Originally posted by the Voice of America. Voice of America content is produced by the Voice of America, a United States federal government-sponsored entity, and is in the public domain. No 'Gay Gene,' but Study Finds Genetic Links to SexualBehavior Reuters LONDON - A large scientific study into thebiological basis of sexual behavior has confirmed there is nosingle "gay gene" but that a complex mix of genetics andenvironment affects whether a person has same-sex sexualpartners. The research, which analyzed data on DNA and sexualexperiences from almost half a million people, found there arethousands of genetic variants linked to same-sex sexualbehavior, most with very small effects. Five of the genetic markers were "significantly" associatedwith same-sex behavior, the researchers said, but even theseare far from being predictive of a person's sexual preferences. "We scanned the entire human genome and found a handful--five,to be precise--of locations that are clearly associatedwith whether a person reports in engaging in same-sex sexualbehavior," said Andrea Ganna, a biologist at the Institute ofMolecular Medicine in Finland who co-led the research. He said these have "a very small effect" and, combined,explain "considerably less than 1% of the variance in theself-reported same-sex sexual behavior." Other factors This means that nongenetic factors--such as environment,upbringing, personality, nurture--are far more significant ininfluencing a person's choice of sexual partner, just as withmost other personality, behavioral and physical human traits,the researchers said. The study, which wasthe largest of its kind,analyzed surveyresponses and performed analyses known as genome-wideassociation studies (GWAS) on data from more than 470,000 peoplewho had given DNA samples and lifestyle information to the UKBiobank and to the U.S. genetics testing company 23andMeInc. Asked why they had wanted to conduct such research, the team told reporters on a teleconference that previous studies on thistopic had mostly been too small to offer robust conclusions. "Previous studies were small and underpowered," Ganna said."So we decided to form a large international consortium andcollected data for[almost]500,000 people,[which]isapproximately 100 times bigger than previous studies on thistopic." .