From clsung@dragon2.net  Thu Oct 30 23:03:30 2003
Return-Path: <clsung@dragon2.net>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8179F16A4CF
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:03:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.dragon2.net (sungsung.csie.nctu.edu.tw [140.113.215.201])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC1843FF5
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 23:03:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from clsung@dragon2.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost.csie.nctu.edu.tw [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.dragon2.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7632415790; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 07:04:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.dragon2.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (sungsung.csie.nctu.edu.tw [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 10405-10; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:04:47 +0800 (CST)
Received: by mail.dragon2.net (Postfix, from userid 1022)
	id 18CC31578F; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:04:47 +0800 (CST)
Message-Id: <20031031070447.18CC31578F@mail.dragon2.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:04:47 +0800 (CST)
From: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@dragon2.net>
Reply-To: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@dragon2.net>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc: clsung@tiger2.net
Subject: [maintainer-update] textproc/p5-Text-MagicTemplate
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         58755
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       [maintainer-update] textproc/p5-Text-MagicTemplate
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          maintainer-update
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Oct 30 23:10:12 PST 2003
>Closed-Date:    Mon Nov 03 07:45:49 PST 2003
>Last-Modified:  Mon Nov 03 07:45:49 PST 2003
>Originator:     Cheng-Lung Sung
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
FreeBSD @ Taiwan
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD sungsung.csie.nctu.edu.tw 4.9-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #5: Wed Oct 29 20:13:25 CST 2003 root@sungsung.csie.nctu.edu.tw:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SUNGSUNG i386

>Description:
- update from 3.1 to 3.11
- In fact I thought we can force to remove PORTEPOCH, maybe a little hurt...
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:

diff -ruN /usr/ports/textproc/p5-Text-MagicTemplate/Makefile ./p5-Text-MagicTemplate/Makefile
--- /usr/ports/textproc/p5-Text-MagicTemplate/Makefile	Thu Oct 30 05:50:36 2003
+++ ./p5-Text-MagicTemplate/Makefile	Fri Oct 31 14:56:32 2003
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 #
 
 PORTNAME=	Text-MagicTemplate
-PORTVERSION=	3.1
+PORTVERSION=	3.11
 PORTEPOCH=	1
 CATEGORIES=	textproc perl5
 MASTER_SITES=	${MASTER_SITE_PERL_CPAN}
diff -ruN /usr/ports/textproc/p5-Text-MagicTemplate/distinfo ./p5-Text-MagicTemplate/distinfo
--- /usr/ports/textproc/p5-Text-MagicTemplate/distinfo	Thu Oct 30 05:42:55 2003
+++ ./p5-Text-MagicTemplate/distinfo	Fri Oct 31 14:34:05 2003
@@ -1 +1 @@
-MD5 (Text-MagicTemplate-3.1.tar.gz) = 1a62f8957575c386e3af1ff24b63c992
+MD5 (Text-MagicTemplate-3.11.tar.gz) = b9b069e87f69e154bb979e4950192843

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@FreeBSD.org>
To: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@dragon2.net>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/58755: [maintainer-update] textproc/p5-Text-MagicTemplate
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:34:31 +0300

 On 2003-10-31 at 15:04 +0800, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
 > - In fact I thought we can force to remove PORTEPOCH, maybe a little hurt...
 
 Once you add PORTEPOCH to a port's Makefile, it should *never* 
 be removed, and it could only increase. See Porter's Handbook.
 
 Sergei

From: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@dragon2.net>
To: Sergei Kolobov <sergei@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/58755: [maintainer-update] textproc/p5-Text-MagicTemplate
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 15:56:56 +0800

 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Ya, I know that certainly.=20
 But since Text-MagicTemplate always update with HTML-MagicTemplate,
 some user must misunderstand why this two ports number are not the same=20
 forever.
 I think maybe I should take the responsiblilty for misleading.
 
 Thanks anyway.
 On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:34:31AM +0300, Sergei Kolobov wrote:
 > On 2003-10-31 at 15:04 +0800, Cheng-Lung Sung wrote:
 > > - In fact I thought we can force to remove PORTEPOCH, maybe a little hu=
 rt...
 >=20
 > Once you add PORTEPOCH to a port's Makefile, it should *never*=20
 > be removed, and it could only increase. See Porter's Handbook.
 >=20
 > Sergei
 
 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
 
 iD8DBQE/ohXI+AeJ85Vui8ERAraIAJ9WHLUfp4g2dpaZ7Wd5nX7guSno5QCfbMuv
 Z12bYEzLC69tCgRiu9OIYRU=
 =d8DJ
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ--
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: ijliao 
State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 3 07:45:08 PST 2003 
State-Changed-Why:  
committed, thanks 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=58755 
>Unformatted:
