The original content of Democracy Now! Headlines appears under the Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 3.0 License (United States). For more, including their other shows and media, visit www.democracynow.org. January 12, 2010 Federal Trial on Same-Sex Marriage Ban Begins in California ----------------------------------------------------------- A federal trial over California’s ban on same-sex marriage opened Monday in San Francisco. The trial is the first in any federal court over same-sex marriage and is the first step in a case that could reach the Supreme Court. During the opening day of the trial, same-sex couples said they’re second-class citizens without the equal right to wed. Bruce Cohen, of the American Foundation for Equal Rights: “We think the consequences have been huge already just in the last week with the news cycle, the amount of attention that this issue has been given, and is hopefully getting to people that haven’t thought about it a lot. There’s a small percentage of Americans who feel really strongly one way or the other about this issue, but there are a lot of Americans who haven’t really thought about gay marriage, don’t really understand what’s at stake, haven’t heard both sides of the story. And for us to have a chance to explain to people why we have the right to be in love and to get married just like every other American and that it’s a fundamental right guaranteed us by the Constitution, that’s going to be huge regardless of the outcome of the case, although we are very much hoping that we will win, of course, and believe we have the lawyers to take us there." Jordan Lorence of the Alliance Defense Fund said the court should not overturn the decision of the California voters to ban same-sex marriage. Jordan Lorence, Alliance Defense Fund: "This is where the people listen to discussions, listen to the debates, and find and reach some sort of decision on their own. And the court should basically leave those decisions alone and let—and if people want to change it over time, it’s up to them. But it’s not for a court or a bunch of rich activists that are funding this case to come in and basically trump what the—what the people have already decided.” .