As an alternative to solving the computationally demanding lens equations, Cen et al. [55] developed
an efficient scheme to identify regions with surface densities capable of generating multiple
images accurately for splittings larger than three arcseconds. They applied this technique to a
standard CDM model with
, and found that this model predicts more large angle
splittings (
) than are known to exist in the observed Universe. Their results suggest that the
standard CDM model should be excluded as a viable model of our Universe. A similar analysis for
a flat low density CDM model with a cosmological constant (
,
)
suggests a lower and perhaps acceptable number of lensing events. However, an uncertainty in
their studies is the nature of the lenses at and below the resolution of the numerical grid. They
model the lensing structures as simplified Singular Isothermal Spheres (SIS) with no distinctive
cores.
Large angle splittings are generally attributed to larger structures such as clusters of galaxies, and there
are indications that clusters have small but finite core radii
. Core radii of this size
can have an important effect on the probability of multiple imaging. Flores and Primack [74] considered the
effects of assuming two different kinds of splitting sources: isothermal spheres with small but finite core radii
and radial density profiles
, and spheres with a Hernquist density profile
, where
and
. They find that the computed
frequency of large-angle splittings, when using the nonsingular profiles, can potentially decrease by more
than an order of magnitude relative to the SIS case and can bring the standard CDM model into better
agreement with observations. They stress that lensing events are sensitive to both the cosmological model
(essentially the number density of lenses) and to the inner lens structure, making it difficult to probe
the models until the structure of the lenses, both observationally and numerically, is better
known.
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2001-2 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |