* * * * * I think there's a quote by Martin Niemöller that also might apply > Twenty years from now, > > * You won’t necessarily know anything about the decisions that affect your > rights, like whether you get a loan, a job, or if a car runs over you. > Things will get decided by data-crunching computer algorithms and no > human will really be able to understand why. > * The Internet will become a lot more like TV and a lot less like the > global conversation we envisioned 20 years ago. > * Rather than being overturned, existing power structures will be > reinforced and replicated, and this will be particularly true for > security. > * Internet technology design increasingly facilitates rather than defeats > censorship and control. > > It doesn’t have to be this way. But to change course, we need to ask some > hard questions and make some difficult decisions. > > … > > Here, too, the message was clear. You need our permission to operate in > this world. If you step over the line we draw, if you automate, if you > download too fast, if you type something weird in the URL bar on your > browser, and we don’t like it, or we don’t like you, then we will get you. > > In the future will we re-secure the Freedom to Tinker? That means Congress > forgoing the tough-on-cybercrime hand waving it engages in every year — > annual proposals, to make prison sentences more severe under the CFAA, as > if any of the suspected perpetrators of the scores of major breaches of the > past two or three years — China, North Korea, who knows who else — would be > deterred by such a thing. These proposals just scare the good guys, they > don’t stop the attackers. > > We’d have to declare that users own and can modify the software we buy and > download — despite software licenses and the Digital Millennium Copyright > Act (DMCA). > > This is going to be increasingly important. Over the next 20 years software > will be embedded in everything, from refrigerators to cars to medical > devices. > > Without the Freedom to Tinker, the right to reverse engineer these > products, we will be living in a world of opaque black boxes. We don’t know > what they do, and you’ll be punished for peeking inside. > Via Lobsters [1], “The End of the Internet Dream? — Backchannel — Medium [2]” The general public just don't care about this stuff [3]. And for some reason, this thought keeps going through my head: you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink. [1] https://lobste.rs/s/tgin56/the_end_of_the_internet_dream/comments/qrt3s [2] https://medium.com/backchannel/the-end-of-the-internet-dream- [3] gopher://gopher.conman.org/0Phlog:2015/02/25.1 Email Sean Conner at sean@conman.org .