From nobody@FreeBSD.org  Fri Feb 25 18:57:00 2000
Return-Path: <nobody@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D4E37BFBA
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:56:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id SAA55942;
	Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:56:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200002260256.SAA55942@freefall.freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:56:59 -0800 (PST)
From: yaldabaoth@geocities.com
Sender: nobody@FreeBSD.org
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Eterm fails to function from Gnome/Enlightenment pop-up menu
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-1.0

>Number:         16998
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Eterm fails to function from Gnome/Enlightenment pop-up menu
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports
>State:          closed
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:  
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Feb 25 19:00:04 PST 2000
>Closed-Date:    Thu Jul 13 13:40:15 PDT 2000
>Last-Modified:  Thu Jul 13 13:41:53 PDT 2000
>Originator:     Andrew Sherrod
>Release:        3.4
>Organization:
Wang
>Environment:
FreeBSD parzival.network.net 3.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE #0:
Tue Feb 8 16:15:46 2000
root@parzival.network.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/PARZIVAL i386
>Description:
(I think this relates to the "Eterm will not run properly when executed from Bourne shell problem I have seen elsewhere. The errors are the same.)

When running eterm,  the prompt appears as normal. However, whenever I
strike
return, the message "load: 0.16 cmd:csh 87509 [tty1n] 0.03u 0.02s 0%
264k" is
displayed. (The specific PID, load and usage numbers vary, but the
message
is always of the same type.) 

Nothing can be executed from the command line.
>How-To-Repeat:
Unknown. I am running GNOME with Enlightenment, with KDE 
compatibility turned on. I am unsure what other factors may have
some bearing on this.


>Fix:
Unknown.

(Don't use eterm?)

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:

From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com>
To: yaldabaoth@geocities.com
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/16998: Eterm fails to function from Gnome/Enlightenment pop-up menu
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 10:30:44 -0600

 Take a look at:
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16246
 
 Specifically, are you running Eterm 0.8.10?
 
 I have a whole mess (150+) of various xterms, eterms, gnome-terminals
 and other junk running on this box right now, with no such problems.
 
 There were issues with previous versions of Eterm.
 
 -aDe
 
 -- 
 Ade Lovett, Austin, TX.
 

From: Andrew Sherrod <yaldabaoth.geo@yahoo.com>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, yaldabaoth@geocities.com,
	ade@lovett.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/16998: Eterm fails to function from Gnome/Enlightenment pop-up 
 menu
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 00:50:01 -0500

 I think I found the problem. Or at least, can clarify the problem.
 
 I was running Gnome as root while setting up the box. Obviously it was
 running in Bourne shell. So, rather than a GNOME/Enlightenment problem,
 I think this is related to the "Eterm executed from Bourne shell"
 problem posted elsewhere.
 
 Sorry for the lack of that important detail.
 
 Also, FYI, running eterm "out-of-the-box" for 3.4. Don't have the
 machine at hand to give a specific version. (Running 3.3 at home.)
 
 AGS
 
 
 __________________________________________________
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
 http://im.yahoo.com
 
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed 
State-Changed-By: jim 
State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 13 13:40:15 PDT 2000 
State-Changed-Why:  
According to the audit trail, the originator seems to have figured this 
out.  If you have not, please try with updated versions of the ports 
involved.  Lots has changed in the GNOME world since February and March. 

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16998 
>Unformatted:
