* * * * * I, for one, will welcome our new AI overlords > Earlier this year, I was driving in a northern Michigan snowstorm headed to > Detroit airport. I was worried that, given the storm, my flight might be > delayed. Thusly, I grabbed my phone and without knowing if it would work I > said to it: > > **"OK GOOGLE, what is the status of my flight today?"** > > Within seconds, Googlebot (or maybe it was Larry Page - not sure) > responded: > > **"Flight XYZ from Detroit, Michigan to San Francisco, California is > scheduled to leave on-time at 2:30pm".** > > Pretty cool huh? If you were like me, you're sort of thinking that was cool > but big deal, it should do that. OF COURSE it should do that - I could have > done that (had I not been driving). After a lot more thinking about it > however, I'd like to point out that boy are we a snot-nosed, ungrateful > species who take amazing things for granted. > > A stunning array of technologies just came together to make that happen. So > much so I'm convinced I could write a full length blog article just listing > them. In the name of sticking to the topic (i.e. complete human destruction > caused by the emergence of AI) let's take for granted the everyday sorcery > of talking to thousands of computers around the world, I'll just focus on > the “artificial intelligence” parts. (Where “intelligence” may have a fuzzy > definition). > > Simply: I spoke to my tiny hand-held computer in English. It heard me start > with "Ok Google" to know I was addressing it. It then parsed the rest of my > words and realized I had asked a question (it likely offloaded that work to > a remote computer). It is also able to recognize the voice of millions of > others speaking in accents and dialects. I could have likely phrased that > question many ways and it still would have worked. It parsed my question > and understood I was asking about a flight. It then scanned my Gmail to > find my flight reservation I had made months before. From that it examined > the outbound and return flight and realized the outbound had already > happened. > > It might have realized my current location was in Michigan near(ish) the > Detroit airport further understanding I was asking about my return flight. > It then hit some real-time flight database to know if the flight was still > on time. It might have checked Detroit Airport in general for delays to > decide if it should respond in a qualified manner. It then formulated a > perfect English sentence, maybe with considerations of how I formulated my > sentence, computer generated the audio in a human voice, and played it > aloud for me. > > Go ahead, be not impressed - I dare you. Clichés be damned. We truly live > in amazing times. > > So that's now. What's coming next? How about: > > **"OK Google, what's the probability my flight will crash today?"** > Via Lobsters [1], “Paul Tyma: How Artificial Intelligence Will Really Kill Us All [2]” The good news? That Paul Tyma [3] doesn't think we'll face the Terminator Scenario [4]. The bad news? It's much, much worse. [1] https://lobste.rs/s/ptdk6e/how_artificial_intelligence_will_really_kill [2] http://paultyma.blogspot.com/2015/10/how-artificial-intelligence-will- [3] http://paultyma.blogspot.com/ [4] http://forum.gateworld.net/threads/85303-Could-a- Email Sean Conner at sean@conman.org .