a
bulky imperial 4to volume by Seguin, entitled La Dentelle, illustrated
with wood-cuts and fifty photo-typographical plates. Seguin divides
his work into four sections. The first is devoted to a sketch of the
origin of laces; the second deals with pillow laces, bibliography of
lace and a review of sumptuary edicts; the third relates to needle-made
lace; and the fourth contains an account of places where lace
has been and is made, remarks upon commerce in lace, and upon the
industry of lace makers. Without sufficient conclusive evidence
Seguin accords to France the palm for having excelled in producing
practically all the richer sorts of laces, notwithstanding that both
before and since the publication of his otherwise valuable work, many
types of them have been identified as being Italian in origin. Descriptive
catalogues are issued of the lace collections at South
Kensington Museum, at the Science and Art Museum, Dublin, and at
the Industrial Museum, Nuremberg. In 1881 a series of four Cantor
Lectures on the art of lace-making were delivered before the Society
of Arts by Alan S. Cole.
A Technical History of the Manufacture of Venetian Laces, by
G. M. Urbani de Gheltof, with plates, was translated by Lady
Layard, and published at Venice by Signor Ongania. The History of
Machine-wrought Hosiery and Lace Manufacture (London, 1867), by
Felkin, has already been referred to. There is also a technological
essay upon lace made by machinery, with diagrams of lace stitches
and patterns (Technologische Studien im sächsischen Erzgebirge,
Leipzig, 1878), by Hugo Fischer. In 1886 the Libraire Renouard,
Paris, published a History of Point d’Alençon, written by Madame
G. Despierres, which gives a close and interesting account of the
industry, together with a list, compiled from local records, of makers
and dealers from 1602 onwards.—Embroidery and Lace: their manufacture
and history from the remotest antiquity to the present day, by
Ernest Lefebure, lace-maker and administrator of the École des Arts
Décoratifs, translated and enlarged with notes by Alan S. Cole, was
published in London in 1888. It is a well-illustrated handbook for
amateurs, collectors and general readers.—Irish laces made from
modern designs are illustrated in a Renascence of the Irish Art of Lace-making,
published in 1888 (London).—Anciennes Dentelles belges
formant la collection de feue madame Augusta Baronne Liedts et
données au Musée de Grunthuis à Bruges, published at Antwerp in
1889, consists of a folio volume containing upwards of 181 phototypes—many
full size—of fine specimens of lace. The ascriptions of
country and date of origin are occasionally inaccurate, on account
of a too obvious desire to credit Bruges with being the birthplace of
all sorts of lace-work, much of which shown in this work is distinctly
Italian in style.—The Encyclopaedia of Needlework, by Thérèse de
Dillmont-Dornach (Alsace, 1891), is a detailed guide to several kinds
of embroidery, knitting, crochet, tatting, netting and most of the
essential stitches for needlepoint lace. It is well illustrated with
wood-cuts and process blocks.—An exhaustive history of Russian
lace-making is given in La Dentelle russe, by Madame Sophie
Davidoff, published at Leipzig, 1895. Russian lace is principally
pillow-work with rather heavy thread, and upwards of eighty
specimens are reproduced by photo-lithography in this book.
A short account of the best-known varieties of Point and Pillow
Lace, by A. M. S. (London, 1899), is illustrated with typical specimens
of Italian, Flemish, French and English laces, as well as with magnified
details of lace, enabling any one to identify the plaits, the twists
and loops of threads in the actual making of the fabric.—L’Industrie
des tulles et dentelles mécaniques dans le Pas de Calais, 1815-1900,
by Henri Hénon (Paris, 1900), is an important volume of over 600
pages of letterpress, interspersed with abundant process blocks of
the several kinds of machine nets and laces made at Calais since 1815.
It opens with a short account of the Arras hand-made laces, the production
of which is now almost extinct. The book was sold for the
benefit of a public subscription towards the erection of a statue in
Calais to Jacquard, the inventor of the apparatus by means of which
all figured textile fabrics are manufactured. It is of some interest to
note that machine net and lace-making at Calais owe their origin to
Englishmen, amongst whom “le sieur R. Webster arrivé à St Pierre-les-Calais
en Décembre, 1816, venant d’Angleterre, est l’un des
premiers qui ont établi dans la communauté une fabrique de tulles,”
&c. Lace-making in the Midlands: Past and Present, by C. C.
Channer and M. E. Roberts (London, 1900) upon the lace-making
industry in Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire and Northamptonshire
contains many illustrations of laces made in these counties from the
17th century to the present time. Musée rétrospectif. Dentelles à
l’exposition universelle internationale de 1900 à Paris. Rapport de
Mons. E. Lefebvre contains several good illustrations, especially of
important specimens of Point de France of the 17th and 18th
centuries. Le Point de France et les autres dentelliers au XVIIe et au
XVIIIe siècles, by Madame Laurence de Laprade (Paris, 1905), brings
together much hitherto scattered information throwing light upon
operations in many localities in France where the industry has been
carried on for considerable periods. The book is well and usefully
illustrated.
See also Irische Spitzen (30 half-tone plates), with a short historical
introduction by Alan S. Cole (Stuttgart, 1902); Pillow Lace, a
practical handbook by Elizabeth Mincoff and Margaret S. Marriage
(London, 1907); The Art of Bobbin Lace, a practical text-book of
workmanship, &c., by Louisa Tebbs (London, 1907); Antiche trine
italiane, by Elisa Ricci (Bergamo, 1908), well illustrated; Seven
Centuries of Lace, by Mrs John Hungerford Pollen (London and New
York, 1908), very fully illustrated.