From ernst@heinz.jollem.com  Tue May 15 12:53:08 2001
Return-Path: <ernst@heinz.jollem.com>
Received: from heinz.jollem.com (c104187.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.104.187])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFC437B424
	for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ernst@heinz.jollem.com)
Received: (from ernst@localhost)
	by heinz.jollem.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4FJpRp85999;
	Tue, 15 May 2001 21:51:27 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ernst)
Message-Id: <200105151951.f4FJpRp85999@heinz.jollem.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 21:51:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: ernst@jollem.com
Reply-To: ernst@heinz.jollem.com
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Naming scheme for JDK ports (java)
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113
X-GNATS-Notify:

>Number:         27358
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Naming scheme for JDK ports (java)
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    znerd
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Tue May 15 13:00:03 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:    Wed Jun 12 14:02:51 PDT 2002
>Last-Modified:  Wed Jun 12 14:02:51 PDT 2002
>Originator:     Ernst de Haan
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE i386
>Organization:
Jollem Information Technology
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD heinz.jollem.com 4.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE #5: Mon May 14 16:08:56 CEST 2001 root@heinz.jollem.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/HEINZ i386
>Description:
The ports for the different JDKs do not seem to conform to a certain naming
scheme. The currently available JDKs are listed below.

   Port name             Version  Platform  Provider
   ----------------      -------  --------  --------
   java/jdk              1.1      FreeBSD   FreeBSD
   java/jdk12-beta       1.2      FreeBSD   FreeBSD
   java/linux-jdk        1.2      Linux     Blackdown
   java/linux-jdk13      1.3      Linux     Sun


A new JDK is in the process of being submitted as a new port:

   Port name             Version  Platform  Provider
   ----------------      -------  --------  --------
   java/???              1.3      Linux     IBM

And other JDKs may qualify as candidates as well:

   Port name             Version  Platform  Provider
   ----------------      -------  --------  --------
   java/???              1.1      Linux     IBM
   java/???              1.2      Linux     IBM
   java/???              1.2      Linux     Sun

And what if both Bill Huey and Greg Lewis would come up with a native JDK 1.3
for FreeBSD? Perhaps we should leave such situations out of the picture for a
moment, but something like this *may* happen.

If me or anybody else would like to add one of these JDKs, then what would
have to be the name for this port? I know that we could ofcourse find unique
names, but perhaps we should come up with a naming scheme, apply it to the
existing JDK ports and apply it to any new JDK ports.

>How-To-Repeat:
	
>Fix:
One possible naming scheme would be the following:

   * For native FreeBSD JDK ports, name the port "jdkXX" where XX is the major
     (2-digit) version number of the JDK, for example "11", "12", "13" or
     "14".

   * If there would be multiple native JDK ports, then these could be
     distinguished by using the name "PPP-jdkXX" where PPP is the name of the
     provider.

   * For Linux JDK ports, name the port "linux-PPP-jdkXX" where PPP is the
     name of the provider in lowercase, for example "blackdown", "ibm", "sun"
     or "inprise". And XX is again the major (2-digit) version number of the
     JDK.

Any suggestions?
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->analyzed 
Responsible-Changed-By: petef 
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 3 00:18:14 PST 2001 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Since we already have the IBM port in as linux-ibm-jdk13, should we keep this 
open? 

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27358 
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed 
State-Changed-By: petef 
State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 3 01:01:34 PST 2001 
State-Changed-Why:  
Since we already have the IBM port in as linux-ibm-jdk13, should we keep this 
open? 


Responsible-Changed-From-To: analyzed->freebsd-ports 
Responsible-Changed-By: petef 
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Nov 3 01:01:34 PST 2001 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Oops, braino 

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27358 
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports->znerd 
Responsible-Changed-By: petef 
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Nov 20 17:36:39 PST 2001 
Responsible-Changed-Why:  
Submitter is now a committer 

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27358 
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed 
State-Changed-By: znerd 
State-Changed-When: Wed Jun 12 14:02:33 PDT 2002 
State-Changed-Why:  
Solved. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=27358 
>Unformatted:
