From nobody  Tue Dec 16 16:58:44 1997
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA17513;
          Tue, 16 Dec 1997 16:58:44 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <199712170058.QAA17513@hub.freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 16:58:44 -0800 (PST)
From: egalois@concentric.net
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: ircii compile errors
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         5326
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       ircii compile errors
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports
>State:          closed
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class:          support
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Dec 16 17:00:15 PST 1997
>Closed-Date:    Tue Dec 16 18:59:51 PST 1997
>Last-Modified:  Tue Dec 16 19:00:39 PST 1997
>Originator:     Bill Eckert
>Release:        2.2.5
>Organization:
>Environment:
generic 386/486/586
>Description:
In compiling ircii-2.9, numerous warnings relating to "puts" and 
"incompatible pointers" crop up. It seems to compile, but makes me 
wonder whether this port is properly done.
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:
Run lint on the damn thing and recast or redefine something.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: jkh 
State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 16 18:59:51 PST 1997 
State-Changed-Why:  
Lots of ports emit warnings of a more-or-less benign nature. 
I don't suspect that anyone will get to this any sooner 
than the central maintainers. 
>Unformatted:
