* * * * * 640G … we're up to 640G, right? That should finally be enough, right? > What I am suggesting is that disks came about because of limited RAM > (Random Access Memory). Now that RAM limitations can be of increasing > greater size, we should explore new freedoms. What follows may seem a > little far-fetched, but may also be just around the corner. > > First, we may take it that a one megabyte RAM is not likely to be filled > with a BASIC or machine code program of anything near that length. The > debugging alone would take too long! This leaves us with other > possibilities. > > We could fill a lot of the RAM with a wide range of programs, and call up > any of the whole suite, instantaneously, from a special menu program. > > We could have as many programming aids in our machine as we could > conceivably wish for, and barely scratch the surface of our new-found > capacity. > > We could have a vast range of help screens available for instantaneous > recall when in trouble. > > We could call in a whole succession of high resolution pictures, which are > usually slow to load from disk, so rapidly that even animation would be > possible. > > We could have split processing in one machine. After all, it is common for > two processors to be in one machine, so why not a schizoid machine with > each part operating independently? > > We could have a really enormous amount of text in our word processor at any > one time, and have many different text areas. Our word processor could > perhaps interact with our accounting and data base programs in RAM. > > Accounting suites of programs could be truly integrated, so that final > accounts are updated after every transaction. > Via Flutterby [1], “Guest Commentary: Is RAM Memory A Status Symbol? [2]” Hmm … sounds a lot like Microsoft Windows. Or a smart phone for that matter. I should note that this was written in 1983, when 512K (Kilobytes) went for $550.00 (cheapest price I could find— today that would be anywhere from $1,080.00 to $2,350.00 [3], depending on how you calculate inflation) and there were no personal computers that could hold more than a megabyte of memory (which would shortly change over the next few years). Oh, and this comment from Flutterby is priceless: > With modern machines having gigabytes of RAM, one can only assume that > debugging has been completely abandoned … and assumption that gets > validated every time Scrabble crashes on my Android phone. > “Comm ent [4]” [1] http://www.flutterby.com/archives/comments/17012.html [2] http://www.atarimagazines.com/compute/issue36/110_Guest_Commentary_Is_R [3] http://www.measuringworth.com/uscompare/result.php?year_source=1983& [4] http://www.flutterby.com/archives/comments/17012.html#artid_54508 Email Sean Conner at sean@conman.org .