From dan@langille.org  Thu Jan  8 11:44:16 2004
Return-Path: <dan@langille.org>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9E10616A4CE; Thu,  8 Jan 2004 11:44:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7E94943D54; Thu,  8 Jan 2004 11:44:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dan@langille.org)
Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99])
	by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 703343D28; Thu,  8 Jan 2004 14:44:11 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3FFD6CBB.25083.FDC34D43@localhost>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:44:11 -0500
From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, portmgr@freebsd.org,
	ports@matey.org, marcel@freebsd.org, vsilyaev@mindspring.com,
	orlando.bassotto@ieo-research.it, jon@witchspace.com, bp@butya.kz,
	boris@brooknet.com.au, snar@paranoia.ru, dan@langille.org
In-Reply-To: <200401081938.i08JcrhF073776@lonesome.lonesome.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] change characterization of ports that require source to build from BROKEN to IGNORE

>Number:         61091
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Re: [patch] change characterization of ports that require source to build from BROKEN to IGNORE
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    ceri
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Jan 08 11:50:11 PST 2004
>Closed-Date:    Thu Jan 08 15:32:31 PST 2004
>Last-Modified:  Thu Jan 08 15:32:31 PST 2004
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 On 8 Jan 2004 at 13:38, Mark Linimon wrote:
 
 >  For most end-users, the change will be academic.  The bento
 >  build cluster will not be affected, because it seems to have
 >  source installed.  The main difference will be to my own
 >  ports monitoring code (which makes a clear distinction
 >  between the two) and possibly FreshPorts (I'm not sure;
 >  I have Cc:ed Dan just in case).
 
 Looks good to me.  It will have the effect of better reporting to 
 FreshPorts users.
 -- 
 Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
 
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: ceri 
State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 8 15:32:02 PST 2004 
State-Changed-Why:  
Misfiled followup to ports/61090 [content migrated]. 


Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnats-admin->ceri 
Responsible-Changed-By: ceri 
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 8 15:32:02 PST 2004 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  

Take from gnats-admin. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=61091 
>Unformatted:
