From HarryHardon@BigNuts.Org Fri Jan 22 07:57:23 1999
Newsgroups: alt.folklore,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.gothic,alt.2600
Subject: Scientologys_KGB_1
From: HarryHardon@BigNuts.Org
Date: 22 Jan 1999 06:57:23 GMT


The following is a confidential Scientology document describing how to
conduct a covert operation against an "opponent"

Some of you reading this will probably get to experience this "tech"
first hand, so here is a preview of what to expect.

[from the '77 FBI raids]


OPERATIONS OFFICER


Successful:

(1) Allowing outer Org B1s to develop their own Ops ideas to submit for
approval -- and demanding such.

(2) Allowing outer Org B1s to run approved Ops based on first hand data
as long as it's kept within the framework of the Op.

(3) Providing a believable source of an operation, thereby filling the
vacuum, so that Scn. isn't dubbed in as source.

(4) When planning an Op, mentally following it all the way through
looking for areas which need to be taken into account; and taking the
enemy's viewpoint of the Op for the same purpose.

(5) Full and correct use of target series for each Op. Targets simply
stated and specific as possible. (Helps in debugging and to hat
inexperienced persons)

(6) The major target of the Op is based on a *real*, current situation.

(7) When hitting a group or individual, hitting their finance and comm
lines.

(8) Getting an enemy to attack another enemy.

(9) Working off of programmes which align Ops actions to other Br 1
sections and other Bureaus and which contain command intention from
LRH on down. (Admin scale and priorities aligned)

(10) Working for VFPs and having such reflected in the statistics, rather
than a lot of sub-products.

(11) Exposure of real, documented enemy crimes and material of a
scandalous nature.

(12) Utilizing current events and trends (and finding the right buttons)
for exploitation in Ops channels.

(13) Keeping plans bright and simple and on target.

(14) Finding real buttons.

(15) Keeping up persistent pressure until the product is achieved.

(16) Establishing some type of feedback line so that exact effects are
known.

(17) Mini-hatting by giving examples of successful Ops.


Unsuccessful:

(1) Ops on random attackers instead of WHOs, just to be doing Ops for Ops
sake.

(2) Dubbing in buttons.

(3) Trying to do everything on an Op by yourself from a management or
senior executive level, and therefore not allowing origination or
juniors to wear their hats.

(4) A one shot approach, rather than persistent pressure and several
channels to a product.

(5) Harassment actions.

(6) Not planning or providing for a believable source of the Op so that
a vacuum is left allowing the recipients to dub in Scn amongst
others.

(7) When planning not considering all the effects as the Op runs it's
full course, and not taking the enemy's viewpoint, leaving critical
holes in the plan which will later backfire on you, make your
scramble on an emergency basis to handle or make the Op less
effective.

(8) No use of, or misuse of, target series. (too few, unspecific
targets; many unaligned, hard to understand targets).

(9) An Op or major target based on revenge or out-of-PT situation.

(10) Producing, and stats aligned with, many sub-products as opposed to
VFPs.

(11) Manufacturing documented enemy crimes (there are rare exceptions to
this)

(12) Long involved and overly complex operations with many conditionals
which if any or any one of several aren't done exactly would cancel
out the effectiveness of the Op. (There are rare exceptions)

(13) No feedback line; results of Ops not really known or dubbed in.

# # # # #


DATA NEEDED BY OPS ON EACH LOCATED WHO

1. Standard ODC with time track and a brief, summarized, well-rounded
picture of a terminal. (Following #2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 are the key areas
data is needed)

2. Criminal background of terminal.

3. Financial involvements (inflow & outflow of money)

4. Legal involvements (summary of actions)

5. Terminal's main interests, personal habits, fears, vices and any
other items of interest.

6. Friends and enemies on the terminal's 1st Dynamic
Friends and enemies on the terminal's 2nd Dynamic
Groups that the terminal belongs to and any groups or terminals, who
are enemies of that group.

7. What the terminal considers valuable & is protecting

8. Simple org board the terminal is on, clearly noting his position and
his seniors and noteworthy juniors.

9. What persons have the power to fire terminal from the position he
holds.

10. Any rules or regulations that if broken would cause the terminal to
lose his job/position.

11. Any regulations concerning licenses that the terminal holds that
would cause him to lose his license if violated (i.e. law, medical,
contractor, etc.)

12. Scandals, conflicts, disputes directly or indirectly connected to
terminal.

13. Documents that show criminality of terminal (i.e. cheating on income
tax, discrediting data in personal letters, use of drugs, etc.)

14.

15.