* * * * * Dive into Accessibility indeed > Validated XHTML (eXtensible HyperText Markup Language) > > This ensures that the code that we have used on this site validates against > the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)'s strict standard. As more and more > assistive technology (such as a Braille reader, a screen reader, TTY > (Teletyperiter), etc.) is using this standard to build against, we can be > sure of making our site accessible to the widest audience. > > Validated CSS (Cascading Style Sheet) > > Again, by validating our style sheets against the W3C gold standard, we can > make our site accessible to everybody with a DDA (Disability Discrimination > Act [United Kingdom]) compliant browser or other assistive technology. > > W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 > > All pages have been validated against standard using “Bobby.” This service > allows us to test web pages and help expose and repair barriers to > accessibility and encourage compliance with existing accessibility > guidelines, such as Section 508 and the W3C's WCAG (Web Content > Accessibility Guidelines). > > Section 508 Guidelines > > The Section 508 guidelines have been reviewed and implemented. All pages > are in compliance. > > All pages on this site use structured semantic markup. H2 tags are used for > main titles, H3 tags for subtitles. For example, on this page, JAWS users > can skip to the next section within the accessibility statement by pressing > ALT+INSERT+3. > Via Mark Pilgrim [1], “Accessibility Statement @ SoundsDirty.com [2]” (not safe for work) I'm not sure why I found it surprising that a porn site [3] (need I even bother mentioning this isn't work safe?) would bother with web accessibility standards [4], but I did. Porn sites in general have always pushed the limits of web technology (they were early adoptors of micropayment schemes, web subscriptions, flash, Java Applets) and I suppose that making a site accessible to everyone is just an opportunity to make more money (Playboy in braille [5] anyone?). So if a porn site can be accessible, then gosh darn it! So will my site! So I've been playing around with accessibility validator [6] and adding some more markup to make my site here a bit more accessible. Why not? [1] http://diveintomark.org/archives/2006/07/27/imagination [2] http://soundsdirty.com/statement.php [3] http://soundsdirty.com/ [4] http://diveintoaccessibility.org/ [5] http://www.banterist.com/archivefiles/000305.html [6] http://webxact.watchfire.com/ Email Sean Conner at sean@conman.org .