From unger@crow.addict.de  Wed Oct 13 09:25:27 2004
Return-Path: <unger@crow.addict.de>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C3E16A4CF
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:25:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from crow.addict.de (raven.addict.de [80.86.187.141])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C2843D5F
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:25:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from unger@crow.addict.de)
Received: from crow.addict.de (raven.addict.de [80.86.187.141])
	by crow.addict.de (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i9D9PBeU019868;
	Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:25:12 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from unger@crow.addict.de)
Received: (from unger@localhost)
	by crow.addict.de (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id i9D9PBfx019867;
	Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:25:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200410130925.i9D9PBfx019867@crow.addict.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:25:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Juergen Unger <j.unger@addict.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Unger <j.unger@addict.de>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: the RELEASE_5_3_0 tagged INDEX-5 is much too old
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         72631
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       the RELEASE_5_3_0 tagged INDEX-5 is much too old
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    portmgr
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          update
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Oct 13 09:30:24 GMT 2004
>Closed-Date:    Wed Oct 13 16:19:35 GMT 2004
>Last-Modified:  Wed Oct 13 16:19:35 GMT 2004
>Originator:     Juergen Unger
>Release:        5.3-BETA7
>Organization:
none
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD 195_49_136_2.jpru.de 5.3-BETA7 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7 #0: Fri Oct  8 01:07:50 UTC 2004     root@195_49_136_2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC  i386

>Description:
INDEX-5 within ports-tree is outdated long ago.  So various port
do not build until the user has generated a new one.  IMO with
5.3-RELEASE there should ship an INDEX-5 which is up-to-date.

>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:

untag revision 1.20 of INDEX-5 from RELEASE_5_3_0, 
build a new INDEX-5 for the RELEASE_5_3_0 ports tree and submit
this new one tagged for RELEASE_5_3_0.

btw: IMHO it should be an predefinied step in the releng-process
to build new index-files in the ports tree before tagging them
for an release.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr 
Responsible-Changed-By: sergei 
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Oct 13 09:33:17 GMT 2004 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
portmgr territory. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72631 

From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/72631: the RELEASE_5_3_0 tagged INDEX-5 is much too old
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 06:53:58 -0700

 On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 09:33:39AM +0000, Sergei Kolobov wrote:
 > Synopsis: the RELEASE_5_3_0 tagged INDEX-5 is much too old
 > 
 > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr
 > Responsible-Changed-By: sergei
 > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Oct 13 09:33:17 GMT 2004
 > Responsible-Changed-Why: 
 > portmgr territory.
 > 
 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72631
 
 Yeah, I havent committed the new one yet :)
 
 Kris
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: marcus 
State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 13 16:19:06 GMT 2004 
State-Changed-Why:  
A new INDEX will be laid down, and the tag slipped, before the release. 
This is how this is always done. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72631 
>Unformatted:
