From bogorodskiy@inbox.ru  Wed Jun 30 12:49:59 2004
Return-Path: <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D61416A4CE
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:49:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87AEA43D58
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 12:49:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bogorodskiy@inbox.ru)
Received: from [217.23.66.42] (port=49576 helo=inbox.ru)
	by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp 
	id 1BfeWM-0000IP-00
	for FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:49:03 +0400
Message-Id: <E1BfeWM-0000IP-00.bogorodskiy-inbox-ru@mx1.mail.ru>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:49:03 +0400
From: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
Reply-To: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         68512
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    mezz
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Jun 30 12:50:25 GMT 2004
>Closed-Date:    Wed Jun 30 21:41:43 GMT 2004
>Last-Modified:  Thu Jul  1 04:30:16 GMT 2004
>Originator:     Roman Bogorodskiy
>Release:        FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 i386
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD lame.novel.ru 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8 #5: Sat Jun 19 22:04:33 MSD 2004 root@lame.novel.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NOV i386

>Description:
	- Remove run depends on boxtools and xterm for the following reasons:
		1. bsetbg is not needed becouse there is fbsetbg in the fluxbox
		   distro and most their options are common. As for style 
		   portability, many styles use Esetroot as well as bsetbg, so
		   that's not the reason to make fluxbox depend on Eterm, is 
		   it? (BTW, no one of "boxes" in ports tree doesn't have run 
		   depend on boxtools as I can see)
		
		2. IMHO, fluxbox should not have a run depend on xterm, 
	           USE_X_PREFIX is enougth.
	
	- A few words about docs: if fluxbox-devel configured without html and 
	pdf docs support, the docs dir will not be created, but there is an
	entry for it in pkg-plist: @dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%. It'll couse warning on 
	deinstall. IMHO, it's better to install the standart docs (NEWS, 
	AUTHORS, etc) when NOPORTDOCS is not defined. If NOPORTDOCS is defined,
	we dissallow for user to install html or pdf docs (maybe even some 
	warrning message should be displayed when WITH_DOC(PDF|HTML) and
	NOPORTDOCS displayed together?).  

>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:

diff -ruN fluxbox-devel.orig/Makefile fluxbox-devel/Makefile
--- fluxbox-devel.orig/Makefile	Wed Jun 30 14:38:41 2004
+++ fluxbox-devel/Makefile	Wed Jun 30 15:53:23 2004
@@ -22,8 +22,6 @@
 
 BUILD_DEPENDS=	xterm:${PORTSDIR}/x11/XFree86-4-clients
 LIB_DEPENDS=	Xft.2:${PORTSDIR}/x11-fonts/libXft
-RUN_DEPENDS=	bsetbg:${PORTSDIR}/x11-wm/boxtools \
-		xterm:${PORTSDIR}/x11/XFree86-4-clients
 
 CONFLICTS=	fluxbox-0.1.*
 
@@ -38,6 +36,8 @@
 		nls/fr_FR nls/it_IT nls/ja_JP nls/lv_LV nls/nl_NL nls/pl_PL \
 		nls/pt_BR nls/pt_PT nls/ru_RU nls/sl_SI nls/sv_SE nls/tr_TR
 
+DOCS=	AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS TODO
+
 .if defined(WITH_DEBUG)
 CONFIGURE_ARGS+=	--enable-debug
 .endif
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
 CONFIGURE_ARGS+=	--disable-kde
 .endif
 
-.if defined(WITH_DOCPDF)
+.if defined(WITH_DOCPDF) && !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
 MASTER_SITES+=		http://fluxbox.org/docbook/en/pdf/:pdf
 DISTFILES+=		fluxbook.pdf:pdf
 PLIST_SUB+=		DOCPDF:=""
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
 PLIST_SUB+=		DOCPDF:="@comment "
 .endif
 
-.if defined(WITH_DOCHTML)
+.if defined(WITH_DOCHTML) && !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
 MASTER_SITES+=		http://fluxbox.org/docbook/en/tarballs/:html
 DISTFILES+=		fb-doc-mfhtml.tgz:html
 EXTRACT_ONLY+=		fb-doc-mfhtml.tgz
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@
 .endif
 
 post-install:
+.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
 .if defined(WITH_DOCPDF)
 	@${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}/pdf
 	@${INSTALL_DATA} ${DISTDIR}/fluxbook.pdf ${DOCSDIR}/pdf/
@@ -130,6 +131,9 @@
 	@${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}/html
 	@${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/html/*.css ${DOCSDIR}/html/
 	@${INSTALL_DATA} ${WRKDIR}/html/*.html ${DOCSDIR}/html/
+.endif
+	@${MKDIR} ${DOCSDIR}
+	cd ${WRKSRC} && ${INSTALL_DATA} ${DOCS} ${DOCSDIR}
 .endif
 	@${CAT} ${PKGMESSAGE}
 
diff -ruN fluxbox-devel.orig/files/patch-util::Makefile.in fluxbox-devel/files/patch-util::Makefile.in
--- fluxbox-devel.orig/files/patch-util::Makefile.in	Wed Jun 30 14:38:41 2004
+++ fluxbox-devel/files/patch-util::Makefile.in	Thu Jan  1 03:00:00 1970
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
---- util/Makefile.in.orig	Fri Apr 30 01:35:18 2004
-+++ util/Makefile.in	Fri Apr 30 01:36:19 2004
-@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
- SUBDIRS = fbrun
- INCLUDES = -I$(top_srcdir)/src -I$(top_srcdir)/src/FbTk
- bin_SCRIPTS = fbsetbg fluxbox-generate_menu startfluxbox
--bin_PROGRAMS = bsetroot
-+bin_PROGRAMS = 
- bsetroot_SOURCES = bsetroot.cc bsetroot.hh
- bsetroot_LDADD = ../src/FbRootWindow.o ../src/I18n.o \
- 			../src/FbAtoms.o ../src/FbTk/libFbTk.a
-@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
- mkinstalldirs = $(SHELL) $(top_srcdir)/mkinstalldirs
- CONFIG_HEADER = $(top_builddir)/config.h
- CONFIG_CLEAN_FILES =
--bin_PROGRAMS = bsetroot$(EXEEXT)
-+bin_PROGRAMS = 
- PROGRAMS = $(bin_PROGRAMS)
- 
- am_bsetroot_OBJECTS = bsetroot.$(OBJEXT)
diff -ruN fluxbox-devel.orig/pkg-plist fluxbox-devel/pkg-plist
--- fluxbox-devel.orig/pkg-plist	Wed Jun 30 14:38:41 2004
+++ fluxbox-devel/pkg-plist	Wed Jun 30 15:40:36 2004
@@ -1,8 +1,13 @@
+bin/bsetroot
 bin/fbrun
 bin/fbsetbg
 bin/fluxbox
 bin/fluxbox-generate_menu
 bin/startfluxbox
+%%PORTDOCS%%%%DOCSDIR%%/AUTHORS
+%%PORTDOCS%%%%DOCSDIR%%/NEWS
+%%PORTDOCS%%%%DOCSDIR%%/ChangeLog
+%%PORTDOCS%%%%DOCSDIR%%/TODO
 %%DOCHTML:%%%%DOCSDIR%%/html/app-artwiz.html
 %%DOCHTML:%%%%DOCSDIR%%/html/app-debugging.html
 %%DOCHTML:%%%%DOCSDIR%%/html/app-setup.html
@@ -164,4 +169,4 @@
 @dirrm share/fluxbox
 %%DOCPDF:%%@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%/pdf
 %%DOCHTML:%%@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%/html
-@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%
+%%PORTDOCS%%@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
To: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:36:25 -0400

 >> (06.30.2004 @ 0849 PST): Roman Bogorodskiy said, in 5.3K: <<
 > 		1. bsetbg is not needed becouse there is fbsetbg in the fluxbox
 > 		   distro and most their options are common.
 
 Not really. fbsetbg can only set a background to an image, and cannot
 set the background to a texture. bsetbg can only set a background to a
 texture, and cannot set the background to an image.
 
 > 	- A few words about docs: if fluxbox-devel configured without html and 
 > 	pdf docs support, the docs dir will not be created, but there is an
 > 	entry for it in pkg-plist: @dirrm %%DOCSDIR%%. It'll couse warning on 
 > 	deinstall.
 
 Agreed. %%PORTDOCS%%@dirrm %%DOCSDIR%% is the way to go.
 
 >	IMHO, it's better to install the standart docs (NEWS, 
 > 	AUTHORS, etc) when NOPORTDOCS is not defined. If NOPORTDOCS is defined,
 > 	we dissallow for user to install html or pdf docs (maybe even some 
 > 	warrning message should be displayed when WITH_DOC(PDF|HTML) and
 > 	NOPORTDOCS displayed together?).  
 
 Why? A user has to manually specify WITH_DOC*.
 
 # Adam
 
 
 --
 Adam Weinberger
 adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org
 adamw@vectors.cx    ||   adamw@gnome.org
 http://www.vectors.cx
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->mezz 
Responsible-Changed-By: vs 
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Jun 30 15:56:20 GMT 2004 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Over to maintainer 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=68512 

From: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:00:14 +0400

 --da4uJneut+ArUgXk
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
  Adam wrote:
 
 > >> (06.30.2004 @ 0849 PST): Roman Bogorodskiy said, in 5.3K: <<
 > > 		1. bsetbg is not needed becouse there is fbsetbg in the fluxbox
 > > 		   distro and most their options are common.
 >=20
 > Not really. fbsetbg can only set a background to an image, and cannot
 > set the background to a texture. bsetbg can only set a background to a
 > texture, and cannot set the background to an image.
 
 fbsetbg is a "front-end" for background setters, and bsetbg is actually
 the same. If you want to set some texture as a background, you may use
 bsetroot (which comes with fluxbox, but for some reasons disabled in
 port), if you want to set an  image as a background you can use some more
 powerful wallpaper setter like Esetroot via fbsetbg or bsetbg.=20
 So, fbsetbg is the same that bsetbg, but has some new fetures and
 supports more wallpaper setters.
 
 > >	IMHO, it's better to install the standart docs (NEWS,=20
 > > 	AUTHORS, etc) when NOPORTDOCS is not defined. If NOPORTDOCS is defined,
 > > 	we dissallow for user to install html or pdf docs (maybe even some=20
 > > 	warrning message should be displayed when WITH_DOC(PDF|HTML) and
 > > 	NOPORTDOCS displayed together?). =20
 >=20
 > Why? A user has to manually specify WITH_DOC*.
 
 IMHO, if user defines NOPORTDOCS that means that one don't want to have any=
 =20
 kind of docs, doesn't it?=20
 
 Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
 Thanks.=20
 
 -Roman Bogorodskiy
 
 --da4uJneut+ArUgXk
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
 
 iQCVAwUBQOLjjoB0WzgdqspGAQLP2AQAiQ6zz1myXXNQH2Vw+E6FJYJuqySdnklT
 yV669Qd/ucdxsuyLjTC8IasXzNFi+yYQpbGI8Oya0F01W1g7sy4067qSqvqTu1AE
 DHKYST6vG9k2lxObGX+bsa59+NmtP0wFNSDfGyLJjS7ha8F9WPOZSTp5PG37R3zX
 OHwTSAbbxNA=
 =Rgjd
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --da4uJneut+ArUgXk--

From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, bogorodskiy@inbox.ru,
	"Adam Weinberger" <adamw@freebsd.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:12:22 -0500

 >    1. bsetbg is not needed becouse there is fbsetbg in the fluxbox
 >    distro and most their options are common.
 
 It has the reason to disable the bsetroot and depend on boxtools to avoid  
 in the conflict with blackbox. The boxtools has bsetbg and bsetroot, which  
 is what fbsetbg and styles will need bsetroot. It doesn't mean you have to  
 use bsetbg, but only on bsetroot.
 
 Maybe, I should change from bsetbg to bsetroot for the less misunderstand.  
 boxtools will install both bsetbg and bsetroot.
 
 >    As for style portability, many styles use Esetroot as well as
 >    bsetbg, so that's not the reason to make fluxbox depend on Eterm,
 >    is it? (BTW, no one of "boxes" in ports tree doesn't have run 
 >    depend on boxtools as I can see)
 
 No, all styles (came with fluxbox tarball) depend on bsetroot by default.  
 The fsetbg will find if bsetroot, Esetroot, XV, wmsetbg, xsetbg, feh and  
 other stuff exist then use one of them by edit the styles. Whomever  
 download or create the unoffical style that depend on one of different  
 than bsetroot is not my problem.
 
 >    2. IMHO, fluxbox should not have a run depend on xterm,
 >    USE_X_PREFIX is enougth.
 
 I agree, it's what I am planning to remove both build and run depend of  
 XFree86-4-clients in the next version. I can do it soon if you want me to.
 
 
 As for add the DOCS is what I am planning to do next version (I start to  
 do that on my ports). Only thing that I disagree is about get  
 WITH_DOC(PDF|HTML) to work with NOPORTDOCS. Because WITH_DOC(PDF|HTML)  
 are/will never install by default. Why not default? Because, it's not  
 install by fluxbox by default and it's not part of fluxbox tarball.
 
 Cheers,
 Mezz
 
 
 -- 
 mezz7@cox.net  -  mezz@FreeBSD.org
 FreeBSD GNOME Team
 http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: mezz 
State-Changed-When: Wed Jun 30 21:41:12 GMT 2004 
State-Changed-Why:  
Committed, thanks! 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=68512 

From: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org,
	Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:38:09 +0400

 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
  Jeremy wrote:
 
 > It has the reason to disable the bsetroot and depend on boxtools to avoid=
  =20
 > in the conflict with blackbox.  =20
 
 Hm... maybe it's better to add blackbox to CONFLICTS like fluxbox-0.1?
 =20
 > As for add the DOCS is what I am planning to do next version (I start to =
 =20
 > do that on my ports). Only thing that I disagree is about get =20
 > WITH_DOC(PDF|HTML) to work with NOPORTDOCS. Because WITH_DOC(PDF|HTML) =
 =20
 > are/will never install by default. Why not default? Because, it's not =20
 > install by fluxbox by default and it's not part of fluxbox tarball.
 
 You're right.=20
 
 -Roman Bogorodskiy
 
 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
 
 iQCVAwUBQOOHIYB0WzgdqspGAQJ/hwQAjx5VNB14cjaLdW/2yywBfoLTCQ1tIc1/
 VV2i3tKPKgYuFtNyWmN+ig9pzpLQ0fD1t7beU8tLTzaK+B1p+vVllaq/5SBO96CD
 nrnZe0JOObfMCsP+rBFMbrb1i04yPEHGFobD3SZa4RfgyTWVcImXqPaXV3oSZqRC
 ZNIGGY6B7Cc=
 =bSg3
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2--

From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
To: "Roman Bogorodskiy" <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org,
	"Adam Weinberger" <adamw@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:56:06 -0500

 On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 07:38:09 +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy  
 <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru> wrote:
 
 >  Jeremy wrote:
 >
 >> It has the reason to disable the bsetroot and depend on boxtools to  
 >> avoid
 >> in the conflict with blackbox.
 >
 > Hm... maybe it's better to add blackbox to CONFLICTS like fluxbox-0.1?
 
 I still disagree, so why do you want that? What's your reason? I suggest  
 you to beg to the fluxbox developers for rename bsetroot to fsetroot.
 
 Cheers,
 Mezz
 
 > -Roman Bogorodskiy
 
 
 -- 
 mezz7@cox.net  -  mezz@FreeBSD.org
 FreeBSD GNOME Team
 http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org

From: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org,
	Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:03:33 +0400

 --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
  Jeremy wrote:
 
 > I still disagree, so why do you want that? What's your reason? I suggest =
 =20
 > you to beg to the fluxbox developers for rename bsetroot to fsetroot.
 
 My reason is: bsetroot comes with fluxbox, fluxbox' themes use bsetroot,
 so why do I need to install something else? And I don't think that's it=20
 is common situation when blacbox and fluxbox are used together. Anyway,
 if you keep depend on boxtools nothing bad will not happened. :)
 
 -Roman Bogorodskiy
 
 --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
 
 iQCVAwUBQOONFYB0WzgdqspGAQI2IQQAuRlP2D6mQiGnqoB7EzFSkdbZtkAAVOEb
 jSgzWZySWaMNN0BRd38fX6IQPu2IjU9hha9mN+dySpISsjJPvWqPSU5q00etBL1k
 bLVi0WzPoc29WxXXTtDZwnfQfBDf/QDTfhW6+Uw6F6YX0t3E5Rqf1/wQ4ZuFA5F3
 4lDbVCdhZ8A=
 =qyQn
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL--

From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
To: "Roman Bogorodskiy" <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org,
	"Adam Weinberger" <adamw@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 23:19:18 -0500

 On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:03:33 +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy  
 <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru> wrote:
 
 >  Jeremy wrote:
 >
 >> I still disagree, so why do you want that? What's your reason? I suggest
 >> you to beg to the fluxbox developers for rename bsetroot to fsetroot.
 >
 > My reason is: bsetroot comes with fluxbox, fluxbox' themes use bsetroot,
 > so why do I need to install something else?
 
 This doesn't make any sense, because boxtools install bsetroot and  
 fluxbox's themes will use it. So... This is not a very good reason and no  
 point. The boxtools is very small and I will not take that as excuse just  
 because you don't want to depend on something else or want to the save  
 space. To have the ability of install blackbox and fluxbox on the same  
 machine is good.
 
 > And I don't think that's it is common situation when blacbox and fluxbox
 > are used together.
 
 I do have both installed on two machines, because I have about 20  
 users/friends and none of them like the same things. ;-)
 
 > Anyway, if you keep depend on boxtools nothing bad will not happened. :)
 >
 > -Roman Bogorodskiy
 
 
 -- 
 mezz7@cox.net  -  mezz@FreeBSD.org
 FreeBSD GNOME Team
 http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org

From: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@inbox.ru>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org,
	Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ports/68512: [ patch ] x11-wm/fluxbox-devel: remove unneeded run deps and docs fix
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 08:24:48 +0400

 --ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
  Jeremy wrote:
 
 > This doesn't make any sense, because boxtools install bsetroot and =20
 > fluxbox's themes will use it. So... This is not a very good reason and no=
  =20
 > point. The boxtools is very small and I will not take that as excuse just=
  =20
 > because you don't want to depend on something else or want to the save =
 =20
 > space. To have the ability of install blackbox and fluxbox on the same =
 =20
 > machine is good.
 
 Yes, you're right.=20
 
 -Roman Bogorodskiy
 
 --ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
 
 iQCVAwUBQOOSEIB0WzgdqspGAQKmUAP/aXEL10CXM0umSgsXXh5LE7SRchxW48SO
 Xg5R8rhRJyKOKXglDJ2U+mrd4Nf1ZfJiICAts4vVi7tA2F8qbca6DRXVI31tCvfc
 1gb5+mgRxZ6cv6CKqTCUWVIGaDdmvL/LFWYi6G/am4Kx8KuTpq2f+/hH8pMsUkI6
 vtwVof7vjI8=
 =sxRj
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX--
>Unformatted:
