From jhs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 17 13:41:43 1997
Received: from wall.jhs.no_domain (vector.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.35])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA20745
          for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 1997 13:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jhs@localhost) by wall.jhs.no_domain (8.8.5/8.6.9) id WAA08582; Sun, 17 Aug 1997 22:45:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199708172045.WAA08582@wall.jhs.no_domain>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 22:45:13 +0200 (MET DST)
From: "Julian Stacey jhs@freebsd.org" <jhs@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install

>Number:         4326
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports
>State:          closed
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Aug 17 13:50:01 PDT 1997
>Closed-Date:    Mon Aug 18 15:36:19 PDT 1997
>Last-Modified:  Mon Aug 18 15:38:06 PDT 1997
>Originator:     Julian Stacey jhs@freebsd.org
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.2.1-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
none
>Environment:

>Description:

	 ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install
	(I seem to recall same goes for exmh/ )

>How-To-Repeat:

	make

>Fix:
	
	 ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
To: "Julian Stacey jhs@freebsd.org" <jhs@freebsd.org>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/4326: ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install 
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 1997 14:59:19 PDT

 "Julian Stacey jhs@freebsd.org" <jhs@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:
 >	 ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install
 
 Presumably because you fetched them via ftp or copied via MSDOS or some
 other way which doesn't preserve the x bit.  It's set in the repository
 and in my checked-out tree.
 
 Should bsd.port.mk take care of this?
 
   Bill

From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/4326: ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install 
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 00:06:09 +0200

 Reference:
 > From:		Bill Fenner <fenner@parc.xerox.com> 
 > Date:		Sun, 17 Aug 1997 14:59:19 PDT 
 > Message-id:	<97Aug17.145925pdt.177513@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> 
 
 Hi,
 Bill Fenner wrote:
 > "Julian Stacey jhs@freebsd.org" <jhs@FreeBSD.ORG> wrote:
 > >	 ports/mail/exmh2 needs chmod +x scripts/build scripts/install
 > 
 > Presumably because you fetched them via ftp or copied via MSDOS or some
 > other way which doesn't preserve the x bit.  It's set in the repository
 > and in my checked-out tree.
 
 CTM actually.
 
 > Should bsd.port.mk take care of this?
 > 
 >   Bill
 
 Good question, would be nice if either ctm or bsd.port.mk handled it,
 ctm for preference, (but I'm on thin ice here I guess: `patches please'
 I hear people preparing to type, & I'm busy (aren't we all :-)
 
 Julian
 --
 Julian H. Stacey       jhs@freebsd.org         http://www.freebsd.org/~jhs/
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: asami 
State-Changed-When: Mon Aug 18 15:36:19 PDT 1997 
State-Changed-Why:  

Close bogus PR, clearly submitter has old bsd.port.mk.  (He would have 
noticed that if he just took a customary look at the Makefile, it has 
a ${SH} in there right before the scripts he's advocating chmod 
+x'ing.) 
>Unformatted:
From: jhs@freebsd.org
Reply-To: jhs@freebsd.org
X-send-pr-version: 3.2


