From linimon@lonesome.com  Wed Jul  9 16:48:02 2003
Return-Path: <linimon@lonesome.com>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B33037B401
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  9 Jul 2003 16:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFA643F3F
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  9 Jul 2003 16:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from lonesome.lonesome.com (cs242746-11.austin.rr.com [24.27.46.11])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 12D50142D7; Wed,  9 Jul 2003 18:47:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lonesome.lonesome.com (localhost.lonesome.com [127.0.0.1])
	by lonesome.lonesome.com (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h69NpINa096984;
	Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:51:22 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.lonesome.com)
Received: (from linimon@localhost)
	by lonesome.lonesome.com (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h69Np5Il096982;
	Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:51:05 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from linimon)
Message-Id: <200307092351.h69Np5Il096982@lonesome.lonesome.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:51:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Reply-To:
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Cc: girgen@pingpong.net
Subject: [patch][non-maintainer] add identification to postgresql72 configuration dialog
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113.1
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         54293
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       [patch] [non-maintainer] add identification to postgresql72 configuration dialog
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Jul 09 16:50:10 PDT 2003
>Closed-Date:    Sat Jul 12 02:09:57 PDT 2003
>Last-Modified:  Wed Jan 14 20:32:16 UTC 2009
>Originator:     Mark Linimon
>Release:        FreeBSD-4.7
>Organization:
FreeBSD
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD lonesome.lonesome.com 4.7-STABLE FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Fri Nov 8 23:46:29 CST 2002 root@lonesome.lonesome.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/MULTIMEDIA i386
>Description:
	One irritation with using portupgrade -a is that you are
	suddenly confronted with configuration dialogs for which
	you don't know the port.  This adds one such label.
>How-To-Repeat:
	make install
>Fix:

--- postgresql72/scripts/configure.postgresql.dist	Fri Feb  7 05:00:47 2003
+++ postgresql72/scripts/configure.postgresql	Wed Jul  9 18:46:40 2003
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 fi
 
 if [ ! "${BATCH}" ]; then
-	dialog --title "Backup your data NOW" \
+	dialog --title "Backup your PostgreSQL data NOW" \
 	--yesno "As always, backup your data before
 upgrading. If the upgrade leads to a higher
 minor revision (e.g. 7.1.x -> 7.2, a dump
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 if [ "${BATCH}" ]; then
 	set \"MultiByte\" \"KRB5\"
 else
-	/usr/bin/dialog --title "configuration options" --clear \
+	/usr/bin/dialog --title "PostgreSQL 7.2 configuration options" --clear \
 					--checklist "\n\
 Please select desired options:" -1 -1 3 \
 MultiByte  "Multibyte for Multilingualism" ON \
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: FreeBSD Gnats Submit <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/54293: [patch][non-maintainer] add identification to postgresql72 configuration dialog
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:14:54 +0100

 Adding to audit trail, from misfiled PR ports/54307:
 
 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:14:22 +0200
 From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net>
 Message-Id: <17670000.1057821262@palle.girgensohn.se>
 References: <200307092351.h69Np5Il096982@lonesome.lonesome.com>
 
  Hi,
  
  I guess there's no harm in adding these labels, it is a good idea, though I 
  advice you to consider using postgresql7 instead. The only reason to get 
  the older postgresql72 installed via portupgrade is to set 
  WITH_POSTGRES72=YES and building something that depends on libgda2. If you 
  manually decide to use postgresl72, perhaps one can expect that the user 
  has used that port before and that he/she would recognize it?
  
  Perhaps not. The patch is OK with me - as I said, its a good idea. :)
  
  /Palle / maintainer
  
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: erwin 
State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 12 02:09:45 PDT 2003 
State-Changed-Why:  
Committed, thanks! 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54293 
>Unformatted:
