__  __      _        _____ _ _ _
|  \/  | ___| |_ __ _|  ___(_) | |_ ___ _ __
| |\/| |/ _ \ __/ _` | |_  | | | __/ _ \ '__|
| |  | |  __/ || (_| |  _| | | | ||  __/ |
|_|  |_|\___|\__\__,_|_|   |_|_|\__\___|_|
community weblog	

Bari Weiss Is The Symptom

I worry some of my colleagues in the industry are getting the Bari Weiss phenomenon exactly wrong. She isn't a saboteur brought in to destroy one of the last remaining citadels of high journalism. She is one of high journalism's purest products, a perfect symptom of its old, unresolved contradictions. Her disingenuousness about motive is the industry's in miniature.
posted by postcommunism on Jan 21, 2026 at 6:39 AM

---------------------------

The Five Farcical Principles of the CBS Evening News
posted by LionIndex at 6:58 AM

---------------------------

I recall that trollish Atlantic opinion piece in the wake of the CECOT story getting canned where Graeme Wood fully affirms all of Weiss' excuses for pulling the story in the exact same words, expands upon her argument by imagining that actually she just wanted the journalists to challenge the administration in an interview, and only criticized her management style for not communicating better. It provides a perfect plastic capsule to help the site's liberal readership question whether this blatant act of censorship in defense of power might just be about upholding journalistic standards after all.

I think the reason Weiss sticks out to other journos is that her career trajectory never put her anywhere near actual journalism. She's always been a columnist and a professional repugnant opinion-haver.
posted by jy4m at 7:15 AM

---------------------------

jy4m: "She's always been a columnist "

are you now or have you ever been a columnist?
posted by chavenet at 7:44 AM

---------------------------

It's been almost ten fucking years since NPR gave the most pathetic excuse they could come up with for not using the word lie:
The policy, in brief, is to largely avoid using the word "lie." As NPR's national security correspondent Mary Louise Kelly said Wednesday, the Oxford English Dictionary defines a "lie" as "'a false statement made with intent to deceive.' Intent being the key word there — without the ability to peer into Donald Trump's head, I can't tell you what his intent was. I can tell you what he said and how that squares — or doesn't — with fact.
posted by RonButNotStupid at 7:50 AM

---------------------------

are you now or have you ever been a columnist?

Specifically, a fifth one.
posted by solotoro at 7:52 AM

---------------------------

are you now or have you ever been a columnist?

That made me chuckle and wonder if that phrase could be wholly original or if it had been used before so I quickly grabbed and googled it - the response was unanticipated:

No, Google Search is not a person and has never been a columnist; it's an information retrieval service.
posted by thecincinnatikid at 7:54 AM

---------------------------

She's both a symptom and a saboteur. IMO. Saying she's not a saboteur is complicating something that needs to be spelled out in plain language.
posted by subdee at 8:33 AM

---------------------------

Intent being the key word there — without the ability to peer into Donald Trump's head, I can't tell you what his intent was. I can tell you what he said and how that squares — or doesn't — with fact.

The blood-caked but well-manicured hands of Cokie Roberts emerge from the grave to give a big thumbs up.
posted by reedbird_hill at 8:50 AM

---------------------------

The article in the FPP looks interesting, but I was only able to get to the first few paragraphs. I will figure out a way through I the paywall later. The Ringer article that LionIndex linked in the first comment is great, though. And chock full of links to follow that makes it a bit of a "how bad is Bari Weiss at running CBS news" rabbit hole. I may even watch it tonight just to see how bad it is.

I don't pay a lot of attention to network news these days for a number of reasons, so had no idea there was a new anchor at CBS. Not particularly surprised, just not something on my radar. It seem that, like Weiss, he isn't particularly good at his job. The Ringer piece includes this tidbit: Megyn Kelly, whose brain wasn't exactly running smoothly to begin with, blamed Weiss's sexual orientation for convincing her to hire the "soft" Dokoupil. ("This is a lesbian's idea," she sneered, "of what women want.") . Which is screwed up on so many levels I don't even know where to begin.
posted by TedW at 8:54 AM

---------------------------

Does this gift link work for you, TedW?
posted by Lawn Beaver at 9:24 AM

---------------------------

Journalism, such as it is, announced its own death in the run-up to the 2016 election. We just didn't pay close enough attention. It's just another one of the institutions that should have been looking out for us that totally abdicated its responsibility.
posted by tommasz at 9:26 AM

---------------------------

No, Google Search is not a person and has never been a columnist; it's an information retrieval service.

