WHAT DID "TARTARY" ACTUALLY MEAN?

This is the first distinction in the file.

TARTARY, TARTARIA, TATARY AND TARTAR

European writers used Tartary or Tartaria as a broad geographic label for
large parts of northern, central and eastern Asia. The spelling varied by
language and period. "Tartar" could refer to peoples Europeans grouped
together under a name inherited from encounters with the Mongol world; it
was not a precise modern ethnic classification.

The label was not one stable country. Its meaning changed with the mapmaker,
the date, the source material and the political geography being described.
One map might divide a huge area into Muscovite Tartary, Chinese Tartary and
Independent Tartary. Another might use different boundaries or omit the
subdivisions entirely.

That is not a hidden empire. It is what broad geographic terminology looks
like when an enormous region is being described from partial information.

THE MAP IS REAL

The Library of Congress holds a map titled "Map of the Great Tartary."
That is a real historical object. The title proves that a mapmaker used the
term. It does not, by itself, prove that every territory covered by the ink
formed one centralized sovereign state.

The same caution applies to labels such as Great Tartary, Chinese Tartary,
Russian Tartary, Western Tartary and Independent Tartary. A regional label
can describe geography, a perceived cultural area, a frontier, an imperial
zone, or a category in a European atlas. The legend and surrounding text
matter.

The term also sits inside real Asian histories that should not be erased by
the modern meme. Tatar communities, Mongol polities, Turkic societies,
Khanates, the Qing Empire, the Russian Empire, Bukhara, Khiva, Kokand and
many other peoples and states have their own histories. "Tartary" was often
an outside label laid across some of those histories, not the name of a
single forgotten civilization that replaces them all.

A useful test is to ask what the map is doing. Is it a political map? Does it
show borders, capitals, rulers and dependencies? Is the label printed over a
vast blank area? Do other labels on the same sheet describe regions rather
than states? Does the mapmaker explain the name in a book or gazetteer?

The existence of TARTARY on an old map is not hidden evidence. The old maps
are available. The question is what the mapmaker meant.

SOURCE:
Map of the Great Tartary, Library of Congress / World Digital Library
https://www.loc.gov/resource/wdl.15038/

SOURCE:
Abraham Ortelius map guide, Library of Congress
https://guides.loc.gov/abraham-ortelius/featured-selection-of-maps

SOURCE:
Mark C. Elliott, "The Limits of Tartary: Manchuria in Imperial and
National Geographies," Journal of Asian Studies, 2000
https://elliott.scholars.harvard.edu/sites/g/files/omnuum10991/files/elliott/files/elliott_jas_limits_of_tartary_0.pdf