From knu@iDaemons.org  Fri Aug  9 04:07:14 2002
Return-Path: <knu@iDaemons.org>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4DBBD37B400; Fri,  9 Aug 2002 04:07:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.musha.org (daemon.musha.org [210.189.104.8])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6593643E6A; Fri,  9 Aug 2002 04:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from knu@iDaemons.org)
Received: from archon.local.idaemons.org (archon.local.idaemons.org [192.168.1.32])
	by mail.musha.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F102519C2; Fri,  9 Aug 2002 20:07:12 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <86y9bguw7z.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 20:07:12 +0900
From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@iDaemons.org>
To: Alan Eldridge <ports@geeksrus.net>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, knu@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <200208090755.g797t4C0068184@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>
Subject: Re: latest portupgrade prevents make arg -DNO_IGNORE from working
References: <200208090755.g797t4C0068184@wwweasel.geeksrus.net>

>Number:         41472
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Re: latest portupgrade prevents make arg -DNO_IGNORE from working
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Aug 09 04:10:05 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:    Mon Aug 19 16:56:18 PDT 2002
>Last-Modified:  Mon Aug 19 16:56:18 PDT 2002
>Originator:     
>Release:        
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
 At Fri, 9 Aug 2002 03:55:04 -0400 (EDT),
 Alan Eldridge wrote:
 > It is not portupgrade's business to stop me from making a port with
 > IGNORE set.  The code that does this should be removed.
 
 You could try modifying portupgrade and see what would happen.  For
 ports that are marked as IGNORE, "make build/install" doesn't fail in
 error, so portupgrade tries to proceed anyway; and due misery follows.
 For the record, Jimmy Olgeni was the one who informed me of that.
 
 > >Fix:
 > 
 > Remove the offending code. Let the port tell you if it isn't going to build.
 > Please do not try to protect the user by preventing an action that should 
 > (and used to) work correctly.
 
 As I explained above, there is a case where user is terribly hurt and
 that's why the check was introduced.  I'll alter the code to check
 NO_IGNORE also to solve your problem.
 
 -- 
                      /
                     /__  __            Akinori.org / MUSHA.org
                    / )  )  ) )  /     FreeBSD.org / Ruby-lang.org
 Akinori MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  @ iDaemons.org / and.or.jp
 
 "When I leave I don't know what I'm hoping to find
               When I leave I don't know what I'm leaving behind.."
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: keramida 
State-Changed-When: Mon Aug 19 16:54:48 PDT 2002 
State-Changed-Why:  
Followup to ports/41467 misfiled as a new PR. 


Responsible-Changed-From-To: gnats-admin->freebsd-ports 
Responsible-Changed-By: keramida 
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Aug 19 16:54:48 PDT 2002 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=41472 
>Unformatted:
