From anholt@leguin.anholt.net  Sat Apr 23 21:18:24 2005
Return-Path: <anholt@leguin.anholt.net>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1903916A4D5
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:18:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from leguin.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6514143D1D
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:18:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from anholt@leguin.anholt.net)
Received: from leguin.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3NLHvo9092600
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 14:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from anholt@leguin.anholt.net)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3NLHumH092580;
	Sat, 23 Apr 2005 14:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from anholt)
Message-Id: <200504232117.j3NLHumH092580@leguin.anholt.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 14:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Anholt <anholt@freebsd.org>
Reply-To: Eric Anholt <anholt@freebsd.org>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: repocopy request from xorg-server to xorg-server-snap
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         80291
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       repocopy request from xorg-server to x11-servers/xorg-server-snap
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    anholt
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Apr 23 21:20:09 GMT 2005
>Closed-Date:    Thu May 05 05:48:23 GMT 2005
>Last-Modified:  Thu May 05 05:48:23 GMT 2005
>Originator:     Eric Anholt
>Release:        FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT amd64
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD leguin.anholt.net 6.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT #9: Tue Apr 19 23:36:20 PDT 2005 anholt@leguin.anholt.net:/usr/src/current/sys/amd64/compile/MYKERNEL amd64


	
>Description:
	xorg-server-snap would provide the latest graphics drivers and other
	improvements from X.Org, and is based off of x11-servers/xorg-server.

>How-To-Repeat:
	
>Fix:

	


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr 
Responsible-Changed-By: anholt 
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 23 21:28:10 GMT 2005 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Send it portmgr's way. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80291 
Responsible-Changed-From-To: portmgr->anholt 
Responsible-Changed-By: marcus 
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Apr 24 04:10:00 GMT 2005 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Repocopy completed. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80291 

From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Eric Anholt <anholt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org,
	<freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ports/80291: repocopy request from xorg-server to xorg-server-snap
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 02:27:37 -0500 (CDT)

 Any reason why would would choose -snap instead of -devel?  I think
 we have more of the latter than the former.
 
 

From: Eric Anholt <anholt@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/80291: repocopy request from xorg-server to
	xorg-server-snap
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:43:44 -0700

 On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 02:27 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
 > Any reason why would would choose -snap instead of -devel?  I think
 > we have more of the latter than the former.
 
 Yeah, but it had been suggested at some point for a replacement for
 -devel and I don't recall loud complainig.  The -dev suffix is often
 assiciated with headers thanks to the debian crowd, which is why I like
 to avoid -devel.
 
 -- 
 Eric Anholt                                     eta@lclark.edu
 http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/              anholt@FreeBSD.org
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: anholt 
State-Changed-When: Thu May 5 05:48:00 GMT 2005 
State-Changed-Why:  
Repocopy was finished and the port committed.  Thanks, portmgr! 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80291 
>Unformatted:
