% This paper has been transcribed in Plain TeX by
% David R. Wilkins
% School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
% (dwilkins@maths.tcd.ie)
%
% Trinity College, 1st June 1999.

\magnification=\magstep1
\vsize=227 true mm \hsize=170 true mm
   \voffset=-0.4 true mm \hoffset=-5.4 true mm

\def\folio{\ifnum\pageno>0 \number\pageno \else\fi}

\font\Largebf=cmbx10  scaled \magstep2
\font\largerm=cmr12
\font\largeit=cmti12
\font\sc=cmcsc10

\pageno=0

\null\vskip72pt

\centerline{\Largebf NOTE TO A PAPER ON THE ERROR OF A}

\vskip12pt

\centerline{\Largebf RECEIVED PRINCIPLE OF ANALYSIS}

\vskip24pt

\centerline{\Largebf By}

\vskip24pt

\centerline{\Largebf William Rowan Hamilton}

\vskip24pt

\centerline{\largerm (Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy,
   vol.~16, part~2, (1831), pp. 129--130.)}

\vskip36pt

\vfill

\centerline{\largerm Edited by David R. Wilkins}

\vskip 12pt

\centerline{\largerm 1999}

\vskip36pt\eject

\null\vskip36pt

\centerline{\largeit
Note to a Paper on the Error of a received Principle of Analysis.}

\vskip 3pt

\centerline{\largeit
By {\largerm WILLIAM R. HAMILTON}, \&c.}

\bigbreak

\centerline{Read April~18, 1831.}

\bigbreak

\centerline{[{\it Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy},
vol.~16, part~2, (1831), pp. 129--130.]}

\nobreak\bigskip

\centerline{\vbox{\hrule width 72pt}}

\nobreak\bigskip

The Royal Irish Academy having done me the honour to publish, in
the First Part of the Sixteenth Volume of their Transactions, a
short Paper, in which I brought forward a certain exponential
function as an example of the Error of a received Principle
respecting Developments, I am desirous to mention that I have
since seen (within the last few days) an earlier Memoir by a
profound French Mathematician, in which the same function is
employed to prove the fallacy of another usual principle.  In the
French Memoir, (tom.~{\sc v}. of the Royal Academy of Sciences,
at page~13, of the History of the Academy,) the exponential
$\left( e^{- {1 \over x^2}} \right)$
is given by {\sc M.~Cauchy}, as an example of the vanishing of a
function and of all its differential coefficients, for a
particular value of the variable ($x$), without the function
vanishing for other values of the variable.  In my Paper the same
exponential is given as an example of a function, which vanishes
with its variable, and yet cannot be represented by any
development according to powers of that variable, with constant
positive exponents, integer or fractional.  There is therefore a
difference between the purposes for which this function has been
employed in the two Memoirs, although there is also a sufficient
resemblance to induce me to wish, that at the time of publishing
my Paper, I had been acquainted with the earlier remarks of
{\sc M.~Cauchy}, in order to have noticed their existence.

\bigbreak

{\sc Observatory},

{\it April}~16, 1831.

\bye

.