Sounds like evasion to me.
posted by Greg_Ace at 9:41 AM

---------------------------

You can't call it a lie unless it comes from the Lié region of France. Otherwise it's just Sparkling Without Evidence.
posted by AlSweigart at 9:49 AM

---------------------------

Anyway, Bari Weiss is a fucking liar.
posted by AlSweigart at 9:49 AM

---------------------------

>"...without the ability to peer into Donald Trump's head, I can't tell you what his intent was."

Tell that to your fellow journalists who clean up and sane-wash incoherent statements "for clarity" or who just assume the guy's talking about Greenland in a speech even though he says Iceland.
posted by theory at 10:09 AM

---------------------------

Any senior editor or manager at any long-established media outlet is always going to go to great lengths to deny that the owners of that outlet have the power to tell them what they should or should not publish.

As Chomsky pointed out to Marr, though: the fact that they have the unexamined biases that they do is the entire reason they're even in a position to be asked that question.
posted by flabdablet at 10:57 AM

---------------------------

Does this gift link work for you, TedW?

Yes it does; thanks! And that piece dovetails nicely with the one in the first comment.
posted by TedW at 11:08 AM

---------------------------

I had an epiphany about journalism some time ago upon reading a few books. The ones I remember off the top of my head are "Toxic Sludge is Good For You," which is about the PR industry, and "Beyond Belief" which is a deep dive into how the facts of the Holocaust were covered in the American press in real time. Both are very good, and I recommend them without reservation.

The fact is that the American media is the house organ of capital, and has been for a long, long time. The people in charge of the industry see their job as managing public opinion on behalf of the very top of the wealth pyramid, and do not hesitate to make editorial decisions to those ends. If they have a set of axioms, it is as follows:

- Politics is entertainment.
- Real relationships of power will never be spoken of openly, and will be quickly obscured on the rare occasion they become accidentally visible.
- Anything that excites the masses in a direction that challenges the status quo will be minimalized by any means necessary.
- Anything that benefits wealth will be treated as the authentic voice of the people, even if you have to dig under a hundred rocks to find one.

The Defector piece ends:

The romantic view of journalism, in which gutsy reporters and editors hang their asses on the line to reveal dangerous truths about the world, obscures the ways that the work of any moment is circumscribed by how much and what kind of truth-telling the business will bear.

And the thing is, that version of a reporter hasn't really existed for a very long time. I think in a lot of ways, we're all haunted by the ghost of Watergate, where for a brief moment, something very real happened. If you want to know what the reality of the situation is today, look at how the Panama Papers or the Epstein List have been handled. Clear indications of deep and pervasive corruption have been handled like radioactive hot potatoes, making sure that no matter what, the obvious questions raised by them are never even aired, and that ultimately, the entire affair is put to bed as quickly as possible, as many times as necessary. The romantic image of a journalist is one who is driven to uncover the truth and bring it to the people. Do those people exist? Of course they do. But as the FPP makes clear, they are quickly and categorically marginalized. In today's world, the last thing that ostensibly journalistic media companies want anything to do with is the truth, and those who try to access it or describe it do so at severe risk to their career.
posted by Smedly, Butlerian jihadi at 11:19 AM

---------------------------


And the thing is, that version of a reporter hasn't really existed for a very long time. I think in a lot of ways, we're all haunted by the ghost of Watergate, where for a brief moment, something very real happened.


I am absolutely haunted by the ghosts of Watergate

Bob Woodward "retires" from Navy intelligence service, only to start working at the CIA's favorite news media collaborator, with no prior experience in the field, and he is almost immediately assigned to take down the President

Graham, Bradlee, Woodward, Felt, they all knew exactly what they were doing, even if they may not have known who they were doing it for.
posted by your postings may, in fact, be signed at 11:45 AM

---------------------------

Bari Weiss is the walking talking embodiment of how Trump got elected. Inflexible conservative who pretends to be "liberal." Very much makes it her goal to spin the news in favor of her fave political party.

She's not the problem, though. The problem is that the actual journalists have tolerated these hucksters for decades now. Actual journalists are so afraid of being called "liberal" they see a video of an ICE agent murdering a woman and say "people will interpret this differently..."

BTW, CBS was one of the main outlets spreading the false propaganda claim that the poor ICE agent had internal bleeding.

She's hardcore MAGA pretending not to be. I'm so sick of this timeline.
posted by teece303 at 12:01 PM

---------------------------

She's hardcore MAGA pretending not to be.

Pretending?

Cheek kisses between Bari Weiss and Donald Trump following '60 Minutes' interview rankle CBS staff
Unbeknownst to Trump, sources told The Independent, Weiss was actually on location for the interview and quickly approached the president to introduce herself. "He was so happy to see her and she was so excited to meet him, they both leaned in and exchanged kisses on the cheek," one source said.
posted by RonButNotStupid at 12:11 PM

---------------------------

I get ya RonButNotStuoid, but in her crowd...absolutely no one would assume she's MAGA. Which is exactly what she is.
posted by teece303 at 12:18 PM

---------------------------

I kind of dispute that. A big part of what separates Bari Weiss from the kinds of practices described in the linked article is just how overt her motives are. She's not some small-c conservative editor fretting about access and decorum. She has hand-picked by the Ellisons to capture CBS.
posted by RonButNotStupid at 12:31 PM

---------------------------

She has hand-picked by the Ellisons to capture CBS.

And yet... no one in mainstream journalism, absolutely no one, will claim she is even right leaning, let alone conservative, let alone hardcore MAGA.

That's how conservatives have done this. They've spent decades calling actual journalism "liberal media" while simultaneously creating an entire sphere of reporting that is the media wing of the Republican Party.

And they succeeded in destroying any idea of the free press. Even the "liberal media" is very biased towards the right.
posted by teece303 at 12:35 PM

---------------------------

I read the entire Dianna Ortiz Wikipedia page linked above. It's a fascinating and terrible story, but no mention of Cokie Roberts is made. Can we be more direct when taking a post off on a tangent?

Also the main article requires me to sign up for the website. /cranky
posted by caviar2d2 at 3:19 PM

---------------------------

I read the entire Dianna Ortiz Wikipedia page linked above. It's a fascinating and terrible story, but no mention of Cokie Roberts is made. Can we be more direct when taking a post off on a tangent?

A remark born of her infamous interview with Ortiz in which she insinuated Ortiz might be lying about her ordeal - while her own brother's PR firm was taking non-insignificant sums of money to polish and package Guatemala's image.
posted by thecincinnatikid at 3:44 PM

---------------------------

Not saying CBS News was perfect, but it's yet another thing destroyed by Zionism. There will be so many more to add to the already impressive list of things that ideology has destroyed in the last 50 years.
posted by chaz at 4:05 PM

---------------------------

I read the entire Dianna Ortiz Wikipedia page linked above. It's a fascinating and terrible story, but no mention of Cokie Roberts is made.

Perhaps you skipped the section titled Guatemalan media lobby, which begins thusly (bold text mine):

In a 1996 widely recounted interview with Ortiz on the TV news program Nightline, American journalist Cokie Roberts contested Ortiz's claim that an American was among her captors. Roberts implied that Ortiz was lying about the entire episode, despite the fact that Ortiz later won a lawsuit against a Guatemalan general she accused in the case.[19] It was later revealed that Patton Boggs, the law firm of Roberts' brother Tom Boggs, was paid by the Guatemalan government to promote a more positive image of the regime, which was widely criticized internationally for human rights abuses.[20][21][22] Patton Boggs ran a smear campaign against Ortiz.[23]


Bari Weiss has obviously been paid $150m to parachute into CBS and destroy its news division, but I kind of have mixed feelings because I could think of newsrooms I'd miss more had it been them. It seems to me that if you're trying to propagandize to people by subverting the CBS editorial independence, you could stand to be less blatantly obvious about it. it's not as if I was watching much CBS news to begin with, but I certainly wouldn't bother now. Of course some people probably still are, and I guess if you don't particularly mind what's going on there, I don't know what to say to you.
posted by axiom at 4:22 PM

---------------------------

Re: tangent, it's in the original Wikipedia link under the "Guatemalan media lobby" header. Astonishing what you can subject someone to in only 24 hours.

I had though it was going to be a reference to the way Cokie put her finger on the scale for Trump by accusing Hillary of lying to the FBI, iirc. As someone with a security clearance, I knew that the statement as described did not provide evidence for that accusation, but I don't know how I could have pushed back on it.
posted by puffinaria at 4:29 PM

---------------------------

Bari Weiss has obviously been paid $150m to parachute into CBS and destroy its news division, but I kind of have mixed feelings because I could think of newsrooms I'd miss more had it been them.

In very short order there will be no news rooms worth saving. The America right understood how important propaganda was. And they are killing actual journalism everywhere they see it.

Let's be clear.

Even milquetoast disagreement is beyond the pale to these people.
posted by teece303 at 5:35 PM

---------------------------

In very short order there will be no news rooms worth saving. The America right understood how important propaganda was. And they are killing actual journalism everywhere they see it.

They're certainly trying. I don't know if I buy the idea that this possible. Proper journalism is a thing I think we will always create a market for, even if perhaps that market is smaller in the future than it is now, or was in the past. A lot of people — even an increasing number of people — seem to not be very careful about their media diet, or particularly opinionated about how journalism should be done. But that's not everyone, and those who do care will form an audience that someone will be interested in speaking to.
posted by axiom at 5:52 PM

---------------------------

I would love to share your optimism, axiom.

But we live in a universe where Donald Trump, the most unqualified man to ever hold the office of presidency, has been elected twice.

How do you think that happened? Biased media made that happen.
posted by teece303 at 5:58 PM

---------------------------

And yet... no one in mainstream journalism, absolutely no one, will claim she is even right leaning, let alone conservative, let alone hardcore MAGA.

I could swear I read a mainstream article just this week that casually referred to Weiss' The Free Press as a "conservative-opinion site," and I remember being struck by it because every similar article I'd recalled from the past had, as you say, avoided that straightforward descriptor. Digging through my browser history, who did it turn out to be? Variety, of all places:
Weiss has been under a microscope since her arrival in October, after Paramount bought her conservative-opinion site The Free Press for $150 million. Since taking the reins, she has pressed programs such as "CBS Evening News" and "60 Minutes" to give more time to Trump administration officials and other leaders. The nascent tenure of Dokoupil on "CBS Evening News" has been marred by awkward segments such as one that celebrated U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio or others that downplayed the severity of changes in vaccine protocol, the Jan. 6 attacks on the U.S. Capitol and the fatal shooting of a woman in Minneapolis by an ICE agent.


And I hadn't seen this one from the same Variety journalist a few days earlier:
Weiss, a conservative opinion provocateur who founded the right-leaning site The Free Press, joined Paramount Skydance last year after the company purchased her outlet for $150 million.


I think this might be a recent shift. The same writer's article covering the acquisition back in September uses language like "founder of the successful online outlet The Free Press."
posted by nobody at 11:02 PM

---------------------------

Oh, wait, closing up my browser tabs here, it turns out the Independent article RonButNotStupid linked to earlier also straightforwardly calls Weiss' site "neo-conservative":
"I don't know her, but I hear she's a great person," the president gushed about Bari Weiss, the "anti-woke" founder of the neoconservative site The Free Press and recently installed editor-in-chief of the network.
I wonder if the tide might be turning on this front, after seeing the precise flavor of mess her tenure at CBS has made.
posted by nobody at 11:10 PM

---------------------------

I disagree with this part of the article: "Megyn Kelly, whose brain wasn't exactly running smoothly to begin with..." Kelly's brain has always seemed smooth.
posted by ryoshu at 5:48 AM

---------------------------

Smedley as usual spot on comments (as have all of these been). I recall when I finally heard the phrase Nice Polite Republicans, and realized that NPR directed its scrutiny solely at the left side, (led by the execrable Cokie Roberts, but dont sleep on sycophantic chud Steve Inskeep), it was quite an awakening for someone who had swallowed the mass media water carriers as heroes from an early age.

Aside, it's long been forgotten, but I haven't forgotten that pathetic NPR leader stating that NPR absolutely needed more conservative reporters given its well known liberal bias (news flash: its a Regime pimping bias).

And the astonishing arrogance of the 'leading journalistic institutions' is breathtaking. To read an interview with Kahn running the NYT is to behold someone with a Trumpian sized ego.

But it's the oligarchs mass media who are strong allies in the fight against democracy and for fascism. Not Indy journalism. Those people rock in the face of overwhelming odds. Support them!
posted by WatTylerJr at 8:59 AM

---------------------------

Mea culpa - I missed the one mention of Roberts in that article. I tend to skim when the goal of reading is to understand a single Metafilter comment that, in fairness, is only tangentially related to the post. As far as Bari Weiss, I have no illusions about the compromised state of American media, but I get frustrated when we have extremely blatant corruption or bias positioned as "what we've always done". For example, a lot of people for example honestly see Trump as just an extension of what America has always done, which is super disingenuous.
posted by caviar2d2 at 9:23 AM

---------------------------

Bari Weiss is the person who checks if the signs are in the window every morning, and tells the scary stories to ensure that they are there.
posted by bonehead at 10:04 AM

---------------------------

I have ignored this thread for a little while sorry

I want to end things by pointing out that even today, in the year of our Lord in 2026, it is very difficult to find any mainstream journalist that calls Fox News what it is: a blatant propaganda outfit that is a part and parcel of the Republican Party.

Remember that.

There is no such thing as a liberal media, and yet millions of your neighbors believe that that exists.

That's how Trump got elected (twice).

Republicans will continue to carry on despite being the worst political party I've ever seen in my life.

They may lose the House just barely. They will keep the Senate, and they have a 50-50 chance of maintaining the presidency going forward.

And this is a party that is actively dismantling American democracy. And none of your neighbors will hear that.
posted by teece303 at 10:54 PM

---------------------------

There is no such thing as a liberal media, and yet millions of your neighbors believe that that exists.

Some of them even accept YouTube sponsorship from Ground News.
posted by flabdablet at 4:58 AM

---------------------------

There is no such thing as a liberal media, and yet millions of your neighbors believe that that exists.

Well, no, of course not actually left-wing. I think a lot of people might be informally using liberal as a shorthand for "not wholly captured by Republicans." And to flabdablet's video's point, it's overly reductionist to speak in those terms, but that doesn't mean it's not a useful distinction.

Speaking personally, I tend to sort my news outlets into three piles, "eh, I guess I'll read that to find about $topical_headline" (your CNNs, Atlantics, New Yorkers, Guardians, regional/city news papers, though you have to be careful about Sinclair), then "oh hell no" (your OANs, Fox, Epoch Times), and finally, "you know what you did to piss me off" (anything on Substack, NYT, WaPo, CBS, LA Times — any specific outlet that I might've even used in the past but either they fucked up one time too many or have problematic ownership/editors I am going out of my way to avoid).
posted by axiom at 2:44 PM

---------------------------

Well, no, of course not actually left-wing

I am on your side, and you have completely missed the point..
posted by teece303 at 6:36 PM

---------------------------

I remember hearing RFK Jr talking during his campaign. One interesting point he made was that Reagan got the Fairness Doctrine repealed in 1987. That doctrine was meant to keep TV networks from presenting news in a biased way (whatever that means). The result was that news broadcasts were boring, and not sensational. Audiences for news broadcasts were scant, and TV networks lost money.

With the repeal, networks started making broadcasts more exciting, and attracted more viewrs, and more advertisers. But advertising is a double edged sword. Notice that the evening news are chock full of ads from pharma. As, a result, news broadcasts are chock full of what are effectively press releases for pharma. Every night you'll learn about some new breakthrough in the war over cancer!

The net result of repealing the doctrine is that ALL broadcast news is now wholly beholden to corporate interests. CBS news is far from unique. There are Bari Weiss'es running every network.

When I came to the US from Canada I was struck by the tone of the news broadcasts. I felt like I was being fed corporate propaganda. Now I understand where that feeling came from.
posted by Zpt2718 at 7:53 PM

---------------------------

The idea of the liberal media is a complete and total lie.

Until you understand that, that idea has been used by the powers that be to make blatantly conservative, Republican media, not even conservative: Republican media, seem as the main stream you will never have any idea what is happening in America today.
posted by teece303 at 8:17 PM

---------------------------

bari weiss' 60 minutes doing an in-depth investigation into ice in minneapolis tonight (per their validated bsky account) so all you doubters can put that in your pipe and smoke it

for legal purposes the statement above is a joke, smoking is bad for your lungs
posted by i used to be someone else at 11:07 AM

---------------------------